Cited by 5Lipid Membrane Structure and BehaviorPhagocytosis and Immune RegulationCell death mechanisms and regulation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Structure and function of the human apoptotic scramblase Xkr4

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract Phosphatidylserine externalization on the surface of dying cells is a key signal for their recognition and clearance by macrophages and is mediated by members of the X-Kell related (Xkr) protein family. Defective Xkr-mediated scrambling impairs clearance, leading to inflammation. It was proposed that activation of the Xkr4 apoptotic scramblase requires caspase cleavage, followed by dimerization and ligand binding. Here, using a combination of biochemical approaches we show that purified monomeric, full-length human Xkr4 (hXkr4) scrambles lipids. CryoEM imaging shows that hXkr4 adopts a novel conformation, where three conserved acidic residues create an electronegative surface embedded in the membrane. Molecular dynamics simulations show this conformation induces membrane thinning, which could promote scrambling. Thinning is ablated or reduced in conditions where scrambling is abolished or reduced. Our work provides insights into the molecular mechanisms of hXkr4 scrambling and suggests the ability to thin membranes might be a general property of active scramblases.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-025-62739-1

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Characterization of hXkr4 and CED-8 in proteoliposomes. a Domain organization of Xkr4, Xkr8, Xkr9 and CED-8. b Representative traces of the dithionite induced fluorescence decay in the scrambling assay for protein free liposomes (cyan) and hXkr4 (red) reconstituted in 7:3 POPC:POPG mixed membranes. c–e Forward (α) and reverse (β) scrambling rate constants of hXk4 reconstituted in 7:3 POPC:POPG mixed membranes doped with NBD-labeled PE (n = 19), PC (n = 9), or PS (n = 9) lipids (c), reconstituted in membranes formed from 7:3 POPC:POPG (n = 23), 7:3 DOPC:DOPG (n = 8), PO-mix (n = 10), DO-mix (n = 24), POPC (n = 10), Soybean (n = 10), PM mix (n = 3) (d), or with fixed 7 PC: 3 PG headgroup and acyl chain length C14 (n = 8), C16 (n = 9), C18 (n = 8), C22 (n = 9) (e). f Representative traces of the dithionite induced fluorescence decay in the scrambling assay for protein free liposomes (cyan), CED-8 (red), and ΔCED-8 (black) reconstituted in 7:3 POPC:POPG mixed membranes. g Forward (α) and reverse (β) scrambling rate constants of CED-8 and ΔCED-8 in liposomes formed from 7:3 POPC:POPG (n = 6 for CED-8 and n = 6 for ΔCED-8) or Soybean Polar lipids (n = 4 for CED-8 and n = 6 for ΔCED-8). Bars in panels (c, d, e, g) are averages for α (black) and β (gray) (N ≥ 3), error bars are S. Dev., and red circles are values from individual repeats whose values are reported in the Source Data Files. h, i Deconvoluted mass plot obtained from nMS analysis of hXkr4 from PM-mimicking liposomes (h) or from 2:1:1 DOPE:DOPC:DOPS (DO mix) liposomes (i). The relative lipid composition is given in the pie charts (insets) and in Supplementary Table 1.
Fig. 1 Characterization of hXkr4 and CED-8 in proteoliposomes. a Domain organization of Xkr4, Xkr8, Xkr9 and CED-8. b Representative traces of the dithionite induced fluorescence decay in the scrambling assay for protein free liposomes (cyan) and hXkr4 (red) reconstituted in 7:3 POPC:POPG mixed membranes. c–e Forward (α) and reverse (β) scrambling rate constants of hXk4 reconstituted in 7:3 POPC:POPG mixed membranes doped with NBD-labeled PE (n = 19), PC (n = 9), or PS (n = 9) lipids (c), reconstituted in membranes formed from 7:3 POPC:POPG (n = 23), 7:3 DOPC:DOPG (n = 8), PO-mix (n = 10), DO-mix (n = 24), POPC (n = 10), Soybean (n = 10), PM mix (n = 3) (d), or with fixed 7 PC: 3 PG headgroup and acyl chain length C14 (n = 8), C16 (n = 9), C18 (n = 8), C22 (n = 9) (e). f Representative traces of the dithionite induced fluorescence decay in