Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 441

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

De novo design of luciferases using deep learning

Open access
Yeh, Andy Hsien-Wei, Norn, Christoffer, Kipnis, Yakov, Tischer, Doug, Pellock, Samuel J., Evans, Declan, Ma, Pengchen, Lee, Gyu Rie, Zhang, Jason Z., Anishchenko, Ivan, Coventry, Brian, Cao, Longxing, Dauparas, Justas, Halabiya, Samer, DeWitt, Michelle, Carter, Lauren, Houk, K. N., Baker, David·2023·Nature

Abstract

De novo enzyme design has sought to introduce active sites and substrate-binding pockets that are predicted to catalyse a reaction of interest into geometrically compatible native scaffolds 1,2, but has been limited by a lack of suitable protein structures and the complexity of native protein sequence–structure relationships. Here we describe a deep-learning-based ‘family-wide hallucination’ approach that generates large numbers of idealized protein structures containing diverse pocket shapes and designed sequences that encode them. We use these scaffolds to design artificial luciferases that selectively catalyse the oxidative chemiluminescence of the synthetic luciferin substrates diphenylterazine 3 and 2-deoxycoelenterazine. The designed active sites position an arginine guanidinium group adjacent to an anion that develops during the reaction in a binding pocket with high shape complementarity. For both luciferin substrates, we obtain designed luciferases with high selectivity; the most active of these is a small (13.9 kDa) and thermostable (with a melting temperature higher than 95 °C) enzyme that has a catalytic efficiency on diphenylterazine (kcat/Km = 10 6 M−1 s−1) comparable to that of native luciferases, but a much higher substrate specificity. The creation of highly active and specific biocatalysts from scratch with broad applications in biomedicine is a key milestone for computational enzyme design, and our approach should enable generation of a wide range of luciferases and other enzymes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-023-05696-3

