Cited by 143Plant Water Relations and Carbon DynamicsPlant responses to elevated CO2Remote Sensing in Agriculture

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A constraint on historic growth in global photosynthesis due to rising CO2

Open access

Abstract

Theory predicts that rising CO 2 increases global photosynthesis, a process known as CO 2 fertilization, and that this is responsible for much of the current terrestrial carbon sink. The estimated magnitude of the historic CO 2 fertilization, however, differs by an order of magnitude between long-term proxies, remote sensing-based estimates and terrestrial biosphere models. Here we constrain the likely historic effect of CO 2 on global photosynthesis by combining terrestrial biosphere models, ecological optimality theory, remote sensing approaches and an emergent constraint based on global carbon budget estimates. Our analysis suggests that CO 2 fertilization increased global annual terrestrial photosynthesis by 13.5 ± 3.5% or 15.9 ± 2.9 PgC (mean ± s.d.) between 1981 and 2020. Our results help resolve conflicting estimates of the historic sensitivity of global terrestrial photosynthesis to CO 2 and highlight the large impact anthropogenic emissions have had on ecosystems worldwide.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41558-023-01867-2

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 75 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Sanderson, B. et al. On structural errors in emergent constraints. Earth Syst. Dynam. Discuss. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2020-85 (2021). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 143

Metadata

Authors
Keenan, T. F., Luo, X., Stocker, B. D., De Kauwe, M. G., Medlyn, B. E., Prentice, I. C., Smith, N. G., Terrer, C., Wang, H., Zhang, Y., & Zhou, S.
Affiliations
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
  • University of Bern (CH)
  • Western Sydney University (AU)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • Texas Tech University (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
Corresponding author
Keenan, T. F.
Venue
Nature Climate Change
Published
2023-11-27
Volume
13
Issue
12
Pages
1376-1381
ISSN
  • 1758-678X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-6798
OpenAlex
W4389045820
Cited by
138
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 2
FWCI
15.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Climate Change (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DORA WSL (Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • ThinkTech (Texas Tech University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (DE-AC52-07-NA27344, DEAC02-05CH11231)
  • U.S. Department of Energy (-AC02-05CH11231, DEAC5207NA27344, AC52‐07NA27344, 05CH11231, DESC0021023, DE AC02 05CH11231, DE-AC02-)
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (DE-AC02-05CH11231, DE-AC52-07NA27344, NNH17AE86I, 80NSSC21K1705)
  • Texas Tech University
  • Imperial College London
  • European Commission (HORIZON2020, DE-AC02-05CH11231, 787203)
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (181115)
  • Nuclear Safety and Security Commission
  • Climate Extremes (CE170100023)
  • Office of Science (DEAC02–05CH11231, AC02-05CH11231, DE-AC02, DE-AC52-07NA27344, 05CH11231)
  • Australian Research Council (DP190101823)
  • Biological and Environmental Research (05CH11231, DE-AC02 − 05CH11231, DE-AC52-07NA27344, AC02-05CH11231)
  • Laboratory Directed Research and Development (DEAC02-05CH11231, DE- AC52-07NA27344)
  • Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (DE‐AC5207NA27344, 07NA27344, 20-ERD-055, DE-AC02-05CH11231, AC52-07NA27344)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant responses to elevated CO2
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Keywords
CO2 fertilization, terrestrial carbon sink, global carbon budget, terrestrial biosphere models, remote sensing of vegetation, anthropogenic CO2 emissions, carbon cycle

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review