Cited by 21Ethics and Social Impacts of AIPsychology Research and BibliometricsComputational and Text Analysis Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

AI language tools risk scientific diversity and innovation

Nakadai, Ryosuke, Nakawake, Yo, Shibasaki, Shota·2023·Nature Human Behaviour

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41562-023-01652-3

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 9 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 21

Metadata

Authors
Nakadai, R., Nakawake, Y., & Shibasaki, S.
Affiliations
  • National Institute for Environmental Studies (JP)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US)
Corresponding author
  • Nakadai, Ryosuke
  • Nakawake, Yo
  • Shibasaki, Shota
Venue
Nature Human Behaviour
Published
2023-06-22
Volume
7
Issue
11
Pages
1804-1805
ISSN
2397-3374 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4381612567
Cited by
20
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2
FWCI
5.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Human Behaviour (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
Keywords
large language models, scientific diversity, scientific innovation, research integrity, AI-generated research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review