the scrambling assay for protein free liposomes (cyan), CED-8 (red), and ΔCED-8 (black) reconstituted in 7:3 POPC:POPG mixed membranes. g Forward (α) and reverse (β) scrambling rate constants of CED-8 and ΔCED-8 in liposomes formed from 7:3 POPC:POPG (n = 6 for CED-8 and n = 6 for ΔCED-8) or Soybean Polar lipids (n = 4 for CED-8 and n = 6 for ΔCED-8). Bars in panels (c, d, e, g) are averages for α (black) and β (gray) (N ≥ 3), error bars are S. Dev., and red circles are values from individual repeats whose values are reported in the Source Data Files. h, i Deconvoluted mass plot obtained from nMS analysis of hXkr4 from PM-mimicking liposomes (h) or from 2:1:1 DOPE:DOPC:DOPS (DO mix) liposomes (i). The relative lipid composition is given in the pie charts (insets) and in Supplementary Table 1.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 Structure of hXkr4. a, b CryoEM density of hXkr4 in LMNG-CHS detergent micelles. The ND repeat is colored in pale blue, the CD repeat in wheat. Associated lipid-like densities are shown in yellow (inner leaflet) and red (outer leaflet). Insets show close-up views of the two lipid-like densities in the C1 cavity. c–e The structure of hXkr4 viewed from the plane of the membrane (c), from the side of the ND repeat (d), and from the extracellular solution (e). The protein is shown in ribbon representation with the ND repeat in pale blue, the CD repeat in wheat, the charged stairway residues (D125, D129, and E313 in pink) and P316 (in yellow) are shown in stick representation. The transparent surface representation of the protein is shown in (c) and (e). f–h Electrostatic potential plotted on the surface of hXkr4 from the same views as in (c–e).
Fig. 2 Structure of hXkr4. a, b CryoEM density of hXkr4 in LMNG-CHS detergent micelles. The ND repeat is colored in pale blue, the CD repeat in wheat. Associated lipid-like densities are shown in yellow (inner leaflet) and red (outer leaflet). Insets show close-up views of the two lipid-like densities in the C1 cavity. c–e The structure of hXkr4 viewed from the plane of the membrane (c), from the side of the ND repeat (d), and from the extracellular solution (e). The protein is shown in ribbon representation with the ND repeat in pale blue, the CD repeat in wheat, the charged stairway residues (D125, D129, and E313 in pink) and P316 (in yellow) are shown in stick representation. The transparent surface representation of the protein is shown in (c) and (e). f–h Electrostatic potential plotted on the surface of hXkr4 from the same views as in (c–e).CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Fig. 3 Structural changes in Xkr4. a, b The cryoEM structures of hXkr4 and hXkr8 (PDBID: 8XEJ), shown in cylindrical cartoon representations, are aligned on their respective CD domains (wheat for hXkr4 and cyan for hXkr8). The pseudo-symmetry axis (dashed vertical line, panel a) and angle of rotation of the ND of hXkr4 (pale blue) relative to the ND of hXkr8 (pale green) is viewed from the plane of the membrane (a) or from the extracellular solution (b). The C-terminal helix of hXkr8 is colored in pink. c The distance between the Cα atoms (maroon spheres) of L147 and S158 on TM2 and of G402W on TM6 and V436 on IH3 is shown (dashed lines). d Forward (α) and reverse (β) scrambling rate constants of WT (n = 9), L147W/G402W (n = 9), S158W/V436W (n = 9) hXkr4 reconstituted in DO-mix liposomes. Bars are averages for α (black) and β (gray) (N ≥ 3), error bars are S. Dev., and red circles are values from individual repeats whose values are reported in the Source Data Files. Alignment of the ND (e) and CD (f) repeats of hXkr4. Colors as in (a, b). Arrows denote direction of movement of the helices from hXkr8 to hXkr4. The charged residues in the ND of hXkr4 (hXkr8), D125 (D26), D129 (D30), E313 (E141), and Y122 (F23) are shown in stick representation and colored in yellow CPK (hXkr4) or pink CPK (hXkr8). Inset of (e) shows a close-up view of these residues.
