Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi.
Open accessAbstract
Systemic fungal infections pose a serious clinical problem. Treatment options are limited, and antifungal drug resistance is increasing. In addition, a substantial proportion of patients do not respond to therapy despite being infected with fungi that are susceptible to the drug. The discordance between overall treatment outcome and low levels of clinical resistance may be attributable to antifungal drug tolerance. In this Review, we define and distinguish resistance and tolerance and discuss the current understanding of the molecular, genetic and physiological mechanisms that contribute to those phenomena. Distinguishing tolerance from resistance might provide important insights into the reasons for treatment failure in some settings.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
98 of 154 cited sources checked · 33 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Drug uptake and efflux appear to contribute at least partially to tolerance, based on studies with fluorescent azole probes and strains with similar MIC levels but different tolerance levels.
“In addition to affecting resistance, drug uptake and efflux appears to contribute, at least partially, to tolerance9, based on studies with fluorescent azole probes and strains with similar MIC levels but different tolerance levels (measured as FoG and SMG, see Box ##)89,90”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [9] Rosenberg, A. et al. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat. Commun. 9, 2470 (2018). This article provides a quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans, distinguishing it from resistance and highlighting its phenotypic heterogeneity and association with subpopulation growth, and sensitivity to adjuvant drugs. source
In the Discussion, the paper says higher tolerance is associated with more cells having lower intracellular drug levels, but explicitly states that tolerance is not a function of either uptake or efflux rates. The section “Decreased intracellular drug levels underlie increased tolerance” likewise reports that measured efflux rates did not correlate with FoG. Thus, the fluorescent-probe findings do not support the attributed conclusion that uptake and efflux contribute to tolerance. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [89] Benhamou, R. I. et al. Real-time imaging of the azole class of antifungal drugs in live Candida cells. ACS Chem. Biol. 12, 1769–1777 (2017). source
The Introduction describes fluorescent azole probes for studying drug uptake, and Results and Discussion reports that increased efflux is associated with fluconazole resistance in one Candida strain. The paper does not report that uptake or efflux contributes to tolerance, or compare strains with similar MICs but different FoG or SMG tolerance levels. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [90] Benhamou, R. I., Bibi, M., Berman, J. & Fridman, M. Localizing antifungal drugs to the correct organelle can markedly enhance their efficacy. Angew. Chem. 57, 6230–6235 (2018). source
- Premisecitation
Infections from Candida isolates that test susceptible frequently do not respond to available treatments.
“For example, the rate of fluconazole and echinocandin resistance in Candida. albicans, the most prevalent Candida species, is generally less than 1%7, yet existing therapies often fail to treat infections caused by susceptible Candida isolates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] Pfaller, M. A., Diekema, D. J., Turnidge, J. D., Castanheira, M. & Jones, R. N. Twenty years of the SENTRY antifungal surveillance program: results for Candida species from 1997–2016. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 6, S79–S94 (2019). source
The Results report very low echinocandin resistance in C. albicans, and the Conclusions mention breakthrough infections. Neither passage says that infections caused by isolates testing susceptible frequently fail to respond to treatment. Searches for treatment failure despite in vitro susceptibility found no such statement in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
In C. albicans, resistance to fluconazole and echinocandins usually occurs in under 1% of isolates.
“For example, the rate of fluconazole and echinocandin resistance in Candida. albicans, the most prevalent Candida species, is generally less than 1%7, yet existing therapies often fail to treat infections caused by susceptible Candida isolates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] Pfaller, M. A., Diekema, D. J., Turnidge, J. D., Castanheira, M. & Jones, R. N. Twenty years of the SENTRY antifungal surveillance program: results for Candida species from 1997–2016. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 6, S79–S94 (2019). source
- Premisecitation
A recent quantitative study of seven diverse C. albicans isolates described four features of cells tolerant to fluconazole.
“A recent quantitative study9 identified four characteristics of fluconazole-tolerant cells across a set of seven diverse C. albicans isolates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] Rosenberg, A. et al. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat. Commun. 9, 2470 (2018). This article provides a quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans, distinguishing it from resistance and highlighting its phenotypic heterogeneity and association with subpopulation growth, and sensitivity to adjuvant drugs. source
The Discussion (page not provided) describes quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans isolates and lists four cellular features, followed by a fifth point: tolerance is mechanistically distinct from resistance. The claim's restriction to seven diverse isolates is not supported: the paper also describes seven non-persistent clinical isolates and isolates from 12 patients with persistent candidemia (Candida albicans isolates, page not provided). (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Genome changes such as whole-chromosome aneuploidy and shorter amplifications can raise resistance.
“Copy number variations, including whole-chromosome aneuploidy and shorter-range amplifications, are genome changes that can increase resistance32,43–49.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 8 sources checked- cites [32] Prasad, R., Rawal, M. K. & Shah, A. H. Candida efflux ATPases and antiporters in clinical drug resistance. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 892, 351–376 (2016). source
- cites [43] Kordalewska, M. et al. Understanding echinocandin resistance in the emerging pathogen Candida auris. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 62, e00238–18 (2018). source
- cites [44] Selmecki, A., Forche, A. & Berman, J. Aneuploidy and isochromosome formation in drug-resistant Candida albicans. Science 313, 367–370 (2006). source
- cites [45] Anderson, M. Z., Saha, A., Haseeb, A. & Bennett, R. J. A chromosome 4 trisomy contributes to increased fluconazole resistance in a clinical isolate of Candida albicans. Microbiology 163, 856–865 (2017). source
- cites [46] Yang, F. et al. Tolerance to caspofungin in Candida albicans is associated with at least three distinctive mechanisms that govern expression of FKS genes and cell wall remodeling. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 61, e00071–17 (2017). source
- cites [47] Yang, F., Kravets, A., Bethlendy, G., Welle, S. & Rustchenko, E. Chromosome 5 monosomy of Candida albicans controls susceptibility to various toxic agents, including major antifungals. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 57, 5026–5036 (2013). source
- cites [48] Yang, F. et al. Aneuploidy enables cross-adaptation to unrelated drugs. Mol. Biol. Evol. 36, 1768–1782 (2019). source
- cites [49] Todd, R. T., Wikoff, T. D., Forche, A. & Selmecki, A. Genome plasticity in Candida albicans is driven by long repeat sequences. eLife. 8, e45954 (2019). source
The Introduction (page not provided) says that amplification of a chromosome arm confers fluconazole resistance, and the Results report increased resistance with another segmental amplification. The paper also associates aneuploidy broadly with resistant isolates, but the passages do not establish that whole-chromosome aneuploidy itself increases resistance. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
In Candida auris, ERG11 polymorphisms and extra ERG11 gene copies are thought to underlie its mostly intrinsic azole resistance.
“Finally, in Candida auris, ERG11 polymorphisms as well as an increased number of ERG11 gene copies are thought to be responsible for its largely intrinsic azole resistance37–40”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 4 sources checked- cites [37] Xiang, M. J. et al. Erg11 mutations associated with azole resistance in clinical isolates of Candida albicans. FEMS Yeast Res. 13, 386–393 (2013). source
- cites [38] Flowers, S. A., Colon, B., Whaley, S. G., Schuler, M. A. & Rogers, P. D. Contribution of clinically derived mutations in ERG11 to azole resistance in Candida albicans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 59, 450–460 (2015). source
- cites [39] Healey, K. R. et al. Limited ERG11 mutations identified in isolates of Candida auris directly contribute to reduced azole susceptibility. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 62, e01427–18 (2018). source
The paper’s Results (TEXT; page unavailable) show that two C. auris ERG11 substitutions, Y132F and K143R, raised azole MICs, while several other substitutions did not. It does not establish that C. auris has extra ERG11 gene copies or that these mechanisms explain largely intrinsic azole resistance; its gene-dosage discussion concerns the experimental constructs and a comparison with C. albicans. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [40] Chowdhary, A. et al. A multicentre study of antifungal susceptibility patterns among 350 Candida auris isolates (2009-17) in India: role of the ERG11 and FKS1 genes in azole and echinocandin resistance. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 73, 891–899 (2018). source
The Discussion (page unavailable) links ERG11 substitutions Y132F and K143R to fluconazole resistance in the C. auris isolates studied. It does not establish that C. auris has extra ERG11 gene copies or that its azole resistance is largely intrinsic. The reported increase after fluconazole exposure concerns ERG11 expression, not gene copy number. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Epidemiological cut-off values rely on MICs to detect acquired resistance, typically caused by mutations.
“Epidemiological cut-off values use MICs to identify isolates with acquired resistance, usually via mutations24.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] Meletiadis, J., Curfs-Breuker, I., Meis, J. F. & Mouton, J. W. In vitro antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida isolates with the EUCAST methodology, a new method for ECOFF determination. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 61, e02372–16 (2017). source
The paper’s introductory text (indexed as ABSTRACT; page unavailable) says ECOFFs use MIC distributions to detect non-wild-type isolates that may have reduced susceptibility. It does not establish that those isolates have acquired resistance or that resistance is usually caused by mutations; it notes that testing isolates with known resistance mechanisms would be useful. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
For a given isolate, tolerant cells form a subpopulation that generally makes up 5%-90% of cells, varying by isolate.
“Second, within a given isolate, tolerant cells (those that do grow slowly in the presence of the drug, while the remaining cells do not grow) represent a subpopulation (generally 5%-90% of the cells, depending on the isolate) (Fig. 1B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] Rosenberg, A. et al. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat. Commun. 9, 2470 (2018). This article provides a quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans, distinguishing it from resistance and highlighting its phenotypic heterogeneity and association with subpopulation growth, and sensitivity to adjuvant drugs. source
The Subpopulation growth dynamics section reports that the fraction of cells growing in drug varies by isolate and represents a subpopulation. It gives an observed range of 2%–98%, however, rather than establishing the claimed ‘generally 5%–90%’ range (page not available in our copy). (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Candida species are the leading cause of human fungal infections.
“In this Review, we explore the molecular mechanisms that contribute to antifungal drug resistance, with a focus on Candida spp., the most common cause of fungal infections in humans7.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] Pfaller, M. A., Diekema, D. J., Turnidge, J. D., Castanheira, M. & Jones, R. N. Twenty years of the SENTRY antifungal surveillance program: results for Candida species from 1997–2016. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 6, S79–S94 (2019). source
The paper’s discussion of invasive fungal infections (section labeled Abstract > Conclusions; page unavailable) calls candidemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis “the most important of the invasive mycoses.” That supports Candida’s prominence in invasive disease, but not the broader claim that it is the most common cause of all fungal infections in humans. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
On drug-containing plates, colonies become visible sooner for highly tolerant isolates than for less tolerant ones.
“Fourth, the time required for cells to appear as visible colonies on a petri plate containing drug is shorter for isolates with high tolerance levels than for isolates with lower tolerance levels (Fig. 1C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] Rosenberg, A. et al. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat. Commun. 9, 2470 (2018). This article provides a quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans, distinguishing it from resistance and highlighting its phenotypic heterogeneity and association with subpopulation growth, and sensitivity to adjuvant drugs. source
In “Subpopulation growth dynamics” (page unavailable), the paper reports that highly tolerant isolates had a shorter drug-induced delay in colony appearance than less tolerant isolates. Because colony appearance times also differed without drug, this does not establish that highly tolerant isolates’ colonies became visible sooner in absolute time on drug-containing plates. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Drug concentration has little effect on tolerance.
“Third, tolerance is largely independent of drug concentration (Box 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] Rosenberg, A. et al. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat. Commun. 9, 2470 (2018). This article provides a quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans, distinguishing it from resistance and highlighting its phenotypic heterogeneity and association with subpopulation growth, and sensitivity to adjuvant drugs. source
- Premisecitation
For bactericidal drugs, tolerant bacteria show a longer minimum duration to killing than susceptible bacteria.
“Tolerant bacterial and fungal isolates have MICs in the susceptible range, but tolerant bacteria are characterized by longer minimum duration to killing (MDK) than susceptible isolates10, based on responses to bactericidal drugs10–12.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [10] Brauner, A., Fridman, O., Gefen, O. & Balaban, N. Q. Distinguishing between resistance, tolerance and persistence to antibiotic treatment. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 14, 320–330 (2016). source
- cites [11] Balaban, N. Q. et al. Definitions and guidelines for research on antibiotic persistence. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 17, 441–448 (2019). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
- cites [12] Brauner, A., Shoresh, N., Fridman, O. & Balaban, N. Q. An experimental framework for quantifying bacterial tolerance. Biophys. J. 112, 2664–2671 (2017). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Candida biofilms cause a temporary physiological change in drug responses.
“Candida spp. biofilms induce a transient, physiological alteration in drug responses22 (Box 3); that is, fungal biofilms exhibit reduced antifungal drug susceptibility via mechanisms that are dependent on cells growing within a biofilm, in which cells adhere to a substrate and form a thick mat of cells and secreted extracellular matrix that holds them together and reduces drug efficacy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] Taff, H. T., Mitchell, K. F., Edward, J. A. & Andes, D. R. Mechanisms of Candida biofilm drug resistance. Future Microbiol. 8, 1325–1337 (2013). source
- Premisecitation
Fungal biofilms are less susceptible to antifungals through mechanisms requiring biofilm growth, with cells adhering to a surface and forming a dense mat plus secreted matrix that lowers drug efficacy.
“Candida spp. biofilms induce a transient, physiological alteration in drug responses22 (Box 3); that is, fungal biofilms exhibit reduced antifungal drug susceptibility via mechanisms that are dependent on cells growing within a biofilm, in which cells adhere to a substrate and form a thick mat of cells and secreted extracellular matrix that holds them together and reduces drug efficacy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] Taff, H. T., Mitchell, K. F., Edward, J. A. & Andes, D. R. Mechanisms of Candida biofilm drug resistance. Future Microbiol. 8, 1325–1337 (2013). source
- Interpretationcitation
In non-standard assays, greater drug-phase growth than a reference strain may reflect tolerance or trailing, not resistance, since the 24-hour MIC is unchanged and increased growth appears at 48 hours.
“Further effects could be due to tolerance or trailing, rather than resistance9,25–28 because the MIC was not altered at 24 h. Instead, increased growth in the presence of the drug (relative to a reference strain) was usually detected at 48 h.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 5 sources checked- cites [9] Rosenberg, A. et al. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat. Commun. 9, 2470 (2018). This article provides a quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans, distinguishing it from resistance and highlighting its phenotypic heterogeneity and association with subpopulation growth, and sensitivity to adjuvant drugs. source
- cites [25] Lockhart, S. R., Ghannoum, M. A. & Alexander, B. D. Establishment and use of epidemiological cutoff values for molds and yeasts by use of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute M57 standard. J. Clin. Microbiol. 55, 1262–1268 (2017). This review provides an important and accessible over-review of the concept of epidemiological cut-off values as well as the methodology that underlies their establishment. source
- cites [26] Onyewu, C., Wormley, F. L. Jr., Perfect, J. R. & Heitman, J. The calcineurin target, Crz1, functions in azole tolerance but is not required for virulence of Candida albicans. Infect. Immun. 72, 7330–7333 (2004). source
The fluconazole Etest passage (labeled Abstract in our copy; page unavailable) describes growth within an inhibition halo as a trailing effect, and the assay passage says plates were read after 48 hours. The paper does not report an unchanged 24-hour MIC or increased drug-phase growth relative to the reference strain; it observed trailing in the reference strain too. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [27] Sanglard, D., Ischer, F., Marchetti, O., Entenza, J. & Bille, J. Calcineurin A of Candida albicans: involvement in antifungal tolerance, cell morphogenesis and virulence. Mol. Microbiol. 48, 959–976 (2003). source
- cites [28] Luna-Tapia, A., Tournu, H., Peters, T. L. & Palmer, G. E. Endosomal trafficking defects can induce calcium-dependent azole tolerance in Candida albicans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 60, 7170–7177 (2016). source
- Premisecitation
These LOH events included homozygosis of a chromosome 5 left-arm region containing an ERG11 point mutation.
“These LOH events included homozygosis of a region of the left arm of chromosome 5 that includes a point mutation in ERG1155.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [55] Ford, C. B. et al. The evolution of drug resistance in clinical isolates of Candida albicans. eLife 4, e00662 (2015). source
- Premisecitation
Exposure to azoles promotes mitotic defects that yield tetraploid and aneuploid cells.
“Importantly, exposure to azoles promotes mitotic defects that yield tetraploid and aneuploid cells58.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [58] Forche, A. et al. The parasexual cycle in Candida albicans provides an alternative pathway to meiosis for the formation of recombinant strains. PLoS Biol. 6, e110 (2008). source
The Results section reports aneuploid progeny arising from chromosome loss in tetraploid C. albicans strains grown on pre-spo or sorbose medium. It does not show that azole exposure promotes mitotic defects or produces those cells; searches for azole and fluconazole found references but no passage establishing that causal claim. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Growth conditions influence the degree of tolerance exhibited by a strain.
