Cited by 31Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementOil Palm Production and SustainabilityAgriculture, Land Use, Rural Development

Protected areas still used to produce brazil’s cattle

Open access
West, Thales A. P., Rausch, Lisa, Munger, Jacob, Gibbs, Holly K.·2022·Conservation Letters

Abstract

Cattle production inside Brazil's protected areas (PAs), including indigenous lands, continues to contaminate Amazonian supply chains more than a decade after efforts to reform the sector were launched with the signing of the zero‐deforestation cattle agreements (CAs). During 2013–2018, nearly 1.1 million cattle head were sold directly from private properties inside PAs to slaughterhouses in Mato Grosso, Pará, and Rondônia states. Another 2.2 million head were linked via indirect suppliers located in PAs. Most of these 3.3 million slaughtered head were originated in to sustainable‐use areas (72%), where cattle ranching may be permitted in certain cases; however, production also occurred in strictly protected units (20%) and indigenous lands (8%), where commercial grazing activities are illegal and prohibited by the CAs. Nearly half of the PA properties linked to cattle transactions from 2013 to 2018 also had deforestation. We estimate that approximately 2.8 million cattle head from properties in PAs were sold to slaughterhouses participating in the CAs (86% of the total cattle from indirect suppliers in PAs). Controlling commercial cattle production inside of PAs is crucial to both ensure Brazil's access to international beef markets and protect critical biodiversity regions in the Amazon rainforest.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/conl.12916

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Gibbs, H. K., Munger, J., L'Roe, J., Barreto, P., Pereira, R., Christie, M., Amaral, T., & Walker, N. F. (2016). Did ranchers and slaughter- houses respond to zero-deforestation agreements in the Brazilian Amazon? Conservation Letters, 9, 32-42.
  2. INPE-Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais. (2021). PRODES- Coordenação-Geral de Observação da Terra [WWW Docu- ment]. URL https://www.obt.inpe.br/OBT/assuntos/programas/ amazonia/prodes JBS. (2021). Blockchain platform developed by JBS begins operation. [WWW Document]. URL https://jbs.com.br/en/press/releases- en/blockchain-platform-developed-by-jbs-begins-operation/

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
West, T. A. P., Rausch, L., Munger, J., & Gibbs, H. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Gibbs, Holly K.
Venue
Conservation Letters
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-10-17
Volume
15
Issue
6
ISSN
1755-263X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4306762239
Cited by
18
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Conservation Letters (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Apollo
Funders
  • United States Agency for International Development
  • Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Oil Palm Production and Sustainability
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Keywords
protected areas, cattle farming, indigenous territories, deforestation, beef supply chain, slaughterhouses, illegal grazing, Amazon rainforest conservation, beef trade

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review