Cited by 155Forensic and Genetic ResearchGenetic diversity and population structureRace, Genetics, and Society

Reconciling material cultures in archaeology with genetic data: The nomenclature of clusters emerging from archaeogenomic analysis

Open access
Eisenmann, Stefanie, Bánffy, Eszter, van Dommelen, Peter, Hofmann, Kerstin P., Maran, Joseph, Lazaridis, Iosif, Mittnik, Alissa, McCormick, Michael +3 more·2018·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Genome-wide ancient DNA analysis of skeletons retrieved from archaeological excavations has provided a powerful new tool for the investigation of past populations and migrations. An important objective for the coming years is to properly integrate ancient genomics into archaeological research. This article aims to contribute to developing a better understanding and cooperation between the two disciplines and beyond. It focuses on the question of how best to name clusters encountered when analysing the genetic makeup of past human populations. Recent studies have frequently borrowed archaeological cultural designations to name these genetic groups, while neglecting the historically problematic nature of the concept of cultures in archaeology. After reviewing current practices in naming genetic clusters, we introduce three possible nomenclature systems ('numeric system', 'mixed system (a)', 'geographic-temporal system') along with their advantages and challenges.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-018-31123-z

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The archaeological and historical category of Canaanites correlates with shared ancestry.

    “This suggests that the archaeological and historical category of “Canaanites” correlates with shared ancestry (Eisenmann et al., 2018).”

    From The Genomic History of the Bronze Age Southern Levant (2020) · cites this paper as Eisenmann et al., 2018

    In “The use of archaeological cultural designations in genetic studies” (page unavailable), the paper says archaeological and genetic groups may correlate, but that any association requires case-by-case investigation. A search for “Canaanite” found only the title of a cited study in the nomenclature table and references; our copy does not assess whether the Canaanite category correlates with shared ancestry. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [37]Strahm, C. (ed.) Das Glockenbecher-Phänomen. Ein Seminar (Institut für Ur- und Frühgeschichte der Universität Freiburg, 1995).
  2. [46]Lucy, S. Ethnic and Cultural Identities in The Archaeology of Identity (eds. Díaz-Andreu García, M., Lucy, S., Babić, S. & Edwards, D. N.) 86-109 (Routledge, 2005).
  3. [48]Childe, V. G. Piecing togehter the Past. The Interpretation of Archaeological Data (Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1956).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eisenmann, S., Bánffy, E., van Dommelen, P., Hofmann, K. P., Maran, J., Lazaridis, I., Mittnik, A., McCormick, M., Krause, J., Reich, D., & Stockhammer, P. W.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck - Harvard Research Center for the Archaeoscience of the Ancient Mediterranean (DE)
  • Deutsches Archäologisches Institut, Zentrale (DE)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Eisenmann, Stefanie
  • Stockhammer, Philipp W.
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2018-08-29
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
13003-13003
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2888249567
Cited by
155
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 4
FWCI
9.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • heiDOK (Heidelberg University) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Open access LMU (Ludwid Maxmilian's Universitat Munchen) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University Library Heidelberg
Funders
Max-Planck - Harvard Research Center for the Archaeoscience of the Ancient Mediterranean
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Race, Genetics, and Society
Keywords
paleogenomics, ancient DNA, material culture, population genetics, human migration, nomenclature system
MeSH terms
DNA, Ancient, Archaeology, Fossils, Humans, Terminology as Topic, Skeleton, Genomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review