“In addition to genetic determinants of tolerance level, growth conditions influence the degree of tolerance exhibited by a strain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 4 sources checked- cites [76] Walker, L. A., Gow, N. A. & Munro, C. A. Elevated chitin content reduces the susceptibility of Candida species to caspofungin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 57, 146–154 (2013). This study finds that the ability of Candida species to grow in the presence of sub-MIC levels of caspofungin is associated with increased chitin levels in the cell wall. Pretreatment of cells with CaCl 2 and calcofluor white induces a similar increase in chitin and ability to grow in sub-MIC caspofungin levels. Whether this effect is an alteration in tolerance or resistance levels remains to be determined; higher cell source
- cites [77] Lee, K. K. et al. Elevated cell wall chitin in Candida albicans confers echinocandin resistance in vivo. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 56, 208–217 (2012). source
- cites [68] Cowen, L. E., Sanglard, D., Howard, S. J., Rogers, P. D. & Perlin, D. S. Mechanisms of antifungal drug resistance. CSH Perspect. Med. 5, a019752 (2015). source
The Biofilms section reports that biofilm growth makes normally susceptible planktonic cells highly resistant, supporting the broader point that growth state affects drug response. The Adaptive Cellular Factors section discusses drug tolerance, but our copy does not directly establish that growth conditions change the degree of tolerance exhibited by a given strain. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [78] Singh-Babak, S. D. et al. Global analysis of the evolution and mechanism of echinocandin resistance in Candida glabrata. PLoS Pathog. 8, e1002718 (2012). source
The Discussion reports that Hsp90 is required for basal echinocandin tolerance in C. glabrata and describes methionine-mediated repression of HSP90 in a conditional strain. That supports a condition-dependent change in this engineered setting, but the paper does not establish that ordinary changes in growth conditions alter the tolerance of a strain generally. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Extended echinocandin treatment is linked to the appearance of resistant strains.
“Of note, long periods of echinocandin therapy are associated with the emergence of echinocandin-resistant strains65.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [65] Perlin, D. S. Echinocandin resistance in Candida. Clin. Infect. Dis. 61, S612–S617 (2015). source
- Premisecitation
Certain drugs increase genome instability, promoting aneuploidy and whole-chromosome LOH.
“Finally, some drugs enhance genome instability and thus promote aneuploidy and whole-chromosome LOH57,58.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [57] Cowen, L. E. et al. Population genomics of drug resistance in Candida albicans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 9284–9289 (2002). source
The Discussion (page unavailable) suggests that mutations, broadly including chromosomal rearrangements, may underlie changes in gene expression during adaptation to fluconazole. It does not say that the drug increases genome instability or promotes aneuploidy or whole-chromosome LOH; searches for those terms found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [58] Forche, A. et al. The parasexual cycle in Candida albicans provides an alternative pathway to meiosis for the formation of recombinant strains. PLoS Biol. 6, e110 (2008). source
The Results section (Analysis of the Pattern of Concerted Chromosome Loss during the Parasexual Cycle; page unavailable) reports more trisomies and a different distribution of whole-chromosome LOH in progeny grown on sorbose medium than on pre-spo medium. It attributes the difference tentatively to selective pressure from the growth medium, not to drugs; the claimed drug-induced genome instability is therefore unsupported by this paper. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
In heterozygous diploids like C. albicans, loss of heterozygosity is another common resistance mechanism.
“For heterozygous diploids such as C. albicans, loss of heterozygosity (LOH) is another frequent mechanism of resistance (reviewed in Refs. 52 and 53).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [52] Mount, H. O. et al. Global analysis of genetic circuitry and adaptive mechanisms enabling resistance to the azole antifungal drugs. PLoS Genet. 14, e1007319 (2018). This article screens a library of C. albicans deletion strains and identifies two genes that affect azole responses, have roles in stress response pathways and functions that are are suppressed by the acquisition of aneuploid chromosomes. Whether the mutations are affecting resistance or tolerance is not clear, but activities of the identified genes (vacuolar retrograde trafficking and a cell wall and polarity GTPase activating pro source
The Introduction describes aneuploidy as frequent in fluconazole-resistant isolates, while the Results section on chromosome 3 and 7 reports structural changes in four evolved resistant isolates. Neither passage says that loss of heterozygosity is a frequent resistance mechanism in C. albicans. A search for “loss of heterozygosity” found the term in a reference title, not in a finding that establishes the claim; page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [53] Todd, R. T., Forche, A. & Selmecki, A. Ploidy variation in fungi: polyploidy, aneuploidy, and genome evolution. Microbiol. Spectr. 5, https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.FUNK-0051-2016 (2017). source
The Introduction describes C. albicans as generally diploid, and section 4 reports loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in C. albicans cells (page numbers unavailable). The paper does not say LOH is a frequent resistance mechanism; its discussion of fluconazole resistance in section 6 instead concerns aneuploidy and gene amplification. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Conditions that increase cell wall chitin promote cell survival in the presence of echinocandin.
“For example, conditions that increase cell wall chitin promote cell survival in the presence of echinocandin76,77, whereas calcineurin inhibitors reduce echinocandin tolerance (measured using MIC assays analyzed after 72 h)68,78.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [76] Walker, L. A., Gow, N. A. & Munro, C. A. Elevated chitin content reduces the susceptibility of Candida species to caspofungin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 57, 146–154 (2013). This study finds that the ability of Candida species to grow in the presence of sub-MIC levels of caspofungin is associated with increased chitin levels in the cell wall. Pretreatment of cells with CaCl 2 and calcofluor white induces a similar increase in chitin and ability to grow in sub-MIC caspofungin levels. Whether this effect is an alteration in tolerance or resistance levels remains to be determined; higher cell source
- cites [77] Lee, K. K. et al. Elevated cell wall chitin in Candida albicans confers echinocandin resistance in vivo. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 56, 208–217 (2012). source
- Premisecitation
Many infections caused by echinocandin-susceptible C. glabrata or C. albicans isolates do not clear easily.
“In addition, a substantial number of infections with echinocandin-susceptible C. glabrata or C. albicans isolates are not readily cleared68, and the degree to which echinocandin tolerance may play a role in this remains to be determined.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [68] Cowen, L. E., Sanglard, D., Howard, S. J., Rogers, P. D. & Perlin, D. S. Mechanisms of antifungal drug resistance. CSH Perspect. Med. 5, a019752 (2015). source
The Adaptive Cellular Factors section discusses echinocandin tolerance but says these stress responses are not typically associated with clinical failures. The Drug Resistance Mechanisms section describes growth of susceptible fungi at high drug concentrations, not whether infections with susceptible C. glabrata or C. albicans isolates clear. A search for clinical outcomes and clearance found no passage establishing the claimed substantial number of difficult-to-clear infections. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
More recent work found no correlation between MSH2 mutations and antifungal resistance in vitro or in vivo.
“however, more recent work did not find a correlation between MSH2 mutations and antifungal resistance in vitro or in vivo69,70.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [69] Bordallo-Cardona, M. A. et al. MSH2 gene point mutations are not antifungal resistance markers in Candida glabrata. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 63, e01876–18 (2019). source
- cites [70] Singh, A. et al. Absence of azole or echinocandin resistance in Candida glabrata isolates in India despite background prevalence of strains with defects in the DNA mismatch repair pathway. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 62, e00195–18 (2018). source
- Premisecitation
Segmental trisomy of chromosome 3 conferred increased fitness in the presence of fluconazole, attributable at least partially to extra copies of NPR2.
“For example, segmental trisomy of chromosome 3 conferred an increased fitness in the presence of fluconazole that was attributable, at least partially, to extra copies of NPR2, which encodes a urea transporter51.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [51] Selmecki, A. M., Dulmage, K., Cowen, L. E., Anderson, J. B. & Berman, J. Acquisition of aneuploidy provides increased fitness during the evolution of antifungal drug resistance. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000705 (2009). source
The Results section (Figure 6; page unavailable) reports that clones carrying a supernumerary chromosome with a Chr3R segment were slightly more fit in fluconazole than clones without it. The Discussion (‘Other aneuploidies in FluR strains’; page unavailable) also identifies segmental Chr3 trisomy, but discusses CDR1 and MRR1, not NPR2. Our copy does not support attributing the fitness benefit to extra NPR2 copies or identifying NPR2 as a urea transporter. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Sphingolipid biosynthesis is an important mechanism by which cells survive azole-induced ergosterol depletion.
“this approach identified sphingolipid biosynthesis as an important mechanism by which cells survive azole-induced ergosterol depletion73.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [73] Hickman, M. A. et al. The ‘obligate diploid’ Candida albicans forms mating-competent haploids. Nature 494, 55–59 (2013). source
The ‘Detection of haploid C. albicans cells’ section mentions a haploid isolate found among colonies growing near fluconazole, but does not discuss how cells survive azole treatment. Searches for sphingolipid biosynthesis and ergosterol depletion found no passage addressing the claimed mechanism; the ‘Haploid strains as genetic tools’ section concerns gene-knockout phenotyping instead. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Aneuploidy can alter fluconazole tolerance in Candida albicans.
“Aneuploidy can alter fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans drug38,51.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [38] Flowers, S. A., Colon, B., Whaley, S. G., Schuler, M. A. & Rogers, P. D. Contribution of clinically derived mutations in ERG11 to azole resistance in Candida albicans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 59, 450–460 (2015). source
- cites [51] Selmecki, A. M., Dulmage, K., Cowen, L. E., Anderson, J. B. & Berman, J. Acquisition of aneuploidy provides increased fitness during the evolution of antifungal drug resistance. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000705 (2009). source
- Premisecitation
In clinical C. albicans isolates from one HIV patient on fluconazole, LOH events kept in all later isolates appeared alongside acquired bona fide resistance.
“For example, in a series of clinical C. albicans isolates from the same patient with HIV treated with fluconazole54,55, LOH events that were retained in all subsequent isolates arose concomitant with the acquisition of bona fide resistance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [54] Bennett, R. J., Forche, A. & Berman, J. Rapid mechanisms for generating genome diversity: whole ploidy shifts, aneuploidy, and loss of heterozygosity. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 4, a019604 (2014). source
- cites [55] Ford, C. B. et al. The evolution of drug resistance in clinical isolates of Candida albicans. eLife 4, e00662 (2015). source
- Premisecitation
Higher copy numbers of chromosome 3's right arm plus unknown genes on trisomic chromosome 7 correlated with increased efflux.
“In agreement with this, increased copies of the right arm of chromosome 3, together with unidentified genes on trisomic chromosome 7 were associated with increased efflux51.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [51] Selmecki, A. M., Dulmage, K., Cowen, L. E., Anderson, J. B. & Berman, J. Acquisition of aneuploidy provides increased fitness during the evolution of antifungal drug resistance. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000705 (2009). source
The Discussion section, “Other aneuploidies in FluR strains” (page unavailable), reports extra copies of chromosome 3’s right-arm segment containing CDR1 and MRR1, genes linked to drug efflux. The Results section, “Multiple aneuploidies are evident in drug-evolved populations” (page unavailable), reports chromosome 7 trisomy but suggests it may enhance fitness, not efflux. The claim’s attribution of increased efflux to unidentified genes on trisomic chromosome 7 is therefore unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Aneuploidy and/or loss of heteroresistance are rapidly acquired genome changes that can result in increased tolerance.
“Aneuploidy and/or loss of heteroresistance are rapidly acquired genome changes that can result in increased tolerance. and are likely to affect one or several genes that alter tolerance level.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [38] Flowers, S. A., Colon, B., Whaley, S. G., Schuler, M. A. & Rogers, P. D. Contribution of clinically derived mutations in ERG11 to azole resistance in Candida albicans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 59, 450–460 (2015). source
- cites [51] Selmecki, A. M., Dulmage, K., Cowen, L. E., Anderson, J. B. & Berman, J. Acquisition of aneuploidy provides increased fitness during the evolution of antifungal drug resistance. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000705 (2009). source
The Introduction and Results report that aneuploidies appeared during early fluconazole exposure and were associated with improved growth and drug resistance. The paper does not establish that loss of heteroresistance produces increased tolerance; its Discussion instead says MTL heterozygosity was maintained throughout the three evolution experiments. Its demonstrated outcome is fluconazole resistance and fitness, rather than tolerance generally. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Fluconazole exposure drives whole-chromosome LOH through atypical mitotic divisions with chromosome gains and losses.
“For example, exposure to fluconazole promotes whole-chromosome LOH via unusual mitotic divisions (chromosome duplications and losses)58–60.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [58] Forche, A. et al. The parasexual cycle in Candida albicans provides an alternative pathway to meiosis for the formation of recombinant strains. PLoS Biol. 6, e110 (2008). source
The Results section on concerted chromosome loss reports whole-chromosome LOH and chromosome re-duplication in parasexual progeny grown on sorbose medium. It does not show that fluconazole exposure promotes those events or establish the claimed mechanism under fluconazole exposure; a fluconazole-related study appears only in the References. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [59] Harrison, B. D. et al. A tetraploid intermediate precedes aneuploid formation in yeasts exposed to fluconazole. PLoS Biol. 12, e1001815 (2014). source
The Discussion (page not provided) reports that fluconazole exposure increases loss of heterozygosity (LOH), which can arise through chromosome missegregation or recombination. The Results show unusual mitotic divisions and unequal chromosome segregation, but the paper does not establish that those divisions cause whole-chromosome LOH specifically. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [60] Forche, A. et al. Stress alters rates and types of loss of heterozygosity in Candida albicans. mBio 2, e00129–11 (2011). source
The Results report that fluconazole increased the proportion of whole-chromosome LOH about fivefold. The Introduction explains how chromosome nondisjunction and subsequent reduplication can produce whole-chromosome LOH, but the Discussion says the mechanism under fluconazole is unclear. The claim presents that proposed mechanism as established. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Echinocandin resistance results almost entirely from FKS gene mutations, which alter the drug target 1,3-β-glucan synthase.
“Echinocandin resistance is almost exclusively due to mutations in FKS genes (Table 1), which encode the target enzyme of the drug, 1,3-β-glucan synthase65.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [65] Perlin, D. S. Echinocandin resistance in Candida. Clin. Infect. Dis. 61, S612–S617 (2015). source
- Premisecitation
Calcineurin inhibitors reduce echinocandin tolerance.
“whereas calcineurin inhibitors reduce echinocandin tolerance (measured using MIC assays analyzed after 72 h)68,78.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [68] Cowen, L. E., Sanglard, D., Howard, S. J., Rogers, P. D. & Perlin, D. S. Mechanisms of antifungal drug resistance. CSH Perspect. Med. 5, a019752 (2015). source
The Adaptive Cellular Factors section says calcineurin signaling helps fungi survive echinocandin-induced stress, and Drug Resistance Mechanisms reports that calcineurin inhibitors eliminate paradoxical growth at high echinocandin concentrations. This supports reduced tolerance, but our copy does not establish the specified measurement by MIC assays analyzed after 72 hours. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [78] Singh-Babak, S. D. et al. Global analysis of the evolution and mechanism of echinocandin resistance in Candida glabrata. PLoS Pathog. 8, e1002718 (2012). source
The Results section reports that the calcineurin inhibitors cyclosporin A and FK506 reduced caspofungin resistance in a C. glabrata clinical isolate. The Methods describe MIC assays using these inhibitors, but our copy does not establish a 72-hour readout for those assays; it specifies a 24-hour endpoint for clinical caspofungin MICs. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Mutations at either of two FKS hot-spot regions can raise an echinocandin's in vitro IC50 by as much as 1,000-fold.
“Point mutations in one of two specific hot-spot regions of FKS genes increase the half maximal inhibition concentration (IC50) of an echinocandin in vitro by up to 3 orders of magnitude67.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [67] Garcia-Effron, G., Lee, S., Park, S., Cleary, J. D. & Perlin, D. S. Effect of Candida glabrata FKS1 and FKS2 mutations on echinocandin sensitivity and kinetics of 1,3-β-D-glucan synthase: implication for the existing susceptibility breakpoint. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53, 3690–3699 (2009). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Multi-drug resistant Candida glabrata isolates are increasing at an alarming rate.
“The emergence of multi-drug resistant (MDR) C. glabrata isolates is increasing at an alarming rate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [71] Shor, E., Schuyler, J. & Perlin, D. S. A novel, drug resistance-independent, fluorescence-based approach to measure mutation rates in microbial pathogens. mBio 10, e00120–19 (2019). source
The Introduction says that C. glabrata infections have become more prevalent and that studies have documented the emergence of multidrug-resistant infections. It does not say that the number of multidrug-resistant isolates is increasing, or establish an alarming rate of increase; those claims go beyond the passage. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Inhibitors of Hsp90, calcineurin, TOR and mutants affecting Rim101 effectively eliminate tolerance and greatly increase the fungicidal activity of fluconazole across diverse isolates with different tolerance levels.