Fig. 3 Structural changes in Xkr4. a, b The cryoEM structures of hXkr4 and hXkr8 (PDBID: 8XEJ), shown in cylindrical cartoon representations, are aligned on their respective CD domains (wheat for hXkr4 and cyan for hXkr8). The pseudo-symmetry axis (dashed vertical line, panel a) and angle of rotation of the ND of hXkr4 (pale blue) relative to the ND of hXkr8 (pale green) is viewed from the plane of the membrane (a) or from the extracellular solution (b). The C-terminal helix of hXkr8 is colored in pink. c The distance between the Cα atoms (maroon spheres) of L147 and S158 on TM2 and of G402W on TM6 and V436 on IH3 is shown (dashed lines). d Forward (α) and reverse (β) scrambling rate constants of WT (n = 9), L147W/G402W (n = 9), S158W/V436W (n = 9) hXkr4 reconstituted in DO-mix liposomes. Bars are averages for α (black) and β (gray) (N ≥ 3), error bars are S. Dev., and red circles are values from individual repeats whose values are reported in the Source Data Files. Alignment of the ND (e) and CD (f) repeats of hXkr4. Colors as in (a, b). Arrows denote direction of movement of the helices from hXkr8 to hXkr4. The charged residues in the ND of hXkr4 (hXkr8), D125 (D26), D129 (D30), E313 (E141), and Y122 (F23) are shown in stick representation and colored in yellow CPK (hXkr4) or pink CPK (hXkr8). Inset of (e) shows a close-up view of these residues.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Fig. 4 Hydration, ion binding and membrane thinning by hXkr4. a The average number of water molecules along the cylindrical axis along the ND vestibule (Fig. 4 Supplementary Fig. 1a) for trajectories of cryoEM hXkr4 where the membrane bends (EM-bent) or where it remains flat (EM-flat), in POPC lipids (EM-bent POPC, red, n = 6; EM-flat POPC, orange, n = 14), or in DO-Mix membranes (EM-bent DO-Mix, green, n = 1; EM-flat DO-Mix, blue, n = 9), and of αFold model hXkr4 in POPC (αFold-flat POPC, purple, n = 10). See Methods for details. The region of the cation site in the ND vestibule (near D125, D129, and E313, 16 Å<h < 20 Å) is colored in gray. b, c The average total number of water molecules in the ND cation site (b) and the probability distribution of the number of K+ ions in the ND cation site (c) for the same trajectory groups as in (a). Filled black circles in (b, c) represent values from individual trajectories. Error bars in (a–c) are the St.Dev. of the values from individual trajectories. For EM-bent DO-Mix n = 1, as we observe membrane bending only in 1 trajectory, so no error is reported. d Time evolution of the z coordinate of the phosphorous atom in the lowest/highest outer/inner leaflet lipid headgroup of individual trajectories of EM-flat POPC (gray) and EM-bent POPC (colored). Solid and dotted lines represent the Avg. and Avg.+ or - 3xSt.Dev of the z coordinate for IL and OL, respectively. e, f Two-dimensional (2D) plot of the average z coordinate of the phosphorous atoms in the outer (top panel) and inner (bottom panel) leaflet lipid headgroups on the x-y plane of the simulation box, calculated from EM-bent POPC (e) or EM-flat POPC (f) trajectories. Individual pixels are colored from red to blue by the average z coordinate displacement. g Cross-section of the 2D plot calculated along the white dotted lines in (e, f) for the outer (filled circles) and inner (empty circles) leaflets. Data is Mean± St.Dev. n as in (a). h Representative snapshot from an EM-bent POPC trajectory. hXkr4 is shown in cartoon representation with TM1 (pink), TM2 (cyan), and IH1 (green), TM3-8 are in light gray. The average lipid head density of the outer and inner leaflets is shown in surface representation (light yellow). Representative lipid molecules are shown in stick, headgroup atoms in thicker sticks. i Superposition of the TM1, TM2, and IH1 from the cryoEM (light gray) and representative MD frame (colored as in h), where the Cα distances between V126 in TM1 and V152 in TM2, shown as spheres (green), are ~7.5 (cryoEM) and ~15 Å (MD). j–l The average z coordinate of the phosphorous atom of the headgroups from the lowest outer leaflet lipid (colored from is plotted as a function of the V126-V152 Cα distance (x axis) and of the number of water molecules in the cation site in the ND vestibule (y axis) for trajectories for cryoEM hXkr4 in POPC (j) or DO-Mix membranes (k) or for αFold hXkr4 POPC (l).
