Cited by 306Pregnancy and Medication ImpactNausea and vomiting managementMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum

Nausea and vomiting of pregnancy and hyperemesis gravidarum

Open access
Fejzo, Marlena S., Trovik, Jone, Grooten, Iris J., Sridharan, Kannan, Roseboom, Tessa J., Vikanes, Åse, Painter, Rebecca C., Mullin, Patrick M.·2019·Nature Reviews Disease Primers

Abstract

Nausea and vomiting of pregnancy (NVP) is a common condition that affects as many as 70% of pregnant women. Although no consensus definition is available for hyperemesis gravidarum (HG), it is typically viewed as the severe form of NVP and has been reported to occur in 0.3-10.8% of pregnant women. HG can be associated with poor maternal, fetal and child outcomes. The majority of women with NVP can be managed with dietary and lifestyle changes, but more than one-third of patients experience clinically relevant symptoms that may require fluid and vitamin supplementation and/or antiemetic therapy such as, for example, combined doxylamine/pyridoxine, which is not teratogenic and may be effective in treating NVP. Ondansetron is commonly used to treat HG, but studies are urgently needed to determine whether it is safer and more effective than using first-line antiemetics. Thiamine (vitamin B1) should be introduced following protocols to prevent refeeding syndrome and Wernicke encephalopathy. Recent advances in the genetic study of NVP and HG suggest a placental component to the aetiology by implicating common variants in genes encoding placental proteins (namely GDF15 and IGFBP7) and hormone receptors (namely GFRAL and PGR). New studies on aetiology, diagnosis, management and treatment are under way. In the next decade, progress in these areas may improve maternal quality of life and limit the adverse outcomes associated with HG.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41572-019-0110-3

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fejzo, M. S., Trovik, J., Grooten, I. J., Sridharan, K., Roseboom, T. J., Vikanes, Å., Painter, R. C., & Mullin, P. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Haukeland University Hospital (NO)
  • Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)
  • Arabian Gulf University (BH)
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
Corresponding author
Fejzo, Marlena S.
Venue
Nature Reviews Disease Primers
Published
2019-09-12
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
62-62
ISSN
2056-676X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2973111398
Cited by
306
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 21
FWCI
3.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Disease Primers (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nausea and vomiting management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Keywords
nausea and vomiting of pregnancy, hyperemesis gravidarum, antiemetic therapy, ondansetron, thiamine supplementation, refeeding syndrome, Wernicke's encephalopathy, GDF15, IGFBP7, GFRAL, PGR, maternal and fetal outcomes
MeSH terms
Antiemetics, Dicyclomine, Doxylamine, Drug Combinations, Female, Humans, Hyperemesis Gravidarum, Mass Screening, Nausea, Pregnancy, Pyridoxine, Growth Differentiation Factor 15

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review