Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 284

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Analysis of the B cell receptor repertoire in six immune-mediated diseases

Open access
Bashford-Rogers, R. J. M., Bergamaschi, L., McKinney, E. F., Pombal, D. C., Mescia, F., Lee, J. C., Thomas, D. C., Flint, S. M., Kellam, P., Jayne, D. R. W., Lyons, P. A., Smith, K. G. C.·2019·Nature

Abstract

B cells are important in the pathogenesis of many, and perhaps all, immune-mediated diseases. Each B cell expresses a single B cell receptor (BCR)1, and the diverse range of BCRs expressed by the total B cell population of an individual is termed the ‘BCR repertoire’. Our understanding of the BCR repertoire in the context of immune-mediated diseases is incomplete, and defining this could provide new insights into pathogenesis and therapy. Here, we compared the BCR repertoire in systemic lupus erythematosus, anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis, Crohn’s disease, Behçet’s disease, eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, and immunoglobulin A (IgA) vasculitis by analysing BCR clonality, use of immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable region (IGHV) genes and—in particular—isotype use. An increase in clonality in systemic lupus erythematosus and Crohn’s disease that was dominated by the IgA isotype, together with skewed use of the IGHV genes in these and other diseases, suggested a microbial contribution to pathogenesis. Different immunosuppressive treatments had specific and distinct effects on the repertoire; B cells that persisted after treatment with rituximab were predominately isotype-switched and clonally expanded, whereas the inverse was true for B cells that persisted after treatment with mycophenolate mofetil. Our comparative analysis of the BCR repertoire in immune-mediated disease reveals a complex B cell architecture, providing a platform for understanding pathological mechanisms and designing treatment strategies. An analysis of the B cell receptor repertoire in six immune-mediated diseases reveals that there are substantial differences in clonality, isotype use, class switching and use of the IGHV genes between diseases.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-019-1595-3

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 47 references

Cited by

See all 284

Metadata

Authors
Bashford-Rogers, R. J. M., Bergamaschi, L., McKinney, E. F., Pombal, D. C., Mescia, F., Lee, J. C., Thomas, D. C., Flint, S. M., Kellam, P., Jayne, D. R. W., Lyons, P. A., & Smith, K. G. C.
Venue
Nature
Published
2019-09-25
Volume
574
Issue
7776
Pages
122-126
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2976155788
Cited by
284
References
47
FWCI
17.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of the B cell receptor repertoire in six immune-mediated diseases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41586-019-1595-3
The paper
Bashford-Rogers, R. J. M., Bergamaschi, L., McKinney, E. F., Pombal, D. C., Mescia, F., Lee, J. C., Thomas, D. C., Flint, S. M., Kellam, P., Jayne, D. R. W., Lyons, P. A., & Smith, K. G. C. (2019). Analysis of the B cell receptor repertoire in six immune-mediated diseases. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1595-3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.