Fig. 4 Hydration, ion binding and membrane thinning by hXkr4. a The average number of water molecules along the cylindrical axis along the ND vestibule (Fig. 4 Supplementary Fig. 1a) for trajectories of cryoEM hXkr4 where the membrane bends (EM-bent) or where it remains flat (EM-flat), in POPC lipids (EM-bent POPC, red, n = 6; EM-flat POPC, orange, n = 14), or in DO-Mix membranes (EM-bent DO-Mix, green, n = 1; EM-flat DO-Mix, blue, n = 9), and of αFold model hXkr4 in POPC (αFold-flat POPC, purple, n = 10). See Methods for details. The region of the cation site in the ND vestibule (near D125, D129, and E313, 16 Å<h < 20 Å) is colored in gray. b, c The average total number of water molecules in the ND cation site (b) and the probability distribution of the number of K+ ions in the ND cation site (c) for the same trajectory groups as in (a). Filled black circles in (b, c) represent values from individual trajectories. Error bars in (a–c) are the St.Dev. of the values from individual trajectories. For EM-bent DO-Mix n = 1, as we observe membrane bending only in 1 trajectory, so no error is reported. d Time evolution of the z coordinate of the phosphorous atom in the lowest/highest outer/inner leaflet lipid headgroup of individual trajectories of EM-flat POPC (gray) and EM-bent POPC (colored). Solid and dotted lines represent the Avg. and Avg.+ or - 3xSt.Dev of the z coordinate for IL and OL, respectively. e, f Two-dimensional (2D) plot of the average z coordinate of the phosphorous atoms in the outer (top panel) and inner (bottom panel) leaflet lipid headgroups on the x-y plane of the simulation box, calculated from EM-bent POPC (e) or EM-flat POPC (f) trajectories. Individual pixels are colored from red to blue by the average z coordinate displacement. g Cross-section of the 2D plot calculated along the white dotted lines in (e, f) for the outer (filled circles) and inner (empty circles) leaflets. Data is Mean± St.Dev. n as in (a). h Representative snapshot from an EM-bent POPC trajectory. hXkr4 is shown in cartoon representation with TM1 (pink), TM2 (cyan), and IH1 (green), TM3-8 are in light gray. The average lipid head density of the outer and inner leaflets is shown in surface representation (light yellow). Representative lipid molecules are shown in stick, headgroup atoms in thicker sticks. i Superposition of the TM1, TM2, and IH1 from the cryoEM (light gray) and representative MD frame (colored as in h), where the Cα distances between V126 in TM1 and V152 in TM2, shown as spheres (green), are ~7.5 (cryoEM) and ~15 Å (MD). j–l The average z coordinate of the phosphorous atom of the headgroups from the lowest outer leaflet lipid (colored from is plotted as a function of the V126-V152 Cα distance (x axis) and of the number of water molecules in the cation site in the ND vestibule (y axis) for trajectories for cryoEM hXkr4 in POPC (j) or DO-Mix membranes (k) or for αFold hXkr4 POPC (l).CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Fig. 5 Role of charged stairway residues and Ca2+ binding to hXkr4. a–g Probability distribution of the number of K+ ions in the ND cation site (a), distribution of water molecules in the ND repeat vestibule (b), total number of water molecules in the ND cation site (c), average z coordinate of the phosphorous atom of the lower/highest lipid headgroup from the outer/inner leaflet in MD trajectories of hXkr4 D125A bent (red, n = 2), D125A flat (orange, n = 8), D129A bent (green, n = 1), D129A flat (cyan, n = 9), E313A bent (blue, n = 1), or E313A flat (purple, n = 9) in POPC membranes (d). Data is mean (e–g) the average z coordinate of the phosphorous atom of the headgroups from the lowest outer leaflet lipid (colored from is plotted as a function of the V126-V152 Cα distance (x axis) and of the number of water molecules in the cation site in the ND vestibule (y axis) for trajectories for D125A (e), D129A (f), and E313A (g). h Forward (α) and reverse (β) scrambling rate constants of WT (n = 15), D125N (n = 9), D129N (n = 9), and E313Q (n = 9) hXkr4 reconstituted in DO-Mix liposomes. I–k Quantification of Ca2+ or water molecules observed during simulation. Bars are averages for α (black) and β (gray) (N ≥ 3), error bars are S. Dev., and red circles are values from individual repeats whose values are reported in the Source Data Files. *-**** denote the statistical significance evaluated using a two sided Student’s t-test and comparing to the WT experiments that were carried out in side-by-side reconstitutions. The WT data points are included in Fig. 1d. p(αD125N) = 0.001, p(βD125N) = 0.003; p(αD129N) < 0.0001, p(βD129N) = 0.0001; p(αE313Q) < 0.0001, p(βE313Q) < 0.0001. l–n Same plots as in (a–g) but for simulations of hXkr4 in cryoEM conformation in POPC (n = 6 for bent, and n = 4 for flat) and DO-mix (n = 1 for bent and n = 9 for flat) membranes in the presence of Ca2+, and for hXkr4α in POPC membranes with Ca2+ (n = 10 for flat). o Forward (α) and reverse (β) scrambling rate constants of hXk4 reconstituted in DO-Mix liposomes in unbuffered Ca2+ (~10 µM) (n = 9), 2 mM EGTA ( < 10 nM Ca2+) (n = 9), and 0.5 mM Ca2+ (n = 10). Data in all panels is Mean± St.Dev. and red circles are values from individual repeats whose values are reported in the Source Data Files.
