Cited by 431Prosthetics and Rehabilitation RoboticsMuscle activation and electromyography studiesSoft Robotics and Applications

A soft neuroprosthetic hand providing simultaneous myoelectric control and tactile feedback

Open access
Gu, Guoying, Zhang, Ningbin, Xu, Haipeng, Lin, Shaoting, Yu, Yang, Chai, Guohong, Ge, Lisen, Yang, Houle +4 more·2021·Nature Biomedical Engineering

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Neuroprosthetic hands are typically heavy (over 400 g) and expensive (more than US$10,000), and lack the compliance and tactile feedback of human hands. Here, we report the design, fabrication and performance of a soft, low-cost and lightweight (292 g) neuroprosthetic hand that provides simultaneous myoelectric control and tactile feedback. The neuroprosthesis has six active degrees of freedom under pneumatic actuation, can be controlled through the input from four electromyography sensors that measure surface signals from residual forearm muscles, and integrates five elastomeric capacitive sensors on the fingertips to measure touch pressure so as to enable tactile feedback by eliciting electrical stimulation on the skin of the residual limb. In a set of standardized tests performed by two individuals with transradial amputations, we show that the soft neuroprosthetic hand outperforms a conventional rigid neuroprosthetic hand in speed and dexterity. We also show that one individual with a transradial amputation wearing the soft neuroprosthetic hand can regain primitive touch sensation and real-time closed-loop control.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41551-021-00767-0

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a system, these devices can work independently, but ideally each part can form a closed-loop system that is interlinked to perform more precise and complex tasks.

    “In a system, they can work independently, but, ideally, each part can form a closed-loop system that is interlinked to perform more precise and complex tasks.[76,153]”

    From Flexible Electronics and Devices as Human–Machine Interfaces for Medical Robotics (2022) · cites this paper as [76]

    The Design section (page unavailable) describes an interlinked system: EMG control, touch sensors and electrical stimulation let the user adjust the hand’s grasp in a closed loop. It says the hand’s degrees of freedom can be independently controlled, but does not establish that the devices work independently, that each part forms its own closed loop, or that this arrangement enables more precise and complex tasks. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A soft EMG controlled pneumatic neuroprosthetic with ionic capacitive sensors and flexible stimulators was developed to reduce manufacturing costs and achieve lightweight actuation.

    “As an exemplary case, a soft EMG controlled pneumatic neuroprosthetic with ionic capacitive sensors and flexible stimulators was developed to reduce manufacturing costs and achieve lightweight actuation.”

    From Flexible Electronics and Devices as Human–Machine Interfaces for Medical Robotics (2022) · cites this paper as [76]

    The Abstract and Conclusion describe a lightweight, potentially low-cost, pneumatically actuated hand controlled by EMG signals. The Design section describes ionic hydrogel-elastomer capacitive touch sensors and electrical stimulators, but does not say the stimulators are flexible. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Various soft mechanical and thermal actuators have been extensively adopted as artificial muscles and heat sources in prosthetic actuation.

    “Currently, various soft mechanical[76,460] and thermal actuators[106,461] have been extensively adopted as artificial muscles and heat sources in prosthetic actuation.”
  • Some prospective systematic works have been reported.

    “Promisingly, some prospective systematic works have been reported.[76,153]”
  • On-body testing showed that after 15 minutes of training, an amputee could use the flexible prosthetic system to perform a range of precise gripping and social tasks, demonstrating potential for future applications.

