Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 740

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Controlling an organic synthesis robot with machine learning to search for new reactivity

Open access
Granda, Jarosław M., Donina, Liva, Dragone, Vincenza, Long, De-Liang, Cronin, Leroy·2018·Nature

Abstract

The discovery of chemical reactions is an inherently unpredictable and time-consuming process1. An attractive alternative is to predict reactivity, although relevant approaches, such as computer-aided reaction design, are still in their infancy2. Reaction prediction based on high-level quantum chemical methods is complex3, even for simple molecules. Although machine learning is powerful for data analysis4,5, its applications in chemistry are still being developed6. Inspired by strategies based on chemists’ intuition7, we propose that a reaction system controlled by a machine learning algorithm may be able to explore the space of chemical reactions quickly, especially if trained by an expert8. Here we present an organic synthesis robot that can perform chemical reactions and analysis faster than they can be performed manually, as well as predict the reactivity of possible reagent combinations after conducting a small number of experiments, thus effectively navigating chemical reaction space. By using machine learning for decision making, enabled by binary encoding of the chemical inputs, the reactions can be assessed in real time using nuclear magnetic resonance and infrared spectroscopy. The machine learning system was able to predict the reactivity of about 1,000 reaction combinations with accuracy greater than 80 per cent after considering the outcomes of slightly over 10 per cent of the dataset. This approach was also used to calculate the reactivity of published datasets. Further, by using real-time data from our robot, these predictions were followed up manually by a chemist, leading to the discovery of four reactions. A robot instructed by a machine learning algorithm and coupled with real-time spectroscopic systems provides fast and accurate reaction outcome predictions and reactivity assessments, leading to the discovery of new reactions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-018-0307-8

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Collins, K. D., Gensch, T. & Glorius, F. Contemporary screening approaches to reaction discovery and development. Nat. Chem. 6, 859–871 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  2. Warr, W. A. A short review of chemical reaction database systems, computer-aided synthesis design, reaction prediction and synthetic feasibility. Mol. Inform. 33, 469–476 (2014). · DOI
  3. Plata, R. E. & Singleton, D. A. A case study of the mechanism of alcohol-mediated Morita Baylis-Hillman reactions. The importance of experimental observations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 3811–3826 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  4. Graulich, N., Hopf, H. & Schreiner, P. R. Heuristic thinking makes a chemist smart. Chem. Soc. Rev. 39, 1503–1512 (2010). · doi:10.1039/b911536f
  5. Gil, Y., Greaves, M., Hendler, J. & Hirsh, H. Amplify scientific discovery with artificial intelligence. Science 346, 171–172 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  6. Trobe, M. & Burke, M. D. The molecular industrial revolution: automated synthesis of small molecules. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 4192–4214 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  7. Ley, S. V., Fitzpatrick, D. E., Ingham, R. J. & Myers, R. M. Organic synthesis: march of the machines. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 3449–3464 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  8. Sans, V. & Cronin, L. Towards dial-a-molecule by integrating continuous flow, analytics and self-optimisation. Chem. Soc. Rev. 45, 2032–2043 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
  9. Houben, C. & Lapkin, A. A. Automatic discovery and optimization of chemical processes. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 9, 1–7 (2015). · DOI
  10. Sans, V., Porwol, L., Dragone, V. & Cronin, L. A self optimizing synthetic organic reactor system using real-time in-line NMR spectroscopy. Chem. Sci. 6, 1258–1264 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  11. Dragone, V., Sans, V., Henson, A. B., Granda, J. M. & Cronin, L. An autonomous organic reaction search engine for chemical reactivity. Nat. Commun. 8, 15733 (2017). · DOI
  12. Bengio, Y., Courville, A. & Vincent, P. Representation learning: a review and new perspectives. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. 35, 1798–1828 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  13. Coomans, D., Jonckheer, M., Massart, D. L., Broeckaert, I. & Blockx, P. Application of linear discriminant analysis in the diagnosis of thyroid diseases. Anal. Chim. Acta 103, 409–415 (1978). · DOI
  14. Perera, D. et al. A platform for automated nanomole-scale reaction screening and micromole-scale synthesis in flow. Science 359, 429–434 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  15. Nielsen, M. K., Ahneman, D. T., Riera, O. & Doyle, A. G. Deoxyfluorination with sulfonyl fluorides: navigating reaction space with machine learning. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 5004–5008 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  16. Bajusz, D., Racz, A. & Heberger, K. Why is Tanimoto index an appropriate choice for fingerprint-based similarity calculations? J. Cheminform. 7, 20 (2015).
  17. Palazzolo, A. M. E., Simons, C. L. W. & Burke, M. D. The natural productome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 114, 5564–5566 (2017). · DOI
  18. Pedregosa, F. et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011).

Cited by

See all 740

Metadata

Authors
Granda, J. M., Donina, L., Dragone, V., Long, D.-L., & Cronin, L.
Venue
Nature
Published
2018-07
Volume
559
Issue
7714
Pages
377-381
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2830440988
Cited by
740
References
6
FWCI
26.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Controlling an organic synthesis robot with machine learning to search for new reactivity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41586-018-0307-8
The paper
Granda, J. M., Donina, L., Dragone, V., Long, D.-L., & Cronin, L. (2018). Controlling an organic synthesis robot with machine learning to search for new reactivity. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0307-8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.