Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 554

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An acute immune response underlies the benefit of cardiac stem cell therapy

Open access
Vagnozzi, Ronald J., Maillet, Marjorie, Sargent, Michelle A., Khalil, Hadi, Johansen, Anne Katrine Z., Schwanekamp, Jennifer A., York, Allen J., Huang, Vincent, Nahrendorf, Matthias, Sadayappan, Sakthivel, Molkentin, Jeffery D.·2020·Nature

Abstract

Clinical trials using adult stem cells to regenerate damaged heart tissue continue to this day 1 , 2 , despite ongoing questions of efficacy and a lack of mechanistic understanding of the underlying biological effect 3 . The rationale for these cell therapy trials is derived from animal studies that show a modest but reproducible improvement in cardiac function in models of cardiac ischaemic injury 4 , 5 . Here we examine the mechanistic basis for cell therapy in mice after ischaemia–reperfusion injury, and find that—although heart function is enhanced—it is not associated with the production of new cardiomyocytes. Cell therapy improved heart function through an acute sterile immune response characterized by the temporal and regional induction of CCR2 + and CX3CR1 + macrophages. Intracardiac injection of two distinct types of adult stem cells, cells killed by freezing and thawing or a chemical inducer of the innate immune response all induced a similar regional accumulation of CCR2 + and CX3CR1 + macrophages, and provided functional rejuvenation to the heart after ischaemia–reperfusion injury. This selective macrophage response altered the activity of cardiac fibroblasts, reduced the extracellular matrix content in the border zone and enhanced the mechanical properties of the injured area. The functional benefit of cardiac cell therapy is thus due to an acute inflammatory-based wound-healing response that rejuvenates the infarcted area of the heart. Cardiac stem cell therapy in mouse models of ischaemia–reperfusion injury demonstrates that improvement in heart function is linked to an immune response characterized by the induction of CCR2 + and CX3CR1 + macrophages.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-019-1802-2

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 75 references

Cited by

See all 554

Metadata

Authors
Vagnozzi, R. J., Maillet, M., Sargent, M. A., Khalil, H., Johansen, A. K. Z., Schwanekamp, J. A., York, A. J., Huang, V., Nahrendorf, M., Sadayappan, S., & Molkentin, J. D.
Venue
Nature
Published
2019-11-27
Volume
577
Issue
7790
Pages
405-409
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2990914781
Cited by
554
References
75
FWCI
50.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An acute immune response underlies the benefit of cardiac stem cell therapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41586-019-1802-2
The paper
Vagnozzi, R. J., Maillet, M., Sargent, M. A., Khalil, H., Johansen, A. K. Z., Schwanekamp, J. A., York, A. J., Huang, V., Nahrendorf, M., Sadayappan, S., & Molkentin, J. D. (2020). An acute immune response underlies the benefit of cardiac stem cell therapy. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1802-2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.