The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Heterochromatin drives compartmentalization of inverted and conventional nuclei
Open accessAbstract
The nucleus of mammalian cells displays a distinct spatial segregation of active euchromatic and inactive heterochromatic regions of the genome 1,2. In conventional nuclei, microscopy shows that euchromatin is localized in the nuclear interior and heterochromatin at the nuclear periphery 1,2. Genome-wide chromosome conformation capture (Hi-C) analyses show this segregation as a plaid pattern of contact enrichment within euchromatin and heterochromatin compartments 3, and depletion between them. Many mechanisms for the formation of compartments have been proposed, such as attraction of heterochromatin to the nuclear lamina 2,4, preferential attraction of similar chromatin to each other 1,4-12, higher levels of chromatin mobility in active chromatin 13-15 and transcription-related clustering of euchromatin 16,17. However, these hypotheses have remained inconclusive, owing to the difficulty of disentangling intra-chromatin and chromatin-lamina interactions in conventional nuclei 18. The marked reorganization of interphase chromosomes in the inverted nuclei of rods in nocturnal mammals 19,20 provides an opportunity to elucidate the mechanisms that underlie spatial compartmentalization. Here we combine Hi-C analysis of inverted rod nuclei with microscopy and polymer simulations. We find that attractions between heterochromatic regions are crucial for establishing both compartmentalization and the concentric shells of pericentromeric heterochromatin, facultative heterochromatin and euchromatin in the inverted nucleus. When interactions between heterochromatin and the lamina are added, the same model recreates the conventional nuclear organization. In addition, our models allow us to rule out mechanisms of compartmentalization that involve strong euchromatin interactions. Together, our experiments and modelling suggest that attractions between heterochromatic regions are essential for the phase separation of the active and inactive genome in inverted and conventional nuclei, whereas interactions of the chromatin with the lamina are necessary to build the conventional architecture from these segregated phases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Despite the disruption of Lamin B1, the A/B compartmentalization of the genome remained relatively unaffected which is in concordance with the observations in retinal rod neurons, where despite the loss of heterochromatin interactions with the nuclear lamina, phase separation drives the formation of A/B compartments135.”
From Neuronal DNA double-strand breaks lead to genome structural variations and 3D genome disruption in neurodegeneration (2023) · cites this paper as [135]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Heinz, S., Benner, C., Spann, N., Bertolino, E., Lin, Y. C., Laslo, P., Cheng, J. X., Murre, C., Singh, H., & Glass, C. K. (2010) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2010.05.004 · Cited by 13,382
A 3D Map of the Human Genome at Kilobase Resolution Reveals Principles of Chromatin Looping
Rao, S. S. P., Huntley, M. H., Durand, N. C., Stamenova, E. K., Bochkov, I. D., Robinson, J. T., Sanborn, A. L., Machol, I., Omer, A. D., Lander, E. S., et al. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.021 · Cited by 9,212
Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions
Dixon, J. R., Selvaraj, S., Yue, F., Kim, A., Li, Y., Shen, Y., Hu, M., Liu, J. S., & Ren, B. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11082 · Cited by 6,829
Rubinstein, M., & Colby, R. H. (2003) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198520597.001.0001 · Cited by 5,686
FIMO: scanning for occurrences of a given motif
Grant, C. E., Bailey, T. L., & Noble, W. S. (2011) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr064 · Cited by 4,247
OpenMM 7: Rapid development of high performance algorithms for molecular dynamics
Eastman, P., Swails, J., Chodera, J. D., McGibbon, R. T., Zhao, Y., Beauchamp, K. A., Wang, L.-P., Simmonett, A. C., Harrigan, M. P., Stern, C. D., et al. (2017) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005659 · Cited by 2,748
HiGlass: web-based visual exploration and analysis of genome interaction maps
Kerpedjiev, P., Abdennur, N. A., Lekschas, F., McCallum, C., Dinkla, K., Strobelt, H., Luber, J. M., Ouellette, S., Azhir, A., Kumar, N., et al. (2018) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-018-1486-1 · Cited by 2,430
