Cited by 40Pleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyLanguage and cultural evolutionArchaeological and Geological Studies

Evidence from personal ornaments suggest nine distinct cultural groups between 34,000 and 24,000 years ago in Europe

Open access
Baker, Jack, Rigaud, Solange, Pereira, Daniel, Courtenay, Lloyd A., d’Errico, Francesco·2024·Nature Human Behaviour

Abstract

Mechanisms governing the relationship between genetic and cultural evolution are the subject of debate, data analysis and modelling efforts. Here we present a new georeferenced dataset of personal ornaments worn by European hunter-gatherers during the so-called Gravettian technocomplex (34,000-24,000 years ago), analyse it with multivariate and geospatial statistics, model the impact of distance on cultural diversity and contrast the outcome of our analyses with up-to-date palaeogenetic data. We demonstrate that Gravettian ornament variability cannot be explained solely by isolation-by-distance. Analysis of Gravettian ornaments identified nine geographically discrete cultural entities across Europe. While broadly in agreement with palaeogenetic data, our results highlight a more complex pattern, with cultural entities located in areas not yet sampled by palaeogenetics and distinctive entities in regions inhabited by populations of similar genetic ancestry. Integrating personal ornament and biological data from other Palaeolithic cultures will elucidate the complex narrative of population dynamics of Upper Palaeolithic Europe.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41562-023-01803-6

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These studies have focused on the analysis of Upper Palaeolithic personal ornaments, mobiliary art and funerary behaviours, all of which hold symbolic meaning and as such can better characterise cultural and social systems.

    “These studies have focused on the analysis of Upper Palaeolithic personal ornaments, mobiliary art and funerary behaviours, all of which hold symbolic meaning and as such can better characterise cultural and social systems (Baker et al., 2024).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baker, J., Rigaud, S., Pereira, D., Courtenay, L. A., & d’Errico, F.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Baker, Jack
Venue
Nature Human Behaviour
Published
2024-01-29
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
431-444
ISSN
2397-3374 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391324318
Cited by
40
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 12
FWCI
69.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Human Behaviour (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR- 10-IDEX-03-02, ANR-10-IDEX-0003)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Archaeological and Geological Studies
Keywords
personal adornment, Upper Palaeolithic, hunter-gatherers, cultural diversity, isolation by distance, cultural groups
MeSH terms
Cultural Evolution, Europe, Humans, Population Dynamics, Cultural Diversity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review