Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 454

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Controlled modelling of human epiblast and amnion development using stem cells

Open access
Zheng, Yi, Xue, Xufeng, Shao, Yue, Wang, Sicong, Esfahani, Sajedeh Nasr, Li, Zida, Muncie, Jonathon M., Lakins, Johnathon N., Weaver, Valerie M., Gumucio, Deborah L., Fu, Jianping·2019·Nature

Abstract

Early human embryonic development involves extensive lineage diversification, cell-fate specification and tissue patterning1. Despite its basic and clinical importance, early human embryonic development remains relatively unexplained owing to interspecies divergence2,3 and limited accessibility to human embryo samples. Here we report that human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) in a microfluidic device recapitulate, in a highly controllable and scalable fashion, landmarks of the development of the epiblast and amniotic ectoderm parts of the conceptus, including lumenogenesis of the epiblast and the resultant pro-amniotic cavity, formation of a bipolar embryonic sac, and specification of primordial germ cells and primitive streak cells. We further show that amniotic ectoderm-like cells function as a signalling centre to trigger the onset of gastrulation-like events in hPSCs. Given its controllability and scalability, the microfluidic model provides a powerful experimental system to advance knowledge of human embryology and reproduction. This model could assist in the rational design of differentiation protocols of hPSCs for disease modelling and cell therapy, and in high-throughput drug and toxicity screens to prevent pregnancy failure and birth defects. Landmarks of early stages of human embryogenesis can be recapitulated in a highly controllable and scalable fashion by culturing human pluripotent stem cells in a microfluidic device.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-019-1535-2

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Cited by

See all 454

Metadata

Authors
Zheng, Y., Xue, X., Shao, Y., Wang, S., Esfahani, S. N., Li, Z., Muncie, J. M., Lakins, J. N., Weaver, V. M., Gumucio, D. L., & Fu, J.
Venue
Nature
Published
2019-09-11
Volume
573
Issue
7774
Pages
421-425
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2972524623
Cited by
454
References
35
FWCI
16.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Controlled modelling of human epiblast and amnion development using stem cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41586-019-1535-2
The paper
Zheng, Y., Xue, X., Shao, Y., Wang, S., Esfahani, S. N., Li, Z., Muncie, J. M., Lakins, J. N., Weaver, V. M., Gumucio, D. L., & Fu, J. (2019). Controlled modelling of human epiblast and amnion development using stem cells. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1535-2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.