“Inhibitors of heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90)82, calcineurin21,25,26, target of rapamycin (TOR)83 and mutants that affect Rim10184 (a transcription factor involved in the pH response pathway) effectively eliminate tolerance and greatly increase the fungicidal activity [G] of fluconazole across a diverse set of isolates with different tolerance levels (Fig. 1E; Box 5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 5 sources checked- cites [82] Cowen, L. E. & Lindquist, S. Hsp90 potentiates the rapid evolution of new traits: drug resistance in diverse fungi. Science 309, 2185–2189 (2005). source
- cites [21] Marchetti, O., Moreillon, P., Glauser, M. P., Bille, J. & Sanglard, D. Potent synergism of the combination of fluconazole and cyclosporine in Candida albicans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44, 2373–2381 (2000). source
The Discussion (page unavailable in our copy) reports that cyclosporine or FK506 combined with fluconazole eliminated trailing growth, and identifies calcineurin as a possible cyclosporine target. It does not establish that calcineurin inhibition caused the effect. The fluconazole–cyclosporine combination was fungicidal in two of three fluconazole-susceptible isolates but only fungistatic in the third; the paper does not establish the claimed effect across isolates with different tolerance levels. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [25] Lockhart, S. R., Ghannoum, M. A. & Alexander, B. D. Establishment and use of epidemiological cutoff values for molds and yeasts by use of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute M57 standard. J. Clin. Microbiol. 55, 1262–1268 (2017). This review provides an important and accessible over-review of the concept of epidemiological cut-off values as well as the methodology that underlies their establishment. source
- cites [26] Onyewu, C., Wormley, F. L. Jr., Perfect, J. R. & Heitman, J. The calcineurin target, Crz1, functions in azole tolerance but is not required for virulence of Candida albicans. Infect. Immun. 72, 7330–7333 (2004). source
The passage describing fluconazole Etest assays (indexed as Abstract; page unavailable) reports that FK506, a calcineurin inhibitor, abolished the trailing effect in the strains tested. The paper also reports enhanced inhibition with FK506 and fluconazole, but it does not establish increased fungicidal activity across diverse isolates with different tolerance levels. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [83] Khandelwal, N. K. et al. Azole resistance in a Candida albicans mutant lacking the ABC transporter CDR6/ROA1 depends on TOR signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 293, 412–432 (2018). source
The Introduction (p. 2) reports that Tor1 inhibition leads to azole hypersensitivity, and the discussion (p. 15) links hyperactive Tor1 to azole resistance in the NKKY101 mutant. The paper does not show that TOR inhibitors eliminate fluconazole tolerance or greatly increase its fungicidal activity across diverse isolates; its experiments focus on the mutant and related strains. The other targets in the citing sentence have separate citations and are not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Mutations in Tac1 increase efflux activity.
“For example, mutations in Tac1, a positive transcriptional regulator of efflux pump genes, increases efflux activity49.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [49] Todd, R. T., Wikoff, T. D., Forche, A. & Selmecki, A. Genome plasticity in Candida albicans is driven by long repeat sequences. eLife. 8, e45954 (2019). source
The Introduction identifies Tac1 as a transcriptional activator of drug efflux pumps. It attributes fluconazole resistance to amplification of TAC1 and ERG11, but does not say that mutations in Tac1 increase efflux activity. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Organelles such as the vacuole make important contributions to tolerance and/or trailing growth.
“Organelles such as the vacuole make important contributions to tolerance and/or trailing growth.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 4 sources checked- cites [27] Sanglard, D., Ischer, F., Marchetti, O., Entenza, J. & Bille, J. Calcineurin A of Candida albicans: involvement in antifungal tolerance, cell morphogenesis and virulence. Mol. Microbiol. 48, 959–976 (2003). source
- cites [51] Selmecki, A. M., Dulmage, K., Cowen, L. E., Anderson, J. B. & Berman, J. Acquisition of aneuploidy provides increased fitness during the evolution of antifungal drug resistance. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000705 (2009). source
The Results section on i(5L) and fitness discusses the advantage conferred by aneuploidy during fluconazole exposure, not a contribution from organelles. Searches for “vacuole” and “trailing” found no passage in our copy addressing the claim; page numbers were unavailable. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [94] Roemer, T. & Krysan, D. J. Antifungal drug development: challenges, unmet clinical needs, and new approaches. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 4, a019703 (2014). source
- cites [95] Cornet, M. et al. Deletions of endocytic components VPS28 and VPS32 affect growth at alkaline pH and virulence through both RIM101-dependent and RIM101-independent pathways in Candida albicans. Infect. Immun. 73, 7977–7987 (2005). source
- Interpretationcitation
Inter-isolate heterogeneity of tolerance is likely due to genetic differences that contribute to several other clinically relevant phenotypes, including biofilm formation, filamentous growth responses and temperature sensitivity.
“The inter-isolate heterogeneity is likely due to genetic differences that contribute to several other clinically relevant phenotypes, including biofilm formation, filamentous growth responses and sensitivity to temperature52,60,79,80.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 4 sources checked- cites [52] Mount, H. O. et al. Global analysis of genetic circuitry and adaptive mechanisms enabling resistance to the azole antifungal drugs. PLoS Genet. 14, e1007319 (2018). This article screens a library of C. albicans deletion strains and identifies two genes that affect azole responses, have roles in stress response pathways and functions that are are suppressed by the acquisition of aneuploid chromosomes. Whether the mutations are affecting resistance or tolerance is not clear, but activities of the identified genes (vacuolar retrograde trafficking and a cell wall and polarity GTPase activating pro source
The Results section on basal fluconazole tolerance identifies genes affecting tolerance, and the clinical-isolate Results section reports differing effects of gene deletions on azole resistance. Neither connects inter-isolate tolerance heterogeneity to genetic differences affecting biofilm formation, filamentous growth, or temperature sensitivity. Searches for those phenotypes found no passage making that connection; page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [60] Forche, A. et al. Stress alters rates and types of loss of heterozygosity in Candida albicans. mBio 2, e00129–11 (2011). source
The Introduction (page unavailable) says genetic variation occurs among C. albicans clinical isolates and that different alleles can confer different benefits under stress. That supports a general genetic basis for differences in stress response, but the paper does not connect inter-isolate tolerance to biofilm formation, filamentous growth, or temperature sensitivity. Its temperature experiments measure loss of heterozygosity under heat stress, not differences in temperature sensitivity among isolates. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [79] Selmecki, A., Forche, A. & Berman, J. Genomic plasticity of the human fungal pathogen Candida albicans. Eukaryot. Cell 9, 991–1008 (2010). source
- cites [80] Sitterle, E. et al. Within-host genomic diversity of Candida albicans in healthy carriers. Sci. Rep. 9, 2563 (2019). source
The Discussion (page unavailable) reports genetic heterogeneity among isolates from healthy carriers and says genomic variation can facilitate adaptation to environmental changes and affect virulence factors. It does not establish that genetic differences explain inter-isolate tolerance heterogeneity or specifically link those differences to biofilm formation, filamentous growth responses, and temperature sensitivity. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Isolates that are more tolerant have lower average intracellular drug than less tolerant isolates.
“For example, isolates that are more tolerant have lower average intracellular drug than less tolerant isolates9 (Fig 1D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] Rosenberg, A. et al. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat. Commun. 9, 2470 (2018). This article provides a quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans, distinguishing it from resistance and highlighting its phenotypic heterogeneity and association with subpopulation growth, and sensitivity to adjuvant drugs. source
- Premisecitation
Many core stress response pathways in C. albicans, including Hsp90, Ca2+-calmodulin-calcineurin, lysine deacetylases, protein kinase C and HOG pathways, also affect echinocandin responses.
“Importantly, many of these same core stress response pathways in C. albicans (Hsp90, Ca2+-calmodulin-calcineurin, lysine deacetylases, protein kinase C and HOG (high osmolarity glycerol responses) pathways) t also affect echinocandin responses68,86,87.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [68] Cowen, L. E., Sanglard, D., Howard, S. J., Rogers, P. D. & Perlin, D. S. Mechanisms of antifungal drug resistance. CSH Perspect. Med. 5, a019752 (2015). source
The Hsp90, Chitin Synthesis, and Cell Integrity Circuit sections link Hsp90, calcineurin, PKC, and HOG signaling to echinocandin responses in C. albicans. The Hsp90 and Related Factors section discusses lysine deacetylases in relation to C. albicans azole resistance, but does not establish their effect on its echinocandin responses. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [86] Shapiro, R. S., Zaas, A. K., Betancourt-Quiroz, M., Perfect, J. R. & Cowen, L. E. The Hsp90 co-chaperone Sgt1 governs Candida albicans morphogenesis and drug resistance. PLoS One 7, e44734 (2012). source
The Introduction (page unavailable) says that Hsp90 affects C. albicans echinocandin resistance and links Hsp90-mediated drug resistance to calcineurin and the PKC pathway. It does not establish the claimed roles of lysine deacetylases or the HOG pathway in echinocandin responses; searches for those terms found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [87] Cowen, L. E. et al. Harnessing Hsp90 function as a powerful, broadly effective therapeutic strategy for fungal infectious disease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 2818–2823 (2009). source
The Discussion links Hsp90 and calcineurin to echinocandin responses in Aspergillus, but links those pathways to azole responses in C. albicans. It does not establish that the listed pathways affect echinocandin responses in C. albicans, and it does not address lysine deacetylases, protein kinase C, or HOG in that context. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
The involvement of lysine deacetylases and calcineurin implies a connection between tolerance and the metabolic anti-stress machinery.
“Indeed, the involvement of lysine deacetylases and calcineurin implies a connection between tolerance and the metabolic anti-stress machinery (for example Ref. 88).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [88] Olin-Sandoval, V. et al. Lysine harvesting is an antioxidant strategy and triggers underground polyamine metabolism. Nature 572, 249–253 (2019). source
- Premisecitation
pH, temperature and nutrient availability affect the level of fluconazole tolerance.
“Similarly, pH, temperature and nutrient availability affect the level of fluconazole tolerance9.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] Rosenberg, A. et al. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat. Commun. 9, 2470 (2018). This article provides a quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans, distinguishing it from resistance and highlighting its phenotypic heterogeneity and association with subpopulation growth, and sensitivity to adjuvant drugs. source
- Premisecitation
An isolate that is resistant because of increased efflux has a proportion of cells with very low levels of intracellular drug, about tenfold less than the moderate drug levels seen in tolerant isolates.
“By contrast, an isolate that is resistant because of increased efflux has a proportion of cells with very low levels of intracellular drug (10X less than those with moderate drug levels compared to tolerant isolates)9 (Fig. 1D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] Rosenberg, A. et al. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat. Commun. 9, 2470 (2018). This article provides a quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans, distinguishing it from resistance and highlighting its phenotypic heterogeneity and association with subpopulation growth, and sensitivity to adjuvant drugs. source
The Fig. 3 caption compares intracellular drug levels in resistant strain T101 with those in isolates of differing tolerance and defines low and mid drug-level categories whose lower bounds differ by about tenfold. The Discussion notes the role of efflux in drug resistance, but our copy does not establish that T101 is resistant because of increased efflux or explicitly quantify a tenfold difference between its cells and tolerant isolates. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.79)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Studies using inhibitors or mutant strains showed that these pathways reduce fungal growth in combination with caspofungin or anidulafungin.
“Specifically, studies of these pathways using either inhibitors or mutant strains showed they reduce fungal growth in combination with caspofungin or anidulafungin.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [68] Cowen, L. E., Sanglard, D., Howard, S. J., Rogers, P. D. & Perlin, D. S. Mechanisms of antifungal drug resistance. CSH Perspect. Med. 5, a019752 (2015). source
The Cell Integrity Circuit section reports that deleting pathway genes increases susceptibility to echinocandins and that kinase inhibitors act synergistically with echinocandins against fungi. The Hsp90 section likewise reports reduced echinocandin tolerance after genetic or pharmacological compromise. These passages support the general finding, but do not establish the claimed growth reduction specifically in combination with caspofungin or anidulafungin; they describe inhibiting the pathways, not the pathways themselves reducing growth. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [86] Shapiro, R. S., Zaas, A. K., Betancourt-Quiroz, M., Perfect, J. R. & Cowen, L. E. The Hsp90 co-chaperone Sgt1 governs Candida albicans morphogenesis and drug resistance. PLoS One 7, e44734 (2012). source
The Results section on Sgt1 depletion reports that genetically reducing Sgt1 increased Candida albicans susceptibility to the echinocandin micafungin and created a fungicidal combination. It does not report the claimed combinations with caspofungin or anidulafungin, or show an inhibitor-based combination in those experiments. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [87] Cowen, L. E. et al. Harnessing Hsp90 function as a powerful, broadly effective therapeutic strategy for fungal infectious disease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 2818–2823 (2009). source
The Results section reports that inhibiting Hsp90 enhanced caspofungin’s efficacy against A. fumigatus. Our copy does not report a corresponding result with anidulafungin or show that mutant strains reduced fungal growth in combination with either drug; it describes genetic depletion of Hsp90 in combination with fluconazole instead. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
Colonies from higher tolerance isolates appear faster than those from low tolerance isolates.
“Furthermore, colonies from higher tolerance isolates appear faster than those from low tolerance isolates (Fig. 1C).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The authors propose that tolerance is a pathogenic-fungal property separable from resistance by one in vitro assay measuring susceptibility at 24 hours and growth at 48 hours.
“We posit that antifungal tolerance is a property of pathogenic fungi that can be distinguished from resistance using the same in vitro assay that can quantify both susceptibility [G] (measured as MIC at 24 h) and growth properties at 48 h (the fraction of growth [G] or supra-MIC growth [G]) (Box 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Non-mycologic factors-host factors, immune status, and pharmacologic issues-have been proposed to explain treatment failure against susceptible Candida isolates.
“This has been attributed to non-mycologic causes such as host factors, immune status, and/or pharmacologic issues8.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] Lepak, A. J. & Andes, D. R. Antifungal pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 5, a019653 (2014). source
- Interpretationreasoning
Antifungal tolerance may explain why overall treatment outcomes do not match the low rates of clinical resistance.
“Specifically, the discordance between overall treatment outcome and low levels of clinical resistance may be attributable to antifungal drug tolerance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
When resistance removes a single antifungal agent, patient care is substantially affected.
“Thus, the loss of one antifungal drug through resistance has a major impact on patient care.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Fungal infections that resist drugs have become a notable clinical issue.
“Drug-resistant fungal infections are emerging as an important clinical problem1,2.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [1] Arendrup, M. C. & Patterson, T. F. Multidrug-resistant Candida: epidemiology, molecular mechanisms, and treatment. J. Infect. Dis. 216, S445–S451 (2017). source
- cites [2] Perlin, D. S., Rautemaa-Richardson, R. & Alastruey-Izquierdo, A. The global problem of antifungal resistance: prevalence, mechanisms, and management. Lancet Infect. Dis. 17, e383–e392 (2017). source
- Premisecitation
Three main antifungal classes-polyenes, azoles, and echinocandins-are the only agents currently used against invasive fungal infections.
“Currently, only three primary classes of agents are used to treat invasive fungal infections5: polyenes (for example, amphotericin B); azoles (for example, fluconazole) and echinocandins (for example, caspofungin) (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] Krysan, D. J. The unmet clinical need of novel antifungal drugs. Virulence 8, 135–137 (2017). source
- Interpretationreasoning
Drug-fungus interactions other than the MIC may influence how a patient responds to therapy.
“However, specific interactions between the drug and the fungus, aside from the MIC, may affect therapeutic responses as well.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The rise in at-risk patients for invasive fungal infections is mainly due to complex surgical procedures, immune suppression, or reduced immune function.
“This is mainly due to an increase in patients at-risk for invasive fungal infections from complex surgical procedures, immune-suppression or reduced immune function3.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] Alangaden, G. J. Nosocomial fungal infections: epidemiology, infection control, and prevention. Infect. Dis. Clin. North Am. 25, 201–225 (2011). source
- Premisecitation
For MRSA, six separate antibiotic classes exist as treatment options.
“By comparison, six distinct classes of antibiotics are currently available to treat methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), an important and widespread drug-resistant bacterium6.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [6] Bassetti, M., Carnelutti, A., Castaldo, N. & Peghin, M. Important new therapies for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 20, 2317–2334 (2019). source
- Interpretationreasoning
Tolerance reflects intrinsic phenotypic heterogeneity within a fungal isolate.
“Thus, drug tolerance is a manifestation of phenotypic heterogeneity intrinsic to a given fungal isolate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Multiple genetic factors that vary among isolates are linked to tolerance.
“Studies are beginning to provide evidence that tolerance is associated with multiple genetic components that differ between isolates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
The core molecular pathways of antifungal resistance are shared across species.
“Although resistance is emerging in non-Candida species such as Aspergillus spp.,29 the general molecular mechanisms of resistance are conserved; therefore, we will focus primarily on Candida spp., the most prevalent species and the most common cause of both life-threatening invasive disease and clinically important mucosal diseases, such as vulvovaginal candidiasis, thrush and esophagitis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
Antifungal activity is often measured with non-standard assays that yield no MIC value.
“In addition, non-standard assays are frequently used to measure antifungal activity but do not generate an MIC value.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
An isolate's genetic composition may influence how much its isogenic cells vary in their responses.
“The genetic make up of an individual isolate may also affect the degree of variability between the responses of different isogenic cells in the population.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Because antifungal tolerance is most apparent with fungistatic drugs, cell-death measurements are less useful.
“By contrast, antifungal tolerance is most evident with fungistatic drugs [G], and thus measuring cell death is less relevant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Resistance is appearing in non-Candida fungi, including Aspergillus species.
