CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 1,441Topic ModelingDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningNatural Language Processing Techniques

Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Models

Open access
Chung, Hyung Won, Hou, Le, Longpre, Shayne, Zoph, Barret, Tay, Yi, Fedus, William, Li, Yunxuan, Wang, Xuezhi +27 more·2022·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2210.11416arXiv 2210.11416
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Finetuning language models on a collection of datasets phrased as instructions has been shown to improve model performance and generalization to unseen tasks. In this paper we explore instruction finetuning with a particular focus on (1) scaling the number of tasks, (2) scaling the model size, and (3) finetuning on chain-of-thought data. We find that instruction finetuning with the above aspects dramatically improves performance on a variety of model classes (PaLM, T5, U-PaLM), prompting setups (zero-shot, few-shot, CoT), and evaluation benchmarks (MMLU, BBH, TyDiQA, MGSM, open-ended generation). For instance, Flan-PaLM 540B instruction-finetuned on 1.8K tasks outperforms PALM 540B by a large margin (+9.4% on average). Flan-PaLM 540B achieves state-of-the-art performance on several benchmarks, such as 75.2% on five-shot MMLU. We also publicly release Flan-T5 checkpoints, which achieve strong few-shot performance even compared to much larger models, such as PaLM 62B. Overall, instruction finetuning is a general method for improving the performance and usability of pretrained language models.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2210.11416

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The latest generation of language models performs above human level in the majority of tasks from standard benchmark datasets.

    “First, the latest generation of language models is already able to perform above the human level in the majority of tasks from standard benchmark datasets (11, 12), making purely performance-based evaluation less meaningful as time progresses.”

    From Using cognitive psychology to understand GPT-3 (2023) · cites this paper as [12]

    Table 1 (Introduction, p. 2) shows Flan-PaLM exceeding the average human rater’s aggregate MMLU score, but not the average human expert’s. The paper does not establish that models exceed human performance on a majority of benchmark tasks; its Evaluation protocol (p. 5) describes the selected challenging benchmarks as ones on which current models remain well below expert human raters. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • Classical and instruction-following summarizers generate concise summaries but often remove structural dependencies required for multi-step reasoning.

    “Classical and instruction-following summarizers such as BART (Lewis et al., 2019), FLAN-T5 (Chung et al., 2022), and compression-oriented methods like LLMLingua (Jiang et al., 2023) generate concise summaries but often remove structural dependencies required for multi-step reasoning.”

    From PAACE: A Plan-Aware Automated Agent Context Engineering Framework (2025) · cites this paper as Chung et al., 2022

    The Introduction (p. 2) identifies Flan-T5 as an instruction-finetuned model, supporting its use as an example. Section 4 (p. 7) discusses how finetuning data affects multi-step reasoning, but our copy does not show that Flan-T5 produces concise summaries or that its summaries remove structural dependencies. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • General-purpose models such as Flan-PaLM or ChatGPT can accurately answer medical questions, achieving passing scores on the United States Medical Licensing Exam.

    “For example, by drawing on medical texts present within their training datasets, general-purpose models such as Flan-PaLM or ChatGPT can accurately answer medical questions, achieving passing scores on the United States Medical Licensing Exam 10,52,53 .”

    From Foundation models for generalist medical artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [52]

    The Evaluation protocol (p. 5) says Flan-PaLM was evaluated on MMLU, which includes exam questions in medicine, and the Introduction (p. 2) reports its overall MMLU score. These passages do not establish a passing score on the United States Medical Licensing Exam, a ChatGPT result, or the claim that answers drew on medical texts in the training data. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • Instruction fine-tuning is a well-known strategy to make language models truthful.

    “Instruction fine-tuning (IFT) (Chung et al., 2022; Wang et al., 2022) is another well-known strategy to make language models truthful.”