Phase separation drives heterochromatin domain formation
Strom, A. R., Emelyanov, A. V., Mir, M., Fyodorov, D. V., Darzacq, X., & Karpen, G. H. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature22989 · Cited by 1,789
Cooler: scalable storage for Hi-C data and other genomically labeled arrays
Abdennur, N., & Mirny, L. A. (2020) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btz540 · Cited by 1,759
Liquid droplet formation by HP1α suggests a role for phase separation in heterochromatin
Larson, A. G., Elnatan, D., Keenen, M. M., Trnka, M. J., Johnston, J. B., Burlingame, A. L., Agard, D. A., Redding, S., & Narlikar, G. J. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature22822 · Cited by 1,717
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 674
Three-dimensional genome rewiring during the development of antibody-secreting cells
Chan, W. F., Johanson, T. M., & Allan, R. S. (2020) · Biochemical Society Transactions · doi:10.1042/bst20191104 · Cited by 1
Genome architecture and expression 2019–2020: the transition phase
Pederson, T. (2020) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2020.09.003 · Cited by 2
Chromosomal condensation leads to a preference for peripheral heterochromatinPreprint
MacPherson, Q., & Spakowitz, A. J. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/714360 · Cited by 1
On the relation of phase separation and Hi-C maps to epigeneticsPreprint
Singh, P. B., & Newman, A. G. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/814566 · Cited by 1
Yamamoto, T., Sakaue, T., & Schießel, H. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.11.30.405134 · Cited by 1
Clustered transposon insertion via formation of chromatin loopsPreprint
Prizak, R., & Hilbert, L. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.02.16.480760 · Cited by 1
“Also, the non-coding repeats 285 LINE-1 (clustered within heterochromatin regions) and Alu 286 (clustered within euchromatin regions) exhibit homotypic in- 287 teractions, leading to formation of the two spatially separated 288 genomic A and B compartments (24, 43).”
BackgroundUnique territorial and compartmental organization of chromosomes in the holocentric silkmothPreprint
Gil, J., Navarrete, E., Rosin, L. F., Chowdhury, N., Abraham, S., Cornilleau, G., Lei, E. P., Mozziconacci, J., Mirny, L., Muller, H., et al. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-4732646/v1 · Cited by 2
“This suggests that A-A attractions play a key role in the compartmentalization of B. mori chromatin, which is in contrast to studied mammalian genomes, where compartmentalization is driven largely by B-B interactions 62 .”
BackgroundLarge-scale manipulation of radial positioning does not affect most aspects of genome organizationPreprint
Guetta, M., Kariti, H., Sherman, L., Israitel, L., Tel-Paz, M., Avidan, N., Shemer, R., & Kaplan, N. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.08.22.609170 · Cited by 1
“A study by Falk et al 47 . showed that although the nuclear architecture of mouse rod photoreceptors and of lamin B receptor null thymocytes is inverted, such that euchromatin is located at the nuclear periphery and heterochromatin occupies the center of the nucleus, changes in the Hi-C interaction…”
BackgroundVinayak, V., Basir, R., Golloshi, R., Toth, J. M., Sant'Anna, L. E., Lakadamyali, M., McCord, R. P., & Shenoy, V. B. (2024) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2024.10.08.617296 · Cited by 1
“For 𝜖 𝐸𝐸 and 𝜖 𝐻𝐻 , we constrain our search such that 𝜖 𝐸𝐸 𝜖 𝐻𝐻 , which results in a higher packing density for heterochromatin or repressed chromatin regions[21, 63, 64].”
Gholamalamdari, O., van Schaik, T., Wang, Y., Kumar, P., Zhang, L., Zhang, Y., Gonzalez, G. A. H., Vouzas, A. E., Zhao, P. A., Gilbert, D. M., et al. (2025) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.99116.2 · Cited by 1
Gholamalamdari, O., van Schaik, T., Wang, Y., Kumar, P., Zhang, L., Zhang, Y., Gonzalez, G. A. H., Vouzas, A. E., Zhao, P. A., Gilbert, D. M., et al. (2025) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.99116.3 · Cited by 1
Nuclear mechanostability emerges from satellite DNA condensation into chromocentersPreprint
Brändle, F., Frühbauer, B., Ceppi, I., de Monchaux-Irons, L., van Heesch, T., Sommer, A., Rivetti, F., Lee, S. S., Morelli, C., Arosio, P., et al. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.08.07.669059 · Cited by 1
“In this model, the chromocenter surface tension, potentially regulated by viscoelasticity, may be critically important to allow the surrounding chromatin in ‘pushing back’ against mechanical compression.”
