Cited by 384Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestockAnimal Genetics and ReproductionGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 282 of the 282 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Harnessing genomic information for livestock improvement

Open access

Georges, Michel, Charlier, Carole, Hayes, Ben·2019·Nature Reviews Genetics

DOI 10.1038/s41576-018-0082-2

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The world demand for animal-based food products is anticipated to increase by 70% by 2050. Meeting this demand in a way that has a minimal impact on the environment will require the implementation of advanced technologies, and methods to improve the genetic quality of livestock are expected to play a large part. Over the past 10 years, genomic selection has been introduced in several major livestock species and has more than doubled genetic progress in some. However, additional improvements are required. Genomic information of increasing complexity (including genomic, epigenomic, transcriptomic and microbiome data), combined with technological advances for its cost-effective collection and use, will make a major contribution.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41576-018-0082-2

Cites

282 of 282 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Items 201–282 of 282

Acceleration of genetic gain in cattle by reduction of generation interval
Kasinathan, P., Wei, H., Xiang, T., et al. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep08674 · Cited by 69
Expression Variants of the Lipogenic AGPAT6 Gene Affect Diverse Milk Composition Phenotypes in Bos taurus
Littlejohn, M. D., Tiplady, K., Lopdell, T., Law, T. A., Scott, A., Harland, C., Sherlock, R. G., Henty, K., Obolonkin, V., Lehnert, K., et al. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0085757 · Cited by 68
Integrating expression profiling and whole-genome association for dissection of fat traits in a porcine model
Ponsuksili, S., Muráni, E., Brand, B., Schwerin, M., & Wimmers, K. (2011) · Journal of Lipid Research · doi:10.1194/jlr.m013342 · Cited by 67
Handmade Cloned Transgenic Sheep Rich in Omega-3 Fatty Acids
Zhang, P., Liu, P., Dou, H., et al. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055941 · Cited by 66
Functional disruption of the prion protein gene in cloned goats
Yu, G., Chen, J., Yu, H., et al. (2006) · Journal of General Virology · doi:10.1099/vir.0.81384-0 · Cited by 65
Discovery of Candidate Genes for Muscle Traits Based on GWAS Supported by eQTL-analysis
Ponsuksili, S., Muráni, E., Trakooljul, N., Schwerin, M., & Wimmers, K. (2014) · International Journal of Biological Sciences · doi:10.7150/ijbs.8134 · Cited by 63
The 80-kb DNA duplication on BTA1 is the only remaining candidate mutation for the polled phenotype of Friesian origin
Rothammer, S., Capitan, A., Mullaart, E., et al. (2014) · Genetics Selection Evolution · doi:10.1186/1297-9686-46-44 · Cited by 63
Genetical genomics of behavior: a novel chicken genomic model for anxiety behavior
Johnsson, M., Williams, M. J., Jensen, P., & Wright, D. (2016) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.115.179010 · Cited by 62
Transgenic alteration of sow milk to improve piglet growth and health
Wheeler, M. B., Bleck, G. T., & Donovan, S. (2020) · Bioscientifica Proceedings · doi:10.1530/biosciprocs.16.0023 · Cited by 62
Expression and Characterization of Bioactive Recombinant Human α-Lactalbumin in the Milk of Transgenic Cloned Cows
Wang, J., Yang, P., Tang, B., Sun, X., Zhang, R., Guo, C., Gong, G., Liu, Y., Li, R., Zhang, L., et al. (2008) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2008-1189 · Cited by 61
A systematic survey to identify lethal recessive variation in highly managed pig populations
Derks, M. F. L., Megens, H., Bosse, M., Lopes, M. S., Harlizius, B., & Groenen, M. A. M. (2017) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-017-4278-1 · Cited by 60
A PLAG1 mutation contributed to stature recovery in modern cattle
Utsunomiya, Y. T., Milanesi, M., Utsunomiya, A. T. H., Torrecilha, R. B. P., Kim, E.-S., Costa, M. D. S., Aguiar, T. S., Schroeder, S., do Carmo, A. S., Carvalheiro, R., et al. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-17127-1 · Cited by 59
Molecular consequences of animal breeding
Andersson, L. (2013) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2013.02.014 · Cited by 57
