Cited by 118Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Information and CryptographyPhotonic and Optical Devices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Error-protected qubits in a silicon photonic chip

Open access

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41567-021-01333-w

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 58 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Gottesman, D. Stabilizer Codes and Quantum Error Correction. PhD thesis, Californian Institute of Technology (1997).
  2. Llewellyn, D. et al. Chip-to-chip quantum teleportation and multi-photon entanglement in silicon. Nat. Phys. 16, 1 (2019).
  3. Kitaev, A. Y. Quantum measurements and the Abelian stabilizer problem. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9511026 (1995). · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Vigliar, C., Paesani, S., Ding, Y., Adcock, J. C., Wang, J., Morley-Short, S., Bacco, D., Oxenløwe, L. K., Thompson, M. G., Rarity, J. G., & Laing, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • Technical University of Denmark (DK)
  • Peking University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Ding, Yunhong
  • Wang, Jianwei
  • Laing, Anthony
Venue
Nature Physics
Published
2021-09-27
Volume
17
Issue
10
Pages
1137-1143
ISSN
  • 1745-2473 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-2481
OpenAlex
W3086329240
Cited by
118
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 8
FWCI
7.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Nature Physics (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion)
  • Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/T001062/1, EP/L024020/1, EP/N003470/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Photonic and Optical Devices
Keywords
quantum error correction, silicon photonics, photonic quantum computing, graph states, hypergraph states, entangled photons, phase estimation, measurement-based quantum computation, correlated errors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review