“Although resistance is emerging in non-Candida species such as Aspergillus spp.,29 the general molecular mechanisms of resistance are conserved; therefore, we will focus primarily on Candida spp., the most prevalent species and the most common cause of both life-threatening invasive disease and clinically important mucosal diseases, such as vulvovaginal candidiasis, thrush and esophagitis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [29] Luna-Tapia, A., Butts, A. & Palmer, G. E. Loss of C-5 sterol desaturase activity in Candida albicans: azole resistance or merely trailing growth? Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 63, e00129–11 (2019). source
- Premisecitation
In C. albicans, the specific aneuploidy isochromosome (5L) creates two extra copies of chromosome 5's left arm, giving extra TAC1 and ERG11 copies that confer azole resistance.
“For example, isochromosome (5L), a specific aneuploidy in C. albicans, results in the formation of two extra copies of the left arm of chromosome 543, and, consequently, extra copies of TAC1 and ERG11, genes that confer resistance to azoles in these strains50.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [43] Kordalewska, M. et al. Understanding echinocandin resistance in the emerging pathogen Candida auris. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 62, e00238–18 (2018). source
- cites [50] Coste, A. et al. A mutation in Tac1p, a transcription factor regulating CDR1 and CDR2, is coupled with loss of heterozygosity at chromosome 5 to mediate antifungal resistance in Candida albicans. Genetics 172, 2139–2156 (2006). source
- Premisecitation
In C. albicans, gain-of-function Upc2 mutations, which affect a key regulator of ergosterol biosynthesis genes, raise ERG11 expression and lower azole susceptibility.
“In C. albicans, gain-of-function mutations in Upc2, a key transcriptional regulator of ergosterol biosynthetic genes34, lead to increased ERG11 expression and reduced azole susceptibility.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [34] Holmes, A. R. et al. Heterozygosity and functional allelic variation in the Candida albicans efflux pump genes CDR1 and CDR2. Mol. Microbiol. 62, 170–186 (2006). source
- Premisecitation
Both bacterial and fungal isolates that are tolerant have MIC values within the susceptible range.
“Tolerant bacterial and fungal isolates have MICs in the susceptible range, but tolerant bacteria are characterized by longer minimum duration to killing (MDK) than susceptible isolates10, based on responses to bactericidal drugs10–12.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [10] Brauner, A., Fridman, O., Gefen, O. & Balaban, N. Q. Distinguishing between resistance, tolerance and persistence to antibiotic treatment. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 14, 320–330 (2016). source
- Premisecitation
Candida glabrata and Candida tropicalis show the highest resistance rates for both azoles and echinocandins.
“The highest rates of both azole and echinocandin resistance are observed in Candida glabrata and Candida tropicalis30 (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30] van der Linden, J. W. et al. Aspergillosis due to voriconazole highly resistant Aspergillus fumigatus and recovery of genetically related resistant isolates from domiciles. Clin. Infect. Dis. 57, 513–520 (2013). source
- Premisenone given
Serial dilution agar plating assays often label isolates or mutants as resistant when they outgrow the reference strain.
“For example, serial dilution agar plating assays frequently compare the susceptibility of one isolate or a mutant to its appropriate reference strain; isolates and mutants that grow better than the reference strain in these assays are often referred to as resistant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Additional copies of chromosome 3's right arm may raise drug efflux because CDR1 and MRR1 reside there.
“Similarly, extra copies of the right arm of chromosome 3 may increase drug efflux because CDR1 and MRR1, which encode a major ABC transporter and a transcriptional activator of MDR1 (the MFS transporter), respectively, are found on this chromosome (Candida Genome Database [http://www.candidagenome.org/]).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Candida Genome Database
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisereasoning
Resistance can also result from drug-target changes, including higher target expression or mutations in the target protein sequence.
“Alterations in antifungal drug targets, due to increased target expression or mutations within the target protein sequence, also mediate antifungal drug resistance (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Many such transcription factors also control other genes involved in resistance, virulence, or general yeast fitness.
“Of note, many of these transcription factors also regulate other genes that also contribute to resistance, virulence or general yeast cell fitness32.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] Prasad, R., Rawal, M. K. & Shah, A. H. Candida efflux ATPases and antiporters in clinical drug resistance. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 892, 351–376 (2016). source
- Premisecitation
Azole resistance most commonly arises from increased efflux pump activity, mainly through gain-of-function mutations in transcription factors controlling ABC transporters (TAC1 in C. albicans, PDR1 in C. glabrata) and MFS pumps (MRR1 in C. albicans).
“The most prevalent mechanism of azole resistance involves increased drug efflux pump activity, primarily due to gain-of-function mutations in transcription factors that regulate ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters (TAC1 in C. albicans and PDR1 in C. glabrata) and major facilitator super family (MFS) pumps (MRR1 in C. albicans)31,32.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationnone given
When susceptible fungal subpopulations grow above the MIC, the cause may be tolerance, heteroresistance, or persistence, depending on drug, organism, and subpopulation size.
“Growth of subpopulations of susceptible fungal isolates in the presence of drugs at concentrations above the MIC can be due to tolerance, heteroresistance [G] or persistence (see Box 2), depending on the drug, organism and the size of the subpopulation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
These genetic factors influence how isogenic cells in one isolate respond physiologically or metabolically to environmental or nutritional cues.
“These genetic components, that differ between isolates, affect the ability of isogenic cells within a single isolate to respond physiologically or metabolically (to environmental or nutritional signals).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
A single aneuploid chromosome can confer more than one unrelated phenotype.
“Notably, a single aneuploid chromosome can confer more than one unrelated phenotype.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Trisomy of chromosome 2 also promotes cell survival in the presence of hydroxyurea.
“Interestingly, trisomy of chromosome 2 also promotes cell survival in the presence of hydroxyurea, a cancer chemotherapy drug.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [47] Yang, F., Kravets, A., Bethlendy, G., Welle, S. & Rustchenko, E. Chromosome 5 monosomy of Candida albicans controls susceptibility to various toxic agents, including major antifungals. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 57, 5026–5036 (2013). source
- Premisecitation
Trisomy of chromosome 2 promotes the growth of C. albicans cells in the presence of caspofungin without altering the MIC.
“Trisomy of chromosome 2 promotes the growth of C. albicans cells in the presence of the antifungal drug caspofungin47 without altering the MIC.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [47] Yang, F., Kravets, A., Bethlendy, G., Welle, S. & Rustchenko, E. Chromosome 5 monosomy of Candida albicans controls susceptibility to various toxic agents, including major antifungals. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 57, 5026–5036 (2013). source
- Interpretationreasoning
Tolerance depends on a shared set of critical pathways across diverse isolates.
“This implies that tolerance depends on a shared set of critical pathways across diverse isolates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Tolerance is due to the slow growth of some cells in the population.
“This highlights the idea that tolerance is due to the slow growth of some cells in the population and raises questions about how such cells differ from those that do not grow (or grow much more slowly).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Differences in tolerance levels measured as FoG or SMG between isolates have a genetic component.
“In this sense, the differences in tolerance levels measured as FoG or SMG (Box 1) between isolates have a genetic component.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Tolerance seems to depend on intracellular processes that facilitate adaptation in response to drug stresses.
“Thus, tolerance seems to depend on intracellular processes that facilitate adaptation in response to drug stresses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In resistant isolates, mutations affecting efflux would enable most or all cells to reduce intracellular drug concentration to very low levels.
“In resistant isolates, mutations (for example, gain-of-function alleles in drug efflux pumps or their positive regulators) affecting efflux would enable most (or all) cells to reduce intracellular drug concentration to very low levels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Many types of mutations could lead to changes in tolerance because many central cellular pathways affect tolerance.
“The large number of central cellular pathways that affect tolerance also implies that many types of mutations could lead to changes in tolerance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Mutations in some pathways seem to affect resistance as well as tolerance.
“Mutations in some pathways seem to affect resistance as well as tolerance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Combination therapies with adjuvant drugs that interfere with the compensatory stress responses required for tolerance have the potential to increase the lethality of an inhibitory antifungal drug.
“Combination therapies with adjuvant drugs that interfere with the compensatory stress responses required for tolerance have the potential to increase the lethality of an inhibitory antifungal drug.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Variations in the function of the critical pathways listed above are candidate drivers of differences in tolerance levels between isolates.
“Thus, variations on the function of the critical pathways listed above are candidate drivers of differences in tolerance levels between isolates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Tolerance in all strains is dependent on all of the major hubs of cell homeostasis, irrespective of subpopulation size and ability to grow in the presence of the drug.
“This implies that tolerance in all strains is dependent on all of these major hubs of cell homeostasis, irrespective of both the subpopulation size and its ability to in the presence of the drug.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
There is a mechanistic distinction between resistance and tolerance.
“This suggests a mechanistic distinction between resistance and tolerance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
At least for azoles, cell-to-cell differences in drug responses within a single isolate seem to be connected to differences in intracellular drug concentration between cells.
“The mechanisms that drive cell-to-cell differences in drug responses within a single isolate remain to be determined; but, at least for azoles, they seem to be connected to differences in intracellular drug concentration between different cells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Pharmacological or genetic disruption of Hsp90, calcineurin, TOR, lysine deacetylases or Rim101 enhances the effect of fluconazole.
“Consistent with this, either pharmacological or genetic disruption of Hsp90, calcineurin, TOR, lysine deacetylases or Rim101 function enhance the effect of fluconazole (reviewed in Ref. 85).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [85] Robbins, N., Caplan, T. & Cowen, L. E. Molecular evolution of antifungal drug resistance. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 71, 753–775 (2017). source
- Premisenone given
Drug pressure leads to positive selection of mutants that exhibit improved fitness.
“In addition, drug pressure will lead to the positive selection of mutants that exhibit improved fitness.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In tolerant isolates, physiological differences would enable some cells to reduce intracellular drug concentrations modestly relative to others, facilitating slow growth in cells with higher efflux gene expression.
“In tolerant isolates, physiological differences (for example, normal distribution in the amount of efflux gene expression) would enable some cells to reduce intracellular drug concentrations modestly relative to others, thereby facilitating slow growth in those cells with higher efflux gene expression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 10
- May combine two claims. 40
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSolid organ transplant recipients who develop candidemia have a 90-day mortality rate of 22%-44%, depending on Candida species.
“For example, the 90-day mortality rate for recipients of solid organ transplants who develop candidemia [G] is between 22%-44%, depending on the Candida species4.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] Andes, D. R. et al. The epidemiology and outcomes of invasive Candida infections among organ transplant recipients in the United States: results of the Transplant-Associated Infection Surveillance Network (TRANSNET). Transpl. Infect. Dis. 18, 921–931 (2016). source
Section 3.2 reports 90-day mortality of 22.6%–44% by Candida species among organ transplant recipients with invasive candidiasis. The cohort includes infection sites other than the bloodstream, so these figures are not established specifically for recipients with candidemia. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAlthough resistance levels for most Candida species are relatively low, candidemia outcomes remain poor, with mortality between 15% and 50%.
“Although relatively low levels of resistance for most Candida species have been described, the outcomes for candidemia remain poor, as high levels of mortality (15%-50%) have been associated with candida infections7.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] Pfaller, M. A., Diekema, D. J., Turnidge, J. D., Castanheira, M. & Jones, R. N. Twenty years of the SENTRY antifungal surveillance program: results for Candida species from 1997–2016. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 6, S79–S94 (2019). source
The introductory passage following the Abstract’s Conclusions says antifungal-resistant Candida isolates remain uncommon and invasive fungal infections are associated with high mortality. It does not give a 15%–50% mortality range or state a mortality rate specifically for candidemia; searches for that range and for candidemia mortality found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTolerant cell subpopulations show slow growth when drug levels exceed the MIC; this usually becomes visible only after more than the standard 24-hour MIC measurement period.
“Subpopulations of tolerant cells grow slowly in drug concentrations above the MIC, which is usually visually evident after time periods longer than the standard 24 h for MIC measurements.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] Rosenberg, A. et al. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat. Commun. 9, 2470 (2018). This article provides a quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans, distinguishing it from resistance and highlighting its phenotypic heterogeneity and association with subpopulation growth, and sensitivity to adjuvant drugs. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationC. auris seems to quickly develop resistance or tolerance to echinocandins and polyenes, leaving few treatment choices.
“C. auris appears to rapidly acquire resistance or tolerance to echinocandins as well polyenes1,42, leaving few, if any, treatment options.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [1] Arendrup, M. C. & Patterson, T. F. Multidrug-resistant Candida: epidemiology, molecular mechanisms, and treatment. J. Infect. Dis. 216, S445–S451 (2017). source
- cites [42] Satoh, K. et al. Candida auris sp. nov., a novel ascomycetous yeast isolated from the external ear canal of an inpatient in a Japanese hospital. Microbiol. Immunol. 53, 41–44 (2009). source
The Results and Discussion (page unavailable) describe antifungal susceptibility for a single C. auris isolate, but do not report resistance developing over time. Table 1 (page unavailable) lists susceptibility results for other drug classes, not echinocandins or polyenes. Searches for rapid acquisition of resistance, echinocandins, polyenes, and treatment options found no passage supporting the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMany ERG11 mutations appear to disrupt drug binding and reduce susceptibility additively.
“Many ERG11 mutations seem to interfere with drug binding and to decrease susceptibility in an additive manner36.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [36] Flowers, S. A. et al. Gain-of-function mutations in UPC2 are a frequent cause of ERG11 upregulation in azole-resistant clinical isolates of Candida albicans. Eukaryot. Cell 11, 1289–1299 (2012). This study establishes that gain-of-function mutations in UPC2, the key regulator of ergosterol biosynthesis gene expression, are a source of clinically important fluconazole resistance. Previously, only transcriptional regulators of efflux pump expression were known to do so. source
The introduction states that ERG11 point mutations reduce azole binding to their target, supporting the drug-binding part of the claim. The Discussion describes lower azole susceptibility with two mutant UPC2 alleles than with one, but does not say that ERG11 mutations reduce susceptibility additively. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRates of antifungal resistance among Candida species change over time and differ across hospitals and countries.
“Antifungal drug resistance rates in Candida species are dynamic and variable between medical institutions and countries7.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] Pfaller, M. A., Diekema, D. J., Turnidge, J. D., Castanheira, M. & Jones, R. N. Twenty years of the SENTRY antifungal surveillance program: results for Candida species from 1997–2016. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 6, S79–S94 (2019). source
The Results section reports changes in fluconazole resistance over time for several Candida species and different resistance rates across geographic regions (Tables 3 and 4; page not provided). It does not report resistance rates by individual medical institution or country, so those specific comparisons are not established by this source. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCandida species have ERG11 mutations, with more than 100 distinct ERG11 alleles reported.
“Mutations in ERG11 have also been observed in Candida spp. and over 100 different ERG11 alleles have been described35.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [35] Munoz, J. F. et al. Genomic insights into multidrug-resistance, mating and virulence in Candida auris and related emerging species. Nat. Commun. 9, 5346 (2018). source
The Results section (“Conservation of known drug resistance and virulence related genes”; page unavailable) reports ERG11 mutations in Candida auris isolates and identifies a mutation also found in C. pseudohaemulonii. It does not report more than 100 distinct ERG11 alleles; searches for that number and for ERG11 allele counts found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTrailing growth depends on growth conditions; clinical isolates differ in this sensitivity, causing substantial variation between laboratories in its measurement.
“Like tolerance, trailing growth is sensitive to growth conditions17–19; the degree of sensitivity to these conditions differs for different clinical isolates9,(reviewed in 20), and leads to considerable laboratory-to-laboratory variation in the estimation of trailing growth.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 5 sources checked- cites [17] Coenye, T., De Vos, M., Vandenbosch, D. & Nelis, H. Factors influencing the trailing endpoint observed in Candida albicans susceptibility testing using the CLSI procedure. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 14, 495–497 (2008). source
- cites [18] Agrawal, D., Patterson, T. F., Rinaldi, M. G. & Revankar, S. G. Trailing end-point phenotype of Candida spp. in antifungal susceptibility testing to fluconazole is eliminated by altering incubation temperature. J. Med. Microbiol. 56, 1003–1004 (2007). source
- cites [19] Marr, K. A., Rustad, T. R., Rex, J. H. & White, T. C. The trailing end point phenotype in antifungal susceptibility testing is pH dependent. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43, 1383–1386 (1999). source
- cites [9] Rosenberg, A. et al. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat. Commun. 9, 2470 (2018). This article provides a quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans, distinguishing it from resistance and highlighting its phenotypic heterogeneity and association with subpopulation growth, and sensitivity to adjuvant drugs. source
- cites [20] Delarze, E. & Sanglard, D. Defining the frontiers between antifungal resistance, tolerance and the concept of persistence. Drug Resist. Updat. 23, 12–19 (2015). source
Section 6 reports trailing growth at neutral pH but not low pH, supporting sensitivity to growth conditions, while cautioning that the media also differed. Section 4 describes different degrees of trailing growth among C. albicans isolates. Neither passage establishes that isolates differ in their sensitivity to growth conditions or that this causes laboratory-to-laboratory variation in trailing-growth measurements; page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn bacteria, greater tolerance correlates with a longer lag phase; in fungi, greater tolerance correlates with a shorter lag phase than in less tolerant isolates.