    “The on-body test of this system showed excellent results: after 15 minutes of training, the amputee was able to use the flexible prosthetic system to perform a range of precise gripping and social tasks, demonstrating tremendous potential for future applications.[76]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Cordella, F. et al. Literature review on needs of upper limb prosthesis users. Front. Neurosci. 10 (2016).
  2. Belter, J. T., Segil, J. L., Dollar, A. M. & Weir, R. F. Mechanical design and performance specifications of anthropomorphic prosthetic hands: a review. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 50, 599 (2013).
  3. Xu, K., Guo, W., Hua, L., Sheng, X. & Zhu, X. A prosthetic arm based on EMG pattern recognition. In IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO). 1179-1184 (IEEE, 2016).
  4. Godfrey, S. B. et al. The SoftHand Pro: functional evaluation of a novel, flexible, and robust myoelectric prosthesis. Plos One 13, e0205653 (2018)
  5. Kanzler, C. M. et al. An Objective Functional Evaluation of Myoelectrically-Controlled Hand Prostheses: A Pilot Study Using the Virtual Peg Insertion Test. In 2019 IEEE 16th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR). 392-397 (2019).
  6. D'Anna, E. et al. A somatotopic bidirectional hand prosthesis with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation based sensory feedback. Sci. Rep. 7, 10930 (2017).
  7. Rich, S. I., Wood, R. J. & Majidi C. Untethered soft robotics. Nat. Electron. 1, 102 (2018).
  8. Polygerinos, P. et al. Soft Robotics: review of fluid-driven intrinsically soft devices; manufacturing, sensing, control, and applications in human-robot interaction. Adv. Eng. Mater. 19, 1700016 (2017).
  9. Connolly, F., Walsh, C. J. & Bertoldi, K. Automatic design of fiber-reinforced soft actuators for trajectory matching. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114, 51-56 (2017).
  10. Farrow, N. & Correll, N. A soft pneumatic actuator that can sense grasp and touch. In IEEE Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). 2317-2323 (IEEE, 2015).
  11. Ferris, D. P. & Lewis, C. L. Robotic lower limb exoskeletons using proportional myoelectric control. In Annual Int. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2119-2124 (2009).
  12. Polygerinos, P. et al. EMG controlled soft robotic glove for assistance during activities of daily living. In IEEE Int. Conf. on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR). 55-60 (IEEE, 2015).
  13. Ge, L. et al. Design, Modeling, and evaluation of fabric-based pneumatic actuators for soft wearable assistive gloves. Soft Robot. Doi: 10.1089/soro.2019.0105 (2020). · DOI
  14. Scharff et al. Towards behavior design of a 3D-printed soft robotic hand. Soft robotics: rends, applications and challenges, Springer, 2017.
  15. Zhao, H., O'Brien, K., Li, S. & Shepherd R. F. Optoelectronically innervated soft prosthetic hand via stretchable optical waveguides. Sci. Robot., 1, 7529 (2016).
  16. Zhou, J. et al. BCL-13: A 13-DOF soft robotic hand for dexterous grasping and in-hand manipulation. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 3, 3379-3386 (2018).
  17. Zhou, J. et al. A Soft-robotic approach to anthropomorphic robotic hand dexterity. IEEE Access. 7, 101483-95 (2019).
  18. Feix, T., Romero, J., Schmiedmayer, H., Dollar, A. M. & Kragic, D. The GRASP taxonomy of human grasp types. IEEE Trans. Hum.-Mach. Syst. 46, 66-77 (2016).
  19. Bullock, I. M. et al. Grasp frequency and usage in daily household and machine shop tasks. IEEE Trans. Haptics. 6, 296-308 (2013).
  20. Phillips, S. L., Harris, M. S., Koss, L. & Latlief, G. Experiences and outcomes with powered partial hand prostheses: A case series of subjects with multiple limb amputations. JPO J. Prosthet. Orthot. 24, 5 (2012).
  21. Smit, G., Plettenburg, D. & Helm, F. The lightweight delft cylinder hand, the first multi-articulating hand that meets the basic user requirements. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng.23, 431-440 (2015).
  22. Fougner, A. et al. Control of upper limb prostheses: Terminology and proportional myoelectric control- A review. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 20, 663-677 (2012).
  23. Jones, D. R. H. & Ashby, M. F. Engineering Materials 1: An Introduction to Properties, Applications and Design (Butterworth-Heinemann, Amsterdam; Boston, 4 edition. (2011).
  24. Farina, D. et al. The extraction of neural information from the surface EMG for the control of upper- limb prostheses: emerging avenues and challenges. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 22, 797-809 (2014).
  25. Chai, G. et al. Characterization of evoked tactile sensation in forearm amputees with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. J. Neural Eng. 12, 066002 (2015).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gu, G., Zhang, N., Xu, H., Lin, S., Yu, Y., Chai, G., Ge, L., Yang, H., Shao, Q., Sheng, X., Zhu, X., & Zhao, X.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
  • Gu, Guoying
  • Zhu, Xiangyang
  • Zhao, Xuanhe
Venue
Nature Biomedical Engineering
Published
2021-08-16
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
589-598
ISSN
2157-846X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3194786616
Cited by
431
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 55 · 2025: 111 · 2024: 94 · 2023: 92 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 7
FWCI
20.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (20550712100)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (91948302,51620105002)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Soft Robotics and Applications
Keywords
myoelectric control, tactile feedback, transradial amputation, pneumatic actuation, electrical stimulation, electromyography, feedback control, dexterity
MeSH terms
Artificial Limbs, Feedback, Hand, Humans, Touch, Feedback, Sensory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review