Fig. 5 Role of charged stairway residues and Ca2+ binding to hXkr4. a–g Probability distribution of the number of K+ ions in the ND cation site (a), distribution of water molecules in the ND repeat vestibule (b), total number of water molecules in the ND cation site (c), average z coordinate of the phosphorous atom of the lower/highest lipid headgroup from the outer/inner leaflet in MD trajectories of hXkr4 D125A bent (red, n = 2), D125A flat (orange, n = 8), D129A bent (green, n = 1), D129A flat (cyan, n = 9), E313A bent (blue, n = 1), or E313A flat (purple, n = 9) in POPC membranes (d). Data is mean (e–g) the average z coordinate of the phosphorous atom of the headgroups from the lowest outer leaflet lipid (colored from is plotted as a function of the V126-V152 Cα distance (x axis) and of the number of water molecules in the cation site in the ND vestibule (y axis) for trajectories for D125A (e), D129A (f), and E313A (g). h Forward (α) and reverse (β) scrambling rate constants of WT (n = 15), D125N (n = 9), D129N (n = 9), and E313Q (n = 9) hXkr4 reconstituted in DO-Mix liposomes. I–k Quantification of Ca2+ or water molecules observed during simulation. Bars are averages for α (black) and β (gray) (N ≥ 3), error bars are S. Dev., and red circles are values from individual repeats whose values are reported in the Source Data Files. *-**** denote the statistical significance evaluated using a two sided Student’s t-test and comparing to the WT experiments that were carried out in side-by-side reconstitutions. The WT data points are included in Fig. 1d. p(αD125N) = 0.001, p(βD125N) = 0.003; p(αD129N) < 0.0001, p(βD129N) = 0.0001; p(αE313Q) < 0.0001, p(βE313Q) < 0.0001. l–n Same plots as in (a–g) but for simulations of hXkr4 in cryoEM conformation in POPC (n = 6 for bent, and n = 4 for flat) and DO-mix (n = 1 for bent and n = 9 for flat) membranes in the presence of Ca2+, and for hXkr4α in POPC membranes with Ca2+ (n = 10 for flat). o Forward (α) and reverse (β) scrambling rate constants of hXk4 reconstituted in DO-Mix liposomes in unbuffered Ca2+ (~10 µM) (n = 9), 2 mM EGTA ( < 10 nM Ca2+) (n = 9), and 0.5 mM Ca2+ (n = 10). Data in all panels is Mean± St.Dev. and red circles are values from individual repeats whose values are reported in the Source Data Files.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 80

  1. Bevers, E. M. & Williamson, P. L. Getting to the Outer Leaflet: Physiology of Phosphatidylserine Exposure at the Plasma Membrane. Physiol. Rev. 96, 605–645 (2016). · DOI
  2. Sakuragi, T. & Nagata, S. Regulation of phospholipid distribution in the lipid bilayer by flippases and scramblases. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 24, 576–596 (2023). · DOI
  3. Kobayashi, T. & Menon, A. K. Transbilayer lipid asymmetry. Curr. Biol. 28, R386–R391 (2018). · DOI
  4. Whitlock, J. M. & Hartzell, H. C. Anoctamins/TMEM16 Proteins: Chloride Channels Flirting with Lipids and Extracellular Vesicles. Annu Rev. Physiol. 10, 119–143 (2017). · DOI
  5. Singh, N. Apoptosis in health and disease and modulation of apoptosis for therapy: An overview. Indian J. Clin. Biochem 22, 6–16 (2007). · DOI
  6. Peter, M. E. Programmed cell death: Apoptosis meets necrosis. Nature 471, 310–312 (2011). · DOI
  7. Shi, Y. Caspase activation, inhibition, and reactivation: a mechanistic view. Protein Sci. 13, 1979–1987 (2004). · DOI
  8. Arandjelovic, S. & Ravichandran, K. S. Phagocytosis of apoptotic cells in homeostasis. Nat. Immunol. 16, 907–917 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  9. Doran, A. C., Yurdagul, A. & Tabas, I. Efferocytosis in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 20, 254–267 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  10. Silva, M. T., do Vale, A. & dos Santos, N. M. Secondary necrosis in multicellular animals: an outcome of apoptosis with pathogenic implications. Apoptosis 13, 463–482 (2008). · DOI
  11. Murao, A. et al. Release mechanisms of major DAMPs. Apoptosis 26, 152–162 (2021). · DOI
  12. Bäck, M. et al. Inflammation and its resolution in atherosclerosis: mediators and therapeutic opportunities. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 16, 389–406 (2019).