    From Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Model (2023) · cites this paper as Chung et al., 2022

    The Introduction (p. 2) and Related Work (p. 14) establish instruction fine-tuning as an established way to improve how language models respond to instructions. The Discussion (p. 13) reports improved performance and usability, but our copy does not establish that it makes models more truthful; searches for truthfulness and TruthfulQA did not find such a result. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • Recent studies have confirmed the effectiveness of supervised fine-tuning to achieve exceptional performance on unseen tasks, showcasing remarkable generalization abilities.

    “Furthermore, recent studies [60, 129] have confirmed the effectiveness of supervised fine-tuning to achieve exceptional performance on unseen tasks, showcasing their remarkable generalization abilities.”

    From A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questions (2025) · cites this paper as [60]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 80

  1. Shourya Aggarwal, Divyanshu Mandowara, Vishwajeet Agrawal, Dinesh Khandelwal, Parag Singla, and Dinesh Garg. Explanations for CommonsenseQA: New Dataset and Models. In ACL , 2021. URL https: //aclanthology.org/2021.acl-long.238 .
  2. Armen Aghajanyan, Anchit Gupta, Akshat Shrivastava, Xilun Chen, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Sonal Gupta. Muppet: Massive multi-task representations with pre-finetuning. In EMNLP , 2021. URL https:// aclanthology.org/2021.emnlp-main.468 .
  3. Raviteja Anantha, Svitlana Vakulenko, Zhucheng Tu, Shayne Longpre, Stephen Pulman, and Srinivas Chappidi. Open-domain question answering goes conversational via question rewriting. In NAACL , 2021. URL https://aclanthology.org/2021.naacl-main.44/ .
  4. Ankur Bapna, Isaac Caswell, Julia Kreutzer, Orhan Firat, Daan van Esch, Aditya Siddhant, Mengmeng Niu, Pallavi Baljekar, Xavier Garcia, Wolfgang Macherey, Theresa Breiner, Vera Axelrod, Jason Riesa, Yuan Cao, Mia Xu Chen, Klaus Macherey, Maxim Krikun, Pidong Wang, Alexander Gutkin, Apurva Shah, Yanping Huang, Zhifeng Chen, Yonghui Wu, and Macduff Hughes. Building machine translation systems for the next thousand languages, 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.03983 . · arXiv
  5. Shaily Bhatt, Sunipa Dev, Partha Talukdar, Shachi Dave, and Vinodkumar Prabhakaran. Re-contextualizing fairness in nlp: The case of india, 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.12226 . · arXiv
  6. Rishi Bommasani, Drew A Hudson, Ehsan Adeli, Russ Altman, Simran Arora, Sydney von Arx, Michael S Bernstein, Jeannette Bohg, Antoine Bosselut, Emma Brunskill, et al. On the opportunities and risks of foundation models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.07258 , 2021. · arXiv
  7. Daniel Borkan, Lucas Dixon, Jeffrey Sorensen, Nithum Thain, and Lucy Vasserman. Nuanced metrics for measuring unintended bias with real data for text classification, 2019a. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/ 1903.04561 .
  8. Daniel Borkan, Lucas Dixon, Jeffrey Sorensen, Nithum Thain, and Lucy Vasserman. Nuanced metrics for measuring unintended bias with real data for text classification, 2019b. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/ 1903.04561 .
  9. Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D. Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Sandhini Agarwal, Ariel Herbert-Voss, Gretchen Krueger, Tom Henighan, Rewon Child, Aditya Ramesh, Daniel Ziegler, Jeffrey Wu, Clemens Winter, Chris Hesse, Mark Chen, Eric Sigler, Mateusz Litwin, Scott Gray, Benjamin Chess, Jack Clark, Christopher Berner, Sam McCandlish, Alec Radford, Ilya Sutskever, and Dario Amodei. Language models are few-shot learners. NeurIPS , 2020. URL https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2020/file/ 1457c0d6bfcb4967418bfb8ac142f64a-Paper.pdf .