Engineered histones reshape chromatin in human cellsPreprint
Jena, S. G., Nagaraja, S., Earl, A., Driller‐Colangelo, A. R., Quezada, M. A., Oreskovic, E., Horlbeck, M. A., Zhang, R., Gomarga, W., & Buenrostro, J. D. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.09.10.674980 · Cited by 2
“Heterochromatin and euchromatin are characteristically compartmentalized into different parts of the nucleus through self-association of heterochromatin and exclusion of euchromatin [29].”
Single-molecule chromosome tracing reveals a diversity of megabase heterochromatin domainsPreprint
Pulido, D. C., You, J. E., Xu, F., Verheijen, T., Sawh, A. N., Kos, P. I., Giorgetti, L., Molina, N., Brückner, D. B., & Mango, S. E. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.09.03.673923 · Cited by 1
“At the megabase scale, Hi-C studies revealed topologically associating domains (TADs), while specific histone modifications contribute to the segregation of chromatin into euchromatic and heterochromatic compartments 1–4 .”
Uyan, Ö., Sambare, S., Oomen, M. E., Wightman, N., Schooley, A., Klim, J. R., Belaghzal, H., Aydemir, Ö., Oksuz, B. A., USLU, Z. S. A., et al. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.09.22.677835 · Cited by 1
Dong, Y. (2020) · Louisiana State University · doi:10.31390/gradschool_dissertations.5233
“By comparing inverted nuclei with conventional nuclei, it also shows the interaction between chromatin and lamina can help to establish conventional nuclear architecture by forming segregated phases [24].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialEditorial overview: Genome architecture and expression
Bystricky, K., & Merkenschlager, M. (2020) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2020.06.001
Mechanistic Modelling of Chromatin Folding to Understand FunctionPreprint
Brackley, C. A., Marenduzzo, D., & Gilbert, N. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.06413
Modular effects of gene promoters and chromatin environments on noise in gene expressionPreprint
Zhao, S., Pincus, Z., & Cohen, B. A. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.04.29.441875
“This result agrees with the recent study showing that the inactivation of chromatin is a constant, and active process (Falk et al., 2019).”
ResultEvolutionary conservation and cell type specificity of nuclear compartments in the brain
Aboelnour, E., & Bonev, B. (2021) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2021.10.007
Cole, M., & Schaafsma, E. (2020) · Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature · doi:10.3410/f.738541400.793579087
Nucleus | Nuclear Compartmentalization
Smith, K. P., Lawrence, J. B., & Verma, V. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819460-7.00197-3
A New Perspective of Genome Regulation from the Physics of Life Standpoint
Erenpreisa, J. A., & Giuliani, A. (2022) · Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of Sciences Section B Natural Exact and Applied Sciences · doi:10.2478/prolas-2022-0026 · Cited by 1
Meng, L., & Luo, Q. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.07.08.499343
“Previous studies show that self-interaction between heterochromatic regions is the mechanism responsible for compartmentalization(25).”
BackgroundKilobase-Level Nuclear Compartments Separate Active Regulatory Elements From Adjacent RegionsPreprint
Gu, H., Harris, H. L., Olshansky, M., Wang, A., Farabella, I., Eliaz, Y., Krishna, A., Kalluchi, A., Jacobs, M., Cauer, A. G., et al. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4138705
Predicting scale-dependent chromatin polymer properties from systematic coarse-grainingPreprint
Kadam, S., Kumari, K., Vinoth, M., Dutta, S., Mitra, M. K., & Padinhateeri, R. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.08.22.504791
Nonequilibrium Physics of Molecules and Cells
Blagoev, K. B. (2022) · Graduate texts in physics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-98606-3_1
Jeong, D., Shi, G., Li, X., & Thirumalai, D. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.10.22.513342
“Although a large number of energy functions could reproduce the Hi-C map [10, 13, 61], the CCM is perhaps the simplest copolymer model with only one unknown energy parameter.”
