Discovery of CRISPR-Cas12a clades using a large language model
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Abstract The identification and engineering of CRISPR-Cas systems revolutionized life science. Metagenome contains millions of unknown Cas proteins, which require precise prediction and characterization. Traditional protein mining mainly depends on protein sequence alignments. In this work, we harnessed the capability of the evolutionary scale language model (ESM) to learn the information beyond the sequence. After training with the CRISPR-Cas sequences and their functional annotation, the ESM model can identify the CRISPR-Cas proteins from the annotated genome sequences accurately and robustly without sequence alignment. However, due to the lack of experimental data, the feature prediction is limited by the small sample size. Integrated with machine learning on small size experimental data, the model is able to predict the trans-cleavage activity of novel Cas12a. Furthermore, we discovered 7 novel subtypes of Cas12a proteins with unique organization of CRISPR loci and protein sequences. Notably, structural alignments revealed that Cas1, Cas2, and Cas4 also exhibit 8 subtypes, with the absence of integrase proteins correlating with a reduction in spacer numbers within CRISPR loci. In addition, the Cas12a subtypes displayed distinct 3D foldings, a finding further corroborated by CryoEM analyses that unveiled unique interaction patterns with RNA. Accordingly, these proteins show distinct double-strand and single-strand DNA cleavage preferences and broad PAM recognition. Finally, we established a specific detection strategy for the oncogene SNP without traditional Cas12a PAM. This study shows the great potential of the language model in the novel Cas protein function exploration via gene cluster classification.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic level protein structure with a language model
Lin, Z., Akin, H., Rao, R., Hie, B., Zhu, Z., Lu, W., Smetanin, N., Verkuil, R., Kabeli, O., Shmueli, Y., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.07.20.500902 · Cited by 5,523 · see citing works
Rives, A., Meier, J., Sercu, T., Goyal, S., Lin, Z., Liu, J., Guo, D., Ott, M., Zitnick, C. L., Ma, J., et al. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2016239118 · Cited by 3,286 · see citing works
Rives, A., Meier, J., Sercu, T., Goyal, S., Lin, Z., Liu, J., Guo, D., Ott, M., Zitnick, C. L., Ma, J., et al. (2019) · doi:10.1101/622803 · Cited by 3,280 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Learning the hidden biological information from protein sequences motivates the development of various evolutionary-scale language models 14 .”
ProtTrans: Toward Understanding the Language of Life Through Self-Supervised Learning
Elnaggar, A., Heinzinger, M., Dallago, C., Rehawi, G., Wang, Y., Jones, L., Gibbs, T., Feher, T., Angerer, C., Steinegger, M., et al. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2021.3095381 · Cited by 2,329 · see citing works
Diversity, classification and evolution of CRISPR-Cas systems
Koonin, E. V., Makarova, K. S., & Zhang, F. (2017) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.mib.2017.05.008 · Cited by 1,423 · see citing works
Single-sequence protein structure prediction using language models from deep learning
Chowdhury, R., Bouatta, N., Biswas, S., Rochereau, C., Church, G. M., Sorger, P. K., & AlQuraishi, M. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.08.02.454840 · Cited by 455 · see citing works
Single-sequence protein structure prediction using a language model and deep learning
Chowdhury, R., Bouatta, N., Biswas, S., Floristean, C., Kharkar, A., Roy, K., Rochereau, C., Ahdritz, G., Zhang, J., Church, G. M., et al. (2022) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-022-01432-w · Cited by 455 · see citing works
Self-citationIn vivo high-throughput profiling of CRISPR-Cpf1 activity
Kim, H. K., Song, M., Lee, J., Menon, A. V., Jung, S., Kang, Y.-M., Choi, J. W., Woo, E., Koh, H. C., Nam, J.-W., et al. (2017) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4104 · Cited by 383 · see citing works
PAM binding ensures orientational integration during Cas4-Cas1-Cas2-mediated CRISPR adaptation
Dhingra, Y., Suresh, S. K., Juneja, P., & Sashital, D. G. (2022) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2022.09.030 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Feng, Y., Shi, J., Li, Z., Li, Y., Yang, J., Huang, S., Zheng, J., Han, W., Qiao, Y., Zhang, J., Liu, Q., Yang, Y., Hu, C., Wu, L., Zhang, X., Tang, J., Huang, X., & Ma, P.
- Affiliations
- Zhejiang Lab (CN)
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
- State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine (CN)
- Tongji University (CN)
- National University of Singapore (SG)
- Nanjing Normal University (CN)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- ShanghaiTech University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zhang, Xiaokang
- Tang, Jin
- Huang, Xingxu
- Ma, Peixiang
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2025-08-23
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 7877-7877
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12375029
- OpenAlex
- W4413470266
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 5
- FWCI
- 6.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Shanghai Science and Technology Development Foundation (24141901302)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (BK20233003, 22177073, 32161133022)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (ZDBS-ZRKJZ-TLC008)
- Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (23HC1400700)
- University of Science and Technology of China
- ShanghaiTech University
- National Institutes of Health
- University of California, San Francisco (P41-GM103311)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P41GM103311)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Keywords
- CRISPR/Cas12a, protein function prediction, DNA cleavage specificity, genome editing
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Large Language Models, Bacterial Proteins, Endodeoxyribonucleases, Cryoelectron Microscopy, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, CRISPR-Cas Systems, CRISPR-Associated Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review