The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Controlling an organic synthesis robot with machine learning to search for new reactivity
Open accessAbstract
The discovery of chemical reactions is an inherently unpredictable and time-consuming process1. An attractive alternative is to predict reactivity, although relevant approaches, such as computer-aided reaction design, are still in their infancy2. Reaction prediction based on high-level quantum chemical methods is complex3, even for simple molecules. Although machine learning is powerful for data analysis4,5, its applications in chemistry are still being developed6. Inspired by strategies based on chemists’ intuition7, we propose that a reaction system controlled by a machine learning algorithm may be able to explore the space of chemical reactions quickly, especially if trained by an expert8. Here we present an organic synthesis robot that can perform chemical reactions and analysis faster than they can be performed manually, as well as predict the reactivity of possible reagent combinations after conducting a small number of experiments, thus effectively navigating chemical reaction space. By using machine learning for decision making, enabled by binary encoding of the chemical inputs, the reactions can be assessed in real time using nuclear magnetic resonance and infrared spectroscopy. The machine learning system was able to predict the reactivity of about 1,000 reaction combinations with accuracy greater than 80 per cent after considering the outcomes of slightly over 10 per cent of the dataset. This approach was also used to calculate the reactivity of published datasets. Further, by using real-time data from our robot, these predictions were followed up manually by a chemist, leading to the discovery of four reactions. A robot instructed by a machine learning algorithm and coupled with real-time spectroscopic systems provides fast and accurate reaction outcome predictions and reactivity assessments, leading to the discovery of new reactions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00994018 · Cited by 59,421
Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects
Jordan, M. I., & Mitchell, T. M. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa8415 · Cited by 9,955
Automatic Chemical Design Using a Data-Driven Continuous Representation of Molecules
Gómez-Bombarelli, R., Wei, J. N., Duvenaud, D., Hernández-Lobato, J. M., Sánchez-Lengeling, B., Sheberla, D., Aguilera-Iparraguirre, J., Hirzel, T. D., Adams, R. P., & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2018) · ACS Central Science · doi:10.1021/acscentsci.7b00572 · Cited by 3,106
Machine-learning-assisted materials discovery using failed experiments
Raccuglia, P., Elbert, K. C., Adler, P. D. F., Falk, C., Wenny, M. B., Mollo, A., Zeller, M., Friedler, S. A., Schrier, J., & Norquist, A. J. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature17439 · Cited by 1,727
Predicting reaction performance in C–N cross-coupling using machine learning
Ahneman, D. T., Estrada, J. G., Lin, S., Dreher, S. D., & Doyle, A. G. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aar5169 · Cited by 1,058
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- Collins, K. D., Gensch, T. & Glorius, F. Contemporary screening approaches to reaction discovery and development. Nat. Chem. 6, 859–871 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
- Warr, W. A. A short review of chemical reaction database systems, computer-aided synthesis design, reaction prediction and synthetic feasibility. Mol. Inform. 33, 469–476 (2014). · DOI
- Plata, R. E. & Singleton, D. A. A case study of the mechanism of alcohol-mediated Morita Baylis-Hillman reactions. The importance of experimental observations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 3811–3826 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
- Graulich, N., Hopf, H. & Schreiner, P. R. Heuristic thinking makes a chemist smart. Chem. Soc. Rev. 39, 1503–1512 (2010). · doi:10.1039/b911536f
- Gil, Y., Greaves, M., Hendler, J. & Hirsh, H. Amplify scientific discovery with artificial intelligence. Science 346, 171–172 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
- Trobe, M. & Burke, M. D. The molecular industrial revolution: automated synthesis of small molecules. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 4192–4214 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
- Ley, S. V., Fitzpatrick, D. E., Ingham, R. J. & Myers, R. M. Organic synthesis: march of the machines. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 3449–3464 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
- Sans, V. & Cronin, L. Towards dial-a-molecule by integrating continuous flow, analytics and self-optimisation. Chem. Soc. Rev. 45, 2032–2043 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
- Houben, C. & Lapkin, A. A. Automatic discovery and optimization of chemical processes. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 9, 1–7 (2015). · DOI
- Sans, V., Porwol, L., Dragone, V. & Cronin, L. A self optimizing synthetic organic reactor system using real-time in-line NMR spectroscopy. Chem. Sci. 6, 1258–1264 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
- Dragone, V., Sans, V., Henson, A. B., Granda, J. M. & Cronin, L. An autonomous organic reaction search engine for chemical reactivity. Nat. Commun. 8, 15733 (2017). · DOI
- Bengio, Y., Courville, A. & Vincent, P. Representation learning: a review and new perspectives. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. 35, 1798–1828 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
- Coomans, D., Jonckheer, M., Massart, D. L., Broeckaert, I. & Blockx, P. Application of linear discriminant analysis in the diagnosis of thyroid diseases. Anal. Chim. Acta 103, 409–415 (1978). · DOI
- Perera, D. et al. A platform for automated nanomole-scale reaction screening and micromole-scale synthesis in flow. Science 359, 429–434 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
- Nielsen, M. K., Ahneman, D. T., Riera, O. & Doyle, A. G. Deoxyfluorination with sulfonyl fluorides: navigating reaction space with machine learning. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 5004–5008 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
- Bajusz, D., Racz, A. & Heberger, K. Why is Tanimoto index an appropriate choice for fingerprint-based similarity calculations? J. Cheminform. 7, 20 (2015).
- Palazzolo, A. M. E., Simons, C. L. W. & Burke, M. D. The natural productome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 114, 5564–5566 (2017). · DOI
- Pedregosa, F. et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011).
Cited by
Burger, B., Maffettone, P. M., Gusev, V. V., Aitchison, C. M., Bai, Y., Wang, X., Li, X., Alston, B. M., Li, B., Clowes, R., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2442-2 · Cited by 1,516
Closed-loop optimization of fast-charging protocols for batteries with machine learning
Attia, P. M., Grover, A., Jin, N., Severson, K. A., Markov, T. M., Liao, Y.-H., Chen, M. H., Cheong, B., Perkins, N., Yang, Z., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-1994-5 · Cited by 1,180
Autonomous chemical research with large language models
Boiko, D. A., MacKnight, R., Kline, B., & Gomes, G. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06792-0 · Cited by 1,050
Self-Driving Laboratories for Chemistry and Materials Science
Tom, G., Schmid, S. P., Baird, S. G., Cao, Y., Darvish, K., Hao, H., Lo, S., Pablo-García, S., Rajaonson, E. M., Skreta, M., et al. (2024) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00055 · Cited by 707
The importance of synthetic chemistry in the pharmaceutical industry
Campos, K. R., Coleman, P. J., Alvarez, J. C., Dreher, S. D., Garbaccio, R. M., Terrett, N. K., Tillyer, R. D., Truppo, M. D., & Parmee, E. R. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aat0805 · Cited by 668
Metadata
- Authors
- Granda, J. M., Donina, L., Dragone, V., Long, D.-L., & Cronin, L.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2018-07
- Volume
- 559
- Issue
- 7714
- Pages
- 377-381
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2830440988
- Cited by
- 740
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 26.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- Open access
- green
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Controlling an organic synthesis robot with machine learning to search for new reactivity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41586-018-0307-8
- The paper
- Granda, J. M., Donina, L., Dragone, V., Long, D.-L., & Cronin, L. (2018). Controlling an organic synthesis robot with machine learning to search for new reactivity. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0307-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.