Efficient genomic prediction based on whole-genome sequence data using split-and-merge Bayesian variable selection
Calus, M. P. L., Bouwman, A. C., Schrooten, C., & Veerkamp, R. F. (2016) · Genetics Selection Evolution · doi:10.1186/s12711-016-0225-x · Cited by 57
GO ‐ FAANG meeting: a Gathering On Functional Annotation of An imal Genomes
Tuggle, C. K., Giuffra, E., White, S. N., Clarke, L., Zhou, H., Ross, P. J., Acloque, H., Reecy, J. M., Archibald, A. L., Bellone, R. R., et al. (2016) · Animal Genetics · doi:10.1111/age.12466 · Cited by 55
Self-citation
Deciphering the genetic regulation of peripheral blood transcriptome in pigs through expression genome-wide association study and allele-specific expression analysis
Maroilley, T., Lemonnier, G., Lecardonnel, J., Esquerré, D., Ramayo‐Caldas, Y., Mercat, M.-J., Rogel-Gaillard, C., & Estellé, J. (2017) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-017-4354-6 · Cited by 54
Integration, expression and germ-line transmission of growth-related genes in pigs.
Pursel, V. G., Hammer, R. E., Bolt, D. J., et al. (1990) · PubMed · Cited by 52
A Splice Site Variant in the Bovine RNF11 Gene Compromises Growth and Regulation of the Inflammatory Response
Sartelet, A., Druet, T., Michaux, C., Fasquelle, C., Géron, S., Tamma, N., Zhang, Z., Coppieters, W. R., Georges, M., & Charlier, C. (2012) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002581 · Cited by 51
Self-citation
Comparison of Bayesian models to estimate direct genomic values in multi-breed commercial beef cattle
Rolf, M. M., Garrick, D. J., Fountain, T. H., et al. (2015) · Genetics Selection Evolution · doi:10.1186/s12711-015-0106-8 · Cited by 50
Antifreeze protein gene transfer in Atlantic salmon.
Hew, C. L., Davies, P. L., & Fletcher, G. (1993) · PubMed · Cited by 49
Novel Harmful Recessive Haplotypes Identified for Fertility Traits in Nordic Holstein Cattle
Sahana, G., Nielsen, U., Aamand, G. P., Lund, M. S., & Guldbrandtsen, B. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0082909 · Cited by 49
Joint QTL mapping and gene expression analysis identify positional candidate genes influencing pork quality traits
González-Prendes, R., Quintanilla, R., Cánovas, Á., Manunza, A., Cardoso, T. F., Jordana, J., Noguera, J. L., Pena, R. N., & Amills, M. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep39830 · Cited by 49
Genome-wide association studies for fatty acid metabolic traits in five divergent pig populations
Zhang, W., Yang, B., Zhang, J., Cui, L., Ma, J., Chen, C., Ai, H., Xiao, S., Ren, J., & Huang, L. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep24718 · Cited by 48
Invited review: efficient computation strategies in genomic selection
Misztal, I., & Legarra, A. (2016) · animal · doi:10.1017/s1751731116002366 · Cited by 48
An initiator codon mutation in SDE2 causes recessive embryonic lethality in Holstein cattle
Fritz, S., Hozé, C., Rebours, E., Barbat, A., Bizard, M., Chamberlain, A. J., Escouflaire, C., Jagt, C. V., Boussaha, M., Grohs, C., et al. (2018) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2017-14119 · Cited by 48
Self-citation
Analysis of response to 20 generations of selection for body composition in mice: fit to infinitesimal model assumptions
Martı́nez, V., Bünger, L., & Hill, W. G. (2000) · Genetics Selection Evolution · doi:10.1186/1297-9686-32-1-3 · Cited by 47
Redefining Biology via Enzyme Engineering
Kvajo, M. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.12.043 · Cited by 47
Expression of a Wool Intermediate Filament Keratin Transgene in Sheep Fibre Alters Structure
Bawden, C. S., Powell, B. C., Walker, S. K., et al. (1998) · Transgenic Research · doi:10.1023/a:1008830314386 · Cited by 46
Heterozygote Advantage: The Effect of Artificial Selection in Livestock and Pets
Hedrick, P. W. (2014) · Journal of Heredity · doi:10.1093/jhered/esu070 · Cited by 45
Using information of relatives in genomic prediction to apply effective stratified medicine
Lee, S., Weerasinghe, S., Wray, N. R., Goddard, M. E., & van der Werf, J. H. J. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep42091 · Cited by 45
Multi-breed genomic prediction using Bayes R with sequence data and dropping variants with a small effect
van den Berg, I., Bowman, P. J., MacLeod, I. M., et al. (2017) · Genetics Selection Evolution · doi:10.1186/s12711-017-0347-9 · Cited by 45
Accuracy of genomic predictions for feed efficiency traits of beef cattle using 50K and imputed HD genotypes1
