The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessing transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2 lineage B.1.1.7 in England
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
The SARS-CoV-2 lineage B.1.1.7, designated variant of concern (VOC) 202012/01 by Public Health England 1, was first identified in the UK in late summer to early autumn 2020 2. Whole-genome SARS-CoV-2 sequence data collected from community-based diagnostic testing for COVID-19 show an extremely rapid expansion of the B.1.1.7 lineage during autumn 2020, suggesting that it has a selective advantage. Here we show that changes in VOC frequency inferred from genetic data correspond closely to changes inferred by S gene target failures (SGTF) in community-based diagnostic PCR testing. Analysis of trends in SGTF and non-SGTF case numbers in local areas across England shows that B.1.1.7 has higher transmissibility than non-VOC lineages, even if it has a different latent period or generation time. The SGTF data indicate a transient shift in the age composition of reported cases, with cases of B.1.1.7 including a larger share of under 20-year-olds than non-VOC cases. We estimated time-varying reproduction numbers for B.1.1.7 and co-circulating lineages using SGTF and genomic data. The best-supported models did not indicate a substantial difference in VOC transmissibility among different age groups, but all analyses agreed that B.1.1.7 has a substantial transmission advantage over other lineages, with a 50% to 100% higher reproduction number.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epidemiological studies suggest that it was approximately 50% more transmissible than previously circulating UK variants 191,197,198 .”
From The biological and clinical significance of emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants (2021) · cites this paper as [191]
In the citing paper
“Volz and colleagues have shown that the B.1.1.7 variant increases the effective reproduction number, Rt, by a factor of 1·5–2·0.5”
From Changes in symptomatology, reinfection, and transmissibility associated with the SARS-CoV-2 variant B.1.1.7: an ecological study (2021) · cites this paper as [5]
In the citing paper
“Preliminary evidence from epidemiological studies suggests that the B.1.1.7 variant is more transmissible than pre-existing variants.”
From Changes in symptomatology, reinfection, and transmissibility associated with the SARS-CoV-2 variant B.1.1.7: an ecological study (2021) · cites this paper as [5]
In the citing paper
“In addition, the emergence of new variants with increased transmissibility 8 and reduced sensitivity to vaccine-elicited antibodies 9 , and for which vaccines are less able to prevent infection 10 , has raised fears for vulnerable groups in whom the magnitude and quality of immune responses may be suboptimal.”
From Age-related immune response heterogeneity to SARS-CoV-2 vaccine BNT162b2 (2021) · cites this paper as [8]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 · Cited by 25,970
IQ-TREE 2: New Models and Efficient Methods for Phylogenetic Inference in the Genomic Era
Minh, B. Q., Schmidt, H. A., Chernomor, O., Schrempf, D., Woodhams, M. D., von Haeseler, A., & Lanfear, R. (2020) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msaa015 · Cited by 16,873
Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (1986) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1177013604 · Cited by 12,575
Posterior summarization in Bayesian phylogenetics using tracer 1.7
Rambaut, A., Drummond, A. J., Xie, D., Baele, G., & Suchard, M. A. (2018) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syy032 · Cited by 11,159
Self-citationBayesian phylogenetic and phylodynamic data integration using BEAST 1.10
Suchard, M. A., Lemey, P., Baele, G., Ayres, D. L., Drummond, A. J., & Rambaut, A. (2018) · Virus Evolution · doi:10.1093/ve/vey016 · Cited by 3,749
Self-citationEstimating the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 in Europe
Flaxman, S. R., Mishra, S., Gandy, A., Unwin, H. J. T., Mellan, T. A., Coupland, H., Whittaker, C., Zhu, H., Berah, T., Eaton, J. W., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2405-7 · Cited by 3,398
Self-citationEstimated transmissibility and impact of SARS-CoV-2 lineage B.1.1.7 in England
Davies, N. G., Abbott, S., Barnard, R. C., Jarvis, C. I., Kucharski, A. J., Munday, J. D., Pearson, C. A. B., Russell, T. W., Tully, D. C., Washburne, A. D., et al. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abg3055 · Cited by 2,581
Estimated transmissibility and impact of SARS-CoV-2 lineage B.1.1.7 in England
Davies, N. G., Abbott, S., Barnard, R. C., Jarvis, C. I., Kucharski, A. J., Munday, J. D., Pearson, C. A. B., Russell, T. W., Tully, D. C., Washburne, A. D., et al. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.12.24.20248822 · Cited by 2,557
Detection of a SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern in South Africa
Tegally, H., Wilkinson, E., Giovanetti, M., Iranzadeh, A., Fonseca, V., Giandhari, J., Doolabh, D., Pillay, S., San, E. J., Msomi, N., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03402-9 · Cited by 2,510