BackgroundIntuitive interpretation of heterochromatin and euchromatin through rapid Hi-C analysisPreprint
Sumikama, T., & Fukuma, T. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.10.27.513973
Gutnik, S., Sawh, A. N., & Mango, S. E. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.11.01.514763
Nuclear Architecture in the Nervous System
Ito, K., & Takizawa, T. (2022) · Results and problems in cell differentiation · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-06573-6_15
Phase separation in chromatin-based intranuclear processes
Ng, W. S., Sielaff, H., & Zhao, Z. (2022) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-823967-4.00020-8
Adherent Moving of Polymers in Spherical Confined Binary Semiflexible Ring Polymer Mixtures
Zhou, X., & Wei, W. (2022) · Biophysica · doi:10.3390/biophysica2040044
Keller, D., Stinus, S., Umlauf, D., Gourbeyre, E., Biot, E., Olivier, N., Mahou, P., Beaurepaire, E., Andrey, P., & Crabbé, L. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.12.22.521599
“Together with additional NE-associated factors, the lamina provides a docking site for chromatin and creates a regulation hub for several essential cellular functions, including the establishment of the euchromatic active and heterochromatic inactive compartments within the nucleus, termed the A and B compartment, res…”
BackgroundAutoacetylation-mediated phase separation of TIP60 is critical for its functionsPreprint
Dubey, S., Gupta, H., & Gupta, A. K. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.05.06.539700
Meng, L., Sheong, F. K., & Luo, Q. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.09.12.557077
“…and the SBS models assume that direct or protein (i.e. binder) mediated interactions between different loci belonging to the same state (i.e. active or inactive) drive the TAD formation(Fiorillo et al., 2020); such homotypic interactions between loci consequently limit their movements.”
InfluentialExplicit Ion Modeling Predicts Physicochemical Interactions for Chromatin OrganizationPreprint
Lin, X., & Zhang, B. (2023) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.90073.1
4D Mesoscale liquid model of nucleus resolves chromatin’s radial organizationPreprint
Laghmach, R., Pierro, M. D., & Potoyan, D. A. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.09.21.558819
Jeong, D., Shi, G., Li, X., & Thirumalai, D. (2023) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.88564.1
Local Volume Concentration, Packing Domains and Scaling Properties of ChromatinPreprint
Carignano, M. A., Kröger, M., Almassalha, L. M., Agrawal, V., Li, W. S., Pujadas-Liwag, E. M., Nap, R. J., Backman, V., & Szleifer, I. G. (2023) · PubMed · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.02257
“The formation of domains is also consistent with the possibility of a microphase separation process dynamically occurring in chromatin( Strom et al., 2017 ; Larson et al., 2017 ; Falk et al., 2019 ; Hilbert et al., 2021 ).”
BackgroundLocal Volume Concentration, Packing Domains and Scaling Properties of ChromatinPreprint
Szleifer, I. G. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3399177/v1
“The formation of domains is also consistent with the possibility of a microphase separation process dynamically occurring in chromatin( Strom et al., 2017 ; Larson et al., 2017 ; Falk et al., 2019 ; Hilbert et al., 2021 ).”
BackgroundProA and ProB repeat sequences shape 3D genome organization in eukaryotesPreprint
Bonnet, K., Hulo, N., Mourad, R., Ewing, A. D., Croce, O., Naville, M., Vassetzky, N. S., Gilson, É., Picard, D., & Fourel, G. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.10.27.564043
Perspective: “Current understanding of NADs dynamics and mechanisms of Disease”
Kumari, A., & Vertii, A. (2023) · Gene · doi:10.1016/j.gene.2023.147960
Widespread link between DNA-packing density distribution and TAD boundary locationsPreprint
Meng, L., Sheong, F. K., & Luo, Q. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3470944/v1
Explicit Ion Modeling Predicts Physicochemical Interactions for Chromatin OrganizationPreprint
Lin, X., & Zhang, B. (2024) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.90073.2
A practical guide for essential analyses of Hi-C data
Liu, Y., & Hildebrand, E. M. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-817218-6.00002-4
Autoacetylation-mediated phase separation of TIP60 is critical for its functionsPreprint
Dubey, S., Gupta, H., & Gupta, A. K. (2024) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.93418
Jeong, D., Shi, G., Li, X., & Thirumalai, D. (2024) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.88564.2
Role of protein-protein interactions on model chromatin organizationPreprint
Swain, P., Choubey, S., & Vemparala, S. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.03.03.583162
“This approach diverges from existing models, which typically assign different interactions among monomers to differentiate between heterochromatin and euchromatin 20,21,41,52,53 .”
