Cited by 2Computational Drug Discovery MethodsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsChemical Synthesis and Analysis

Deciphering DEL pocket patterns through contrastive learning

Open access
Zhang, Wenyi, Wang, Yuxing, Zhan, Rui, Qian, Runtong, Hu, Qi, Huang, Jing·2026·Nature Communications

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

DNA-encoded libraries (DELs) facilitate high-throughput screening of trillions of molecules against protein targets through split-pool synthesis and DNA tagging. Despite their potential, only a few DEL-derived compounds have advanced to clinical trials or reached the market. A better understanding of the defining characteristics of target proteins, particularly those with binding pockets suitable for DEL screening, is critical to improving success rates. However, existing approaches remain limited in assessing pocket flexibility and functional similarity. Here, we present ErePOC, a pocket representation model based on contrastive learning with ESM-2 embeddings to address these challenges. ErePOC captures both structural and functional features of binding pockets, enabling identification of shared characteristics among DEL targets. By integrating analyses of low-dimensional physicochemical properties and high-dimensional ErePOC embeddings, we provide a comprehensive view of DEL target space. With 98% precision in downstream classification tasks, ErePOC demonstrates high performance in pocket representation, which is then applied to predict human proteins suitable for DEL screening, with enrichment uncovered across 18 functional categories. This work establishes a framework for enhancing DEL-based drug discovery through more effective target selection and pocket similarity analysis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-026-69663-y

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, W., Wang, Y., Zhan, R., Qian, R., Hu, Q., & Huang, J.
Affiliations
Westlake University (CN)
Corresponding author
Huang, Jing
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2026-02-16
Volume
17
Issue
1
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7129060316
Cited by
2
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
7.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Westlake University
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (2023C03109, 32171247, 32501101, 2024SSYS0036)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LQ23F020011, 2024SSYS0036)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
Keywords
DNA-encoded libraries, protein pockets, contrastive learning, ESM-2 embeddings, physicochemical properties, protein functional classification, high-throughput screening, drug discovery
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Binding Sites, DNA, Humans, Models, Molecular, Protein Binding, Proteins, Small Molecule Libraries, Drug Discovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review