CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 361Human Mobility and Location-Based AnalysisUrban Design and Spatial AnalysisComplex Systems and Time Series Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 89 of the 90 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The scales of human mobility

Open access
Alessandretti, Laura, Aslak, Ulf, Lehmann, Sune·2020·Nature
DOI 10.1038/s41586-020-2909-1
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

There is a contradiction at the heart of our current understanding of individual and collective mobility patterns. On the one hand, a highly influential body of literature on human mobility driven by analyses of massive empirical datasets finds that human movements show no evidence of characteristic spatial scales. There, human mobility is described as scale free 1-3. On the other hand, geographically, the concept of scale-referring to meaningful levels of description from individual buildings to neighbourhoods, cities, regions and countries-is central for the description of various aspects of human behaviour, such as socioeconomic interactions, or political and cultural dynamics 4,5. Here we resolve this apparent paradox by showing that day-to-day human mobility does indeed contain meaningful scales, corresponding to spatial 'containers' that restrict mobility behaviour. The scale-free results arise from aggregating displacements across containers. We present a simple model-which given a person's trajectory-infers their neighbourhood, city and so on, as well as the sizes of these geographical containers. We find that the containers-characterizing the trajectories of more than 700,000 individuals-do indeed have typical sizes. We show that our model is also able to generate highly realistic trajectories and provides a way to understand the differences in mobility behaviour across countries, gender groups and urban-rural areas.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-020-2909-1

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Larsen, J. & Urry, J. Mobilities, Networks, Geographies (Routledge, 2016).
  2. Alessandretti, L., Sapiezynski, P., Sekara, V., Lehmann, S. & Baronchelli, A. Evidence for a conserved quantity in human mobility. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2, 485–491 (2018). · DOI
  3. Batty, M. in Hierarchy in Natural and Social Sciences (ed. Pumain, D.) 143–168 (Springer, 2006).
  4. Train, K. E. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2009).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 361

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Alessandretti, L., Aslak, U., & Lehmann, S.
Affiliations
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Lehmann, Sune
ORCID
Venue
Nature
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2020-11-18
Volume
587
Issue
7834
Pages
402-407
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
DOI
10.1038/s41586-020-2909-1
OpenAlex
W3098208509
Cited by
361
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 74 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 76 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 3
FWCI
31.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
Keywords
human mobility, spatial scale, neighborhood size, city size, single-cell trajectory analysis, power-law distribution, mobility behavior, urban-rural differences, gender differences
MeSH terms
Built Environment, Denmark, Humans, Models, Theoretical, Reproducibility of Results, Human Migration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review