Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 782

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Environmental determinants of cardiovascular disease: lessons learned from air pollution

Open access
Al-Kindi, Sadeer G., Brook, Robert D., Biswal, Shyam, Rajagopalan, Sanjay·2020·Nature Reviews Cardiology

Abstract

Air pollution is well recognized as a major risk factor for chronic non-communicable diseases and has been estimated to contribute more to global morbidity and mortality than all other known environmental risk factors combined. Although air pollution contains a heterogeneous mixture of gases, the most robust evidence for detrimental effects on health is for fine particulate matter (particles ≤2.5 µm in diameter (PM 2.5 )) and ozone gas and, therefore, these species have been the main focus of environmental health research and regulatory standards. The evidence to date supports a strong link between the risk of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality with PM 2.5 across a range of exposure levels, including to levels below current regulatory standards, with no ‘safe’ lower exposure levels at the population level. In this comprehensive Review, the empirical evidence supporting the effects of air pollution on cardiovascular health are examined, potential mechanisms that lead to increased cardiovascular risk are described, and measures to reduce this risk and identify key gaps in our knowledge that could help address the increasing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality associated with air pollution are discussed. A strong relationship exists between exposure to air pollution and cardiovascular events. In this Review, Rajagopalan and colleagues summarize the evidence supporting the detrimental effects of air pollution on cardiovascular health and describe the potential mechanisms involved in air pollution-mediated cardiovascular mortality. Air pollution is the most important environmental cardiovascular risk factor, with fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) and ozone gas being the most-studied air pollutants. The health effects of air pollution might depend on chronic exposure, pre-existing medical conditions and sources or composition of the pollutants. Multiple primary initiating and secondary effector mechanisms are responsible for the cardiovascular effects of air pollution. Numerous animal and human studies have shown that inhalation of PM 2.5 pollution can contribute to cardiovascular disease and mortality. The most widely studied personalized approaches to reducing the cardiovascular risk of air pollution include the use of face masks and in-home air purifiers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41569-020-0371-2

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Cited by

See all 782

Metadata

Authors
Al-Kindi, S. G., Brook, R. D., Biswal, S., & Rajagopalan, S.
Venue
Nature Reviews Cardiology
Published
2020-05-07
Volume
17
Issue
10
Pages
656-672
ISSN
  • 1759-5002 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-5010
OpenAlex
W3022712724
Cited by
782
References
13
FWCI
14.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Environmental determinants of cardiovascular disease: lessons learned from air pollution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41569-020-0371-2
The paper
Al-Kindi, S. G., Brook, R. D., Biswal, S., & Rajagopalan, S. (2020). Environmental determinants of cardiovascular disease: lessons learned from air pollution. Nature Reviews Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-020-0371-2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.