“Furthermore, higher tolerance in bacterial isolates is associated with longer lag phase length, whereas fungal isolates with higher tolerance levels have shorter lag phase length (measured as time required for colonies to become visible13) relative to those with lower tolerance levels9.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [13] Levin-Reisman, I., Fridman, O. & Balaban, N. Q. ScanLag: high-throughput quantification of colony growth and lag time. J. Vis. Exp. https://doi.org/10.3791/51456 (2014). source
- cites [9] Rosenberg, A. et al. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat. Commun. 9, 2470 (2018). This article provides a quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans, distinguishing it from resistance and highlighting its phenotypic heterogeneity and association with subpopulation growth, and sensitivity to adjuvant drugs. source
The Discussion says antibacterial tolerance generally involves a longer lag phase. In Subpopulation growth dynamics, highly tolerant fungal isolates had shorter lag times in liquid assays with drug and a shorter drug-induced delay in colony appearance. The claim omits the drug condition and implies that colony appearance time itself was shorter; the paper says lag-phase duration did not correlate with tolerance in growth measurements without drug. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTolerance usually involves large subpopulations (5-90%) growing in drug, while heteroresistance or persistence involves rare cells (generally <<1%) that transiently survive high drug levels.
“Whereas tolerance is generally due to substantial subpopulations of cells (5-90%) that grow in drug, antifungal heteroresistance or persistence involve rare cells (generally <<1%) that transiently survive high concentrations of antifungal drugs14.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [14] Wuyts, J., Van Dijck, P. & Holtappels, M. Fungal persister cells: the basis for recalcitrant infections? PLoS Pathog. 14, e1007301 (2018). source
The Introduction describes persisters as a small, nongrowing subpopulation that survives high antifungal doses, supporting that part of the claim. It defines tolerance as survival after transient exposure, not growth in drug, and attributes growth in drug to resistant isolates. The cited passages give neither the 5–90% nor the generally <<1% range, and do not address heteroresistance; the section on in vivo persistence reports persister frequencies of up to 9% in some strains. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAn isolate's tolerance is fairly reproducible; variation in tolerance between isolates is presumed to arise from intrinsic genetic differences.
“First, tolerance of an isolate is relatively reproducible, with differences in tolerance levels between isolates presumed to be affected by intrinsic genetic differences between those isolates. (Fig. 1A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] Rosenberg, A. et al. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat. Commun. 9, 2470 (2018). This article provides a quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans, distinguishing it from resistance and highlighting its phenotypic heterogeneity and association with subpopulation growth, and sensitivity to adjuvant drugs. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe degree of tolerance correlates with the size of the subpopulation of cells that grow above the MIC and with the rate at which such cells form visible colonies at supra-MIC concentrations.
“The degree of tolerance correlates with the size of the subpopulation of cells that grow above the MIC, and the rate at which such cells form visible colonies at supra-MIC concentrations9.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] Rosenberg, A. et al. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat. Commun. 9, 2470 (2018). This article provides a quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans, distinguishing it from resistance and highlighting its phenotypic heterogeneity and association with subpopulation growth, and sensitivity to adjuvant drugs. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationUpon fluconazole exposure, all cells undergo one to three rounds of division before growth arrest; tolerant cells resume growth several hours later, whereas non-tolerant cells arrest for considerably longer and resume division only in the absence of the drug.
“Upon exposure to fluconazole, all cells undergo 1-3 rounds of division before growth arrest9,58; tolerant cells in the population resume growth several hours later, whereas non-tolerant cells arrest for considerably longer and only resume division in the absence of the drug.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [9] Rosenberg, A. et al. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat. Commun. 9, 2470 (2018). This article provides a quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans, distinguishing it from resistance and highlighting its phenotypic heterogeneity and association with subpopulation growth, and sensitivity to adjuvant drugs. source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [58] Forche, A. et al. The parasexual cycle in Candida albicans provides an alternative pathway to meiosis for the formation of recombinant strains. PLoS Biol. 6, e110 (2008). source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAdjuvant drugs and mutations affecting several stress-responsive pathways often reduce tolerance, and adjuvants reduce tolerance to similar baseline levels irrespective of the isolate's tolerance level.
“Adjuvant [G] drugs and mutations that affect several stress-responsive pathways often reduce tolerance9 (Box 5); and adjuvants reduce tolerance to similar baseline levels irrespective of the tolerance level of the isolate9.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] Rosenberg, A. et al. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat. Commun. 9, 2470 (2018). This article provides a quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans, distinguishing it from resistance and highlighting its phenotypic heterogeneity and association with subpopulation growth, and sensitivity to adjuvant drugs. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThis ERG11 allele's homozygosis persisted in the infecting population for over 8 months, supporting the idea that ERG11 mutations help pathogens survive drug selection.
“Homozygosis of this ERG11 allele was persistent (retained in the infecting population for more than 8 months55), consistent with the notion that mutations in ERG11 promote pathogen survival under drug selection56.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [55] Ford, C. B. et al. The evolution of drug resistance in clinical isolates of Candida albicans. eLife 4, e00662 (2015). source
- cites [56] White, T. C. Increased mRNA levels of ERG16, CDR, and MDR1 correlate with increases in azole resistance in Candida albicans isolates from a patient infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41, 1482–1487 (1997). This article presents the first detailed study of the molecular mechanisms underlying the development of fluconazole resistance over time in patients. It is a landmark study because of its patient-based approach and because it yielded strains that are still under study today. source
The paper’s opening passage says alterations in the azole target enzyme can contribute to resistance, which supports the general link between target-enzyme changes and drug resistance. Our copy does not report that this ERG11 allele became homozygous or persisted for more than eight months, nor does it establish that the mutation promoted survival under drug selection. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPhenotypic differences between clinical isolates involve many thousands to tens of thousands of SNPs and are evident in phenotypes such as biofilm formation and dependence on specific transcription factors.
“Phenotypic differences between clinical isolates involves many thousands, to tens of thousands of SNPs, and is also evident with phenotypes such as biofilm formation and its dependence upon specific transcription factors72.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [72] Ropars, J. et al. Gene flow contributes to diversification of the major fungal pathogen Candida albicans. Nat. Commun. 9, 2253 (2018). source
The Results and Discussion report an average of 65,629 heterozygous SNPs per isolate and describe phenotypic differences among isolates. That count is within isolates, not a measure of SNP differences between isolates. The paper links transcription factors to fitness and morphogenesis, but the passages found do not establish differences in biofilm formation or its dependence on particular transcription factors (Results and Discussion; page unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLOH and aneuploidy arise 2-4-fold more often than point mutations and are easily found after one mouse passage through blood or oral cavity.
“Furthermore, both LOH and aneuploidy occur at much higher frequency (2-4-fold) than point mutations59, and are readily detected following a single passage through the bloodstream or oral cavity of a mouse61–63.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim4 of 4 sources checked- cites [59] Harrison, B. D. et al. A tetraploid intermediate precedes aneuploid formation in yeasts exposed to fluconazole. PLoS Biol. 12, e1001815 (2014). source
The citation to this paper is attached to detection after a single mouse passage, not to the 2–4-fold comparison, which cites reference 59. The Results section, “Trimeras Form During Exposure to FLC Within the Host” (page unavailable), reports trimera-like cells in fluconazole-treated mouse ear tissue after 48 hours; it does not report detecting LOH or aneuploidy after passage through the bloodstream or oral cavity. Searches for those routes and for mouse-passage detection found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [61] Ene, I. V. et al. Global analysis of mutations driving microevolution of a heterozygous diploid fungal pathogen. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E8688–E8697 (2018). source
The Genome Architecture and Environmental Pressures section says LOH was more frequent during bloodstream passage and oral-cavity infection than in vitro. The paper also reports aneuploidy after mouse gastrointestinal passage, but does not establish that both changes were readily detected after a single passage through the bloodstream or oral cavity. The 2–4-fold comparison is attached to a different citation (59). (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [62] Forche, A. et al. Rapid phenotypic and genotypic diversification after exposure to the oral host niche in Candida albicans. Genetics 209, 725–741 (2018). source
- cites [63] Forche, A., May, G. & Magee, P. T. Demonstration of loss of heterozygosity by single-nucleotide polymorphism microarray analysis and alterations in strain morphology in Candida albicans strains during infection. Eukaryot. Cell 4, 156–165 (2005). source
Materials and Methods describes isolates obtained after passage through mice in a model of bloodstream-disseminated infection, and Results and Discussion reports LOH and chromosome-size changes in those isolates. The paper does not establish aneuploidy or examine passage through the oral cavity. The 2–4-fold comparison is attached to a different citation in the citing sentence, so it is not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAmphotericin B is toxic and is the only treatment option for multi-drug resistant C. glabrata infections.
“it leaves the polyene amphotericin B, which is toxic8, as the only treatment option for these infections.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [8] Lepak, A. J. & Andes, D. R. Antifungal pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 5, a019653 (2014). source
- cites [71] Shor, E., Schuyler, J. & Perlin, D. S. A novel, drug resistance-independent, fluorescence-based approach to measure mutation rates in microbial pathogens. mBio 10, e00120–19 (2019). source
Citation 8 is attached specifically to the assertion that amphotericin B is toxic. The Introduction (page unavailable) discusses multidrug-resistant C. glabrata infections but does not address amphotericin B or its toxicity; searches for amphotericin B and toxicity found no supporting passage. The Introduction instead says there are no treatment options for these infections, rather than identifying amphotericin B as the only option. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationEchinocandin resistance is rarer than azole resistance: under 1% in C. albicans and up to 10% in C. glabrata.
“Echinocandin resistance is less prevalent than azole resistance (less than 1% of C. albicans infections7, but up to 10% of C. glabrata infections)66.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [7] Pfaller, M. A., Diekema, D. J., Turnidge, J. D., Castanheira, M. & Jones, R. N. Twenty years of the SENTRY antifungal surveillance program: results for Candida species from 1997–2016. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 6, S79–S94 (2019). source
In the Results section on echinocandin resistance (page unavailable), the paper reports 1.7%–3.5% resistance among C. glabrata isolates overall and cites earlier findings of 8%–9% specifically among fluconazole-resistant bloodstream isolates. Thus, “up to 10%” is plausible for that restricted subgroup, but the citing sentence omits the qualifier and presents it as a rate for C. glabrata infections generally. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [66] Farmakiotis, D., Tarrand, J. J. & Kontoyiannis, D. P. Drug-resistant Candida glabrata infection in cancer patients. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 20, 1833–1840 (2014). source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTolerant cell growth is slower and more time-dependent than resistant cell growth, and is less dependent on drug concentration.
“tolerant cell growth is slower and more time-dependent than resistant cell growth, and is less dependent on drug concentration9.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] Rosenberg, A. et al. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat. Commun. 9, 2470 (2018). This article provides a quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans, distinguishing it from resistance and highlighting its phenotypic heterogeneity and association with subpopulation growth, and sensitivity to adjuvant drugs. source
The Results describe tolerant growth at supra-MIC fluconazole concentrations becoming evident at 48 hours while MIC remains unchanged, supporting a time-dependent distinction from resistance. Subpopulation growth dynamics reports delayed colony appearance with drug except in a resistant strain, but does not establish a general slower growth rate for tolerant versus resistant cells. The passages do not establish that tolerant growth is less dependent on drug concentration than resistant growth. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIntracellular drug concentrations vary among cells within a given isolate, with more tolerant isolates having a larger population of cells with moderate amounts of drug per cell.
“Furthermore, intracellular drug concentrations vary among cells within a given isolate, with the more tolerant isolates (those that grow slowly) having a larger population of cells with moderate amounts of drug per cell.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] Rosenberg, A. et al. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat. Commun. 9, 2470 (2018). This article provides a quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans, distinguishing it from resistance and highlighting its phenotypic heterogeneity and association with subpopulation growth, and sensitivity to adjuvant drugs. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn Saccharomyces cerevisiae, several genes involved in retrograde trafficking modulate tolerance and/or trailing growth, including VPS21, VPS15 and VPS5; Rim101 may influence tolerance via regulating transcription of key components of the vacuolar trafficking pathway.
“In Saccharomyces cerevisiae several genes involved in retrograde trafficking modulate tolerance and/or trailing growth, including VPS2127,51, VPS15 and VPS5194; Rim101 may influence tolerance via its ability to regulate the transcription of key components of the vacuolar trafficking pathway95.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 4 sources checked- cites [27] Sanglard, D., Ischer, F., Marchetti, O., Entenza, J. & Bille, J. Calcineurin A of Candida albicans: involvement in antifungal tolerance, cell morphogenesis and virulence. Mol. Microbiol. 48, 959–976 (2003). source
- cites [51] Selmecki, A. M., Dulmage, K., Cowen, L. E., Anderson, J. B. & Berman, J. Acquisition of aneuploidy provides increased fitness during the evolution of antifungal drug resistance. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000705 (2009). source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [94] Roemer, T. & Krysan, D. J. Antifungal drug development: challenges, unmet clinical needs, and new approaches. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 4, a019703 (2014). source
- cites [95] Cornet, M. et al. Deletions of endocytic components VPS28 and VPS32 affect growth at alkaline pH and virulence through both RIM101-dependent and RIM101-independent pathways in Candida albicans. Infect. Immun. 73, 7977–7987 (2005). source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationInhibition of Hsp90 in the presence of fluconazole eliminates tolerance and renders fluconazole fungicidal.
“In part, this argument is based on the observation that inhibition of Hsp90 in the presence of fluconazole not only eliminates tolerance9 but also renders fluconazole fungicidal87.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [9] Rosenberg, A. et al. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat. Commun. 9, 2470 (2018). This article provides a quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans, distinguishing it from resistance and highlighting its phenotypic heterogeneity and association with subpopulation growth, and sensitivity to adjuvant drugs. source
- cites [87] Cowen, L. E. et al. Harnessing Hsp90 function as a powerful, broadly effective therapeutic strategy for fungal infectious disease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 2818–2823 (2009). source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningA finer understanding of how fungi respond to drugs could clarify why infections from apparently susceptible isolates have poor outcomes.
“However, a more nuanced understanding of the fungal response to drugs may help explain the poor outcomes for infections caused by apparently susceptible isolates (that is, isolates that have a susceptible MIC at 24h, the standard endpoint for MIC measurements for Candida species).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenStrains classified as resistant have MIC values exceeding clinical breakpoints; such strains are more prone to treatment failure than susceptible strains whose MIC values fall below those breakpoints.
“Resistant strains have MICs above the breakpoint and are more likely to cause a therapeutic failure than susceptible strains with MICs below the breakpoint.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenWithin the same isogenic population, another subpopulation either fails to grow in drug or grows so slowly that it is undetectable by 48 hours.
“In the same isogenic population, a second subpopulation of cells does not grow in the drug or its extremely slow growth is not detectable following 48 h in the drug.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningLoss of one antifungal class to resistance reduces therapeutic options by at least 33%, and often by 50%, because not all fungi respond to azoles or echinocandins.
“Thus, one antifungal drug class becoming ineffective in treating a fungal infection owing to resistance reduces the therapeutic options by at least 33%, and frequently by 50% because azoles and echinocandins are not active against all fungi.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premiseown dataUpon retesting, tolerant or trailing cells show a similar MIC and comparable slow or partial growth above the MIC.
“Noteworthy, tolerant or trailing cells, when re-tested, have a similar MIC and a similar slow/partial growth in the presence of drugs at concentrations above the MIC (Fig. 1A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenCandida species are the most prevalent fungi and the leading cause of life-threatening invasive disease and clinically important mucosal conditions such as vulvovaginal candidiasis, thrush, and esophagitis.
“Although resistance is emerging in non-Candida species such as Aspergillus spp.,29 the general molecular mechanisms of resistance are conserved; therefore, we will focus primarily on Candida spp., the most prevalent species and the most common cause of both life-threatening invasive disease and clinically important mucosal diseases, such as vulvovaginal candidiasis, thrush and esophagitis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationOverlapping efflux pump functions mean that losing one pump gene or gaining less efficient pumps only modestly affects true resistance; the strongest effects require overexpression plus homozygosis of hyperactive transcription factor alleles.
“Furthermore, because of the overlapping functions of different efflux pumps, mutations such as loss-of-function of a single gene encoding an efflux pump, or gain-of-function of less efficient efflux pumps, have only modest effects on bona fide resistance and the most dramatic effects are from overexpression combined with homozygosis (loss of heterozygosity) of hyperactive transcription factor alle”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [33] Sasse, C. et al. The stepwise acquisition of fluconazole resistance mutations causes a gradual loss of fitness in Candida albicans. Mol. Microbiol. 86, 539–556 (2012). This article shows that when a strain accumulates multiple resistance mutations that affect different transcription factors, the effects are independent and additive. In addition, these effects, generated by engineered deletion mutations, are associated with reduced fitness in the absence of drug stress. As many resistant isolates do not have obvious fitness defects, it is assumed that they must have acquired compensatory mechan source
- cites [37] Xiang, M. J. et al. Erg11 mutations associated with azole resistance in clinical isolates of Candida albicans. FEMS Yeast Res. 13, 386–393 (2013). source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTrailing growth is commonly measured as growth at various drug concentrations relative to drug-free growth, similar to the supra-MIC growth parameter for tolerance.