Lu, D., Akanno, E. C., Crowley, J. J., et al. (2016) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2015-0126 · Cited by 43
How old are quantitative trait loci and how widely do they segregate?
Kemper, K. E., Hayes, B. J., Daetwyler, H. D., & Goddard, M. E. (2015) · Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics · doi:10.1111/jbg.12152 · Cited by 42
Self-citation
Production of transgenic calves expressing an shRNA targeting myostatin
Tessanne, K., Golding, M. C., Long, C. R., Peoples, M. D., Hannon, G. J., & Westhusin, M. E. (2011) · Molecular Reproduction and Development · doi:10.1002/mrd.22007 · Cited by 42
Updating the reference population to achieve constant genomic prediction reliability across generations
Pszczoła, M., & Calus, M. P. L. (2015) · animal · doi:10.1017/s1751731115002785 · Cited by 42
An integrative systems genetics approach reveals potential causal genes and pathways related to obesity
Kogelman, L. J. A., Zhernakova, D. V., Westra, H.-J., Cirera, S., Fredholm, M., Franke, L., & Kadarmideen, H. N. (2015) · Genome Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13073-015-0229-0 · Cited by 41
Overexpression of Porcine Beta-Defensin 2 Enhances Resistance to Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae Infection in Pigs
Yang, X., Cheng, Y.-T., Tan, M., et al. (2015) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.03101-14 · Cited by 38
Accuracy of genotype imputation based on random and selected reference sets in purebred and crossbred sheep populations and its effect on accuracy of genomic prediction
Moghaddar, N., Gore, K. P., Daetwyler, H. D., et al. (2015) · Genetics Selection Evolution · doi:10.1186/s12711-015-0175-8 · Cited by 38
Transgenic engineering of male-specific muscular hypertrophy
Pirottin, D., Grobet, L., Adamantidis, A., Farnir, F., Herens, C., Schrøder, H. D., & Georges, M. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0502426102 · Cited by 37
Self-citation
The value of using DNA markers for beef bull selection in the seedstock sector1,2
Eenennaam, A. L. V., van der Werf, J. H. J., & Goddard, M. E. (2011) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2010-3223 · Cited by 37
Incorporating heifer feed efficiency in the Australian selection index using genomic selection
González-Recio, Ó., Pryce, J. E., Haile‐Mariam, M., & Hayes, B. J. (2014) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2013-7515 · Cited by 37
Self-citation
Selection in action: dissecting the molecular underpinnings of the increasing muscle mass of Belgian Blue Cattle
Druet, T., Ahariz, N., Cambisano, N., Tamma, N., Michaux, C., Coppieters, W. R., Charlier, C., & Georges, M. (2014) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-15-796 · Cited by 37
Self-citation
A Transgene, alv 6, that Expresses the Envelope of Subgroup A Avian Leukosis Virus Reduces the Rate of Congenital Transmission of a Field Strain of Avian Leukosis Virus
Crittenden, L. B., & Salter, D. W. (1992) · Poultry Science · doi:10.3382/ps.0710799 · Cited by 36
Artificial selection on introduced Asian haplotypes shaped the genetic architecture in European commercial pigs
Bosse, M., Lopes, M. S., Madsen, O., Megens, H., Crooijmans, R. P. M. A., Frantz, L., Harlizius, B., Bastiaansen, J. W. M., & Groenen, M. A. M. (2015) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2015.2019 · Cited by 36
Economic evaluation of genomic selection in small ruminants: a sheep meat breeding program
Shumbusho, F., Raoul, J., Astruc, J., et al. (2015) · animal · doi:10.1017/s1751731115002049 · Cited by 35
Genetically modified animals: Options and issues for traceability and enforcement
Lievens, A., Petrillo, M., Querci, M., & Patak, A. (2015) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2015.05.001 · Cited by 34
Contributions of FASN and SCD gene polymorphisms on fatty acid composition in muscle from Japanese Black cattle
Yokota, S., Sugita, H., Ardiyanti, A., et al. (2012) · Animal Genetics · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2052.2012.02331.x · Cited by 32
Genetic dissection of blood lipid traits by integrating genome-wide association study and gene expression profiling in a porcine model
Chen, C., Yang, B. J., Zeng, Z., Yang, H., Liu, C., Ren, J., & Huang, L. (2013) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-14-848 · Cited by 32
Generation of transgenic cattle expressing human β‐defensin 3 as an approach to reducing susceptibility to Mycobacterium bovis infection
