Cited by 228

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Monogenic and polygenic inheritance become instruments for clonal selection

Loh, Po-Ru, Genovese, Giulio, McCarroll, Steven A.·2020·Nature

Published version of a preprint

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-020-2430-6

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Jacobs, K. B. et al. Detectable clonal mosaicism and its relationship to aging and cancer. Nat. Genet. 44, 651–658 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  2. Laurie, C. C. et al. Detectable clonal mosaicism from birth to old age and its relationship to cancer. Nat. Genet. 44, 642–650 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Machiela, M. J. et al. Characterization of large structural genetic mosaicism in human autosomes. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 96, 487–497 (2015). · DOI
  4. Vattathil, S. & Scheet, P. Extensive hidden genomic mosaicism revealed in normal tissue. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 98, 571–578 (2016). · DOI
  5. Zink, F. et al. Clonal hematopoiesis, with and without candidate driver mutations, is common in the elderly. Blood 130, 742–752 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  6. Loh, P.-R. et al. Insights into clonal haematopoiesis from 8,342 mosaic chromosomal alterations. Nature 559, 350–355 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  7. Deng, Y., Guo, X., Ferguson, D. O. & Chang, S. Multiple roles for MRE11 at uncapped telomeres. Nature 460, 914–918 (2009). · DOI
  8. Kimura, S., Roberts, A. W., Metcalf, D. & Alexander, W. S. Hematopoietic stem cell deficiencies in mice lacking c-Mpl, the receptor for thrombopoietin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 1195–1200 (1998). · DOI
  9. Solar, G. P. et al. Role of c-mpl in early hematopoiesis. Blood 92, 4–10 (1998). · DOI
  10. Seita, J. et al. Lnk negatively regulates self-renewal of hematopoietic stem cells by modifying thrombopoietin-mediated signal transduction. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 2349–2354 (2007). · DOI
  11. Loh, P.-R., Palamara, P. F. & Price, A. L. Fast and accurate long-range phasing in a UK Biobank cohort. Nat. Genet. 48, 811–816 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
  12. Loh, P.-R. et al. Reference-based phasing using the Haplotype Reference Consortium panel. Nat. Genet. 48, 1443–1448 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
  13. Auer, P. L. et al. Rare and low-frequency coding variants in CXCR2 and other genes are associated with hematological traits. Nat. Genet. 46, 629–634 (2014). · DOI
  14. Schultz, K. A. P. et al. PTEN, DICER1, FH, and their associated tumor susceptibility syndromes: clinical features, genetics, and surveillance recommendations in childhood. Clin. Cancer Res. 23, e76–e82 (2017). · DOI
  15. Van Hout, C. V. et al. Whole exome sequencing and characterization of coding variation in 49,960 individuals in the UK Biobank. Preprint at https://www.bioRxiv.org/content/10.1101/572347v1 (2019). · DOI
  16. Meuwissen, T. H., Hayes, B. J. & Goddard, M. E. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157, 1819–1829 (2001). · DOI · Paper page
  17. Loh, P.-R. et al. Efficient Bayesian mixed-model analysis increases association power in large cohorts. Nat. Genet. 47, 284–290 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  18. Thompson, D. J. et al. Genetic predisposition to mosaic Y chromosome loss in blood. Nature 575, 652–657 (2019). · DOI
  19. Davoli, T. et al. Cumulative haploinsufficiency and triplosensitivity drive aneuploidy patterns and shape the cancer genome. Cell 155, 948–962 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  20. O’Keefe, C., McDevitt, M. A. & Maciejewski, J. P. Copy neutral loss of heterozygosity: a novel chromosomal lesion in myeloid malignancies. Blood 115, 2731–2739 (2010). · DOI
  21. Chase, A. et al. Profound parental bias associated with chromosome 14 acquired uniparental disomy indicates targeting of an imprinted locus. Leukemia 29, 2069–2074 (2015). · DOI
  22. Choate, K. A. et al. Mitotic recombination in patients with ichthyosis causes reversion of dominant mutations in KRT10. Science 330, 94–97 (2010). · DOI
  23. Tesi, B. et al. Gain-of-function SAMD9L mutations cause a syndrome of cytopenia, immunodeficiency, MDS, and neurological symptoms. Blood 129, 2266–2279 (2017). · DOI
  24. Wain, L. V. et al. Novel insights into the genetics of smoking behaviour, lung function, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (UK BiLEVE): a genetic association study in UK Biobank. Lancet Respir. Med. 3, 769–781 (2015). · DOI
  25. Das, S. et al. Next-generation genotype imputation service and methods. Nat. Genet. 48, 1284–1287 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
  26. Peiffer, D. A. et al. High-resolution genomic profiling of chromosomal aberrations using Infinium whole-genome genotyping. Genome Res. 16, 1136–1148 (2006). · DOI
  27. Diskin, S. J. et al. Adjustment of genomic waves in signal intensities from whole-genome SNP genotyping platforms. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, e126 (2008). · DOI
  28. McLaren, W. et al. The Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor. Genome Biol. 17, 122 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
  29. Thorvaldsdóttir, H., Robinson, J. T. & Mesirov, J. P. Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV): high-performance genomics data visualization and exploration. Brief. Bioinform. 14, 178–192 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  30. Pedersen, B. S. & Quinlan, A. R. Mosdepth: quick coverage calculation for genomes and exomes. Bioinformatics 34, 867–868 (2018). · DOI
  31. Regier, A. A. et al. Functional equivalence of genome sequencing analysis pipelines enables harmonized variant calling across human genetics projects. Nat. Commun. 9, 4038 (2018). · DOI
  32. Loh, P.-R., Kichaev, G., Gazal, S., Schoech, A. P. & Price, A. L. Mixed-model association for biobank-scale datasets. Nat. Genet. 50, 906–908 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  33. Jones, A. V. et al. JAK2 haplotype is a major risk factor for the development of myeloproliferative neoplasms. Nat. Genet. 41, 446–449 (2009). · DOI
  34. Kilpivaara, O. et al. A germline JAK2 SNP is associated with predisposition to the development of JAK2 V617F-positive myeloproliferative neoplasms. Nat. Genet. 41, 455–459 (2009). · DOI
  35. Olcaydu, D. et al. A common JAK2 haplotype confers susceptibility to myeloproliferative neoplasms. Nat. Genet. 41, 450–454 (2009). · DOI
  36. Koren, A. et al. Genetic variation in human DNA replication timing. Cell 159, 1015–1026 (2014). · DOI
  37. Gusev, A. et al. Whole population, genome-wide mapping of hidden relatedness. Genome Res. 19, 318–326 (2009). · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 228

Metadata

Authors
Loh, P.-R., Genovese, G., & McCarroll, S. A.
Venue
Nature
Published
2020-06-24
Volume
584
Issue
7819
Pages
136-141
ISSN
  • 0028-0836
  • 1476-4687
Cited by
228
References
20
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review