Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 434

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 175 of the 175 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Computational models in cardiology

Open access
Niederer, Steven A., Lumens, Joost, Trayanova, Natalia A.·2019·Nature Reviews Cardiology

Abstract

The treatment of individual patients in cardiology practice increasingly relies on advanced imaging, genetic screening and devices. As the amount of imaging and other diagnostic data increases, paralleled by the greater capacity to personalize treatment, the difficulty of using the full array of measurements of a patient to determine an optimal treatment seems also to be paradoxically increasing. Computational models are progressively addressing this issue by providing a common framework for integrating multiple data sets from individual patients. These models, which are based on physiology and physics rather than on population statistics, enable computational simulations to reveal diagnostic information that would have otherwise remained concealed and to predict treatment outcomes for individual patients. The inherent need for patient-specific models in cardiology is clear and is driving the rapid development of tools and techniques for creating personalized methods to guide pharmaceutical therapy, deployment of devices and surgical interventions.Computational models are increasingly used in cardiology to integrate multiple data sets from individual patients and create virtual-patient simulations. In this Review, Niederer and colleagues discuss how multi-scale models of cardiac electrophysiology and mechanics can support diagnostic assessment and clinical decision-making and pave the way to personalized cardiac care.Key pointsComputational models of the heart have an important and growing role in cardiology, enabling patients to be diagnosed and treated on the basis of their specific pathophysiology.Simulations provide the link between the effects of genetic mutations, physiological regulations or drugs on protein function and emergent cellular and tissue function or clinical phenotypes.Models representing an individual patient or a specific pathology are now used to identify the mechanisms underpinning a disease, improve patient selection and predict clinical outcomes.Predictive modelling also contributes to the development of new diagnostics and devices and to the tailoring of therapies for individual patients.Translational barriers remain regarding model personalization, speed and detail of the simulations and how to communicate model predictions to cardiologists within a clinical environment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41569-018-0104-y

Cites

175 of 175 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 175 references

Cited by

See all 434

Metadata

Authors
Niederer, S. A., Lumens, J., & Trayanova, N. A.
Venue
Nature Reviews Cardiology
Published
2018-10-25
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
100-111
ISSN
  • 1759-5002 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-5010
OpenAlex
W2898458682
Cited by
434
References
175
FWCI
7.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computational models in cardiology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41569-018-0104-y
The paper
Niederer, S. A., Lumens, J., & Trayanova, N. A. (2019). Computational models in cardiology. Nature Reviews Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-018-0104-y

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.