Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 714

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

m6A enhances the phase separation potential of mRNA

Ries, Ryan J., Zaccara, Sara, Klein, Pierre, Olarerin-George, Anthony, Namkoong, Sim, Pickering, Brian F., Patil, Deepak P., Kwak, Hojoong, Lee, Jun Hee, Jaffrey, Samie R.·2019·Nature
DOI 10.1038/s41586-019-1374-1PMC PMC6662915
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-019-1374-1

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. Perry, R. P. & Kelley, D. E. Existence of methylated messenger RNA in mouse L cells. Cell 1, 37–42 (1974). · DOI
  2. Desrosiers, R., Friderici, K. & Rottman, F. Identification of methylated nucleosides in messenger RNA from Novikoff hepatoma cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 71, 3971–3975 (1974). · DOI
  3. Meyer, K. D. & Jaffrey, S. R. Rethinking m6A readers, writers, and erasers. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 33, 319–342 (2017). · DOI
  4. Patil, D. P., Pickering, B. F. & Jaffrey, S. R. Reading m6A in the transcriptome: m6A-binding proteins. Trends Cell Biol. 28, 113–127 (2018). · DOI
  5. Nott, T. J. et al. Phase transition of a disordered nuage protein generates environmentally responsive membraneless organelles. Mol. Cell 57, 936–947 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  6. Lin, Y., Protter, D. S., Rosen, M. K. & Parker, R. Formation and maturation of phase-separated liquid droplets by RNA-binding proteins. Mol. Cell 60, 208–219 (2015). · DOI
  7. Quiroz, F. G. & Chilkoti, A. Sequence heuristics to encode phase behaviour in intrinsically disordered protein polymers. Nat. Mater. 14, 1164–1171 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  8. Shin, Y. & Brangwynne, C. P. Liquid phase condensation in cell physiology and disease. Science 357, eaaf4382(2017). · DOI
  9. Molliex, A. et al. Phase separation by low complexity domains promotes stress granule assembly and drives pathological fibrillization. Cell 163, 123–133 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  10. Kroschwald, S. et al. Promiscuous interactions and protein disaggregases determine the material state of stress-inducible RNP granules. eLife 4, e06807 (2015). · DOI
  11. Standart, N. & Weil, D. P-bodies: cytosolic droplets for coordinated mRNA storage. Trends Genet. 34, 612–626 (2018). · DOI
  12. Zhou, J. et al. Dynamic m6A mRNA methylation directs translational control of heat shock response. Nature 526, 591–594 (2015). · DOI
  13. Dominissini, D. et al. Topology of the human and mouse m6A RNA methylomes revealed by m6A-seq. Nature 485, 201–206 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  14. Meyer, K. D. et al. 5′ UTR m6A promotes cap-independent translation. Cell 163, 999–1010 (2015). · DOI
  15. Anders, M. et al. Dynamic m6A methylation facilitates mRNA triaging to stress granules. Life Sci. Alliance 1, e201800113 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  16. Slobodin, B., Han, R., Calderone, V., Vrielink, J. A., Loayza-Puch, F., Elkon, R. & Agami, R. Transcription impacts the efficiency of mRNA translation via co-transcriptional N 6-adenosine methylation. Cell 169, 326–337.e312 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  17. Knuckles, P. et al. RNA fate determination through cotranscriptional adenosine methylation and microprocessor binding. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 24, 561–569 (2017). · DOI
  18. Wang, P., Doxtader, K. A. & Nam, Y. Structural basis for cooperative function of Mettl3 and Mettl14 methyltransferases. Mol. Cell 63, 306–317 (2016). · DOI
  19. Wang, X. et al. Structural basis of N 6-adenosine methylation by the METTL3–METTL14 complex. Nature 534, 575–578 (2016). · DOI
  20. Śledź, P. & Jinek, M. Structural insights into the molecular mechanism of the m6A writer complex. eLife 5, e18434 (2016). · DOI
  21. Han, T. W. et al. Cell-free formation of RNA granules: bound RNAs identify features and components of cellular assemblies. Cell 149, 768–779 (2012). · DOI
  22. Khong, A., Matheny, T., Jain, S., Mitchell, S. F., Wheeler, J. R. & Parker, R. The stress granule transcriptome reveals principles of mRNA accumulation in stress granules. Mol. Cell 68, 808–820.e805 (2017). · DOI
  23. Namkoong, S., Ho, A., Woo, Y. M., Kwak, H. & Lee, J. H. Systematic characterization of stress-induced RNA granulation. Mol. Cell 70, 175–187.e178 (2018). · DOI
  24. Bouche, G., Amalric, F., Caizergues-Ferrer, M. & Zalta, J. P. Effects of heat shock on gene expression and subcellular protein distribution in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 7, 1739–1747 (1979). · DOI
