Cited by 113

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Experimental quantum fast hitting on hexagonal graphs

Tang, Hao, Di Franco, Carlo, Shi, Zi-Yu, He, Tian-Shen, Feng, Zhen, Gao, Jun, Sun, Ke, Li, Zhan-Ming, Jiao, Zhi-Qiang, Wang, Tian-Yu, Kim, M. S., Jin, Xian-Min·2018·Nature Photonics

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41566-018-0282-5

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An integration of a QD-SPS with SNSPDs in a GaAs photonic-crystal waveguide system enables the detection of QD luminescence in a compact system.

    “An integration of a QD-SPS with SNSPDs in the GaAs photonic-crystal waveguide system. It enables the detection of QD luminescence in a compact system.”

    From Integrated photonic quantum technologies (2020) · cites this paper as [118]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Childs, A. M., Farhi, E. & Gutmann, S. An example of the difference between quantum and classical random walks. Quantum Inf. Process. 1, 35–43 (2002). · DOI · Paper page
  2. Szegedy, M. in Proceedings of the 45th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science 32–41 (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, 2004).
  3. Childs, A. M. & Goldstone, J. Spatial search by quantum walk. Phys. Rev. A 70, 022314 (2004). · DOI · Paper page
  4. Aaronson, S. & Shi, Y. Quantum lower bounds for the collision and the element distinctness problems. J. ACM 51, 595–605 (2004). · DOI
  5. Buhrman, H. & Špalek, R. in Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual ACM–SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithm 880–889 (SIAM, Philadelphia, 2006). · DOI
  6. Farhi, E., Goldstone, J. & Gutmann, S. A quantum algorithm for the Hamiltonian NAND tree. Theory Comput. 4, 169–190 (2008). · DOI
  7. Douglas, B. L. & Wang, J. B. A classical approach to the graph isomorphism problem using quantum walks. J. Phys. A 41, 075303 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
  8. Bruderer, M. & Plenio, M. B. Decoherence enhances performance of quantum walks applied to graph isomorphism testing. Phys. Rev. A 94, 062317 (2016). · DOI
  9. Childs, A. M. et al. in Proceedings of the Thirty-fifth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing 59–68 (ACM, New York, 2003). · DOI · Paper page
  10. Douglas, B. L. & Wang, J. B. Efficient quantum circuit implementation of quantum walks. Phys. Rev. A 79, 052335 (2009). · DOI
  11. Carneiro, I. et al. Entanglement in coined quantum walks on regular graphs. New J. Phys. 7, 156 (2005). · DOI · Paper page
  12. Schmitz, H. et al. Quantum walk of a trapped ion in phase space. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 090504 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  13. Du, J. et al. Experimental implementation of the quantum random-walk algorithm. Phys. Rev. A 67, 042316 (2003). · DOI
  14. Preiss, P. M. et al. Strongly correlated quantum walks in optical lattices. Science 347, 1229–1233 (2015). · DOI
  15. Tang, H. et al. Experimental two-dimensional quantum walk on a photonic chip. Sci. Adv. 4, eaat3174 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  16. Gao, J. et al. Non-classical photon correlation in a two-dimensional photonic lattice. Opt. Express 24, 12607–12616 (2016). · DOI
  17. Izaac, J. A. & Wang, J. B. pyctqw: a continuous-time quantum walk simulator on distributed memory computers. Comput. Phys. Commun. 186, 81–92 (2015). · DOI
  18. Whitfield, J. D., Rodríguez-Rosario, C. A. & Aspuru-Guzik, A. Quantum stochastic walks: a generalization of classical random walks and quantum walks. Phys. Rev. A 81, 022323 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  19. Sánchez-Burillo, E., Duch, J., Gómez-Gardenes, J. & Zueco, D. Quantum navigation and ranking in complex networks. Sci. Rep. 2, 605 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  20. Chaboyer, Z., Meany, T., Helt, L. G., Withford, M. J. & Steel, M. J. Tunable quantum interference in a 3D integrated circuit. Sci. Rep. 5, 9601 (2015). · DOI
  21. Feng, Z. et al. Invisibility cloak printed on a photonic chip. Sci. Rep. 6, 28527 (2016). · DOI
  22. Darázs, Z., Anishchenko, A., Kiss, T., Blumen, A. & Mülken, O. Transport properties of continuous-time quantum walks on sierpinski fractals. Phys. Rev. E 90, 032113 (2014). · DOI
  23. Kim, Y. H. Quantum interference with beamlike type-II spontaneous parametric down-conversion. Phys. Rev. A 68, 013804 (2003). · DOI
  24. Sun, K. et al. Mapping and measuring large-scale photonic correlation with single-photon imaging. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.09569 (2018). · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tang, H., Di Franco, C., Shi, Z.-Y., He, T.-S., Feng, Z., Gao, J., Sun, K., Li, Z.-M., Jiao, Z.-Q., Wang, T.-Y., Kim, M. S., & Jin, X.-M.
Venue
Nature Photonics
Published
2018-10-29
Volume
12
Issue
12
Pages
754-758
ISSN
  • 1749-4885
  • 1749-4893
Cited by
113
References
13
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review