CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 90

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The earliest evidence for mechanically delivered projectile weapons in Europe

Sano, Katsuhiro, Arrighi, Simona, Stani, Chiaramaria, Aureli, Daniele, Boschin, Francesco, Fiore, Ivana, Spagnolo, Vincenzo, Ricci, Stefano, Crezzini, Jacopo, Boscato, Paolo, Gala, Monica, Tagliacozzo, Antonio, Birarda, Giovanni, Vaccari, Lisa, Ronchitelli, Annamaria, Moroni, Adriana, Benazzi, Stefano·2019·Nature Ecology & Evolution
DOI 10.1038/s41559-019-0990-3PMC PMC6823051
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41559-019-0990-3

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mechanical projectile weaponry is inferred from the morphometrics of Levallois points in the IUP and indicated by diagnostic impact fractures in southwest Europe approximately 45 ka.

    “Mechanical projectile weaponry is inferred from the morphometrics of Levallois points in the IUP and indicated by diagnostic impact fractures in southwest Europe approximately 45 ka [63,64].”

    From Beringia and the peopling of the Western Hemisphere (2023) · cites this paper as [64]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. Moroni, A. et al. J. Anthr. Sci. 96, 125–160 (2018).
  2. Zanchetta, G., Giaccio, B., Bini, M. & Sarti, L. Quat. Sci. Rev. 182, 65–77 (2018). · DOI
  3. Giaccio, B., Hajdas, I., Isaia, R., Deino, A. & Nomade, S. Sci. Rep. 7, 45940 (2017). · DOI
  4. d’Errico, F., Borgia, V. & Ronchitelli, A. Quat. Int. 259, 59–71 (2012). · DOI
  5. Moroni, A., Boscato, P. & Ronchitelli, A. Quat. Int. 316, 27–44 (2013). · DOI
  6. Palma di Cesnola, A. Riv. Sci. Preist. 21, 3–59 (1966).
  7. Fischer, A., Hansen, P. V. & Rasmussen, P. J. Dan. Archaeol. 3, 19–46 (1984). · DOI · Paper page
  8. Sano, K. & Oba, M. J. Archaeol. Sci. 63, 13–23 (2015). · DOI
  9. Bradtmöller, M., Sarmiento, A., Perales, U. & Zuluaga, M. C. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–13 (2016).
  10. Goldstein, S. T. & Shaffer, C. M. Archaeol. Anthr. Sci. 9, 1767–1788 (2017). · DOI
  11. Thomas, D. H. Am. Antiq. 43, 461–472 (1978). · DOI
  12. Shott, M. J. Am. Antiq. 62, 86–101 (1997). · DOI
  13. Wadley, L. J. Hum. Evol. 49, 587–601 (2005). · DOI
  14. Cattelain, P. Bull. Soc. Préhist. Fr. 86, 213–216 (1989). · DOI
  15. Thieme, H. & Veil, S. Ldkr. Verden Kunde 36, 11–58 (1985).
  16. Villa, P., Boscato, P., Ranaldo, F. & Ronchitelli, A. J. Archaeol. Sci. 36, 850–859 (2009). · DOI
  17. Shea, J. J. J. Archaeol. Sci. 33, 823–846 (2006). · DOI · Paper page
  18. Slimak, L. Quat. Sci. Rev. 217, 330–339 (2019). · DOI
  19. Villa, P. & Soriano, S. J. Anthropol. Res. 66, 5–38 (2010). · DOI
  20. Wadley, L. & Mohapi, M. J. Archaeol. Sci. 35, 2594–2605 (2008). · DOI
  21. Zilhão, J., Banks, W. E., d’Errico, F. & Gioia, P. PLoS ONE 10, e0131181 (2015). · DOI
  22. Benazzi, S. et al. Nature 479, 525–528 (2011). · DOI
  23. Heptner, V. G., Nasimovich, A. A. & Bannikov, A. G. Mammals of the Soviet Union Vol. 1 (Smithsonian Institution Libraries, National Science Foundation, 1988). · DOI · Paper page
  24. Lew-Levy, S., Reckin, R., Lavi, N., Cristóbal-Azkarate, J. & Ellis-Davies, K. Hum. Nat. 28, 367–394 (2017). · DOI
  25. Milks, A., Parker, D. & Pope, M. Sci. Rep. 9, 820 (2019). · DOI
  26. Tringham, R., Cooper, G., Odell, G., Voytek, B. & Whitman, A. J. Field Archaeol. 1, 171–196 (1974).
  27. Odell, G. H. & Odell-Vereecken, F. J. Field Archaeol. 7, 87–120 (1980).
  28. Odell, G. H. J. Field Archaeol. 8, 197–209 (1981). · DOI
  29. Akoshima, K. in The Human Uses of Flint and Chert: Proc. Fourth International Flint Symposium Held at Brighton Polytechnic 10-1 April 1983 (eds Sieveking, G. D. & Newcomer, M. H.) 71–79 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1987).
  30. Keeley, L. H. Experimental Determination of Stone Tool Uses: A Microwear Analysis (Univ. Chicago Press, 1980).
  31. Vaughan, P. C. Use-Wear Analysis of Flaked Stone Tools (Univ. Arizona Press, 1985).
  32. Lombard, M. J. Archaeol. Sci. 35, 26–41 (2008). · DOI
  33. Pargeter, J. J. Archaeol. Sci. 40, 4056–4065 (2014). · DOI
  34. Sano, K. Quartär 56, 67–86 (2009).
  35. Pargeter, J. J. Archaeol. Sci. 38, 2882–2888 (2011). · DOI
  36. Moss, E. H. & Newcomer, M. H. Stud. Praehist. Belg. 2, 289–312 (1982).
  37. Lupi, S. et al. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 24, 959–964 (2007). · DOI
  38. Petrea, P., Amarioarei, G., Apostolescu, N., Puitel, A. C. & Ciovica, S. Cell. Chem. Technol. 47, 369–375 (2013).
  39. Socrates, G. in Infrared and Raman Characteristic Group Frequencies Tables and Charts (ed. Socrates, G.) 283–340 (Wiley, 2001).
  40. van der Marel, H. W. & Krohmer, P. Contr. Mineral. Petrol. 22, 73–82 (1969). · DOI
  41. Espinosa-Andrews, H., Sandoval-Castilla, O., Vazquez-Torres, H., Vernon-Carter, E. J. & Lobato-Calleros, C. Carbohydr. Polym. 79, 541–546 (2010). · DOI
  42. Fleet, M. E. Biomaterials 30, 1473–1481 (2009). · DOI
  43. Richter, D. & Krbetschek, M. J. Hum. Evol. 89, 46–56 (2015). · DOI
  44. Thieme, H. in The Hominid Individual in Context: Archaeological Investigations of Lower and Middle Palaeolithic Landscapes, Locales and Artefacts (eds Gamble, C. & Porr, M.) 115–132 (Routledge, 2005).
  45. Cattelain, P. in Projectile Technology (ed. Knecht, H.) 213–240 (Plenum, 1997). · DOI · Paper page
  46. Hughes, S. S. J. Archaeol. Method Theory 5, 345–408 (1998). · DOI
  47. Pétillon, J.-M. et al. J. Archaeol. Sci. 38, 1266–1283 (2011). · DOI
  48. Shea, J. J. & Sisk, M. L. Paleoanthropology 2010, 100–122 (2010).
  49. Sisk, M. L. & Shea, J. J. Int. J. Evolut. Biol. 2011, 1–8 (2011). · DOI
  50. Waelbroeck, C. et al. Quat. Sci. Rev. 21, 295–305 (2002). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sano, K., Arrighi, S., Stani, C., Aureli, D., Boschin, F., Fiore, I., Spagnolo, V., Ricci, S., Crezzini, J., Boscato, P., Gala, M., Tagliacozzo, A., Birarda, G., Vaccari, L., Ronchitelli, A., Moroni, A., & Benazzi, S.
ORCID
Venue
Nature Ecology & Evolution
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2019-09-26
Volume
3
Issue
10
Pages
1409-1414
ISSN
2397-334X
DOI
10.1038/s41559-019-0990-3
PMC
PMC6823051
Cited by
90
References
2
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review