  25. Van Treeck, B. & Parker, R. Emerging roles for intermolecular RNA–RNA interactions in RNP assemblies. Cell 174, 791–802 (2018). · DOI
  26. Kedersha, N. et al. Stress granules and processing bodies are dynamically linked sites of mRNP remodeling. J. Cell Biol. 169, 871–884 (2005). · DOI
  27. Zhu, T. et al. Crystal structure of the YTH domain of YTHDF2 reveals mechanism for recognition of N 6-methyladenosine. Cell Res. 24, 1493–1496 (2014). · DOI
  28. Xiang, Y. et al. RNA m6A methylation regulates the ultraviolet-induced DNA damage response. Nature 543, 573–576 (2017). · DOI
  29. Geula, S. et al. m6A mRNA methylation facilitates resolution of naïve pluripotency toward differentiation. Science 347, 1002–1006 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  30. Knuckles, P. et al. Zc3h13/Flacc is required for adenosine methylation by bridging the mRNA-binding factor Rbm15/Spenito to the m6A machinery component Wtap/Fl(2)d. Genes Dev. 32, 415–429 (2018). · DOI
  31. Wen, J. et al. Zc3h13 regulates nuclear RNA m6A methylation and mouse embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Mol. Cell 69, 1028–1038.e1026 (2018). · DOI
  32. Xu, C. et al. Structural basis for the discriminative recognition of N 6-methyladenosine RNA by the human YT521-B homology domain family of proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 24902–24913 (2015). · DOI
  33. Zhang, H. et al. RNA controls polyQ protein phase transitions. Mol. Cell 60, 220–230 (2015). · DOI
  34. Zhong, S. et al. MTA is an Arabidopsis messenger RNA adenosine methylase and interacts with a homolog of a sex-specific splicing factor. Plant Cell 20, 1278–1288 (2008). · DOI
  35. Hoover, D. M. & Lubkowski, J. DNAWorks: an automated method for designing oligonucleotides for PCR-based gene synthesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, e43 (2002). · DOI
  36. Li, H. et al. Design and specificity of long ssDNA donors for CRISPR-based knock-in. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/178905v1 (2017). · DOI
  37. McGlincy, N. J. & Ingolia, N. T. Transcriptome-wide measurement of translation by ribosome profiling. Methods 126, 112–129 (2017). · DOI
  38. Xiao, Z., Zou, Q., Liu, Y. & Yang, X. Genome-wide assessment of differential translations with ribosome profiling data. Nat. Commun. 7, 11194 (2016).
  39. Mi, H. et al. PANTHER version 7: improved phylogenetic trees, orthologs and collaboration with the Gene Ontology Consortium. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, D204–D210 (2010). · DOI
  40. Lancaster, A. K., Nutter-Upham, A., Lindquist, S. & King, O. D. PLAAC: a web and command-line application to identify proteins with prion-like amino acid composition. Bioinformatics 30, 2501–2502 (2014). · DOI
  41. Gilles, J. F., Dos Santos, M., Boudier, T., Bolte, S. & Heck, N. DiAna, an ImageJ tool for object-based 3D co-localization and distance analysis. Methods 115, 55–64 (2017). · DOI
  42. Hubstenberger, A. et al. P-body purification reveals the condensation of repressed mRNA regulons. Mol. Cell 68, 144–157.e145 (2017). · DOI
  43. Jain, S. et al. ATPase-modulated stress granules contain a diverse proteome and substructure. Cell 164, 487–498 (2016). · DOI
  44. Youn, J. Y. et al. High-density proximity mapping reveals the subcellular organization of mRNA-associated granules and bodies. Mol. Cell 69, 517–532.e511 (2018). · DOI
  45. Markmiller, S. et al. Context-dependent and disease-specific diversity in protein interactions within stress granules. Cell 172, 590–604.e513 (2018). · DOI
  46. Tsherniak, A. et al. Defining a cancer dependency map. Cell 170, 564–576.e516 (2017). · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 714

Metadata

Authors
Ries, R. J., Zaccara, S., Klein, P., Olarerin-George, A., Namkoong, S., Pickering, B. F., Patil, D. P., Kwak, H., Lee, J. H., & Jaffrey, S. R.
Venue
Nature
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2019-07-10
Volume
571
Issue
7765
Pages
424-428
ISSN
  • 0028-0836
  • 1476-4687
DOI
10.1038/s41586-019-1374-1
PMC
PMC6662915
Cited by
714
References
6
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: m6A enhances the phase separation potential of mRNA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41586-019-1374-1
The paper
Ries, R. J., Zaccara, S., Klein, P., Olarerin-George, A., Namkoong, S., Pickering, B. F., Patil, D. P., Kwak, H., Lee, J. H., & Jaffrey, S. R. (2019). m6A enhances the phase separation potential of mRNA. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1374-1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.