Cited by 15Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsHealth disparities and outcomes

Environmental–genetic interactions in ageing and dementia across Latin America

Open access
Ibanez, Agustin, Slachevsky, Andrea·2024·Nature Reviews Neurology

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41582-024-00998-0

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gene-environment interactions are crucial to developing therapies and interventions and are extensively researched in the global south.

    “Gene–environment interactions, which are crucial to the development of therapies and interventions, are the subject of extensive research in the global south48.”

    From Resilience and brain health in global populations (2025) · cites this paper as [48]

    The Abstract says studying environmental–genetic interactions in Latin America is important for developing better dementia prevention and treatment strategies. It does not establish that such interactions are already extensively researched across the global south; instead, it calls for further research in Latin America. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Frisoni GB et al. The probabilistic model of Alzheimer disease: the amyloid hypothesis revised. Nat Rev Neurosci 23, 53-66 (2022). 10.1038/s41583-021-00533-w [PubMed: 34815562] · DOI · Paper page
  2. De Felice FG, Gonçalves RA & Ferreira ST Impaired insulin signalling and allostatic load in Alzheimer disease. Nat Rev Neurosci 23, 215-230 (2022). 10.1038/s41583-022-00558-9 [PubMed: 35228741] · DOI
  3. Migeot JA, Duran-Aniotz CA, Signorelli CM, Piguet O & Ibanez A A predictive coding framework of allostatic-interoceptive overload in frontotemporal dementia. Trends Neurosci 45, 838-853 (2022). 10.1016/j.tins.2022.08.005 [PubMed: 36057473] · DOI · Paper page
  4. Parra MA et al. Dementia in Latin America: Paving the way toward a regional action plan. Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association 17, 295-313 (2021). 10.1002/ alz.12202 · DOI
  5. Santamaria-Garcia H et al. Factors associated with healthy aging in Latin American populations. Nature medicine 29, 2248-2258 (2023). 10.1038/s41591-023-02495-1 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Llibre-Guerra JJ et al. Social determinants of health but not global genetic ancestry predict dementia prevalence in Latin America. Alzheimer's & dementia: the journal of the Alzheimer's Association
  7. Ibanez A, Kringelbach ML & Deco G A synergetic turn in cognitive neuroscience of brain diseases. Trends in cognitive sciences (2024). 10.1016/j.tics.2023.12.006 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Ibanez A et al. Healthy aging metanalyses and scoping review of risk factors across Latin America reveal large heterogeneity and weak predictive models. Nature Aging (2024). 10.1038/ s43587-024-00648-6
  9. Ibanez A, Legaz A & Ruiz-Adame M Addressing the gaps between socioeconomic disparities and biological models of dementia. Brain : a journal of neurology (2023). 10.1093/brain/awad236 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ibanez, A., & Slachevsky, A.
Affiliations
Clínica Alemana (CL)
Corresponding author
Slachevsky, Andrea
Venue
Nature Reviews Neurology
Published
2024-07-12
Volume
20
Issue
10
Pages
571-572
ISSN
  • 1759-4758 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-4766
OpenAlex
W4400585088
Cited by
15
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 1
FWCI
4.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Universidad de Chile (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Alzheimer's Association (20-725707, SG-20- 725707)
  • Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo (ANID/PIA/ANILLOS ACT210096, ACT210096, FONDAP-15150012, PIA/ANILLOS ACT210096, 15150012, 1210195, 1210622, 1210176, 1220995)
  • National Institutes of Health (15150012)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG012101, R01AG057234, P01AG019724, R01AG075775)
  • Fogarty International Center
  • Fondo de Financiamiento de Centros de Investigación en Áreas Prioritarias (15150012)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
dementia, aging, social determinants of health, Latin America, dementia prevalence, lifestyle intervention, health care access
MeSH terms
Aging, Dementia, Humans, Latin America, Gene-Environment Interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review