Cited by 758Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and AnimalsGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock

Mixed-model association for biobank-scale datasets

Open access
Loh, Po-Ru, Kichaev, Gleb, Gazal, Steven, Schoech, Armin P., Price, Alkes L.·2018·Nature Genetics

Published version of a preprint

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41588-018-0144-6

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • To assess for confounding, the attenuation ratio of each trait was determined via LD score regression and was within the expected range for polygenic traits.

    “To assess for confounding we determined the attenuation ratio of each trait via LD score regression, which was within the expected range for polygenic traits (Table S3).104”
  • Using BOLT-LMM, which adjusts for population structure and relatedness, allowed inclusion of 13,320 additional individuals compared with analysing a reduced set of unrelated white British individuals using linear regression.

    “To improve our power to detect associations, we used BOLT-LMM15 to perform linear mixed models analysis. As this adjusts for population structure and relatedness, we could include many additional individuals (n = 13,320) than if following the common practice of analysing a reduced set of unrelated white British individuals using linear regression60.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Loh, P.-R., Kichaev, G., Gazal, S., Schoech, A. P., & Price, A. L.
Affiliations
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
  • Loh, Po-Ru
  • Price, Alkes L.
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2018-06-11
Volume
50
Issue
7
Pages
906-908
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W2950598813
Cited by
758
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 69 · 2025: 128 · 2024: 140 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 92 · 2021: 99 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 2
FWCI
38.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Nature Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds
  • National Institutes of Health (1s10rr028832-01, MH107649)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH107649)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (R01HG006399, U01HG009379)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM105857)
  • National Center for Research Resources (S10 RR028832, 1S10RR028832, 1S10RR028832-01)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Keywords
biobank-scale data, genome-wide association study, genetic association, primary sclerosing cholangitis, genetic susceptibility loci
MeSH terms
United Kingdom, Humans, Genome, Human, Linear Models, Biological Specimen Banks, Genome-Wide Association Study, Datasets as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review