“Trailing growth is often estimated as the percent of growth at different drug concentrations relative to growth in the absence of drug16, a measure similar to the ‘supra-MIC growth’ (SMG) parameter used to measure tolerance (Fig. 1B).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16] Marcos-Zambrano, L. J., Escribano, P., Sanchez-Carrillo, C., Bouza, E. & Guinea, J. Scope and frequency of fluconazole trailing assessed using EUCAST in invasive Candida spp. isolates. Med. Mycol. 54, 733–739 (2016). source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenClinical breakpoints help indicate whether a particular isolate is likely to respond to treatment.
“Clinical breakpoints provide guidance regarding the likelihood that a given isolate will respond to therapy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenIntrinsically resistant non-C. albicans species also show higher ERG11 expression, though the mechanism remains unknown.
“Increased ERG11 expression is also seen in intrinsically resistant non-C. albicans species; however, the underlying mechanism is unknown.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenIn many publications, especially mechanism-focused studies, resistance means a higher MIC than a reference strain.
“Specifically, many published reports refer to resistance as an increase in the MIC relative to a reference strain, particularly in the setting of work focused on elucidating the mechanisms of resistance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe response to hydroxyurea depends on two genes on chromosome 2, RNR1 and RNR2; the genes responsible for caspofungin survival are distinct and have not yet been identified.
“The response to hydroxyurea was shown to be dependent on two of the 1087 different genes located on chromosome 2: RNR1 and RNR21; the genes responsible for survival in the presence of caspofungin are distinct from these RNR genes and have not yet been identified47.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [47] Yang, F., Kravets, A., Bethlendy, G., Welle, S. & Rustchenko, E. Chromosome 5 monosomy of Candida albicans controls susceptibility to various toxic agents, including major antifungals. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 57, 5026–5036 (2013). source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThe degree of tolerance varies across different isolates, presumably owing to the intrinsic allele diversity of each isolate.
“The degree of tolerance varies across different isolates, presumably owing to the intrinsic allele diversity of each isolate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationRecent IDSA guidelines advise starting with an echinocandin instead of an azole for most invasive Candida infections.
“Recent guidelines of the Infectious Disease Society of America recommend that an echinocandin, rather than azoles, be used as initial therapy for most invasive Candida spp. infections64.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [64] Forche, A., Magee, P. T., Selmecki, A., Berman, J. & May, G. Evolution in Candida albicans populations during a single passage through a mouse host. Genetics 182, 799–811 (2009). source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe increased growth from chromosome 3 trisomy is tolerance rather than resistance because the MIC remained susceptible and increased growth was detected after more than 24 hours in standard MIC assays.
“This is tolerance, rather than resistance, because the MIC remained susceptible and the increased growth was detected after incubation for more than the 24 h in standard MIC assays.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenFor a single isolate, the phenotypic heterogeneity that drives some cells to grow slowly and others to arrest must be due to physiological or metabolic shifts that differ between isogenic cells.
“By contrast, for a single isolate, the phenotypic heterogeneity that drives some cells to grow slowly, and others to arrest growth, must be due to physiological or metabolic shifts that differ between isogenic cells in the population.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningTolerance is likely due to physiological responses that emerge heterogeneously among the cell population, with the proportion of cells exhibiting such responses being a function of the genetic potential of the specific isolate.
“Thus, tolerance is likely to be due to physiological responses that emerge heterogeneously among the cell population, where the proportion of cells exhibiting such responses is a function of the genetic potential of the specific isolate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningTolerance is a feature of susceptible, non-resistant isolates that relies on several central stress response pathways; it is a consequence of phenotypic heterogeneity in which some cells in the population grow slowly in drug.
“By contrast, tolerance is a feature of susceptible (non-resistant) isolates that relies upon several central stress response pathways; it is a consequence of phenotypic heterogeneity, in which some cells in the population grow, albeit slowly, in drug.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Differences in tolerance levels between isolates have a genetic basis and affect the proportion of cells able to grow in the presence of drug.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningA highly tolerant strain will divide more frequently in the presence of fluconazole than a strain with low tolerance levels, and will therefore have a higher population size and a higher likelihood of acquiring new mutations.
“Nonetheless, because a highly tolerant strain will divide more frequently in the presence of fluconazole than a strain with low tolerance levels, it will also have a higher population size and a higher likelihood of acquiring new mutations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningInter-isolate heterogeneity in tolerance is a composite phenotype emerging from variations at multiple loci; different stress response pathways probably contribute to tolerance to different degrees in different isolates.
“We posit that inter-isolate heterogeneity in tolerance is a composite phenotype that emerges from variations at multiple loci; that is, different stress response pathways probably contribute to tolerance to a different degree in different isolates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe downstream effects of mutations in transcription factors on resistance and tolerance could be independent of one another.
“Transcription factors can regulate multiple targets, and therefore the downstream effects of mutations in those transcription factors on resistance and tolerance could be independent of one another.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenResistance is due to genetic changes that directly affect either the drug target and/or intracellular drug concentrations and cause a heritable effect on the entire population of cells in a given isolate.
“Resistance is due to genetic changes that directly affect either the drug target and/or intracellular drug concentrations and cause a heritable effect on the entire population of cells in a given isolate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningCell-to-cell phenotypic heterogeneity occurs at a frequency too high to be due to genetic acquisition of mutations, implying that it is due to non-genetic differences between cells.
“Cell-to-cell phenotypic heterogeneity occurs at a frequency that is far too high (10-90% of cells) to be due to the genetic acquisition of mutations, implying that it is due to non-genetic differences between the cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningTolerance has a genetic component that varies between isolates and a non-genetic component influenced by growth conditions and cell physiology.
“Thus, tolerance has a genetic component that varies between isolates, and a non-genetic component that is influenced by growth conditions and cell physiology.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningMost or all fluconazole-associated stress response pathways affect tolerance, because inhibiting these pathways does not affect MIC levels.
“It appears that most, or all, of these fluconazole-associated stress response pathways affect tolerance, because inhibiting these pathways does not affect MIC levels (Box 5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningNo colonies grow when fluconazole and an Hsp90 inhibitor are combined, because dead cells cannot evolve.
“Thus, no colonies grow when fluconazole and an Hsp90 inhibitor are combined, because dead cells cannot evolve.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAlthough resistance and tolerance are different, they may share the same processes, albeit to different degrees, to promote growth in the presence of antifungal drugs.
“Thus, although resistance and tolerance are different (as described above), they may share the same processes (albeit to different degrees) to promote growth in the presence of antifungal drugs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The authors state this as an assumption.
Tolerance and trailing growth in fluconazole probably represent the same phenomenon.
“Thus, we use the term ‘trailing’ for describing studies that used that term, with the assumption that tolerance and trailing growth in fluconazole probably reflect the same phenomenon19–21 in this Review.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Differences in tolerance levels between isolates have a genetic basis and affect the proportion of cells able to grow in the presence of drug.
“Differences in tolerance levels between isolates is assumed to have a genetic basis, and to affect the proportion of cells able to grow in drug.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some 5-90% of tolerant cells can slowly proliferate.
“Furthermore, some 5–90% of the tolerant cells can slowly proliferate [105].”
From Insight into the Mechanisms and Clinical Relevance of Antifungal Heteroresistance (2025) · cites this paper as [105]
The Introduction says that slowly growing tolerant cells make up 5–90% of all cells in an isolate, depending on the isolate. The citing sentence instead makes 5–90% a fraction of the tolerant cells, changing the denominator. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe fungistatic nature of FLC renders pathogenic fungi capable of developing tolerance, characterized by FLC-susceptible fungal strains surviving at FLC concentrations higher than the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC).
“Nevertheless, the fungistatic nature of FLC renders pathogenic fungi capable of developing tolerance, characterized by FLC-susceptible fungal strains surviving at FLC concentrations higher than the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) [9].”
From Pitavastatin Calcium Confers Fungicidal Properties to Fluconazole by Inhibiting Ubiquinone Biosynthesis and Generating Reactive Oxygen Species (2024) · cites this paper as [9]
The Introduction defines tolerance as growth of drug-susceptible fungal strains above the MIC, and says antifungal tolerance is most evident with fungistatic drugs. The paper discusses fluconazole-tolerant cells, but does not establish that fluconazole’s fungistatic nature itself causes pathogenic fungi to develop tolerance. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredAzole resistance and tolerance pose substantial obstacle and underscore necessity for alternative approaches to impede Erg11 function.
“However, the emerging issue of azole resistance and tolerance poses a substantial obstacle7 and underscores the necessity for alternative approaches to impede the function of Erg11.”
From Impairing the interaction between Erg11 and cytochrome P450 reductase Ncp1 enhances azoles’ antifungal activities (2025) · cites this paper as [7]
Fungal drug tolerance is linked to azole treatment failure and the inability to clear an infection, despite isolates being considered drug-sensitive by typical MIC50 assays.
“Fungal drug tolerance is linked to azole treatment failure and the inability to clear an infection, despite these isolates being considered drug-sensitive by the typical MIC50 assays (Sanglard et al. 2003; Delarze and Sanglard 2015; Rosenberg et al. 2018; Berman and Krysan 2020).”
From Antifungal Drug Concentration Impacts the Spectrum of Adaptive Mutations in <i>Candida albicans</i> (2023) · cites this paper as Berman and Krysan 2020
The C. neoformans homologue of mTOR kinase, Tor1, is essential for Cryptococcus stress response signalling, virulence and fluconazole tolerance.
“The C. neoformans homologue of mTOR kinase, Tor1, is essential for Cryptococcus stress response signalling, virulence84,85 and fluconazole tolerance (that is, the ability of a drug-susceptible organism to grow in the presence of an antifungal drug at concentrations above the minimum inhibitory concentration)86.”
From Treatment strategies for cryptococcal infection: challenges, advances and future outlook (2021) · cites this paper as [86]
Cites
Pappas, P. G., Kauffman, C. A., Andes, D. R., Clancy, C. J., Marr, K. A., Ostrosky-Zeichner, L., Reboli, A. C., Schuster, M. G., Vazquez, J. A., Walsh, T. J., et al. (2016) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/civ933 · Cited by 4,200 · see citing works
Lockhart, S. R., Etienne, K. A., Vallabhaneni, S., Farooqi, J., Chowdhary, A., Govender, N. P., Colombo, A. L., Calvo, B., Cuomo, C. A., Desjardins, C. A., et al. (2017) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/ciw691 · Cited by 1,662 · see citing works
Distinguishing between resistance, tolerance and persistence to antibiotic treatment
Brauner, A., Fridman, O., Gefen, O., & Balaban, N. Q. (2016) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2016.34 · Cited by 1,612 · see citing works
Satoh, K., Makimura, K., Hasumi, Y., Nishiyama, Y., Uchida, K., & Yamaguchi, H. (2009) · Microbiology and Immunology · doi:10.1111/j.1348-0421.2008.00083.x · Cited by 1,381 · see citing works
Definitions and guidelines for research on antibiotic persistence
Balaban, N. Q., Helaine, S., Lewis, K., Ackermann, M., Aldridge, B., Andersson, D. I., Brynildsen, M. P., Bumann, D., Camilli, A., Collins, J. J., et al. (2019) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-019-0196-3 · Cited by 1,313 · see citing works
Pappas, P. G., Kauffman, C. A., Andes, D. R., Clancy, C. J., Marr, K. A., Ostrosky-Zeichner, L., Reboli, A. C., Schuster, M. G., Vazquez, J. A., Walsh, T. J., et al. (2016) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/civ1194 · Cited by 1,298 · see citing works
The global problem of antifungal resistance: prevalence, mechanisms, and management
Perlin, D. S., Rautemaa-Richardson, R., & Alastruey-Izquierdo, A. (2017) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(17)30316-x · Cited by 1,055 · see citing works
Pfaller, M. A., Diekema, D. J., Turnidge, J. D., Castanheira, M., & Jones, R. N. (2019) · Open Forum Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofy358 · Cited by 825 · see citing works
Ramage, G., Vande Walle, K., Wickes, B. L., & López-Ribot, J. L. (2001) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.45.9.2475-2479.2001 · Cited by 753 · see citing works
Aneuploidy and Isochromosome Formation in Drug-Resistant <i>Candida albicans</i>
Selmecki, A., Forche, A., & Berman, J. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1128242 · Cited by 733 · see citing works
Self-citationMultidrug-Resistant Candida: Epidemiology, Molecular Mechanisms, and Treatment
Arendrup, M. C., & Patterson, T. F. (2017) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/infdis/jix131 · Cited by 707 · see citing works
Hsp90 Potentiates the Rapid Evolution of New Traits: Drug Resistance in Diverse Fungi
Cowen, L. E., & Lindquist, S. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1118370 · Cited by 698 · see citing works
Mechanisms of Antifungal Drug Resistance
Cowen, L. E., Sanglard, D., Howard, S. J., Rogers, P. D., & Perlin, D. S. (2015) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a019752 · Cited by 647 · see citing works
Development and regulation of single- and multi-species Candida albicans biofilms
Lohse, M. B., Gulati, M., Johnson, A. D., & Nobile, C. J. (2018) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2017.107 · Cited by 643 · see citing works
White, T. C. (1997) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.41.7.1482 · Cited by 612 · see citing works
Antifungal Drug Development: Challenges, Unmet Clinical Needs, and New Approaches
Roemer, T., & Krysan, D. J. (2014) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a019703 · Cited by 593 · see citing works
Self-citationChowdhary, A., Prakash, A., Sharma, C., Kordalewska, M., Kumar, A., Sarma, S., Tarai, B., Singh, A., Upadhyaya, G., Upadhyay, S., et al. (2018) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/dkx480 · Cited by 577 · see citing works
mTORC1 Controls Phase Separation and the Biophysical Properties of the Cytoplasm by Tuning Crowding
Delarue, M., Brittingham, G. P., Pfeffer, S., Surovtsev, I. V., Pinglay, S., Kennedy, K. J., Schaffer, M., Gutierrez, J. I., Sang, D., Poterewicz, G., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.05.042 · Cited by 526 · see citing works
Muñoz, J. F., Gade, L., Chow, N. A., Loparev, V. N., Juieng, P., Berkow, E. L., Farrer, R. A., Litvintseva, A. P., & Cuomo, C. A. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07779-6 · Cited by 458 · see citing works
Molecular Evolution of Antifungal Drug Resistance
Robbins, N., Caplan, T., & Cowen, L. E. (2017) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev-micro-030117-020345 · Cited by 441 · see citing works
Mechanisms of <i>Candida</i> Biofilm Drug Resistance
Taff, H. T., Mitchell, K. F., Edward, J. A., & Andes, D. R. (2013) · Future Microbiology · doi:10.2217/fmb.13.101 · Cited by 422 · see citing works
Cowen, L. E., Singh, S. D., Köhler, J. R., Collins, C., Zaas, A. K., Schell, W. A., Aziz, H., Mylonakis, E., Perfect, J. R., Whitesell, L., et al. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0813394106 · Cited by 413 · see citing works
Coste, A., Turner, V., Ischer, F., Morschhäuser, J., Forche, A., Selmecki, A., Berman, J., Bille, J., & Sanglard, D. (2006) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.105.054767 · Cited by 385 · see citing works
Self-citationEchinocandin resistance in Candida.
Perlin, D. S. (2015) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/civ791 · Cited by 374 · see citing works
Sanglard, D., Ischer, F., Marchetti, O., Entenza, J., & Bille, J. (2003) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03495.x · Cited by 350 · see citing works
The evolution of drug resistance in clinical isolates of Candida albicans.
