Cited by 954Microplastics and Plastic PollutionPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental ImpactsNanoparticles: synthesis and applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nanoplastics are neither microplastics nor engineered nanoparticles

Open access

Abstract

Increasing concern and research on the subject of plastic pollution has engaged the community of scientists working on the environmental health and safety of nanomaterials. While many of the methods developed in nano environment, health and safety work have general applicability to the study of particulate plastics, the nanometric size range has important consequences for both the analytical challenges of studying nanoscale plastics and the environmental implications of these incidental nanomaterials. Related to their size, nanoplastics are distinguished from microplastics with respect to their transport properties, interactions with light and natural colloids, a high fraction of particle molecules on the surface, bioavailability and diffusion times for the release of plastic additives. Moreover, they are distinguished from engineered nanomaterials because of their high particle heterogeneity and their potential for rapid further fragmentation in the environment. These characteristics impact environmental fate, potential effects on biota and human health, sampling and analysis. Like microplastics, incidentally produced nanoplastics exhibit a diversity of compositions and morphologies and a heterogeneity that is typically absent from engineered nanomaterials. Therefore, nanoscale plastics must be considered as distinct from both microplastics and engineered nanomaterials.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41565-021-00886-4

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 60 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Rist, S. & Hartmann, N. B. in Freshwater Microplastics: Emerging Environmental Contaminants? (eds Wagner, M. & Lambert, S.) 25–49 (Springer, 2018).
  2. Crank J. The Mathematics of Diffusion (Elsevier, 1975).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 953

Metadata

Authors
Gigault, J., El Hadri, H., Nguyen, B., Grassl, B., Rowenczyk, L., Tufenkji, N., Feng, S., & Wiesner, M.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • McGill University (CA)
  • Duke University (US)
Venue
Nature Nanotechnology
Published
2021-04-29
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
501-507
ISSN
  • 1748-3387 (ISSN-L)
  • 1748-3395
OpenAlex
W3157443957
Cited by
954
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 178 · 2025: 222 · 2024: 207 · 2023: 163 · 2022: 136 · 2021: 48
FWCI
6.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Nanotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • eScholarship@McGill (McGill) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
Keywords
nanoplastics, microplastics, engineered nanoparticles, plastic pollution, environmental fate, particle size effects, fragmentation, polymer additives, bioavailability, environmental health and safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review