  13. Calenda, G. et al. Identification of two new members, XPLAC and XTES, of the XK family. Gene 370, 6–16 (2006). · DOI
  14. Suzuki, J. et al. Xk-Related Protein 8 and CED-8 Promote Phosphatidylserine Exposure in Apoptotic Cells. Science 341, 403–406 (2013). · DOI
  15. Suzuki, J., Imanishi, E. & Nagata, S. Exposure of phosphatidylserine by Xk-related protein family members during apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 30257–30267 (2014). · DOI
  16. Harley, J. B. et al. Genome-wide association scan in women with systemic lupus erythematosus identifies susceptibility variants in ITGAM, PXK, KIAA1542 and other loci. Nat. Genet 40, 204–210 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
  17. Kawano, M. & Nagata, S. Lupus-like autoimmune disease caused by a lack of Xkr8, a caspase-dependent phospholipid scramblase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, 2132–2137 (2018). · DOI
  18. Kim, G.-W. et al. Xk-related protein 8 regulates myoblast differentiation and survival. FEBS J. 284, 3575–3588 (2017). · DOI
  19. Sun, J. et al. XK-related protein 5 (XKR5) is a novel negative regulator of KIT/D816V-mediated transformation. Oncogenesis 7, 48 (2018). · DOI
  20. Henson, P. M. & Tuder, R. M. Apoptosis in the lung: induction, clearance and detection. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 294, L601–L611 (2008). · DOI
  21. Maruoka, M. et al. Caspase cleavage releases a nuclear protein fragment that stimulates phospholipid scrambling at the plasma membrane. Mol. Cell 81, 1397–1410 e9 (2021). · DOI
  22. Shook, D. et al. XKR4 Gene Effects on Cerebellar Development Are Not Specific to ADHD. Front Cell Neurosci. 11, 396 (2017). · DOI
  23. de Zeeuw, P. et al. Imaging gene and environmental effects on cerebellum in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and typical development. NeuroImage: Clin. 2, 103–110 (2013). · DOI
  24. Uhl, G. R. et al. Higher order” addiction molecular genetics: Convergent data from genome-wide association in humans and mice. Biochem. Pharmacol. 75, 98–111 (2008). · DOI
  25. Chen, Y.-Z. et al. Caspase-mediated activation of Caenorhabditis elegans CED-8 promotes apoptosis and phosphatidylserine externalization. Nat. Commun. 4, 2726 (2013). · DOI
  26. Sakuragi, T., Kosako, H. & Nagata, S. Phosphorylation-mediated activation of mouse Xkr8 scramblase for phosphatidylserine exposure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 116, 2907–2912 (2019). · DOI
  27. Suzuki, J., Imanishi, E. & Nagata, S. Xkr8 phospholipid scrambling complex in apoptotic phosphatidylserine exposure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 9509–9514 (2016). · DOI
  28. Zhang, P. et al. Extracellular calcium functions as a molecular glue for transmembrane helices to activate the scramblase Xkr4. Nat. Commun. 14, 5592 (2023). · DOI
  29. Sakuragi, T. et al. The tertiary structure of the human Xkr8-Basigin complex that scrambles phospholipids at plasma membranes. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 28, 825–834 (2021). · DOI
  30. Straub, M. S. et al. Cryo-EM structures of the caspase-activated protein XKR9 involved in apoptotic lipid scrambling. eLife 10, e69800 (2021). · DOI
  31. Guillén-Samander, A. et al. A partnership between the lipid scramblase XK and the lipid transfer protein VPS13A at the plasma membrane. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2205425119 (2022). · DOI
  32. Ryoden, Y. & Nagata, S. The XK plasma membrane scramblase and the VPS13A cytosolic lipid transporter for ATP-induced cell death. Bioessays 44, e2200106 (2022). · DOI
  33. Ghanbarpour, A. et al. A model for a partnership of lipid transfer proteins and scramblases in membrane expansion and organelle biogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 118, e2101562118 (2021). · DOI
  34. Adlakha, J. et al. Structural and biochemical insights into lipid transport by VPS13 proteins. J. Cell Biol. 221, e202202030 (2022). · DOI
  35. Sakuragi, T. et al. The role of the C-terminal tail region as a plug to regulate XKR8 lipid scramblase. J. Biol. Chem. 300, 105755 (2024). · DOI
  36. Pomorski, T. & Menon, A. K. Lipid flippases and their biological functions. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 63, 2908–2921 (2006). · DOI
