The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Single-particle cryo-EM at atomic resolution
Open accessAbstract
The three-dimensional positions of atoms in protein molecules define their structure and their roles in biological processes. The more precisely atomic coordinates are determined, the more chemical information can be derived and the more mechanistic insights into protein function may be inferred. Electron cryo-microscopy (cryo-EM) single-particle analysis has yielded protein structures with increasing levels of detail in recent years1,2. However, it has proved difficult to obtain cryo-EM reconstructions with sufficient resolution to visualize individual atoms in proteins. Here we use a new electron source, energy filter and camera to obtain a 1.7 Å resolution cryo-EM reconstruction for a human membrane protein, the β3 GABAA receptor homopentamer3. Such maps allow a detailed understanding of small-molecule coordination, visualization of solvent molecules and alternative conformations for multiple amino acids, and unambiguous building of ordered acidic side chains and glycans. Applied to mouse apoferritin, our strategy led to a 1.22 Å resolution reconstruction that offers a genuine atomic-resolution view of a protein molecule using single-particle cryo-EM. Moreover, the scattering potential from many hydrogen atoms can be visualized in difference maps, allowing a direct analysis of hydrogen-bonding networks. Our technological advances, combined with further approaches to accelerate data acquisition and improve sample quality, provide a route towards routine application of cryo-EM in high-throughput screening of small molecule modulators and structure-based drug discovery. Advances in electron cryo-microscopy hardware allow proteins to be studied at atomic resolution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rosenthal, P. B., & Henderson, R. (2003) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2003.07.013 · Cited by 2,416
Kühlbrandt, W. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1251652 · Cited by 1,325
Crystal structures of a GABAA-receptor chimera reveal new endogenous neurosteroid-binding sites.
Laverty, D., Thomas, P., Field, M., Andersen, O. J., Gold, M. G., Biggin, P. C., Gielen, M., & Smart, T. G. (2017) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.3477 · Cited by 179
Cited by
Structure-based classification of tauopathies
Shi, Y., Zhang, W., Yang, Y., Murzin, A. G., Falcon, B., Kotecha, A., van Beers, M., Tarutani, A., Kametani, F., Garringer, H. J., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03911-7 · Cited by 878
Self-citationAutomated model building and protein identification in cryo-EM maps
Jamali, K., Käll, L., Zhang, R., Brown, A., Kimanius, D., & Scheres, S. H. W. (2023) · doi:10.1101/2023.05.16.541002 · Cited by 686
Self-citationAutomated model building and protein identification in cryo-EM maps
Jamali, K., Käll, L., Zhang, R., Brown, A., Kimanius, D., & Scheres, S. H. W. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07215-4 · Cited by 686
Self-citationCurrent strategies for the design of PROTAC linkers: a critical review
Troup, R. I., Fallan, C., & Baud, M. G. J. (2020) · Exploration of Targeted Anti-tumor Therapy · doi:10.37349/etat.2020.00018 · Cited by 424
“Critically, recent reports of prototypical cryo-EM structures at atomic resolution, along with fragment bound protein structures suggest that the gap in resolution between X-ray crystallography and cryo-EM is closing quickly [149-151].”
BackgroundPhelps, J. S., Hildebrand, D. G. C., Graham, B. J., Kuan, A. T., Thomas, L. A., Nguyen, T. M., Buhmann, J., Azevedo, A. W., Sustar, A., Agrawal, S., et al. (2021) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.12.013 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Nakane, T., Kotecha, A., Sente, A., McMullan, G., Masiulis, S., Brown, P. M. G. E., Grigoras, I. T., Malinauskaite, L., Malinauskas, T., Miehling, J., Uchański, T., Yu, L., Karia, D., Pechnikova, E. V., de Jong, E., Keizer, J., Bischoff, M., McCormack, J., Tiemeijer, P., Hardwick, S. W., Chirgadze, D. Y., Murshudov, G., Aricescu, A. R., & Scheres, S. H. W.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2020-10-21
- Volume
- 587
- Issue
- 7832
- Pages
- 152-156
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W3093646295
- Cited by
- 868
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 53.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.