CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 0Cognitive Abilities and TestingCognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skillsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Author Correction: Near transfer to an unrelated N-back task mediates the effect of N-back working memory training on matrix reasoning

Open access
Pahor, Anja, Seitz, Aaron R., Jaeggi, Susanne M.·2023·Nature Human Behaviour
DOI 10.1038/s41562-022-01514-4
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41562-022-01514-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Pahor, A., Seitz, A. R., & Jaeggi, S. M.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Riverside (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Pahor, Anja
ORCID
Venue
Nature Human Behaviour
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2023-01-31
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
292-292
ISSN
2397-3374 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1038/s41562-022-01514-4
OpenAlex
W4318703653
Cited by
0
References
0
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Nature Human Behaviour (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
n-back task, working memory training, matrix reasoning, transfer of training, countermanding, sequencing, active control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review