Cited by 68Neurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms

The neuronal logic of how internal states control food choice

Open access
Münch, Daniel, Goldschmidt, Dennis, Ribeiro, Carlos·2022·Nature

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

When deciding what to eat, animals evaluate sensory information about food quality alongside multiple ongoing internal states 1-10. How internal states interact to alter sensorimotor processing and shape decisions such as food choice remains poorly understood. Here we use pan-neuronal volumetric activity imaging in the brain of Drosophila melanogaster to investigate the neuronal basis of internal state-dependent nutrient appetites. We created a functional atlas of the ventral fly brain and find that metabolic state shapes sensorimotor processing across large sections of the neuropil. By contrast, reproductive state acts locally to define how sensory information is translated into feeding motor output. These two states thus synergistically modulate protein-specific food intake and food choice. Finally, using a novel computational strategy, we identify driver lines that label neurons innervating state-modulated brain regions and show that the newly identified 'borboleta' region is sufficient to direct food choice towards protein-rich food. We thus identify a generalizable principle by which distinct internal states are integrated to shape decision making and propose a strategy to uncover and functionally validate how internal states shape behaviour.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-022-04909-5

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The model predicts central neurons that respond to both sugar and water taste activation, as well as sugar-specific and water-specific neurons.

    “In contrast, our model predicts central neurons that respond to both sugar and water taste activation, as well as sugar-specific and water-specific neurons, consistent with brainwide calcium imaging studies29,46.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Münch, D., Goldschmidt, D., & Ribeiro, C.
Affiliations
Champalimaud Foundation (PT)
Corresponding author
  • Münch, Daniel
  • Ribeiro, Carlos
Venue
Nature
Published
2022-07-06
Volume
607
Issue
7920
Pages
747-755
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W4283826056
Cited by
68
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7
FWCI
5.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (NIH P40OD018537)
  • National Institutes of Health (NIH P40OD018537, P40OD018537)
  • Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (PD/BD/114273/2016)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
Keywords
food choice, internal state, metabolic status, reproductive status, sensorimotor processing, feeding behavior, Drosophila melanogaster, decision-making
MeSH terms
Animals, Appetite, Dietary Proteins, Drosophila melanogaster, Food Preferences, Logic, Neurons, Neuropil, Feedback, Sensory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review