From Antibody Selection to Automated Quantification: Trpv1 Immunofluorescence on Human SkinPreprint
Jin, Y., Brennecke, J., Sodmann, A., Blum, R., & Sommer, C. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4744818
Sequential-GAM constructs the single-cell geometric 3D genome structure
Li, Y., Wang, K., Shi, M., Zhang, M. Q., & Gao, J. T. (2026) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkag794
“These results consistent with the functional segregation of active and inactive chromatin [ 34 ].”
Feng, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, X., He, X., Chen, Y., Naseri, A., Pederson, T., Zheng, J., Zhang, S., Xiao, X., et al. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13352150
Feng, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, X., He, X., Chen, Y., Naseri, A., Pederson, T., Zheng, J., Zhang, S., Xiao, X., et al. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13352144
Shi, M., You, K., Chen, T., Hou, C., Liang, Z., Liu, M., Wang, J., Wei, T., Qin, J., Chen, Y., et al. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.15184562
Xue, L., Gao, Y., Wu, M., Tian, T., Fan, H., Huang, Y., Huang, Z. J., Li, D., & Xu, L. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14966159
Xue, L., Gao, Y., Wu, M., Tian, T., Fan, H., Huang, Y., Huang, Z. J., Li, D., & Xu, L. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14966177
Feng, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, X., He, X., Chen, Y., Naseri, A., Pederson, T., Zheng, J., Zhang, S., Xiao, X., et al. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13352153
Additional file 3 of SPIN reveals genome-wide landscape of nuclear compartmentalization
Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhang, R., van Schaik, T., Zhang, L., Sasaki, T., Peric‐Hupkes, D., Chen, Y., Gilbert, D. M., van Steensel, B., et al. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13579161
Xue, L., Gao, Y., Wu, M., Tian, T., Fan, H., Huang, Y., Huang, Z. J., Li, D., & Xu, L. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14966180
Shi, M., You, K., Chen, T., Hou, C., Liang, Z., Liu, M., Wang, J., Wei, T., Qin, J., Chen, Y., et al. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.15184571
Shi, M., You, K., Chen, T., Hou, C., Liang, Z., Liu, M., Wang, J., Wei, T., Qin, J., Chen, Y., et al. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.15184565
Xue, L., Gao, Y., Wu, M., Tian, T., Fan, H., Huang, Y., Huang, Z. J., Li, D., & Xu, L. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14966165
Xue, L., Gao, Y., Wu, M., Tian, T., Fan, H., Huang, Y., Huang, Z. J., Li, D., & Xu, L. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14966171
Liu, X., Jiang, S., Ma, L., Qu, J., Zhao, L., Zhu, X. Q., & Ding, J. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.15184676
Xue, L., Gao, Y., Wu, M., Tian, T., Fan, H., Huang, Y., Huang, Z. J., Li, D., & Xu, L. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14966168
Additional file 5 of SPIN reveals genome-wide landscape of nuclear compartmentalization
Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhang, R., van Schaik, T., Zhang, L., Sasaki, T., Peric‐Hupkes, D., Chen, Y., Gilbert, D. M., van Steensel, B., et al. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13579167
Additional file 4 of SPIN reveals genome-wide landscape of nuclear compartmentalization
Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhang, R., van Schaik, T., Zhang, L., Sasaki, T., Peric‐Hupkes, D., Chen, Y., Gilbert, D. M., van Steensel, B., et al. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13579164
Xue, L., Gao, Y., Wu, M., Tian, T., Fan, H., Huang, Y., Huang, Z. J., Li, D., & Xu, L. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14966183
Feng, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, X., He, X., Chen, Y., Naseri, A., Pederson, T., Zheng, J., Zhang, S., Xiao, X., et al. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13352147
Xue, L., Gao, Y., Wu, M., Tian, T., Fan, H., Huang, Y., Huang, Z. J., Li, D., & Xu, L. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14966174
Local Volume Concentration, Packing Domains and Scaling Properties of ChromatinPreprint
Carignano, M. A., Kröger, M., Almassalha, L. M., Agrawal, V., Li, W. S., Pujadas-Liwag, E. M., Nap, R. J., Backman, V., & Szleifer, I. G. (2024) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.97604.1
Epigenetic Control of Cell Fate Decisions by Enhancer-Derived Long Noncoding RNAs
Mattick, J. S. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-59286-7_2
Local Volume Concentration, Packing Domains and Scaling Properties of ChromatinPreprint
Cangnano, M., Kröger, M., Almassalha, L. M., Agrawal, V., Li, W. S., Pujadas-Liwag, E. M., Nap, R. J., Backman, V., & Szleifer, I. G. (2024) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.97604.2
Understanding and Simulating the Dynamics of a Polymer-Like Chromatin
Câmara, A. S., & Mascher, M. (2024) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-4228-3_16
Telomere interactions and structural variants in ALT cells revealed with TelSPRITEPreprint
Wilson, D. G., Soper, S. F. C., Pineda, M. A., Walker, R. L., & Meltzer, P. S. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.11.22.624895
“Regions with similar chromatin states tend to spatially associate, 14,15,24 so this relationship may reflect spatial clustering of telomeric and centromeric constitutive heterochromatin.”
