The systematic dismantling of Brazilian environmental laws risks losses on all fronts
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Deforestation and forest fires in the Amazon increased again after many conservation efforts were abolished by the Bolsonaro government.
“In fact, deforestation and forest fires in the Amazon increased again after many of these conservation efforts were abolished by the Bolsonaro government 65,79 .”
From Health benefits of reduced deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon (2024) · cites this paper as [79]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Menezes, R. G., & Barbosa, R. (2021) · Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s12286-021-00491-8 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Protected areas still used to produce brazil’s cattle
West, T. A. P., Rausch, L., Munger, J., & Gibbs, H. K. (2022) · Conservation Letters · doi:10.1111/conl.12916 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Health benefits of reduced deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon
Damm, Y., Börner, J., Gerber, N., & Soares-Filho, B. (2024) · Communications Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43247-024-01840-7 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Norris, D., Sabadini Carvalho, T., Guerrero, A. M., Sobral Escada, M. I., Alencar, A., Kimbrough, L., & Butler, R. A. (2022) · Tropical Conservation Science · doi:10.1177/19400829221132193 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Abessa, D., Famá, A., & Buruaem, L.
- Affiliations
- Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Abessa, Denis
- ORCID
- Abessa, Denis
- Venue
- Nature Ecology & Evolution
- Published
- 2019-03-18
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 510-511
- ISSN
- 2397-334X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2922427231
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 23 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 22.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Ecology & Evolution (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Social Sciences › Law › Environmental law and policy
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Science and Science Education
- Keywords
- Jair Bolsonaro, environmental policy, environmental protection, science advocacy, Brazil
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Brazil, Environment, Humans, Pesticides, Recreation, Government Regulation, Population Groups
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