Ford, C. B., Funt, J. M., Abbey, D., Issi, L., Guiducci, C., Martinez, D. A., Delorey, T., Li, B. Y., White, T. C., Cuomo, C., et al. (2015) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.00662 · Cited by 348 · see citing works
Self-citationvan der Linden, J. W. M., Camps, S. M. T., Kampinga, G. A., Arends, J. P. A., Debets-Ossenkopp, Y. J., Haas, P. J. A., Rijnders, B. J. A., Kuijper, E. J., van Tiel, F. H., Varga, J., et al. (2013) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/cit320 · Cited by 342 · see citing works
Forche, A., Alby, K., Schaefer, D., Johnson, A. D., Berman, J., & Bennett, R. J. (2008) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060110 · Cited by 338 · see citing works
Self-citationNosocomial Fungal Infections: Epidemiology, Infection Control, and Prevention
Alangaden, G. J. (2011) · Infectious Disease Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.idc.2010.11.003 · Cited by 337 · see citing works
Garcia-Effron, G., Lee, S., Park, S., Cleary, J. D., & Perlin, D. S. (2009) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.00443-09 · Cited by 323 · see citing works
Genetic and phenotypic intra-species variation in <i>Candida albicans</i>
Hirakawa, M. P., Martinez, D. A., Sakthikumar, S., Anderson, M. Z., Berlin, A., Gujja, S., Zeng, Q., Zisson, E., Wang, J. M., Greenberg, J. M., et al. (2015) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.174623.114 · Cited by 320 · see citing works
Self-citationSelmecki, A. M., Dulmage, K., Cowen, L. E., Anderson, J. B., & Berman, J. (2009) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000705 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
Self-citationContribution of Clinically Derived Mutations in <i>ERG11</i> to Azole Resistance in Candida albicans
Flowers, S. A., Colón, B., Whaley, S. G., Schuler, M. A., & Rogers, P. D. (2015) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.03470-14 · Cited by 294 · see citing works
A Candida Biofilm-Induced Pathway for Matrix Glucan Delivery: Implications for Drug Resistance
Taff, H. T., Nett, J. E., Zarnowski, R., Ross, K. M., Sanchez, H., Cain, M. T., Hamaker, J., Mitchell, A. P., & Andes, D. R. (2012) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1002848 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
McCarty, T. P., & Pappas, P. G. (2016) · Infectious Disease Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.idc.2015.10.013 · Cited by 285 · see citing works
The ‘obligate diploid’ Candida albicans forms mating-competent haploids
Hickman, M. A., Zeng, G., Forche, A., Hirakawa, M. P., Abbey, D., Harrison, B. D., Wang, Y.-M., Su, C.-H., Bennett, R. J., Wang, Y., et al. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11865 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Self-citationRosenberg, A., Ene, I. V., Bibi, M., Zakin, S., Segal, E. S., Ziv, N., Dahan, A. M., Colombo, A. L., Bennett, R. J., & Berman, J. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04926-x · Cited by 270 · cited 5× · see citing works
“Parts a–d are adapted from ref.(9), CC BY 4.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationPotent Synergism of the Combination of Fluconazole and Cyclosporine in <i>Candida albicans</i>
Marchetti, O., Moreillon, P., Glauser, M. P., Bille, J., & Sanglard, D. (2000) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.44.9.2373-2381.2000 · Cited by 252 · see citing works
Fungal Biofilms, Drug Resistance, and Recurrent Infection
Desai, J. V., Mitchell, A. P., & Andes, D. R. (2014) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a019729 · Cited by 252 · see citing works
Genomic Plasticity of the Human Fungal Pathogen Candida albicans
Selmecki, A., Forche, A., & Berman, J. (2010) · Eukaryotic Cell · doi:10.1128/ec.00060-10 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Self-citationUnderstanding Echinocandin Resistance in the Emerging Pathogen Candida auris
Kordalewska, M., Lee, A., Park, S., Berrio, I., Chowdhary, A., Zhao, Y., & Perlin, D. S. (2018) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.00238-18 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Flowers, S. A., Barker, K. S., Berkow, E. L., Toner, G., Chadwick, S. G., Gygax, S. E., Morschhäuser, J., & Rogers, P. D. (2012) · Eukaryotic Cell · doi:10.1128/ec.00215-12 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Stress Alters Rates and Types of Loss of Heterozygosity in Candida albicans
Forche, A., Abbey, D., Pisithkul, T., Weinzierl, M. A., Ringstrom, T., Bruck, D., Petersen, K., & Berman, J. (2011) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.00129-11 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Self-citationUppuluri, P., Nett, J., Heitman, J., & Andes, D. (2008) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.01397-07 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
Stevens, D. A., Espiritu, M., & Parmar, R. (2004) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.48.9.3407-3411.2004 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Elevated Chitin Content Reduces the Susceptibility of Candida Species to Caspofungin
Walker, L. A., Gow, N. A. R., & Munro, C. A. (2013) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.01486-12 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Elevated Cell Wall Chitin in Candida albicans Confers Echinocandin Resistance <i>In Vivo</i>
Lee, K. K., MacCallum, D. M., Jacobsen, M. D., Walker, L. A., Odds, F. C., Gow, N. A. R., & Munro, C. A. (2012) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.00683-11 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Global Analysis of the Evolution and Mechanism of Echinocandin Resistance in Candida glabrata
Singh-Babak, S. D., Babak, T., Diezmann, S., Hill, J. A., Xie, J. L., Chen, Y.-L., Poutanen, S. M., Rennie, R. P., Heitman, J., & Cowen, L. E. (2012) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1002718 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Xiang, M.-J., Liu, J.-Y., Ni, P.-H., Wang, S., Shi, C., Wei, B., Ni, Y.-X., & Ge, H.-L. (2013) · FEMS Yeast Research · doi:10.1111/1567-1364.12042 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Gene flow contributes to diversification of the major fungal pathogen Candida albicans
Ropars, J., Maufrais, C., Diogo, D., Marcet-Houben, M., Perin, A., Sertour, N., Mosca, K., Permal, E., Laval, G., Bouchier, C., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04787-4 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Colombo, A. L., Guimarães, T., Sukiennik, T., Pasqualotto, A. C., Andreotti, R., Queiroz‐Telles, F., Nouér, S. A., & Nucci, M. (2014) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-014-3400-y · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Andes, D. R., Safdar, N., Baddley, J. W., Alexander, B., Brumble, L., Freifeld, A., Hadley, S., Herwaldt, L., Kauffman, C., Lyon, G. M., et al. (2016) · Transplant Infectious Disease · doi:10.1111/tid.12613 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Sionov, E., Chang, Y. C., Garraffo, H. M., & Kwon-Chung, K. J. (2009) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.00295-09 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
A Tetraploid Intermediate Precedes Aneuploid Formation in Yeasts Exposed to Fluconazole
Harrison, B. D., Hashemi, J., Bibi, M., Pulver, R., Bavli, D., Nahmias, Y., Wellington, M., Sapiro, G., & Berman, J. (2014) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001815 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Self-citationRex, J. H., Nelson, P. W., Paetznick, V. L., Lozano-Chiu, M., Espinel-Ingroff, A., & Anaissie, E. J. (1998) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.42.1.129 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Dynamic ploidy changes drive fluconazole resistance in human cryptococcal meningitis
Stone, N. R. H., Rhodes, J., Fisher, M. C., Mfinanga, S., Kivuyo, S., Rugemalila, J., Segal, E. S., Needleman, L., Molloy, S. F., Kwon-Chung, J., et al. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci124516 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Self-citationProtein Phase Separation as a Stress Survival StrategyPreprint
Franzmann, T. M., & Alberti, S. (2019) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a034058 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Healey, K. R., Kordalewska, M., Jiménez Ortigosa, C., Singh, A., Berrío, I., Chowdhary, A., & Perlin, D. S. (2018) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.01427-18 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Lysine harvesting is an antioxidant strategy and triggers underground polyamine metabolism
Olin-Sandoval, V., Yu, J. S. L., Miller-Fleming, L., Alam, M. T., Kamrad, S., Correia-Melo, C., Haas, R., Segal, J., Peña Navarro, D. A., Herrera-Dominguez, L., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1442-6 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Arthington-Skaggs, B. A., Lee-Yang, W., Ciblak, M. A., Frade, J. P., Brandt, M. E., Hajjeh, R. A., Harrison, L. H., Sofair, A. N., & Warnock, A. D. W. (2002) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.46.8.2477-2481.2002 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Global analysis of mutations driving microevolution of a heterozygous diploid fungal pathogen
Ene, I. V., Farrer, R. A., Hirakawa, M. P., Agwamba, K., Cuomo, C. A., & Bennett, R. J. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1806002115 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Drug-Resistant<i>Candida glabrata</i>Infection in Cancer Patients
Farmakiotis, D., Tarrand, J. J., & Kontoyiannis, D. P. (2014) · Emerging Infectious Diseases · doi:10.3201/eid2011.140685 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Segal, E. S., Gritsenko, V., Levitan, A., Yadav, B., Dror, N., Steenwyk, J. L., Silberberg, Y., Mielich, K., Rokas, A., Gow, N. A. R., et al. (2018) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.02048-18 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Self-citationEvolution in<i>Candida albicans</i>Populations During a Single Passage Through a Mouse Host
Forche, A., Magee, P. T., Selmecki, A., Berman, J., & May, G. (2009) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.109.103325 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Trailing End Point Phenotype in Antifungal Susceptibility Testing Is pH Dependent
Marr, K. A., Rustad, T. R., Rex, J. H., & White, T. C. (1999) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.43.6.1383 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Population genomics of drug resistance in <i>Candida albicans</i>
Cowen, L. E., Nantel, A., Whiteway, M. S., Thomas, D. Y., Tessier, D. C., Kohn, L. M., & Anderson, J. B. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.102291099 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Fungal persister cells: The basis for recalcitrant infections?
Wuyts, J., Van Dijck, P., & Holtappels, M. (2018) · PLOS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1007301 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Antifungal Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
Lepak, A. J., & Andes, D. R. (2015) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a019653 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Hsp90 orchestrates stress response signaling governing fungal drug resistance
Cowen, L. E. (2009) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000471 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Candida albicans gains azole resistance by altering sphingolipid composition
Gao, J., Wang, H., Li, Z., Wong, A. H.-H., Wang, Y.-Z., Guo, Y., Lin, X., Zeng, G., Liu, H., Wang, Y., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06944-1 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
An Experimental Framework for Quantifying Bacterial Tolerance
Brauner, A., Shoresh, N., Fridman, O., & Balaban, N. Q. (2017) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2017.05.014 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Onyewu, C., Wormley, F. L., Perfect, J. R., & Heitman, J. (2004) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.72.12.7330-7333.2004 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Ploidy Variation in Fungi: Polyploidy, Aneuploidy, and Genome Evolution
Todd, R. T., Forche, A., & Selmecki, A. (2017) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/microbiolspec.funk-0051-2016 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Defining the frontiers between antifungal resistance, tolerance and the concept of persistence
Delarze, E., & Sanglard, D. (2015) · Drug Resistance Updates · doi:10.1016/j.drup.2015.10.001 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Bennett, R. J., Forche, A., & Berman, J. (2014) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a019604 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Self-citationGenome plasticity in Candida albicans is driven by long repeat sequences
Todd, R. T., Wikoff, T. D., Forche, A., & Selmecki, A. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.45954 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Sionov, E., Chang, Y. C., & Kwon-Chung, K. J. (2013) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.00694-13 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Studies of the paradoxical effect of caspofungin at high drug concentrations
Stevens, D. A., White, T. C., Perlin, D. S., & Selitrennikoff, C. P. (2005) · Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease · doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2004.10.006 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Heteroresistance of <i>Cryptococcus gattii</i> to Fluconazole
Varma, A., & Kwon-Chung, K. J. (2010) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.00153-10 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Circuit diversification in a biofilm regulatory network
Huang, M. Y., Woolford, C. A., May, G. E., McManus, C. J., & Mitchell, A. P. (2019) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1007787 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Aneuploidy Enables Cross-Adaptation to Unrelated Drugs
Yang, F., Teoh, F., Tan, A. S. M., Cao, Y., Pavelka, N., & Berman, J. (2019) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msz104 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Self-citationAbsence of Amphotericin B-Tolerant Persister Cells in Biofilms of Some <i>Candida</i> Species
Al-Dhaheri, R. S., & Douglas, L. J. (2008) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.01473-07 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Rueda, C., Cuenca‐Estrella, M., & Zaragoza, Ó. (2013) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.00946-13 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Li, P., Seneviratne, C. J., Alpi, E., Vizcaino, J. A., & Jin, L. (2015) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.00543-15 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Forche, A., Cromie, G., Gerstein, A. C., Solis, N. V., Pisithkul, T., Srifa, W., Jeffery, E., Abbey, D., Filler, S. G., Dudley, A. M., et al. (2018) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.118.301019 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Self-citationSasse, C., Dunkel, N., Schäfer, T., Schneider, S., Dierolf, F., Ohlsen, K., & Morschhäuser, J. (2012) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08210.x · Cited by 93 · see citing works
The Hsp90 chaperone network modulates Candida virulence traits
O’Meara, T. R., Robbins, N., & Cowen, L. E. (2017) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2017.05.003 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Ben-Ami, R., Zimmerman, O., Finn, T., Amit, S., Novikov, A., Wertheimer, N., Lurie-Weinberger, M., & Berman, J. (2016) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.00655-16 · Cited by 88 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Box figure part b is adapted from ref.(97), CC BY 4.”
Self-citationThe Hsp90 Co-Chaperone Sgt1 Governs Candida albicans Morphogenesis and Drug Resistance
Shapiro, R. S., Zaas, A. K., Betancourt-Quiroz, M., Perfect, J. R., & Cowen, L. E. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0044734 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Forche, A., May, G., & Magee, P. T. (2005) · Eukaryotic Cell · doi:10.1128/ec.4.1.156-165.2005 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Lockhart, S. R., Ghannoum, M. A., & Alexander, B. D. (2017) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.02416-16 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Yang, F., Zhang, L., Wakabayashi, H., Myers, J., Jiang, Y., Cao, Y., Jimenez-Ortigosa, C., Perlin, D. S., & Rustchenko, E. (2017) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.00071-17 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Gu, W., Guo, D., Zhang, L., Xu, D., & Sun, S. (2016) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.03046-15 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Recent Insights into the Paradoxical Effect of Echinocandins
Wagener, J., & Loiko, V. (2017) · Journal of Fungi · doi:10.3390/jof4010005 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Synergistic Effects of Amiodarone and Fluconazole on Candida tropicalis Resistant to Fluconazole
da Silva, C. R., Neto, J. B. D. A., Sidrim, J. J. C., Ângelo, M. R. F., Magalhães, H. I. F., Cavalcanti, B. C., Brilhante, R. S. N., Macêdo, D. S., de Moraes, M. O., Lobo, M. D. P., et al. (2013) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.00966-12 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Real-Time Imaging of the Azole Class of Antifungal Drugs in Live Candida Cells
Benhamou, R. I., Bibi, M., Steinbuch, K. B., Engel, H., Levin, M., Roichman, Y., Berman, J., & Fridman, M. (2017) · ACS Chemical Biology · doi:10.1021/acschembio.7b00339 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Self-citationCornet, M., Bidard, F., Schwarz, P., Da Costa, G., Blanchin-Roland, S., Dromer, F., & Gaillardin, C. (2005) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.73.12.7977-7987.2005 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Holmes, A. R., Tsao, S., Ong, S., Lamping, E., Niimi, K., Monk, B. C., Niimi, M., Kaneko, A., Holland, B. R., Schmid, J., et al. (2006) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05357.x · Cited by 68 · see citing works
ScanLag: High-throughput Quantification of Colony Growth and Lag Time
Levin-Reisman, I., Fridman, O., & Balaban, N. Q. (2014) · Journal of Visualized Experiments · doi:10.3791/51456 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Gerstein, A. C., Rosenberg, A., Hecht, I., & Berman, J. (2016) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/mic.0.000295 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Self-citationHubbard, M. J., Bradley, M. P., Sullivan, P., et al. (1982) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/0014-5793(82)80320-7 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Yang, F., Kravets, A., Bethlendy, G., Welle, S., & Rustchenko, E. (2013) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.00516-13 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Khandelwal, N. K., Chauhan, N., Sarkar, P., Esquivel, B. D., Coccetti, P., Singh, A., Coste, A. T., Gupta, M., Sanglard, D., White, T. C., et al. (2018) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m117.807032 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Calcineurin signaling: lessons from Candida species
Yu, S.-J., Chang, Y.-L., & Chen, Y. (2015) · FEMS Yeast Research · doi:10.1093/femsyr/fov016 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Rueda, C., Puig-Asensio, M., Guinea, J., Almirante, B., Cuenca-Estrella, M., Zaragoza, O., Padilla, B., Muñoz, P., Guinea, J., Paño Pardo, J. R., et al. (2017) · Clinical Microbiology and Infection · doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2016.09.016 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Singh, A., Healey, K. R., Yadav, P., Upadhyaya, G., Sachdeva, N., Sarma, S., Kumar, A., Tarai, B., Perlin, D. S., & Chowdhary, A. (2018) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.00195-18 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Anderson, M. Z., Saha, A., Haseeb, A., & Bennett, R. J. (2017) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/mic.0.000478 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Within-Host Genomic Diversity of Candida albicans in Healthy Carriers
Sitterlé, E., Maufrais, C., Sertour, N., Palayret, M., d’Enfert, C., & Bougnoux, M.-E. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-38768-4 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Astvad, K. M. T., Sanglard, D., Delarze, E., Hare, R. K., & Arendrup, M. C. (2018) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.01624-18 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Campbell, K., Herrera-Domínguez, L., Correia‐Melo, C., Zelezniak, A., & Ralser, M. (2017) · Current Opinion in Systems Biology · doi:10.1016/j.coisb.2017.12.001 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Localizing Antifungal Drugs to the Correct Organelle Can Markedly Enhance their Efficacy
Benhamou, R. I., Bibi, M., Berman, J., & Fridman, M. (2018) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201802509 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Self-citationGarnaud, C., García-Oliver, E., Wang, Y., Maubon, D., Bailly, S., Despinasse, Q., Champleboux, M., Govin, J., & Cornet, M. (2018) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.01785-17 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Meletiadis, J., Curfs-Breuker, I., Meis, J. F., & Mouton, J. W. (2017) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.02372-16 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
The unmet clinical need of novel antifungal drugs
Krysan, D. J. (2017) · Virulence · doi:10.1080/21505594.2016.1276692 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Self-citationLü, M., Yang, X., Yu, C., Gong, Y., Yuan, L., Hao, L., & Sun, S. (2019) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.03142 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Costa‐de‐Oliveira, S., Miranda, I. M., Silva-Dias, A., Silva, A. P., Rodrigues, A. G., & Pina‐Vaz, C. (2015) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.05056-14 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Mount, H. O., Revie, N. M., Todd, R. T., Anstett, K., Collins, C., Costanzo, M., Boone, C., Robbins, N., Selmecki, A., & Cowen, L. E. (2018) · PLOS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007319 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Marcos-Zambrano, L. J., Escribano, P., Sánchez-Carrillo, C., Bouza, E., & Guinea, J. (2016) · Medical Mycology · doi:10.1093/mmy/myw033 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
<i>Candida albicans</i> Biofilms Are Generally Devoid of Persister Cells
Denega, I., d’Enfert, C., & Bachellier-Bassi, S. (2019) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.01979-18 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Agrawal, D., Patterson, T. F., Rinaldi, M. G., & Revankar, S. G. (2007) · Journal of Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1099/jmm.0.47168-0 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Candida Efflux ATPases and Antiporters in Clinical Drug Resistance
Prasad, R., Rawal, M. K., & Shah, A. H. (2016) · Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-25304-6_15 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
<i>MSH2</i> Gene Point Mutations Are Not Antifungal Resistance Markers in <i>Candida glabrata</i>
Bordallo-Cardona, M. Á., Agnelli, C., Gómez-Nuñez, A., Sánchez-Carrillo, C., Bouza, E., Muñoz, P., Escribano, P., & Guinea, J. (2019) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.01876-18 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Coenye, T., De Vos, M., Vandenbosch, D., & Nelis, H. (2008) · Clinical Microbiology and Infection · doi:10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.01956.x · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Li, H., Chen, Z., Zhang, W., Gao, Y., Zhang, X., & Sun, S. (2014) · Journal of Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1099/jmm.0.081760-0 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Important new therapies for methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>
Bassetti, M., Carnelutti, A., Castaldo, N., & Peghin, M. (2019) · Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1080/14656566.2019.1675637 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Lee, M., Kim, H., Kang, J., Kim, E.-C., Kim, J., Kim, J., Kim, J., Park, Y., Song, W., Shin, J.-H., et al. (2006) · Mycoses · doi:10.1111/j.1439-0507.2006.01329.x · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Shor, E., Schuyler, J., & Perlin, D. S. (2019) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.00120-19 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Hooper, R. W., Ashcraft, D. S., & Pankey, G. A. (2018) · Medical Mycology · doi:10.1093/mmy/myy008 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Luna-Tapia, A., Butts, A., & Palmer, G. E. (2019) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.01337-18 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Endosomal Trafficking Defects Can Induce Calcium-Dependent Azole Tolerance in Candida albicans
Luna-Tapia, A., Tournu, H., Peters, T. L., & Palmer, G. E. (2016) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.01034-16 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
7 of the 137 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tackling the emerging threat of antifungal resistance to human health
Fisher, M. C., Alastruey-Izquierdo, A., Berman, J., Bicanic, T., Bignell, E. M., Bowyer, P., Bromley, M., Brüggemann, R., Garber, G., Cornely, O. A., et al. (2022) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-022-00720-1 · Cited by 1,179 · see citing works
Self-citationAntifungal Drug Resistance: Molecular Mechanisms in <i>Candida albicans</i> and Beyond
Lee, Y., Puumala, E., Robbins, N., & Cowen, L. E. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00199 · Cited by 801 · see citing works
The Antifungal Pipeline: Fosmanogepix, Ibrexafungerp, Olorofim, Opelconazole, and Rezafungin
Hoenigl, M., Sprute, R., Egger, M., Arastehfar, A., Cornely, O. A., Krause, R., Lass-Flörl, C., Prattes, J., Spec, A., Thompson, G. R., et al. (2021) · Drugs · doi:10.1007/s40265-021-01611-0 · Cited by 467 · see citing works
“Candida dubliensis, C. fabianii, C. glabrata, C. inconspicua, C. kefyr, C. krusei, C. lipolytica, C. pulcherrima, C. sojae, and C. tropicalis were also inhibited by MIC values ≤ 0.125 µg/mL and were susceptible to other echinocandins using epidemiological cut-off value (ECV) interpretive criteria [194, 195].”