Su, F., Wang, Y., Liu, G., Ru, K., Liu, X., Yuan, Y. J., Liu, J., Wu, Y., Quan, F., Guo, Z., et al. (2016) · FEBS Journal · doi:10.1111/febs.13641 · Cited by 32
Gastrointestinal parasitic infection, anthropometrics, nutritional status, and physical work capacity in Colombian boys
Wilson, W. M., Dufour, D. L., Staten, L. K., Barac‐Nieto, M., Reina, J., & Spurr, G. B. (1999) · American Journal of Human Biology · doi:10.1002/(sici)1520-6300(199911/12)11:6 · Cited by 31
Polymorphisms of SP110 Are Associated with both Pulmonary and Extra-Pulmonary Tuberculosis among the Vietnamese
Fox, G. J., Sy, D. N., Nhung, N. V., Yu, B., Ellis, M. K., Hùng, N. V., Cuong, N. K., Lien, L. T., Marks, G. B., Saunders, B. M., et al. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0099496 · Cited by 31
Genetic variability of transcript abundance in pig peri-mortem skeletal muscle: eQTL localized genes involved in stress response, cell death, muscle disorders and metabolism
Liaubet, L., Lobjois, V., Faraut, T., Tircazes, A., Benne, F., Iannuccelli, N., Pires, J., Glénisson, J., Robic, A., Roy, P. L., et al. (2011) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-12-548 · Cited by 31
The impact of a transgene for ovine growth hormone on the performance of two breeds of sheep
Adams, N. R., Briegel, J. R., & Ward, K. A. (2002) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/2002.8092325x · Cited by 31
Expression of bacterial cysteine biosynthesis genes in transgenic mice and sheep: toward a newin vivo amino acid biosynthesis pathway and improved wool growth
Bawden, C. S., Sivaprasad, A. V., Verma, P. J., Walker, S. K., & Rogers, G. E. (1995) · Transgenic Research · doi:10.1007/bf01969411 · Cited by 29
Recent Advance in DNA-based Traceability and Authentication of Livestock Meat PDO and PGI Products
Nicoloso, L., Crepaldi, P., Mazza, R., Ajmone‐Marsan, P., & Negrini, R. (2013) · Recent Patents on Food Nutrition & Agriculture · doi:10.2174/2212798411305010004 · Cited by 29
A golden goat genome
Worley, K. C. (2017) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3824 · Cited by 28
Allelic heterogeneity of C rooked T ail S yndrome: result of balancing selection?
Sartelet, A., Klingbeil, P., Franklin, C. K., et al. (2012) · Animal Genetics · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2052.2011.02311.x · Cited by 27
Production of transgenic pigs over-expressing the antiviral gene Mx1
Yan, Q., Yang, H., Yang, D., et al. (2014) · Cell Regeneration · doi:10.1186/2045-9769-3-11 · Cited by 27
Reduced representation bisulphite sequencing of ten bovine somatic tissues reveals DNA methylation patterns and their impacts on gene expression
Zhou, Y., Xu, L., Bickhart, D. M., Hay, E. H., Schroeder, S., Connor, E. E., Alexander, L. J., Sonstegard, T. S., Tassell, C. P. V., Chen, H., et al. (2016) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-016-3116-1 · Cited by 27
A genetical genomics approach reveals new candidates and confirms known candidate genes for drip loss in a porcine resource population
Heidt, H., Çınar, M. U., Uddin, M. J., Looft, C., Jüngst, H., Tesfaye, D., Becker, A., Zimmer, A., Ponsuksili, S., Wimmers, K., et al. (2013) · Mammalian Genome · doi:10.1007/s00335-013-9473-z · Cited by 25
Quantitative Trait Locus and Genetical Genomics Analysis Identifies Putatively Causal Genes for Fecundity and Brooding in the Chicken
Johnsson, M., Jonsson, K. B., Andersson, L., Jensen, P., & Wright, D. (2015) · G3 Genes Genomes Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.115.024299 · Cited by 24
Novel harmful recessive haplotypes for reproductive traits in pigs
Häggman, J., & Uimari, P. (2016) · Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics · doi:10.1111/jbg.12240 · Cited by 22
Right-hand-side updating for fast computing of genomic breeding values
Calus, M. P. L. (2014) · Genetics Selection Evolution · doi:10.1186/1297-9686-46-24 · Cited by 20
Application of a Bayesian non-linear model hybrid scheme to sequence data for genomic prediction and QTL mapping
Wang, T., Chen, Y. P., MacLeod, I. M., Pryce, J. E., Goddard, M. E., & Hayes, B. J. (2017) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-017-4030-x · Cited by 20
Self-citation
A de novo missense mutation of FGFR2 causes facial dysplasia syndrome in Holstein cattle
Agerholm, J. S., McEvoy, F. J., Heegaard, S., et al. (2017) · BMC Genetics · doi:10.1186/s12863-017-0541-3 · Cited by 18