  10. Oana-Maria Camburu, Tim Rocktäschel, Thomas Lukasiewicz, and Phil Blunsom. e-SNLI: Natural language inference with natural language explanations. NeurIPS , 2018. URL https://arxiv.org/pdf/1812.01193. pdf . · arXiv
  11. Oana-Maria Camburu, Brendan Shillingford, Pasquale Minervini, Thomas Lukasiewicz, and Phil Blunsom. Make up your mind! Adversarial generation of inconsistent natural language explanations. In ACL , 2020. URL https://aclanthology.org/2020.acl-main.382 .
  12. Mark Chen, Jerry Tworek, Heewoo Jun, Qiming Yuan, Henrique Ponde de Oliveira Pinto, Jared Kaplan, Harri Edwards, Yuri Burda, Nicholas Joseph, Greg Brockman, et al. Evaluating large language models trained on code. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.03374 , 2021. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.03374 . · arXiv
  13. Aakanksha Chowdhery, Sharan Narang, Jacob Devlin, Maarten Bosma, Gaurav Mishra, Hyung Won Chung, Charles Sutton, Sebastian Gehrmann, Parker Schuh, et al. PaLM: Scaling language modeling with Pathways. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.02311 , 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.02311 . · arXiv
  14. Jonathan H. Clark, Eunsol Choi, Michael Collins, Dan Garrette, Tom Kwiatkowski, Vitaly Nikolaev, and Jennimaria Palomaki. TyDiQA: A benchmark for information-seeking question answering in typologically diverse languages. TACL , 2020. URL https://aclanthology.org/2020.tacl-1.30 .
  15. Karl Cobbe, Vineet Kosaraju, Mohammad Bavarian, Jacob Hilton, Reiichiro Nakano, Christopher Hesse, and John Schulman. Training verifiers to solve math word problems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.14168 , 2021. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.14168 . · arXiv
  16. Zhuyun Dai, Arun Tejasvi Chaganty, Vincent Y Zhao, Aida Amini, Qazi Mamunur Rashid, Mike Green, and Kelvin Guu. Dialog inpainting: Turning documents into dialogs. In ICML , 2022. URL https: //proceedings.mlr.press/v162/dai22a.html .
  17. Sunipa Dev, Emily Sheng, Jieyu Zhao, Aubrie Amstutz, Jiao Sun, Yu Hou, Mattie Sanseverino, Jiin Kim, Akihiro Nishi, Nanyun Peng, and Kai-Wei Chang. On measures of biases and harms in nlp, 2021b. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.03362 . · arXiv
  18. Nan Du, Yanping Huang, Andrew M. Dai, Simon Tong, Dmitry Lepikhin, Yuanzhong Xu, Maxim Krikun, Yanqi Zhou, Adams Wei Yu, Orhan Firat, Barret Zoph, Liam Fedus, Maarten Bosma, Zongwei Zhou, Tao Wang, Yu Emma Wang, Kellie Webster, Marie Pellat, Kevin Robinson, Kathleen Meier-Hellstern, Toju Duke, Lucas Dixon, Kun Zhang, Quoc V Le, Yonghui Wu, Zhifeng Chen, and Claire Cui. GLaM: Efficient Scaling of Language Models with Mixture-of-Experts. ICML , 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.06905 . · arXiv
  19. Tanmay Garg, Sarah Masud, Tharun Suresh, and Tanmoy Chakraborty. Handling bias in toxic speech detection: A survey, 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.00126 . · arXiv
  20. Mor Geva, Daniel Khashabi, Elad Segal, Tushar Khot, Dan Roth, and Jonathan Berant. Did aristotle use a laptop? A question answering benchmark with implicit reasoning strategies. TACL , 2021. doi: 10.1162/ tacl\_a\_00370. URL https://aclanthology.org/2021.tacl-1.21 .
  21. Nitesh Goyal, Ian Kivlichan, Rachel Rosen, and Lucy Vasserman. Is your toxicity my toxicity? exploring the impact of rater identity on toxicity annotation, 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.00501 . · arXiv