  37. Falzone, M. E. et al. TMEM16 scramblases thin the membrane to enable lipid scrambling. Nat. Commun. 13, 2604 (2022). · DOI
  38. Falzone, M. E., et al., Structural basis of Ca(2+)-dependent activation and lipid transport by a TMEM16 scramblase. Elife, 8, (2019). · DOI
  39. Panda, A. et al. Direct determination of oligomeric organization of integral membrane proteins and lipids from intact customizable bilayer. Nat. Methods 20, 891–897 (2023). · DOI
  40. Panda, A., Brown, C. & Gupta, K. Studying Membrane Protein-Lipid Specificity through Direct Native Mass Spectrometric Analysis from Tunable Proteoliposomes. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 34, 1917–1927 (2023). · DOI
  41. Hattori, M., Hibbs, R. E. & Gouaux, E. A fluorescence-detection size-exclusion chromatography-based thermostability assay for membrane protein precrystallization screening. Structure 20, 1293–1299 (2012). · DOI
  42. Goehring, A. et al. Screening and large-scale expression of membrane proteins in mammalian cells for structural studies. Nat. Protoc. 9, 2574–2585 (2014). · DOI
  43. Malvezzi, M. et al. Out of the groove transport of lipids by TMEM16 and GPCR scramblases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 115 E7033–E7042 (2018). · DOI
  44. Falzone, M. E. & Accardi, A. Reconstitution of Proteoliposomes for Phospholipid Scrambling and Nonselective Channel Assays. Methods Mol. Biol. 2127, 207–225 (2020). · DOI
  45. Feng, Z., Alvarenga, O. E. & Accardi, A. Structural basis of closed groove scrambling by a TMEM16 protein. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 31, 1468–1481 (2024). · DOI
  46. Malvezzi, M. et al. Ca2+-dependent phospholipid scrambling by a reconstituted TMEM16 ion channel. Nat. Commun. 4, 2367 (2013). · DOI
  47. Garcia-Calvo, M. et al. Purification and catalytic properties of human caspase family members. Cell Death Differ. 6, 362–369 (1999). · DOI
  48. Lee, B.-C., Menon, A. nantK. & Accardi, A. The nhTMEM16 Scramblase Is Also a Nonselective Ion Channel. Biophysical J. 111, 1919–1924 (2016). · DOI
  49. Alvadia, C. et al. Cryo-EM structures and functional characterization of the murine lipid scramblase TMEM16F. eLife 8, e44365 (2019). · DOI
  50. Brunner, J. D. et al. X-ray structure of a calcium-activated TMEM16 lipid scramblase. Nature 516, 207–212 (2014). · DOI
  51. Motiwala, Z. et al. Structural basis of GABA reuptake inhibition. Nature 606, 820–826 (2022). · DOI
  52. Punjani, A. et al. cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 14, 290 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  53. Bushell, S. R. et al. The structural basis of lipid scrambling and inactivation in the endoplasmic reticulum scramblase TMEM16K. Nat. Commun. 10, 3956 (2019). · DOI
  54. Lee, B. C. et al. Gating mechanism of the extracellular entry to the lipid pathway in a TMEM16 scramblase. Nat. Commun. 9, 3251 (2018). · DOI
  55. Bethel, N. P. & Grabe, M. Atomistic insight into lipid translocation by a TMEM16 scramblase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 14049–14054 (2016). · DOI
  56. Jiang, T. et al. Lipids and ions traverse the membrane by the same physical pathway in the nhTMEM16 scramblase. Elife. 6, e28671 (2017). · DOI
  57. Kostritskii, A. Y. & Machtens, J.-P. Molecular mechanisms of ion conduction and ion selectivity in TMEM16 lipid scramblases. Nat. Commun. 12, 2826 (2021). · DOI
  58. Arndt, M. et al. Structural basis for the activation of the lipid scramblase TMEM16F. Nat. Commun. 13, 6692 (2022). · DOI
  59. Kalienkova, V. et al. Stepwise activation mechanism of the scramblase nhTMEM16 revealed by cryo-EM. eLife 8, e44364 (2019). · DOI
  60. Feng, S. et al. Cryo-EM Studies of TMEM16F Calcium-Activated Ion Channel Suggest Features Important for Lipid Scrambling. Cell Rep. 28, 567–579.e4 (2019). · DOI
  61. Jarvis, D. L., Chapter 14 Baculovirus–Insect Cell Expression Systems, in Methods in Enzymology, R.R. Burgess and M.P. Deutscher, Editors. 2009, Academic Press. p. 191-222. · DOI
  62. Berger, I., Fitzgerald, D. J. & Richmond, T. J. Baculovirus expression system for heterologous multiprotein complexes. Nat. Biotechnol. 22, 1583–1587 (2004). · DOI
