The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The role of IgG Fc receptors in antibody-dependent enhancement
Open accessAbstract
Antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) is a mechanism by which the pathogenesis of certain viral infections is enhanced in the presence of sub-neutralizing or cross-reactive non-neutralizing antiviral antibodies. In vitro modelling of ADE has attributed enhanced pathogenesis to Fcγ receptor (FcγR)-mediated viral entry, rather than canonical viral receptor-mediated entry. However, the putative FcγR-dependent mechanisms of ADE overlap with the role of these receptors in mediating antiviral protection in various viral infections, necessitating a detailed understanding of how this diverse family of receptors functions in protection and pathogenesis. Here, we discuss the diversity of immune responses mediated upon FcγR engagement and review the available experimental evidence supporting the role of FcγRs in antiviral protection and pathogenesis through ADE. We explore FcγR engagement in the context of a range of different viral infections, including dengue virus and SARS-CoV, and consider ADE in the context of the ongoing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) has been described as a mechanism that contributes to the pathogenesis of dengue virus infection. Limited evidence also suggests that it can also occur in other viral infections. Here, the authors explore the history of the ADE phenomenon, discuss the diversity of Fc effector functions and consider its potential relevance in the context of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Innate or adaptive immunity? The example of natural killer cells
Vivier, E., Raulet, D. H., Moretta, A., Caligiuri, M. A., Zitvogel, L., Lanier, L. L., Yokoyama, W. M., & Ugolini, S. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1198687 · Cited by 2,824
KIM, H. W., CANCHOLA, J. G., BRANDT, C. D., PYLES, G., CHANOCK, R. M., JENSEN, K., & PARROTT, R. H. (1969) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a120955 · Cited by 1,981
Development of an inactivated vaccine candidate for SARS-CoV-2
Gao, Q., Bao, L., Mao, H., Wang, L., Xu, K., Yang, M., Li, Y., Zhu, L., Wang, N., Lv, Z., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abc1932 · Cited by 1,434
Corti, D., Voss, J., Gamblin, S. J., Codoni, G., Macagno, A., Jarrossay, D., Vachieri, S. G., Pinna, D., Minola, A., Vanzetta, F., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1205669 · Cited by 1,203
DiLillo, D. J., Tan, G. S., Palese, P., & Ravetch, J. V. (2014) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.3443 · Cited by 749
Self-citationLocalized Biphasic Changes in Phosphatidylinositol-4,5-Bisphosphate at Sites of Phagocytosis
Botelho, R. J., Teruel, M., Dierckman, R., Anderson, R., Wells, A., York, J. D., Meyer, T., & Grinstein, S. (2000) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.151.7.1353 · Cited by 539
Cdc42, Rac1, and Rac2 Display Distinct Patterns of Activation during Phagocytosis
Hoppe, A. D., & Swanson, J. A. (2004) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.e03-11-0847 · Cited by 365
Cited by
Meylan, M., Petitprez, F., Becht, E., Bougoüin, A., Pupier, G., Calvez, A., Giglioli, I., Verkarre, V., Lacroix, G., Verneau, J., et al. (2022) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2022.02.001 · Cited by 831
Schäfer, A., Muecksch, F., Lorenzi, J. C. C., Leist, S. R., Cipolla, M., Bournazos, S., Schmidt, F., Maison, R. M., Gazumyan, A., Martinez, D. R., et al. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20201993 · Cited by 305
Self-citationProspects for a safe COVID-19 vaccine
Haynes, B. F., Corey, L., Fernandes, P., Gilbert, P. B., Hotez, P. J., Rao, S., Santos, M. R., Schuitemaker, H., Watson, M., & Arvin, A. (2020) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.abe0948 · Cited by 261
Leukocyte trafficking to the lungs and beyond: lessons from influenza for COVID-19
Alon, R., Sportiello, M., Kozlovski, S., Kumar, A., Reilly, E. C., Zarbock, A., Garbi, N., & Topham, D. J. (2021) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41577-020-00470-2 · Cited by 197
The Dawn of a New Era: Targeting the “Undruggables” with Antibody-Based Therapeutics
Qian, L., Lin, X., Gao, X., Khan, R. U., Liao, J.-Y., Du, S., Ge, J., Zeng, S., & Yao, S. Q. (2023) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00915 · Cited by 155
Metadata
- Authors
- Bournazos, S., Gupta, A., & Ravetch, J. V.
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Immunology
- Published
- 2020-08-11
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 633-643
- ISSN
- 1474-1733 (ISSN-L)
- 1474-1741
- OpenAlex
- W3048558989
- Cited by
- 617
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 15.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