  22. Saga Hansson, Konstantinos Mavromatakis, Yvonne Adesam, Gerlof Bouma, and Dana Dannélls. The Swedish Winogender dataset. In Proceedings of the 23rd Nordic Conference on Computational Linguistics (NoDaLiDa) , pages 452-459, Reykjavik, Iceland (Online), May 31-2 June 2021. Linköping University Electronic Press, Sweden. URL https://aclanthology.org/2021.nodalida-main.52 .
  23. Ali Hasan, Shea Brown, Jovana Davidovic, Benjamin Lange, and Mitt Regan. Algorithmic bias and risk assessments: Lessons from practice. Digital Society , 1(1):1-15, 2022.
  24. Dan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou, Mantas Mazeika, Dawn Song, and Jacob Steinhardt. Measuring massive multitask language understanding. ICLR , 2020. URL https://openreview.net/ forum?id=d7KBjmI3GmQ .
  25. Jordan Hoffmann, Sebastian Borgeaud, Arthur Mensch, Elena Buchatskaya, Trevor Cai, Eliza Rutherford, Diego de Las Casas, Lisa Anne Hendricks, Johannes Welbl, Aidan Clark, et al. Training compute-optimal large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.15556 , 2022. · arXiv
  26. Jiaxin Huang, Shixiang Shane Gu, Le Hou, Yuexin Wu, Xuezhi Wang, Hongkun Yu, and Jiawei Han. Large language models can self-improve. In arxiv , 2022. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=NiEtU7blzN .
  27. Norman P Jouppi, Doe Hyun Yoon, George Kurian, Sheng Li, Nishant Patil, James Laudon, Cliff Young, and David Patterson. A domain-specific supercomputer for training deep neural networks. Communications of the ACM , 63(7):67-78, 2020.
  28. Daniel Khashabi, Sewon Min, Tushar Khot, Ashish Sabharwal, Oyvind Tafjord, Peter Clark, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi. UnifiedQA: Crossing format boundaries with a single QA system. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020 , 2020. URL https://aclanthology.org/2020.findings-emnlp. 171 .
  29. Tushar Khot, Peter Clark, Michal Guerquin, Peter Jansen, and Ashish Sabharwal. QASC: A dataset for question answering via sentence composition. In AAAI , 2020. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.11473 . · arXiv
  30. Takeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo, and Yusuke Iwasawa. Large language models are zero-shot reasoners. NeurIPS , 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.11916 . · arXiv
  31. Matthew Lamm, Jennimaria Palomaki, Chris Alberti, Daniel Andor, Eunsol Choi, Livio Baldini Soares, and Michael Collins. QED: A framework and dataset for explanations in question answering. TACL , 9:790-806, 2021. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.06354 . · arXiv
  32. Mike Lewis, Yinhan Liu, Naman Goyal, Marjan Ghazvininejad, Abdelrahman Mohamed, Omer Levy, Ves Stoyanov, and Luke Zettlemoyer. Bart: Denoising sequence-to-sequence pre-training for natural language generation, translation, and comprehension. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.13461 , 2019. URL https://arxiv. org/abs/1910.13461 . · arXiv
  33. Aitor Lewkowycz, Anders Andreassen, David Dohan, Ethan Dyer, Henryk Michalewski, Vinay Ramasesh, Ambrose Slone, Cem Anil, Imanol Schlag, Theo Gutman-Solo, et al. Solving quantitative reasoning problems with language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.14858 , 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2206.14858 . · arXiv
  34. Yujia Li, David Choi, Junyoung Chung, Nate Kushman, Julian Schrittwieser, Rémi Leblond, Tom Eccles, James Keeling, Felix Gimeno, Agustin Dal Lago, et al. Competition-level code generation with alphacode. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.07814 , 2022. URL http://go/arxiv/2203.07814 . · arXiv
  35. Wang Ling, Dani Yogatama, Chris Dyer, and Phil Blunsom. Program induction by rationale generation: Learning to solve and explain algebraic word problems. ACL , 2017. URL https://aclanthology.org/ P17-1015 .