  63. Kostelic, M. M. & Marty, M. T. Deconvolving Native and Intact Protein Mass Spectra with UniDec. Methods Mol. Biol. 2500, 159–180 (2022). · DOI
  64. Rohou, A. & Grigorieff, N. CTFFIND4: Fast and accurate defocus estimation from electron micrographs. J. Struct. Biol. 192, 216–221 (2015). · DOI
  65. Tegunov, D. & Cramer, P. Real-time cryo-electron microscopy data preprocessing with Warp. Nat. Methods 16, 1146–1152 (2019). · DOI
  66. Lander, G. C. et al. Appion: an integrated, database-driven pipeline to facilitate EM image processing. J. Struct. Biol. 166, 95–102 (2009). · DOI
  67. Suloway, C. et al. Automated molecular microscopy: The new Leginon system. J. Struct. Biol. 151, 41–60 (2005). · DOI
  68. Afonine, P. V. Phenix tool to compute a difference map for cryo-EM. Computational Crystallogr. Newsl. 8, 8–9 (2017).
  69. Afonine, P. V. et al. PHENIX News. Computational Crystallogr. Newsl. 4, 43–44 (2013).
  70. Liebschner, D. et al. Macromolecular structure determination using X-rays, neutrons and electrons: recent developments in Phenix. Acta Crystallogr D. Struct. Biol. 75, 861–877 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  71. Mirdita, M. et al. ColabFold: making protein folding accessible to all. Nat. Methods 19, 679–682 (2022). · DOI · Paper page
  72. Webb, B. & Sali, A. Comparative protein structure modeling using MODELLER. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics, 54, 5.6.1–5.6.37 (2016). · DOI
  73. Humphrey, W., Dalke, A. & Schulten, K. VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 14, 33–38 (1996). · DOI · Paper page
  74. Wu, E. L. et al. CHARMM-GUI Membrane Builder toward realistic biological membrane simulations. J. Comp. Chem. 35, 1997–2004 (2014). · DOI
  75. Best, R. B. et al. Optimization of the additive CHARMM all-atom protein force field targeting improved sampling of the backbone phi, psi and side-chain chi(1) and chi(2) dihedral angles. J. Chem. Theory Comput 8, 3257–3273 (2012). · DOI
  76. Jorgensen, W. L. et al. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J. Chem. Phys. 79, 926–935 (1983). · DOI
  77. Zhang, A. et al. The Ca2+ permeation mechanism of the ryanodine receptor revealed by a multi-site ion model. Nat. Commun. 11, 922 (2020). · DOI
  78. Abraham, M. J. et al. GROMACS: High performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers. SoftwareX 1-2, 19–25 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  79. Fortea, E. et al. Structural basis of pH-dependent activation in a CLC transporter. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 31, 644–656 (2024). · DOI
  80. Bernhardt, N. & Faraldo-Gómez, J. D. MOSAICS: A software suite for analysis of membrane structure and dynamics in simulated trajectories. Biophysical J. 122, 2023–2040 (2023). · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Chakraborty, S., Feng, Z., Lee, S., Alvarenga, O. E., Panda, A., Zhang, S., Bruni, R., Khelashvili, G., Gupta, K., & Accardi, A.
Affiliations
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • New York Structural Biology Center (US)
Corresponding author
Accardi, Alessio
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2025-08-08
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
7317-7317
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4413054266
Cited by
5
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI178180)
  • NSF | Directorate for Biological Sciences (1746886)
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM141192)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Phagocytosis and Immune Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cell death mechanisms and regulation
Keywords
phosphatidylserine exposure, membrane thinning, protein conformation, caspase cleavage, inflammation, cryo-electron microscopy, molecular dynamics simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structure and function of the human apoptotic scramblase Xkr4. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41467-025-62739-1
The paper
Chakraborty, S., Feng, Z., Lee, S., Alvarenga, O. E., Panda, A., Zhang, S., Bruni, R., Khelashvili, G., Gupta, K., & Accardi, A. (2025). Structure and function of the human apoptotic scramblase Xkr4. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-62739-1