Cluster size determines internal structure of transcription factories in human cellsPreprint
Semeraro, M., Negro, G., Forte, G., Suma, A., Gonnella, G., Cook, P. R., & Marenduzzo, D. (2025) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.103955 · Cited by 1
Cluster size determines morphology of transcription factories in human cellsPreprint
Semeraro, M., Negro, G., Forte, G., Suma, A., Gonnella, G., Cook, P. R., & Marenduzzo, D. (2025) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.103955.1
“It is also important to specify that, even if an investigation of a transition between small and larger transcription factories have been carried out in mouse embryonic stem cells [53], in serum-stimulated cells [54] and in zebrafish embryos [55], our study aims to provide a broader mechanistic…”
A microfluidic platform for extraction and analysis of bacterial genomic DNA
Joesaar, A., Holub, M., Lutze, L., Emanuele, M., Kerssemakers, J. W. J., Pabst, M., & Dekker, C. (2025) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/d4lc00839a · Cited by 2
One-click image reconstruction in single-molecule localization microscopy via deep learningPreprint
Saguy, A., Xiao, D., Narayanasamy, K. K., Nakatani, Y., Gustavsson, A., Heilemann, M., & Shechtman, Y. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.04.13.648574
“This multi-model, patch-based approach can also be easily extended to other image-based NNs that are confronted with heterogeneous image data from cell biology samples, such as in denoising 29,30 , image restoration 19 , and segmentation 31–33 .”
Roles and Future Opportunities for Genomic Architecture in Understanding Repeated Evolution
Kellermeyer, R., Alvarez‐Ponce, D., Arsuaga, J., Chain, F. J. J., Dennis, M. Y., Margres, M. J., Meisel, R. P., Meyer, W. K., Moon, T. S., Smith, K. N., et al. (2025) · Integrative and Comparative Biology · doi:10.1093/icb/icaf040
Bartosova, M., Saleem, A., Schäfer, M., Messerschmidt, G., Schmitt, C. P., & Hausmann, M. (2025) · Nanoscale · doi:10.1039/d5nr00686d
Quantifying conformational heterogeneity of 3D genome organization in fruit fly
Mali, S., Tolokh, I. S., Cross, E., & Onufriev, A. V. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0326927
“The issue is further complicated by the fact that chromatin conformations are not static, evolving in time [13,32–39] even within the same phase of the cell cycle, further contributing to natural conformational heterogeneity of chromatin in living cells.”
Narat, Z., Figueroa, S., Donjon, A., Doucet, C. M., Laabas, N., & Boumendil, C. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.07.18.665545
The emerging sequence grammar of 3D genome organisation
Tamon, L., Ashford, J., Nicholls, M., Bruijn, M. F. T. R. D., & Sahakyan, A. B. (2025) · Human Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00439-025-02772-8
“Polymer simulations (Jost et al. 2014 ; Nuebler et al. 2018; Falk et al. 2019 ; Mirny et al. 2019) and in vitro demonstrations of condensate formation by transcription factors and other chromatin-bound proteins, as reviewed in (Hildebrand and Dekker 2020), have shed light on this phenomenon.”
Criticality-driven enhancer-promoter dynamics in Drosophila chromosomesPreprint
Ganesh, G., Fiche, J.-B., Nöllmann, M., & Mozziconacci, J. (2025) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.108117.1
Criticality-driven enhancer-promoter dynamics in Drosophila chromosomesPreprint
Ganesh, G., Fiche, J.-B., Nöllmann, M., & Mozziconacci, J. (2025) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.108117 · Cited by 1
Active Hydrodynamic Theory of Euchromatin and Heterochromatin
Rautu, S. A., Zidovska, A., Saintillan, D., & Shelley, M. (2026) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/8n8h-7gx6 · Cited by 1
“Phase separation models describe chromatin compartmentalization through liquid-liquid or microphase separation, where segment-specific interactions and nuclear confinement drive euchromatin and heterochromatin segregation [37 – 40].”