Bi, Q., Wu, Y., Mei, S., Ye, C., Zou, X., Zhang, Z., Liu, X., Wei, L., Truelove, S., Zhang, T., et al. (2020) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30287-5 · Cited by 1,960
Cited by
Sorted by citations
SARS-CoV-2 variants, spike mutations and immune escape
Harvey, W. T., Carabelli, A. M., Jackson, B., Gupta, R. K., Thomson, E. C., Harrison, E. M., Ludden, C., Reeve, R., Rambaut, A., COVID-19 Genomics UK (COG-UK) Consortium, et al. (2021) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-021-00573-0 · Cited by 3,528
Self-citationFeatures, Evaluation and Treatment Coronavirus (COVID-19)
Cascella, M., Rajnik, M., Cuomo, A., Dulebohn, S. C., & Napoli, R. D. (2020) · StatPearls · Cited by 3,351
Detection of a SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern in South Africa
Tegally, H., Wilkinson, E., Giovanetti, M., Iranzadeh, A., Fonseca, V., Giandhari, J., Doolabh, D., Pillay, S., San, E. J., Msomi, N., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03402-9 · Cited by 2,510
Rapid epidemic expansion of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant in southern Africa
Viana, R. P. E. S., Moyo, S. M., Amoako, D. G., Tegally, H., Scheepers, C., Althaus, C. L., Anyaneji, U. J., Bester, P. A., Boni, M. F., Chand, M., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04411-y · Cited by 1,678
Self-citationGenomics and epidemiology of the P.1 SARS-CoV-2 lineage in Manaus, Brazil
Faria, N. R., Mellan, T. A., Whittaker, C., Claro, I. M., Candido, D. D. S., Mishra, S., Crispim, M. A. E., Sales, F. C. S., Hawryluk, I., McCrone, J. T., et al. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abh2644 · Cited by 1,461
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- The COVID-19 Genomics UK (COG-UK) consortium, Volz, E., Mishra, S., Chand, M., Barrett, J. C., Johnson, R., Geidelberg, L., Hinsley, W. R., Laydon, D. J., Dabrera, G., O’Toole, Á., Amato, R., Ragonnet-Cronin, M., Harrison, I., Jackson, B., Ariani, C. V., Boyd, O., Loman, N. J., McCrone, J. T., Gonçalves, S., Jorgensen, D., Myers, R., Hill, V., Jackson, D. K., Gaythorpe, K., Groves, N., Sillitoe, J., Kwiatkowski, D. P., Flaxman, S., Ratmann, O., Bhatt, S., Hopkins, S., Gandy, A., Rambaut, A., & Ferguson, N. M.
- Affiliations
- Imperial College London (GB)
- Public Health England (GB)
- Wellcome Sanger Institute (GB)
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Volz, Erik
- Ferguson, Neil M.
- ORCID
- Volz, Erik
- Mishra, Swapnil
- Chand, Meera
- Barrett, Jeffrey C.
- Geidelberg, Lily
- Hinsley, Wes R.
- Laydon, Daniel J.
- Dabrera, Gavin
- Harrison, Ian
- Jackson, Ben
- Ariani, Cristina V.
- Boyd, Olivia
- Loman, Nicholas J.
- McCrone, John T.
- Gonçalves, Sónia
- Jorgensen, David
- Myers, Richard
- Hill, Verity
- Jackson, David K.
- Gaythorpe, Katy
- Groves, Natalie
- Kwiatkowski, Dominic P.
- Flaxman, Seth
- Ratmann, Oliver
- Bhatt, Samir
- Hopkins, Susan
- Gandy, Axel
- Rambaut, Andrew
- Ferguson, Neil M.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2021-03-25
- Volume
- 593
- Issue
- 7858
- Pages
- 266-269
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W3136588845
- Cited by
- 1,611
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 38 · 2025: 86 · 2024: 116 · 2023: 216 · 2022: 464 · 2021: 685
- FWCI
- 116.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
- UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (submittedVersion)
- University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
- Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
- Apollo
- Funders
- Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP 1175094, 206194, OPP1197730, MR/R015600/1, OPP1084362)
- Wellcome Trust (MR/R015600/1, 204911/Z/16/Z, Z/17/Z, 206298/Z/17/Z, RDA02, 206298, 206194)
- UK Research and Innovation (MR/V038109/1, MR/R015600/1, MC_PC_19027)
- National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit
- Cancer Research UK (23923)
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (PR-OD-1017–20002, MR/R015600/1, RDA02, NIHR301445, OPP1175094, ACF-2018-04-014)
- Academy of Medical Sciences (AMS-CSF4-Torok, SBF004\1080)
- Imperial College London (MR/R015600/1)
- European Commission (725422, MR/R015600/1, 101003653, COVID-19, 206298/Z/17/Z)
- Rural Development Administration
- Novo Nordisk (NNF20OC0059309)
- Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF20OC0059309)
- Medical Research Council (MR/R015600/1, MR/M006212/1, MC_PC_19026, MR/V038109/1, MR/S00291X/1, MC_PC_19012, COVID-19)
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/V002910/1, EP/V002910/2)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
- Keywords
- SARS-CoV-2, B.1.1.7 lineage, variants of concern, transmissibility, S-gene target failure, time-varying reproduction number, viral genomic surveillance, COVID-19 pandemic, England
- MeSH terms
- COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Child, Child, Preschool, England, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Middle Aged, Phylogeny, Time Factors, Genome, Viral, Age Distribution, Evolution, Molecular, Basic Reproduction Number, Young Adult, Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review