Cited by 517Protein Degradation and InhibitorsUbiquitin and proteasome pathwaysChemical Synthesis and Analysis

Differential PROTAC substrate specificity dictated by orientation of recruited E3 ligase

Open access
Smith, Blake E., Wang, Stephen L., Jaime-Figueroa, Saul, Harbin, Alicia, Wang, Jing, Hamman, Brian D., Crews, Craig M.·2019·Nature Communications

Abstract

PROteolysis-TArgeting Chimeras (PROTACs) are hetero-bifunctional molecules that recruit an E3 ubiquitin ligase to a given substrate protein resulting in its targeted degradation. Many potent PROTACs with specificity for dissimilar targets have been developed; however, the factors governing degradation selectivity within closely-related protein families remain elusive. Here, we generate isoform-selective PROTACs for the p38 MAPK family using a single warhead (foretinib) and recruited E3 ligase (von Hippel-Lindau). Based on their distinct linker attachments and lengths, these two PROTACs differentially recruit VHL, resulting in degradation of p38α or p38δ. We characterize the role of ternary complex formation in driving selectivity, showing that it is necessary, but insufficient, for PROTAC-induced substrate ubiquitination. Lastly, we explore the p38δ:PROTAC:VHL complex to explain the different selectivity profiles of these PROTACs. Our work attributes the selective degradation of two closely-related proteins using the same warhead and E3 ligase to heretofore underappreciated aspects of the ternary complex model.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-018-08027-7

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several mechanisms contribute to increased selectivity of PROTACs, including steric incapability of some targets to form a productive ternary complex, or lack of a suitably positioned lysine residue for ubiquitination.

    “Several mechanisms have been shown to contribute to this increase in selectivity. This includes steric incapability of some targets to form a productive ternary complex, or lack of a suitably positioned lysine residue for ubiquitination.62−69”
  • The propensity of different E3 ligases to ubiquitinate specific proteins varies.

    “The propensity of different E3 ligases to ubiquitinate specific proteins has been reported to vary in the literature (Bondeson et al., 2018; Smith et al., 2019) and variation is attributed to the unique protein-protein interactions that may form between the E3 ligase and target.”
  • AR, ER, FAK, P38 PROTACs have been developed against different solid tumors.

    “For example, PROTACs against BRD4, BTK, BCR-ABL and CDK-6 etc. have shown efficacy in leukemia [22, 44, 58, 60], whereas AR, ER, FAK, P38 PROTACs have been developed against different solid tumors [13, 49, 51, 104] (Table 1).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, B. E., Wang, S. L., Jaime-Figueroa, S., Harbin, A., Wang, J., Hamman, B. D., & Crews, C. M.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Arvinas (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Crews, Craig M.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2019-01-10
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
131-131
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2909353434
Cited by
517
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 74 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 75 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 34
FWCI
21.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (R35CA197589)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
Keywords
PROTACs, targeted protein degradation, VHL, p38 MAPK, p38α, p38δ, linker length, ternary complex model, ubiquitination, foretinib, warheads
MeSH terms
Protein Domains, Humans, Models, Molecular, Substrate Specificity, Molecular Structure, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases, p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases, Von Hippel-Lindau Tumor Suppressor Protein, Small Molecule Libraries, Ubiquitination, Proteolysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review