  36. Yinhan Liu, Myle Ott, Naman Goyal, Jingfei Du, Mandar Joshi, Danqi Chen, Omer Levy, Mike Lewis, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Veselin Stoyanov. Roberta: A robustly optimized bert pretraining approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.11692 , 2019. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.11692 . · arXiv
  37. Sewon Min, Mike Lewis, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi. MetaICL: Learning to learn in context. In NAACL , 2022. URL https://aclanthology.org/2022.naacl-main.201 .
  38. Swaroop Mishra, Daniel Khashabi, Chitta Baral, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi. Cross-task generalization via natural language crowdsourcing instructions. ACL , 2021. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.08773 . · arXiv
  39. Margaret Mitchell, Simone Wu, Andrew Zaldivar, Parker Barnes, Lucy Vasserman, Ben Hutchinson, Elena Spitzer, Inioluwa Deborah Raji, and Timnit Gebru. Model cards for model reporting. In Proceedings of the conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency , pages 220-229, 2019.
  40. Maxwell Nye, Anders Johan Andreassen, Guy Gur-Ari, Henryk Michalewski, Jacob Austin, David Bieber, David Dohan, Aitor Lewkowycz, Maarten Bosma, David Luan, et al. Show your work: Scratchpads for intermediate computation with language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.00114 , 2021. URL http: //arxiv.org/abs/2112.00114 . · arXiv
  41. Yasumasa Onoe, Michael JQ Zhang, Eunsol Choi, and Greg Durrett. CREAK: A dataset for commonsense reasoning over entity knowledge. In NeurIPS Datasets and Benchmarks Track (Round 2) , 2021. URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/2109.01653 .
  42. Long Ouyang, Jeff Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida, Carroll L. Wainwright, Pamela Mishkin, Chong Zhang, Sandhini Agarwal, Katarina Slama, Alex Ray, et al. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.02155 , 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.02155 . · arXiv
  43. Vishakh Padmakumar, Leonard Lausen, Miguel Ballesteros, Sheng Zha, He He, and George Karypis. Exploring the role of task transferability in large-scale multi-task learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.11117 , 2022. URL https://aclanthology.org/2022.naacl-main.183/ . · arXiv
  44. Ravsehaj Singh Puri, Swaroop Mishra, Mihir Parmar, and Chitta Baral. How many data samples is an additional instruction worth? arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.09161 , 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2203. 09161 . · arXiv
  45. Mahima Pushkarna, Andrew Zaldivar, and Oddur Kjartansson. Data cards: Purposeful and transparent dataset documentation for responsible ai. In Data-centric AI Workshop at NeurIPS , 2021. URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/2204.01075 .
  46. Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, Rewon Child, David Luan, Dario Amodei, Ilya Sutskever, et al. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI blog , 1(8):9, 2019. URL https://d4mucfpksywv.cloudfront. net/better-language-models/language\_models\_are\_unsupervised\_multitask\_learners.pdf .
  47. Jack W. Rae, Sebastian Borgeaud, Trevor Cai, Katie Millican, Jordan Hoffmann, Francis Song, John Aslanides, Sarah Henderson, Roman Ring, Susannah Young, et al. Scaling language models: Methods, analysis & insights from training Gopher. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.11446 , 2021a. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2112. 11446 . · arXiv