InfluentialAnalysis of heterochromatin mesoscale architecture by cryo-electron tomography
Kazakov, E. P., Chesnokov, Y. M., Kireev, I. I., & Golyshev, S. A. (2025) · Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta Seria 16 Biologia · doi:10.55959/msu0137-0952-16-80-3s-18
Zhang, H., Ugur, E., Hake, C., Romero, H., Arroyo, M., Mahmoud, M., Lermyte, F., Leonhardt, H., & Cardoso, M. C. (2025) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaf1380
“The constitutive pericentric heterochromatin is particularly important for proper chromatin segregation during mitosis as well as spatial chromosome organization in interphase [ 3 ] yet the precise mechanisms governing its organization and compartmentalization remain incompletely understood.”
Liu, X., Jiang, S., Ma, L., Qu, J., Zhao, L., Zhu, X., & Ding, J. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.15184682
Shah, P. P., Keough, K. C., Gjoni, K., Santini, G. T., Abdill, R. J., Wickramasinghe, N. M., Dundes, C. E., Karnay, A. M., Chen, A. C., Salomon, R. E. A., et al. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26563459
Pujadas-Liwag, E. M., Wei, X., Acosta, N., Carter, L. M., Yang, J., Almassalha, L. M., Jain, S., Daneshkhah, A., Rao, S. S. P., Seker-Polat, F., et al. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26696598
Shah, P. P., Keough, K. C., Gjoni, K., Santini, G. T., Abdill, R. J., Wickramasinghe, N. M., Dundes, C. E., Karnay, A. M., Chen, A. C., Salomon, R. E. A., et al. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26563462
Additional file 1 of TAD cliques predict key features of chromatin organization
Ali, T. M. L., Brunet, A., Collas, P., & Paulsen, J. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14906136
Liu, X., Jiang, S., Ma, L., Qu, J., Zhao, L., Zhu, X., & Ding, J. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.15184673
Yang, H., Wang, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2023) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.24499374
Additional file 2 of CTCF and cohesin promote focal detachment of DNA from the nuclear lamina
van Schaik, T., Liu, N. Q., Manzo, S. G., Peric‐Hupkes, D., de Wit, E., & van Steensel, B. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.20787022
Additional file 6 of SPIN reveals genome-wide landscape of nuclear compartmentalization
Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhang, R., van Schaik, T., Zhang, L., Sasaki, T., Peric‐Hupkes, D., Chen, Y., Gilbert, D. M., van Steensel, B., et al. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13579170
Shah, P. P., Keough, K. C., Gjoni, K., Santini, G. T., Abdill, R. J., Wickramasinghe, N. M., Dundes, C. E., Karnay, A. M., Chen, A. C., Salomon, R. E. A., et al. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26563456
Metadata
- Authors
- Falk, M., Feodorova, Y., Naumova, N., Imakaev, M., Lajoie, B. R., Leonhardt, H., Joffe, B., Dekker, J., Fudenberg, G., Solovei, I., & Mirny, L. A.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Medical University Plovdiv (BG)
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
- Gladstone Institutes (US)
- Corresponding author
- Fudenberg, Geoffrey
- Solovei, Irina
- Mirny, Leonid A.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2019-06
- Volume
- 570
- Issue
- 7761
- Pages
- 395-399
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- PMC
- PMC7206897
- OpenAlex
- W2948487481
- Cited by
- 646
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 50 · 2025: 84 · 2024: 95 · 2023: 90 · 2022: 90 · 2021: 116 · 2020: 88 · 2019: 33
- FWCI
- 28.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2019-08-02)
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- eScholarship@UMassChan (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- National Human Genome Research Institute (RM1HG007743, R01HG003143)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM114190)
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (U54DK107980)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nuclear Structure and Function
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Keywords
- nuclear compartmentalization, heterochromatin, rod photoreceptors, nuclear lamina, euchromatin, pericentromeric heterochromatin, facultative heterochromatin, phase separation, chromosome conformation, chromatin organization, polymer simulation
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cell Compartmentation, Cell Nucleus, Heterochromatin, Models, Biological, Time Factors, Euchromatin, Nuclear Lamina, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review