Cited by 81Fungal and yeast genetics researchMicrotubule and mitosis dynamicsUbiquitin and proteasome pathways

Natural proteome diversity links aneuploidy tolerance to protein turnover

Open access
Muenzner, Julia, Trébulle, Pauline, Agostini, Federica, Zauber, Henrik, Messner, Christoph B., Steger, Martin, Kilian, Christiane, Lau, Kate +15 more·2024·Nature

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Accessing the natural genetic diversity of species unveils hidden genetic traits, clarifies gene functions and allows the generalizability of laboratory findings to be assessed. One notable discovery made in natural isolates of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is that aneuploidy—an imbalance in chromosome copy numbers—is frequent 1,2 (around 20%), which seems to contradict the substantial fitness costs and transient nature of aneuploidy when it is engineered in the laboratory 3–5 . Here we generate a proteomic resource and merge it with genomic 1 and transcriptomic 6 data for 796 euploid and aneuploid natural isolates. We find that natural and lab-generated aneuploids differ specifically at the proteome. In lab-generated aneuploids, some proteins—especially subunits of protein complexes—show reduced expression, but the overall protein levels correspond to the aneuploid gene dosage. By contrast, in natural isolates, more than 70% of proteins encoded on aneuploid chromosomes are dosage compensated, and average protein levels are shifted towards the euploid state chromosome-wide. At the molecular level, we detect an induction of structural components of the proteasome, increased levels of ubiquitination, and reveal an interdependency of protein turnover rates and attenuation. Our study thus highlights the role of protein turnover in mediating aneuploidy tolerance, and shows the utility of exploiting the natural diversity of species to attain generalizable molecular insights into complex biological processes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-024-07442-9

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Muenzner, J., Trébulle, P., Agostini, F., Zauber, H., Messner, C. B., Steger, M., Kilian, C., Lau, K., Barthel, N., Lehmann, A., Textoris-Taube, K., Caudal, E., Egger, A.-S., Amari, F., De Chiara, M., Demichev, V., Gossmann, T. I., Mülleder, M., Liti, G., Schacherer, J., Selbach, M., Berman, J., & Ralser, M.
Affiliations
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
  • Centre for Human Genetics (GB)
  • Max Delbrück Center (DE)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • Evotec (Germany) (DE)
  • The Francis Crick Institute (GB)
  • TU Dortmund University (DE)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
Corresponding author
  • Berman, Judith
  • Ralser, Markus
Venue
Nature
Published
2024-05-22
Volume
630
Issue
8015
Pages
149-157
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W4398201077
Cited by
81
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 5
FWCI
8.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MDC Repository (Max-Delbrueck-Center for Molecular Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (FC001134, 200829/Z/16/Z)
  • Francis Crick Institute (10134, FC001134)
  • Cancer Research UK (FC001134)
  • European Commission (HORIZON2020)
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (-15-IDEX-01, ANR‐15‐IDEX‐01)
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (031L0220)
  • Medical Research Council (FC001134)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
Keywords
aneuploidy tolerance, protein turnover, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, natural genetic variation, proteome, dosage compensation, gene dosage, proteasome, ubiquitination, attenuation, wild isolate
MeSH terms
Aneuploidy, Dosage Compensation, Genetic, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Genetic Variation, Proteome, Gene Expression Profiling, Genomics, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Proteomics, Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex, Ubiquitination, Proteolysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review