  48. Jack W. Rae, Sebastian Borgeaud, Trevor Cai, Katie Millican, Jordan Hoffmann, H. Francis Song, John Aslanides, Sarah Henderson, Roman Ring, Susannah Young, Eliza Rutherford, Tom Hennigan, Jacob Menick, Albin Cassirer, Richard Powell, George van den Driessche, Lisa Anne Hendricks, Maribeth Rauh, Po-Sen Huang, Amelia Glaese, Johannes Welbl, Sumanth Dathathri, Saffron Huang, Jonathan Uesato, John Mellor, Irina Higgins, Antonia Creswell, Nat McAleese, Amy Wu, Erich Elsen, Siddhant M. Jayakumar, Elena Buchatskaya, David Budden, Esme Sutherland, Karen Simonyan, Michela Paganini, Laurent Sifre, Lena Martens, Xiang Lorraine Li, Adhiguna Kuncoro, Aida Nematzadeh, Elena Gribovskaya, Domenic Donato, Angeliki Lazaridou, Arthur Mensch, Jean-Baptiste Lespiau, Maria Tsimpoukelli, Nikolai Grigorev, Doug Fritz, Thibault Sottiaux, Mantas Pajarskas, Toby Pohlen, Zhitao Gong, Daniel Toyama, Cyprien de Masson d'Autume, Yujia Li, Tayfun Terzi, Vladimir Mikulik, Igor Babuschkin, Aidan Clark, Diego de Las Casas, Aurelia Guy, Chris Jones, James Bradbury, Matthew Johnson, Blake A. Hechtman, Laura Weidinger, Iason Gabriel, William S. Isaac, Edward Lockhart, Simon Osindero, Laura Rimell, Chris Dyer, Oriol Vinyals, Kareem Ayoub, Jeff Stanway, Lorrayne Bennett, Demis Hassabis, Koray Kavukcuoglu, and Geoffrey Irving. Scaling language models: Methods, analysis & insights from training gopher. CoRR , abs/2112.11446, 2021b. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.11446 . · arXiv
  49. Colin Raffel, Noam Shazeer, Adam Roberts, Katherine Lee, Sharan Narang, Michael Matena, Yanqi Zhou, Wei Li, and Peter J Liu. Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer. Journal of Machine Learning Research , 21:1-67, 2020. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.10683 . · arXiv
  50. AdamRoberts, Hyung Won Chung, Anselm Levskaya, Gaurav Mishra, James Bradbury, Daniel Andor, Sharan Narang, Brian Lester, Colin Gaffney, Afroz Mohiuddin, Curtis Hawthorne, Aitor Lewkowycz, Alex Salcianu, Marc van Zee, Jacob Austin, Sebastian Goodman, Livio Baldini Soares, Haitang Hu, Sasha Tsvyashchenko, Aakanksha Chowdhery, Jasmijn Bastings, Jannis Bulian, Xavier Garcia, Jianmo Ni, Andrew Chen, Kathleen Kenealy, Jonathan H. Clark, Stephan Lee, Dan Garrette, James Lee-Thorp, Colin Raffel, Noam Shazeer, Marvin Ritter, Maarten Bosma, Alexandre Passos, Jeremy Maitin-Shepard, Noah Fiedel, Mark Omernick, Brennan Saeta, Ryan Sepassi, Alexander Spiridonov, Joshua Newlan, and Andrea Gesmundo. Scaling up models and data with t5x and seqio . arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.17189 , 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/ abs/2203.17189 . · arXiv
  51. Victor Sanh, Albert Webson, Colin Raffel, Stephen H. Bach, Lintang Sutawika, Zaid Alyafeai, Antoine Chaffin, Arnaud Stiegler, Teven Le Scao, Arun Raja, et al. Multitask prompted training enables zero-shot task generalization. ICLR 2022 , 2021. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.08207 . · arXiv
  52. Maarten Sap, Swabha Swayamdipta, Laura Vianna, Xuhui Zhou, Yejin Choi, and Noah A. Smith. Annotators with attitudes: How annotator beliefs and identities bias toxic language detection, 2021. URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/2111.07997 .
  53. Timo Schick, Sahana Udupa, and Hinrich Schütze. Self-diagnosis and self-debiasing: A proposal for reducing corpus-based bias in NLP. CoRR , abs/2103.00453, 2021. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.00453 . · arXiv
  54. Thomas Scialom, Tuhin Chakrabarty, and Smaranda Muresan. Continual-T0: Progressively instructing 50+ tasks to language models without forgetting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.12393 , 2022. URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/2205.12393 . · arXiv
  55. Nikil Roashan Selvam, Sunipa Dev, Daniel Khashabi, Tushar Khot, and Kai-Wei Chang. The tail wagging the dog: Dataset construction biases of social bias benchmarks, 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2210. 10040 .
  56. Noam Shazeer and Mitchell Stern. Adafactor: Adaptive learning rates with sublinear memory cost. In ICML , 2018. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.04235 . · arXiv
