Cited by 112Protein Degradation and InhibitorsChemical Synthesis and AnalysisComputational Drug Discovery Methods

Molecular glues and bifunctional compounds: Therapeutic modalities based on induced proximity

Open access
Schreiber, Stuart L.·2024·Cell Chemical Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

This Perspective explores molecular glues and bifunctional compounds-proximity-inducing compounds-and offers a framework to understand and exploit their similarity to hotspots, missense mutations, and posttranslational modifications (PTMs). This view is also shown to be relevant to intramolecular glues, where compounds induce contacts between distinct domains of the same protein. A historical perspective of these compounds is presented that shows the field has come full circle from molecular glues targeting native proteins, to bifunctionals targeting fusion proteins, and back to molecular glues and bifunctionals targeting native proteins. Modern screening methods and data analyses with pre-selected target proteins are shown to yield either cooperative molecular glues or bifunctional compounds that induce proximity, thereby enabling novel functional outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chembiol.2024.05.004

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The underlying principles of molecular glue mechanisms might be rooted in partial mimicry of naturally occurring PPIs at preexisting sites of high PPI propensity, interactions further enhanced by a matching molecular glue.

    “Taken together, our findings provide another example that the underlying principles of molecular glue mechanisms might be rooted in the partial mimicry of naturally occurring PPIs at preexisting sites of high PPI propensity, interactions that are further enhanced by a matching molecular glue1,10,11,50–54.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 76 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. First International Congress on FK 506. August 21-24, 1991, Pittsburgh, PA (1991). Transplant. Proc. 23, 2709–3380.
  2. Xie, 2024, KBTBD4 Cancer Hotspot Mutations Drive Neomorphic Degradation of HDAC1/2 Corepressor Complexes, bioRxiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schreiber, S. L.
Affiliations
Broad Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Schreiber, Stuart L.
Venue
Cell Chemical Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-06
Volume
31
Issue
6
Pages
1050-1063
ISSN
  • 2451-9448 (ISSN-L)
  • 2451-9456
OpenAlex
W4399491693
Cited by
112
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 9
FWCI
4.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell chemical biology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences
  • National Cancer Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
molecular glues, bifunctional molecules, induced proximity, protein-protein interaction, fusion protein, missense mutations, post-translational modification, drug screening
MeSH terms
Humans, Protein Processing, Post-Translational, Proteins, Mutation, Missense

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review