Cited by 34Digital Games and MediaEducational Games and GamificationPsychological and Educational Research Studies

Empowerment contributes to exploration behaviour in a creative video game

Open access
Brändle, Franziska, Stocks, Lena J., Tenenbaum, Joshua B., Gershman, Samuel J., Schulz, Eric·2023·Nature Human Behaviour

Abstract

Studies of human exploration frequently cast people as serendipitously stumbling upon good options. Yet these studies may not capture the richness of exploration strategies that people exhibit in more complex environments. Here we study behaviour in a large dataset of 29,493 players of the richly structured online game 'Little Alchemy 2'. In this game, players start with four elements, which they can combine to create up to 720 complex objects. We find that players are driven not only by external reward signals, such as an attempt to produce successful outcomes, but also by an intrinsic motivation to create objects that empower them to create even more objects. We find that this drive for empowerment is eliminated when playing a game variant that lacks recognizable semantics, indicating that people use their knowledge about the world and its possibilities to guide their exploration. Our results suggest that the drive for empowerment may be a potent source of intrinsic motivation in richly structured domains, particularly those that lack explicit reward signals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41562-023-01661-2

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brändle, F., Stocks, L. J., Tenenbaum, J. B., Gershman, S. J., & Schulz, E.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics (DE)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Brändle, Franziska
Venue
Nature Human Behaviour
Published
2023-07-24
Volume
7
Issue
9
Pages
1481-1489
ISSN
2397-3374 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4385219792
Cited by
34
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2
FWCI
13.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Human Behaviour (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Volkswagen Foundation (VW98569)
  • Jacob’s Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Games and Media
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Educational Research Studies
Keywords
exploratory behavior, empowerment, intrinsic motivation, reward signals, semantic knowledge, exploration strategy, player behavior
MeSH terms
Achievement, Exploratory Behavior, Humans, Motivation, Reward, Video Games

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review