Cited by 1,894

Reference-based phasing using the Haplotype Reference Consortium panel

Loh, Po-Ru, Danecek, Petr, Palamara, Pier Francesco, Fuchsberger, Christian, A Reshef, Yakir, K Finucane, Hilary, Schoenherr, Sebastian, Forer, Lukas +4 more·2016·Nature Genetics

Published version of a preprint

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ng.3679

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Genetic ancestry of samples was confirmed by principal components analysis and MDS values compared to 1000 Genome Project samples.

    “Genetic ancestry of samples was confirmed by principal components analysis using the PLINK program99 and MDS (multidimensional scaling) values of study subjects were compared to those of 1000 Genome Project samples (Phase 3) (Supplementary Fig. 10d).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. [1]Tewhey R Bansal V Torkamani A Topol EJ Schork NJ The importance of phase information for human genomics. Nature Reviews Genetics 2011 12 215 223 PMC3753045 21301473
  2. [2]Browning SR Browning BL Haplotype phasing: existing methods and new developments. Nature Reviews Genetics 2011 12 703 714 PMC3217888 21921926
  3. [3]Stephens M Smith NJ Donnelly P A new statistical method for haplotype reconstruction from population data. American Journal of Human Genetics 2001 68 978 989 11254454 PMC1275651
  4. [4]Halperin E Eskin E Haplotype reconstruction from genotype data using imperfect phylogeny. Bioinformatics 2004 20 1842 1849 14988101
  5. [5]Stephens M Scheet P Accounting for decay of linkage disequilibrium in haplotype inference and missing-data imputation. American Journal of Human Genetics 2005 76 449 462 15700229 PMC1196397
  6. [6]Scheet P Stephens M A fast and flexible statistical model for large-scale population genotype data: applications to inferring missing genotypes and haplotypic phase. American Journal of Human Genetics 2006 78 629 644 16532393 PMC1424677
  7. [7]Browning SR Browning BL Rapid and accurate haplotype phasing and missing-data inference for whole-genome association studies by use of localized haplotype clustering. American Journal of Human Genetics 2007 81 1084 1097 17924348 PMC2265661
  8. [10]Delaneau O Marchini J Zagury J-F A linear complexity phasing method for thousands of genomes. Nature Methods 2012 9 179 181 22138821
  9. [11]Williams AL Patterson N Glessner J Hakonarson H Reich D Phasing of many thousands of genotyped samples. American Journal of Human Genetics 2012 91 238 251 22883141 PMC3415548
  10. [12]Delaneau O Zagury J-F Marchini J Improved whole-chromosome phasing for disease and population genetic studies. Nature Methods 2013 10 5 6 23269371
  11. [13]Loh P-R Palamara PF Price AL Fast and accurate long-range phasing in a uk biobank cohort. Nature Genetics 2016 PMC4925291 27270109
  12. [14]O'Connell J Haplotype estimation for biobank-scale data sets. Nature Genetics 2016 PMC4926957 27270105
  13. [15]Snyder MW Adey A Kitzman JO Shendure J Haplotype-resolved genome sequencing: experimental methods and applications. Nature Reviews Genetics 2015 16 344 358 25948246
  14. [16]van de Geijn B McVicker G Gilad Y Pritchard JK WASP: allele-specific software for robust molecular quantitative trait locus discovery. Nature Methods 2015 12 1061 1063 26366987 PMC4626402
  15. [17]Kumasaka N Knights AJ Gaffney DJ Fine-mapping cellular QTLs with RASQUAL and ATAC-seq. Nature Genetics 2015 PMC5098600 26656845
  16. [18]Das S Next generation genotype imputation service and methods. Nature Genetics 2016 In press PMC5157836 27571263
  17. [19]McCarthy S A reference panel of 64,976 haplotypes for genotype imputation. Nature Genetics 2016 In press PMC5388176 27548312
  18. [20]Durbin R Efficient haplotype matching and storage using the positional Burrows– Wheeler transform (PBWT). Bioinformatics 2014 30 1266 1272 24413527 PMC3998136
  19. [21]Li N Stephens M Modeling linkage disequilibrium and identifying recombination hotspots using single-nucleotide polymorphism data. Genetics 2003 165 2213 2233 14704198 PMC1462870
  20. [22]Sudlow C UK Biobank: an open access resource for identifying the causes of a wide range of complex diseases of middle and old age. PLOS Medicine 2015 12 1 10 PMC4380465 25826379
  21. [23]Kvale MN Genotyping informatics and quality control for 100,000 Subjects in the Genetic Epidemiology Research on Adult Health and Aging (GERA) Cohort. Genetics 2015 200 1051 1060 26092718 PMC4574249
  22. [24]Banda Y Characterizing race/ethnicity and genetic ancestry for 100,000 subjects in the Genetic Epidemiology Research on Adult Health and Aging (GERA) cohort. Genetics 2015 200 1285 1295 26092716 PMC4574246
  23. [25]Browning BL Browning SR Genotype imputation with millions of reference samples. The American Journal of Human Genetics 2016 98 116 126 26748515 PMC4716681
  24. [28]He D Han B Eskin E Hap-seq: an optimal algorithm for haplotype phasing with imputation using sequencing data. Journal of Computational Biology 2013 20 80 92 23383995 PMC3576919
  25. [29]Delaneau O Howie B Cox AJ Zagury J-F Marchini J Haplotype estimation using sequencing reads. American Journal of Human Genetics 2013 93 687 696 24094745 PMC3791270
  26. [30]Sharp K Kretzschmar W Delaneau O Marchini J Phasing for medical sequencing using rare variants and large haplotype reference panels. Bioinformatics 2016 PMC4920110 27153703
  27. [31]Chang CC Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets. GigaScience 2015 4 1 16 25722852 PMC4342193

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Loh, P.-R., Danecek, P., Palamara, P. F., Fuchsberger, C., A Reshef, Y., K Finucane, H., Schoenherr, S., Forer, L., McCarthy, S., Abecasis, G. R., Durbin, R., & L Price, A.
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2016-10-03
Volume
48
Issue
11
Pages
1443-1448
ISSN
  • 1061-4036
  • 1546-1718
Cited by
1,894
References
6
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review