  57. Renee Shelby, Shalaleh Rismani, Kathryn Henne, AJung Moon, Negar Rostamzadeh, Paul Nicholas, N'Mah Yilla, Jess Gallegos, Andrew Smart, Emilio Garcia, and Gurleen Virk. Sociotechnical harms: Scoping a taxonomy for harm reduction, 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.05791 . · arXiv
  58. Freda Shi, Mirac Suzgun, Markus Freitag, Xuezhi Wang, Suraj Srivats, Soroush Vosoughi, Hyung Won Chung, Yi Tay, Sebastian Ruder, Denny Zhou, Dipanjan Das, and Jason Wei. Language models are multilingual chain-of-thought reasoners. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.03057 , 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2210. 03057 . · arXiv
  59. Eric Michael Smith, Melissa Hall, Melanie Kambadur, Eleonora Presani, and Adina Williams. "i'm sorry to hear that": Finding new biases in language models with a holistic descriptor dataset, 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.09209 . · arXiv
  60. David So, Wojciech Mańke, Hanxiao Liu, Zihang Dai, Noam Shazeer, and Quoc V. Le. Searching for efficient transformers for language modeling. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 2021. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.08668 . · arXiv
  61. Aarohi Srivastava, Abhinav Rastogi, Abhishek Rao, Abu Awal Md Shoeb, Abubakar Abid, Adam Fisch, Adam R Brown, Adam Santoro, Aditya Gupta, Adrià Garriga-Alonso, et al. Beyond the imitation game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.04615 , 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.04615 . · arXiv
  62. Mirac Suzgun, Nathan Scales, Nathaneal Scharli, Sebastian Gehrmann, Yi Tay, Hyung Won Chung, Aakanksha Chowdhery, Quoc V. Le, Ed H. Chi, Denny ZHou, and Jason Wei. Challenging BIG-Bench tasks and whether chain-of-thought can solve them. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.09261 , 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2210.09261 . · arXiv
  63. Alon Talmor, Oyvind Tafjord, Peter Clark, Yoav Goldberg, and Jonathan Berant. Leap-of-thought: Teaching pre-trained models to systematically reason over implicit knowledge. NeurIPS , 2020. URL https://arxiv. org/abs/2006.06609 .
  64. Yi Tay, Mostafa Dehghani, Vinh Q Tran, Xavier Garcia, Dara Bahri, Tal Schuster, Huaixiu Steven Zheng, Neil Houlsby, and Donald Metzler. Unifying language learning paradigms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.05131 , 2022a. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.05131 . · arXiv
  65. Yi Tay, Jason Wei, Hyung Won Chung, David R. So, Siamak Shakeri, Xavier Garcia, Vinh Q. Tran, Hauixiu Steven Zheng, Jinfeng Rao, Denny Zhou, Donald Metzler, Neil Houlsby, Quoc V. Le, and Mostafa Dehghani. Transcending scaling laws with 0.1% extra compute. In arxiv , 2022b.
  66. Alex Wang, Yada Pruksachatkun, Nikita Nangia, Amanpreet Singh, Julian Michael, Felix Hill, Omer Levy, and Samuel Bowman. SuperGlue: A stickier benchmark for general-purpose language understanding systems. NeurIPS , 2019a. URL http://go/arxiv/1905.00537 .
  67. Cunxiang Wang, Shuailong Liang, Yue Zhang, Xiaonan Li, and Tian Gao. Does it make sense? And why? A pilot study for sense making and explanation. In ACL , 2019b. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.00363 . · arXiv
  68. Thomas Wang, Adam Roberts, Daniel Hesslow, Teven Le Scao, Hyung Won Chung, Iz Beltagy, Julien Launay, and Colin Raffel. What language model architecture and pretraining objective work best for zero-shot generalization? ICML , 2022a. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.05832 . · arXiv
  69. Xuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc Le, Ed Chi, and Denny Zhou. Self-consistency improves chain of thought reasoning in language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.11171 , 2022b. URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/2203.11171 . · arXiv