Pathway deregulation and expression QTLs in response to Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae infection in swine
Reiner, G., Dreher, F., Drungowski, M., Hoeltig, D., Bertsch, N., Selke, M., Willems, H., Gerlach, G.-F., Probst, I., Tuemmler, B., et al. (2014) · Mammalian Genome · doi:10.1007/s00335-014-9536-9 · Cited by 17
QTL mapping of stress related gene expression in a cross between domesticated chickens and ancestral red junglefowl
Fallahshahroudi, A., de Kock, N., Johnsson, M., Bektic, L., Ubhayasekera, S. J. K. A., Bergquist, J., Wright, D., & Jensen, P. (2017) · Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.mce.2017.02.010 · Cited by 17
Genomic prediction and genome-wide association analysis of female longevity in a composite beef cattle breed1,2
Hay, E. H., & Roberts, A. J. (2017) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2016.1355 · Cited by 17
Total cost estimation for implementing genome-enabled selection in a multi-level swine production system
Abell, C. E., Dekkers, J. C. M., Rothschild, M. F., et al. (2014) · Genetics Selection Evolution · doi:10.1186/1297-9686-46-32 · Cited by 16
Combination of the somatic cell nuclear transfer method and RNAi technology for the production of a prion gene-knockdown calf using plasmid vectors harboring the U6 or tRNA promoter
Wongsrikeao, P., Sutou, S., 國司, 美., Dong, Y. J., Bai, X., & Otoi, T. (2011) · Prion · doi:10.4161/pri.5.1.14075 · Cited by 15
Generation of β‐lactoglobulin‐modified transgenic goats by homologous recombination
Zhu, H., Hu, L., Liu, J., Chen, H., Cui, C., Song, Y., Jin, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2016) · FEBS Journal · doi:10.1111/febs.13950 · Cited by 14
Deciphering the regulation of porcine genes influencing growth, fatness and yield-related traits through genetical genomics
Martínez-Montes, Á. M., Muiños-Bühl, A., Fernández, A., Folch, J. M., Ibáñez‐Escriche, N., & Fernández, A. I. (2016) · Mammalian Genome · doi:10.1007/s00335-016-9674-3 · Cited by 13
Genome-wide analysis reveals the extent of EAV-HP integration in domestic chicken
Wragg, D., Mason, A. S., Yu, L., Kuo, R. I., Lawal, R. A., Desta, T. T., Mwacharo, J. M., Cho, C.-Y., Kemp, S., Burt, D. W., et al. (2015) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-015-1954-x · Cited by 12
A Triad of Highly Divergent Polymeric Immunoglobulin Receptor (PIGR) Haplotypes with Major Effect on IgA Concentration in Bovine Milk
Berry, S., Coppieters, W. R., Davis, S. R., et al. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0057219 · Cited by 12
Adrenal cortex expression quantitative trait loci in a German Holstein × Charolais cross
Brand, B., Scheinhardt, M. O., Friedrich, J., Zimmer, D., Reinsch, N., Ponsuksili, S., Schwerin, M., & Ziegler, A. (2016) · BMC Genetics · doi:10.1186/s12863-016-0442-x · Cited by 11
Putting sleeping sickness to bed
Willyard, C. (2011) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm0111-14 · Cited by 10
Embryo transfer tests for bovine syndactyly
Baker, R. D., Snider, G. W., Leipold, H. E., et al. (1980) · Theriogenology · doi:10.1016/0093-691x(80)90017-5 · Cited by 9
Identifying cows with subclinical mastitis by bulk single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping of tank milk
Blard, G., Zhang, Z., Coppieters, W. R., & Georges, M. (2012) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2011-5178 · Cited by 7
Self-citation
Complex trait subtypes identification using transcriptome profiling reveals an interaction between two QTL affecting adiposity in chicken
Blum, Y., Mignon, G. L., Causeur, D., Filangi, O., Désert, C., Demeure, O., Roy, P. L., & Lagarrigue, S. (2011) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-12-567 · Cited by 4
Assessment of the genetic and economic impact of performance recording and genotyping in Australian commercial sheep operations
Santos, B., Amer, P. R., Granleese, T., et al. (2018) · Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics · doi:10.1111/jbg.12328 · Cited by 4
Cis- and Trans-Effects Underlying Polar Overdominance at the Callipyge Locus
Georges, M., Takeda, H., Cheng, H., Xu, X., Shay, T. L., Cockett, N., & Charlier, C. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-8078-5_4 · Cited by 3
Self-citation
Abstracts from the UC Davis Transgenic Animal Research Conference VIII
Bentzon, J. F., Sørensen, C. B., Al-Mashhadi, R. H. I. 0.-0.-9.-8., et al. (2011) · Transgenic Research · doi:10.1007/s11248-011-9570-2 · Cited by 2