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Jiang, L. et al. De novo computational design of retro-aldol enzymes. Science 319, 1387–1391 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
  2. Rothlisberger, D. et al. Kemp elimination catalysts by computational enzyme design. Nature 453, 190–195 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Yeh, H. W. et al. Red-shifted luciferase–luciferin pairs for enhanced bioluminescence imaging. Nat. Methods 14, 971–974 (2017). · DOI
  4. Love, A. C. & Prescher, J. A. Seeing (and using) the light: recent developments in bioluminescence technology. Cell Chem. Biol. 27, 904–920 (2020). · DOI
  5. Syed, A. J. & Anderson, J. C. Applications of bioluminescence in biotechnology and beyond. Chem. Soc. Rev. 50, 5668–5705 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  6. Yeh, H.-W. & Ai, H.-W. Development and applications of bioluminescent and chemiluminescent reporters and biosensors. Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 12, 129–150 (2019). · DOI
  7. Zambito, G., Chawda, C. & Mezzanotte, L. Emerging tools for bioluminescence imaging. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 63, 86–94 (2021). · DOI
  8. Markova, S. V., Larionova, M. D. & Vysotski, E. S. Shining light on the secreted luciferases of marine copepods: current knowledge and applications. Photochem. Photobiol. 95, 705–721 (2019). · DOI
  9. Jiang, T. Y., Du, L. P. & Li, M. Y. Lighting up bioluminescence with coelenterazine: strategies and applications. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 15, 466–480 (2016). · DOI
  10. Michelini, E. et al. Spectral-resolved gene technology for multiplexed bioluminescence and high-content screening. Anal. Chem. 80, 260–267 (2008). · DOI
  11. Rathbun, C. M. et al. Parallel screening for rapid identification of orthogonal bioluminescent tools. ACS Cent. Sci. 3, 1254–1261 (2017). · DOI
  12. Yeh, H.-W., Wu, T., Chen, M. & Ai, H.-W. Identification of factors complicating bioluminescence imaging. Biochemistry 58, 1689–1697 (2019). · DOI
  13. Su, Y. C. et al. Novel NanoLuc substrates enable bright two-population bioluminescence imaging in animals. Nat. Methods 17, 852–860 (2020). · DOI
  14. Lombardi, A., Pirro, F., Maglio, O., Chino, M. & DeGrado, W. F. De novo design of four-helix bundle metalloproteins: one scaffold, diverse reactivities. Acc. Chem. Res. 52, 1148–1159 (2019). · DOI
  15. Chino, M. et al. Artificial diiron enzymes with a de novo designed four‐helix bundle structure. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2015, 3352–3352 (2015). · DOI
  16. Basler, S. et al. Efficient Lewis acid catalysis of an abiological reaction in a de novo protein scaffold. Nat. Chem. 13, 231–235 (2021). · DOI
  17. Yang, J. Y. et al. Improved protein structure prediction using predicted interresidue orientations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 1496–1503 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  18. Basanta, B. et al. An enumerative algorithm for de novo design of proteins with diverse pocket structures. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 22135–22145 (2020). · DOI
  19. Loening, A. M., Fenn, T. D. & Gambhir, S. S. Crystal structures of the luciferase and green fluorescent protein from Renilla reniformis. J. Mol. Biol. 374, 1017–1028 (2007). · DOI
  20. Tomabechi, Y. et al. Crystal structure of nanoKAZ: the mutated 19 kDa component of Oplophorus luciferase catalyzing the bioluminescent reaction with coelenterazine. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 470, 88–93 (2016). · DOI
  21. Wu, N. et al. Solution structure of Gaussia luciferase with five disulfide bonds and identification of a putative coelenterazine binding cavity by heteronuclear NMR. Sci. Rep. 10, 20069 (2020). · DOI
  22. Ding, B. W. & Liu, Y. J. Bioluminescence of firefly squid via mechanism of single electron-transfer oxygenation and charge-transfer-induced luminescence. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 1106–1119 (2017). · DOI
  23. Isobe, H., Yamanaka, S., Kuramitsu, S. & Yamaguchi, K. Regulation mechanism of spin-orbit coupling in charge-transfer-induced luminescence of imidazopyrazinone derivatives. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 132–149 (2008). · DOI
  24. Kondo, H. et al. Substituent effects on the kinetics for the chemiluminescence reaction of 6-arylimidazo[1,2-a]pyrazin-3(7H)-ones (Cypridina luciferin analogues): support for the single electron transfer (SET)-oxygenation mechanism with triplet molecular oxygen. Tetrahedron Lett. 46, 7701–7704 (2005). · DOI
  25. Branchini, B. R. et al. Experimental support for a single electron-transfer oxidation mechanism in firefly bioluminescence. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 7592–7595 (2015). · DOI
  26. Dou, J. Y. et al. De novo design of a fluorescence-activating β-barrel. Nature 561, 485–491 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  27. Cao, L. et al. Design of protein-binding proteins from the target structure alone. Nature 605, 551–560 (2022). · DOI · Paper page
  28. Yeh, H.-W. et al. ATP-independent bioluminescent reporter variants to improve in vivo imaging. ACS Chem. Biol. 14, 959–965 (2019). · DOI
  29. Xiong, Y. et al. Engineered amber-emitting nano luciferase and its use for immunobioluminescence imaging in vivo. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 14101–14111 (2022). · DOI
  30. Bhaumik, S. & Gambhir, S. S. Optical imaging of Renilla luciferase reporter gene expression in living mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 377–382 (2002). · DOI
  31. Szent-Gyorgyi, C., Ballou, B. T., Dagnal, E. & Bryan, B. Cloning and characterization of new bioluminescent proteins. In Proc. SPIE 3600, Biomedical Imaging: Reporters, Dyes, and Instrumentation (eds. Bornhop, D. J., Contag, C. H. & Sevick-Muraca, E. M.) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.351015 (SPIE, 1999). · DOI
  32. Hall, M. P. et al. Engineered luciferase reporter from a deep sea shrimp utilizing a novel imidazopyrazinone substrate. ACS Chem. Biol. 7, 1848–1857 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  33. Wicky, B. I. M. et al. Hallucinating symmetric protein assemblies. Science 378, 56–61 (2022). · DOI · Paper page
  34. Giger, L. et al. Evolution of a designed retro-aldolase leads to complete active site remodeling. Nat. Chem. Biol. 9, 494–498 (2013). · DOI
  35. Yao, Z. et al. Multiplexed bioluminescence microscopy via phasor analysis. Nat. Methods 19, 893–898 (2022). · DOI

Cited by

See all 441

Metadata

Authors
Yeh, A. H.-W., Norn, C., Kipnis, Y., Tischer, D., Pellock, S. J., Evans, D., Ma, P., Lee, G. R., Zhang, J. Z., Anishchenko, I., Coventry, B., Cao, L., Dauparas, J., Halabiya, S., DeWitt, M., Carter, L., Houk, K. N., & Baker, D.
Venue
Nature
Published
2023-02-22
Volume
614
Issue
7949
Pages
774-780
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W4321480048
Cited by
441
References
7
FWCI
32.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: De novo design of luciferases using deep learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41586-023-05696-3
The paper
Yeh, A. H.-W., Norn, C., Kipnis, Y., Tischer, D., Pellock, S. J., Evans, D., Ma, P., Lee, G. R., Zhang, J. Z., Anishchenko, I., Coventry, B., Cao, L., Dauparas, J., Halabiya, S., DeWitt, M., Carter, L., Houk, K. N., & Baker, D. (2023). De novo design of luciferases using deep learning. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05696-3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.