  70. Yizhong Wang, Swaroop Mishra, Pegah Alipoormolabashi, Yeganeh Kordi, Amirreza Mirzaei, Anjana Arunkumar, Arjun Ashok, Arut Selvan Dhanasekaran, Atharva Naik, David Stap, et al. Benchmarking generalization via in-context instructions on 1,600+ language tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.07705 , 2022c. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.07705 . · arXiv
  71. Jason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu, Adams Wei Yu, Brian Lester, Nan Du, Andrew M. Dai, and Quoc V. Le. Finetuned language models are zero-shot learners. ICLR 2022 , 2021. URL https: //openreview.net/forum?id=gEZrGCozdqR .
  72. Jason Wei, Yi Tay, Rishi Bommasani, Colin Raffel, Barret Zoph, Sebastian Borgeaud, Dani Yogatama, Maarten Bosma, Denny Zhou, Donald Metzler, et al. Emergent abilities of large language models. TMLR , 2022a. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=yzkSU5zdwD .
  73. Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, Brian Ichter, Fei Xia, Ed Chi, Quoc Le, and Denny Zhou. Chain of thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. NeurIPS , 2022b. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.11903 . · arXiv
  74. Albert Xu, Eshaan Pathak, Eric Wallace, Suchin Gururangan, Maarten Sap, and Dan Klein. Detoxifying language models risks marginalizing minority voices, 2021. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.06390 . · arXiv
  75. Linting Xue, Aditya Barua, Noah Constant, Rami Al-Rfou, Sharan Narang, Mihir Kale, Adam Roberts, and Colin Raffel. ByT5: Towards a token-free future with pre-trained byte-to-byte models. TACL , 2022. URL https://aclanthology.org/2022.tacl-1.17 .
  76. Michihiro Yasunaga and Percy Liang. Graph-based, self-supervised program repair from diagnostic feedback. In ICML , 2020. URL http://go/arxiv/2005.10636 .
  77. Qinyuan Ye, Bill Yuchen Lin, and Xiang Ren. Crossfit: A few-shot learning challenge for cross-task generalization in NLP. In EMNLP , 2021. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.08835 . · arXiv
  78. Ann Yuan, Daphne Ippolito, Vitaly Nikolaev, Chris Callison-Burch, Andy Coenen, and Sebastian Gehrmann. Synthbio: A case study in human-ai collaborative curation of text datasets, 2021. URL https://arxiv. org/abs/2111.06467 .
  79. Eric Zelikman, Yuhuai Wu, and Noah D. Goodman. STaR: Bootstrapping reasoning with reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.14465 , 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.14465 . · arXiv
  80. Ruiqi Zhong, Kristy Lee, Zheng Zhang, and Dan Klein. Adapting language models for zero-shot learning by meta-tuning on dataset and prompt collections. EMNLP Findings , 2021. URL https://aclanthology. org/2021.findings-emnlp.244/ .

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Chung, H. W., Hou, L., Longpre, S., Zoph, B., Tay, Y., Fedus, W., Li, Y., Wang, X., Dehghani, M., Brahma, S., Webson, A., Gu, S. S., Dai, Z., Suzgun, M., Chen, X., Chowdhery, A., Castro-Ros, A., Pellat, M., Robinson, K., Valter, D., Narang, S., Mishra, G., Yu, A., Zhao, V., Huang, Y., Dai, A., Yu, H., Petrov, S., Chi, E. H., Dean, J., Devlin, J., Roberts, A., Zhou, D., Le, Q. V., & Wei, J.
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2022
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2210.11416
arXiv
2210.11416
OpenAlex
W4307079201
Cited by
1,441
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 395 · 2024: 489 · 2023: 524 · 2022: 4
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
Keywords
instruction tuning, task scaling, model size scaling, Flan-T5, zero-shot prompting, few-shot prompting, open-ended generation, MMLU, TyDiQA

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review