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

Fortes, M. R. S. et al. Evidence for pleiotropism and recent selection in the PLAG1 region in Australian Beef cattle. Anim. Genet. 44, 6636–6647 (2013).
Wang, M., Pryce, J. E., Savin, K. & Hayes, B. J. Prediction of residual feed intake from genome & metagenome profiles in first lactation Holstein-Friesian dairy cattle. Proc. Assoc. Adv. Breed. Genet. 21, 89–92 (2015).

Sorted by citations

Genetic mechanisms underlying feed utilization and implementation of genomic selection for improved feed efficiency in dairy cattle
Brito, L. F., Oliveira, H. R., Houlahan, K., Fonseca, P. A. S., Lam, S., Butty, A. M., Seymour, D. J., Vargas, G., Chud, T. C. S., Silva, F. F., et al. (2020) · Canadian Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.1139/cjas-2019-0193 · Cited by 53
Selection Signatures in Tropical Cattle Are Enriched for Promoter and Coding Regions and Reveal Missense Mutations in the Damage Response Gene HELB
Naval-Sánchez, M., Porto-Neto, L. R., Cardoso, D. F., Hayes, B. J., Daetwyler, H. D., Kijas, J., & Reverter, A. (2020) · Genetics Selection Evolution · doi:10.1186/s12711-020-00546-6 · Cited by 43
Self-citation
Candidate genes associated with heat stress and breeding strategies to relieve its effects in dairy cattle: a deeper insight into the genetic architecture and immune response to heat stress
Worku, D., Hussen, J., De Matteis, G., Schusser, B., & Alhussien, M. N. (2023) · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · doi:10.3389/fvets.2023.1151241 · Cited by 43
“As global demand for food products of animal origin is expected to rise by 70% by 2050, this demand must be met in a manner that has a negligible impact on the environment by improving the genetic quality of livestock using cutting-edge technologies and techniques (1).”
Background
Chromosomal-level reference genome assembly of muskox (Ovibos moschatus) from Banks Island in the Canadian Arctic, a resource for conservation genomics
Lok, S., Lau, T. N. H., Trost, B., Tong, A. H. Y., Paton, T., Wintle, R. F., Engstrom, M. D., Gunn, A., & Scherer, S. W. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-67270-9 · Cited by 4
“…scheme 152–154 for the muskox, we provide exon-level annotation of genes that have contributed to livestock domestication (Supplementary Table S8) and desirable commercial traits such as meat and dairy production, wool quality, prolificity, and heat tolerance 155–159 (Supplementary Table S9).”
Background

See all 384

Authors: Georges, M., Charlier, C., & Hayes, B.
Affiliations: University of Liège (BE)
The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author: Georges, Michel
ORCID: Georges, Michel
Charlier, Carole
Hayes, Ben
Venue: Nature Reviews Genetics
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published: 2018-12-04
Volume: 20
Issue: 3
Pages: 135-156
ISSN: 1471-0056 (ISSN-L)
1471-0064
DOI: 10.1038/s41576-018-0082-2
OpenAlex: W2902798405
Cited by: 384
References: 282
Citations by year: 2026: 36 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 17
FWCI: 4.88
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: green
orbi.uliege.be
Licence: other-oa
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations: Nature Reviews Genetics (publishedVersion)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
ORBi (University of Liège) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics: Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Animal Genetics and Reproduction
Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Keywords: genomic selection, livestock improvement, animal breeding, genetic advance, epigenomics, transcriptomics, microbiome, food security, genomic technologies
MeSH terms: Animals, Animal Husbandry, Genome, Livestock

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Harnessing genomic information for livestock improvement

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks