Cited by 62Animal Vocal Communication and BehaviorPrimate Behavior and EcologyMarine animal studies overview

African elephants address one another with individually specific name-like calls

Pardo, Michael A., Fristrup, Kurt, Lolchuragi, David S., Poole, Joyce H., Granli, Petter, Moss, Cynthia, Douglas-Hamilton, Iain, Wittemyer, George·2024·Nature Ecology & Evolution

Abstract

Personal names are a universal feature of human language, yet few analogues exist in other species. While dolphins and parrots address conspecifics by imitating the calls of the addressee, human names are not imitations of the sounds typically made by the named individual. Labelling objects or individuals without relying on imitation of the sounds made by the referent radically expands the expressive power of language. Thus, if non-imitative name analogues were found in other species, this could have important implications for our understanding of language evolution. Here we present evidence that wild African elephants address one another with individually specific calls, probably without relying on imitation of the receiver. We used machine learning to demonstrate that the receiver of a call could be predicted from the call's acoustic structure, regardless of how similar the call was to the receiver's vocalizations. Moreover, elephants differentially responded to playbacks of calls originally addressed to them relative to calls addressed to a different individual. Our findings offer evidence for individual addressing of conspecifics in elephants. They further suggest that, unlike other non-human animals, elephants probably do not rely on imitation of the receiver's calls to address one another.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41559-024-02420-w

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pardo et al. (2024) recently found evidence that wild African savanna elephants use name-like calls-which were specific to the receiver but did not imitate the receiver's vocalizations-to individually address conspecifics.

    “Indeed, Pardo et al. (2024) recently found evidence that wild African savanna elephants use name-like calls-which were specific to the receiver but did not imitate the receiver's vocalizations-to individually address conspecifics.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 57 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pardo, M. A., Fristrup, K., Lolchuragi, D. S., Poole, J. H., Granli, P., Moss, C., Douglas-Hamilton, I., & Wittemyer, G.
Affiliations
  • Colorado State University (US)
  • Save the Elephants (KE)
Corresponding author
Pardo, Michael A.
Venue
Nature Ecology & Evolution
Published
2024-06-10
Volume
8
Issue
7
Pages
1353-1364
ISSN
2397-334X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4399490190
Cited by
62
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 14
FWCI
26.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Ecology & Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1907122)
  • National Geographic Society
  • Care for the Wild Crystal Springs Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
Keywords
Loxodonta africana, acoustic structure, language evolution, animal communication, vocal individuality
MeSH terms
Animals, Elephants, Female, Male, Social Behavior, Vocalization, Animal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review