BackgroundInfluentialTreatment strategies for cryptococcal infection: challenges, advances and future outlook
Iyer, K. R., Revie, N. M., Fu, C., Robbins, N., & Cowen, L. E. (2021) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-021-00511-0 · Cited by 363 · see citing works
Diagnosis of invasive fungal infections: challenges and recent developments
Fang, W., Wu, J., Cheng, M., Zhu, X., Du, M., Chen, C., Liao, W., Zhi, K., & Pan, W. (2023) · Journal of Biomedical Science · doi:10.1186/s12929-023-00926-2 · Cited by 391 · see citing works
“Echinocandins work by blocking the catalytic subunit of the β-1,3 glucan synthase and thus interfere with β-1,3-d-glucan production, a major cell wall component [23].”
BackgroundUltra-fast proteomics with Scanning SWATH
Messner, C. B., Demichev, V., Bloomfield, N., Yu, J., White, M. E. H., Kreidl, M., Egger, A.-S., Freiwald, A., Ivosev, G., Wasim, F., et al. (2021) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-021-00860-4 · Cited by 314 · see citing works
Drug-Resistant Fungi: An Emerging Challenge Threatening Our Limited Antifungal Armamentarium
Arastehfar, A. A., Gabaldón, T., Garcia‐Rubio, R., Jenks, J. D., Hoenigl, M., Salzer, H. J. F., İlkit, M., Lass‐Flörl, C., & Perlin, D. S. (2020) · Antibiotics · doi:10.3390/antibiotics9120877 · Cited by 294 · see citing works
“), echinocandins (caspofungin, micafungin, and anidulafungin), and polyenes, such as amphotericin B (AMB) [7].”
BackgroundInfluential<i>Candida albicans</i> biofilms and polymicrobial interactions
Ponde, N. O., Lortal, L., Ramage, G., Naglik, J. R., & Richardson, J. P. (2021) · Critical Reviews in Microbiology · doi:10.1080/1040841x.2020.1843400 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Arastehfar, A. A., Carvalho, A., Nguyen, M. H., Hedayati, M. T., Netea, M. G., Perlin, D. S., & Hoenigl, M. (2020) · Journal of Fungi · doi:10.3390/jof6040211 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Aspergillus fumigatus and aspergillosis: From basics to clinics
Arastehfar, A. A., Carvalho, A., Houbraken, J. A. M. P., Lombardi, L., Garcia‐Rubio, R., Jenks, J. D., Rivero-Menéndez, O., Aljohani, R., Jacobsen, I. D., Berman, J. G., et al. (2021) · Studies in Mycology · doi:10.1016/j.simyco.2021.100115 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Self-citationThe importance of antimicrobial resistance in medical mycology
Gow, N. A. R., Johnson, C., Berman, J. G., Coste, A. T., Cuomo, C. A., Perlin, D. S., Bicanic, T. A., Harrison, T. S., Wiederhold, N. P., Bromley, M., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-32249-5 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
Self-citationCandida albicans and Candida glabrata : global priority pathogens
Katsipoulaki, M., Stappers, M. H. T., Malavia, D., Brunke, S., Hube, B., & Gow, N. A. R. (2024) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00021-23 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
“Tolerance seems to involve the chaperone Hsp90, the calcineurin pathway, and protein kinase C (93).”
BackgroundInfluentialFungal biofilm architecture produces hypoxic microenvironments that drive antifungal resistance
Kowalski, C. H., Morelli, K. A., Schultz, D., Nadell, C. D., & Cramer, R. A. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2003700117 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
“We alternatively considered the use of “tolerance” that has been more rigorously defined in the context of planktonic yeast cell populations, but it remains unclear if the reduced drug susceptibility of hypoxic hyphae within the biofilm meet the accepted tolerance definition for planktonic cells (9, 46).”
BackgroundExpandable and reversible copy number amplification drives rapid adaptation to antifungal drugs
Todd, R. T., & Selmecki, A. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.58349 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
The Quiet and Underappreciated Rise of Drug-Resistant Invasive Fungal Pathogens
Arastehfar, A., Lass-Flörl, C., Garcia-Rubio, R., Daneshnia, F., Ilkit, M., Boekhout, T., Gabaldon, T., & Perlin, D. S. (2020) · Journal of Fungi · doi:10.3390/jof6030138 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
“If incubated for 48 h, however, tolerant cells can grow at a drug level higher than MIC, which is due to slow growth of tolerant cells in presence of antifungal drugs relative to drug‐resistant isolates [11].”
BackgroundInfluentialPruden, A. J., Vikesland, P. J., Davis, B. C., & Husman, A. M. D. R. (2021) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.mib.2021.09.013 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Hoenigl, M., Arastehfar, A. A., Arendrup, M. C., Brüggemann, R. J. M., Carvalho, A., Chiller, T. M., Chen, W., Egger, M., Feys, S., Gangneux, J., et al. (2024) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00074-23 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Yu, J., Correia‐Melo, C., Zorrilla, F., Herrera-Domínguez, L., Wu, M., Hartl, J., Campbell, K., Blasche, S., Kreidl, M., Egger, A.-S., et al. (2022) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41564-022-01072-5 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Self-citationOuyang, J., Bu, Q., Tao, N., et al. (2022) · Bioactive Materials · doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.03.033 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
“is tens to thousands of times higher, which is the main cause of bacterial drug resistance at present [42,43].”
BackgroundCurrent trends, limitations and future research in the fungi?
Hyde, K. D., Baldrian, P., Chen, Y., Chethana, K. W. T., de Hoog, S., Doilom, M., de Farias, A. R. G., Gonçalves, M. F. M., Gonkhom, D., Gui, H., et al. (2024) · Fungal diversity · doi:10.1007/s13225-023-00532-5 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Fungal infections: Pathogenesis, antifungals and alternate treatment approaches
Reddy, G. K. K., Padmavathi, A. R., & Nancharaiah, Y. V. (2022) · Current Research in Microbial Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.crmicr.2022.100137 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Antifungal activity of thiosemicarbazones, bis(thiosemicarbazones), and their metal complexes
Bajaj, K., Buchanan, R. M., & Grapperhaus, C. A. (2021) · Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2021.111620 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Fungicide effects on human fungal pathogens: Cross-resistance to medical drugs and beyond
Bastos, R. W., Rossato, L. L., Goldman, G. H., & Santos, D. A. (2021) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1010073 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Recent developments of metal-based compounds against fungal pathogens
Lin, Y., Betts, H. D., Keller, S., Cariou, K., & Gasser, G. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00945h · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Ji, X., Yang, H., Liu, W., Ma, Y., Wu, J., Zong, X., Yuan, P., Chen, X., Yang, C., Li, X., et al. (2021) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.1c01379 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Fungal Drug Response and Antimicrobial Resistance
Osset-Trénor, P., Pascual‐Ahuir, A., & Proft, M. (2023) · Journal of Fungi · doi:10.3390/jof9050565 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
“This ability is associated with various general stress responses and/or epigenetic pathways, as comprehensively reviewed in [70].”
BackgroundVanreppelen, G., Wuyts, J., Dijck, P. V., & Vandecruys, P. (2023) · Journal of Fungi · doi:10.3390/jof9020171 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
“More specifically, they inhibit cytochrome P450-dependent lanosterol 14-α-demethylase, a crucial step in the ergosterol biosynthesis pathway, by competitively binding its heme group within the substrate pocket [21,22].”
BackgroundResistance to Antifungal Drugs
Ben‐Ami, R., & Kontoyiannis, D. P. (2021) · Infectious Disease Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.idc.2021.03.003 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Emerging Antifungal Resistance in Fungal Pathogens
Hui, S. T., Gifford, H., & Rhodes, J. L. (2024) · Current Clinical Microbiology Reports · doi:10.1007/s40588-024-00219-8 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
“Yet clinicians and mycologists alike may say we are losing the battle, with rising drug resistance and tolerance causing treatment failure [7].”
BackgroundThe role of Candida albicans stress response pathways in antifungal tolerance and resistance
Iyer, K. R., Robbins, N., & Cowen, L. E. (2022) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2022.103953 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
“albicans can persist and grow upon exposure to high concentrations of echinocandins (Berman and Krysan, 2020; Wiederhold, 2007; Wiederhold et al., 2005), also requires the calcineurin pathway, as addition of cyclosporin A abolishes growth at higher drug concentrations (Wiederhold et al.”
BackgroundInfluentialPhotodynamic disinfection and its role in controlling infectious diseases
Aroso, R. T., Scháberle, F. A., Arnaut, L. G., & Pereira, M. M. (2021) · Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences · doi:10.1007/s43630-021-00102-1 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Cell Wall Destruction and Internal Cascade Synergistic Antifungal Strategy for Fungal Keratitis
Ye, Y., He, J., Wang, H., Li, W., Wang, Q., Luo, C., Tang, X., Chen, X. S., Jin, X., Yao, K., et al. (2022) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.2c07444 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Burrack, L. S., Todd, R. T., Soisangwan, N., Wiederhold, N. P., & Selmecki, A. (2022) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.00842-22 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
“of drug higher than the MIC50 and can be measured by supra-MIC growth (SMG) at 48 h (23, 24, 39).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialArastehfar, A. A., Polat, S. H., Daneshnia, F., Pan, W., Hafez, A. I., Fang, W., Liao, W., Şahbudak-Bal, Z., Metin, D. Y., de Almeida, J. N., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fcimb.2021.676177 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
“Fluconazole tolerance was defined as incomplete growth inhibition at supra-MICs for 48 h compared to positive control (Arastehfar et al., 2020e; Berman and Krysan, 2020).”
BackgroundDrug Resistance and Novel Therapeutic Approaches in Invasive Candidiasis
Murphy, S. E., & Bicanic, T. A. (2021) · Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fcimb.2021.759408 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
<i>Candida albicans</i>targets that potentially synergize with fluconazole
Lu, H., Shrivastava, M., Whiteway, M., & Jiang, Y. (2021) · Critical Reviews in Microbiology · doi:10.1080/1040841x.2021.1884641 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
A dual-targeting antifungal is effective against multidrug-resistant human fungal pathogens
Zhou, M., Liu, L., Cong, Z., Jiang, W., Xiao, X., Xie, J., Luo, Z., Chen, S., Wu, Y., Xue, X., et al. (2024) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41564-024-01662-5 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
“Due to the highly adaptable genomes of fungi and the rapid spread of antifungal-resistance genes, fungi are prone to develop resistance to conventional single-targeting antifungal drugs 8–10 .”
Visualized Gallium/Lyticase‐Integrated Antifungal Strategy for Fungal Keratitis Treatment
He, J., Ye, Y., Zhang, D., Yao, K., & Zhou, M. (2022) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202206437 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Kim, J. H., Cheng, L. W., Chan, K. L., Tam, C. C., Mahoney, N., Friedman, M., Shilman, M. M., & Land, K. M. (2020) · Antibiotics · doi:10.3390/antibiotics9110812 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Combination Therapy to Treat Fungal Biofilm-Based Infections
Tits, J., Cammue, B. P. A., & Thevissen, K. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21228873 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Natural proteome diversity links aneuploidy tolerance to protein turnover
Muenzner, J., Trébulle, P., Agostini, F., Zauber, H., Messner, C. B., Steger, M., Kilian, C., Lau, K., Barthel, N., Lehmann, A., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07442-9 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
“…advantage, as demonstrated in certain environmental or stress conditions, or in the presence of toxic substances and antifungal drugs 4,5,11–14, 16 , the fitness Third, the finding that dosage compensation dominates proteins that are not necessarily members of complexes requires new…”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationApplication of Probiotic Yeasts on Candida Species Associated Infection
Kunyeit, L., Anu‐Appaiah, K. A., & Rao, R. P. (2020) · Journal of Fungi · doi:10.3390/jof6040189 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
“Several resistant mechanisms have been connected to drug-resistant Candida species including overexpression of drug efflux pumps, alteration in drug targets, and changes in membrane sterol composition [22].”
BackgroundLiu, Z., Li, M., Xie, Q., Liu, Y., Huang, J., Zeng, Q., Li, X., Rao, K., Ning, J., Zhao, M., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-61519-1 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
“Moreover, long-term, high-dose usage and mismanagement of these drugs not only cause adverse toxic effects to the host, but also lead to the emergence of drug-resistant fungal strains, resulting in a severe public health crisis 7 – 9 .”
Yang, F., Scopel, E. F. C., Li, H., Sun, L.-L., Kawar, N., Cao, Y.-B., Jiang, Y.-Y., & Berman, J. (2023) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.00227-23 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
“Antifungal drug tolerance depends upon diverse stress pathway responses, including heat shock responses, responses to amino acid starvation, kinases such as protein kinase C, and epigenetic processes (11).”
BackgroundSelf-citationChen, L., Zhang, L., Xie, Y., Wang, Y., Tian, X., Fang, W., Xue, X., & Wang, L. (2023) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2023.115007 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Santos, R., Steenwyk, J. L., Rivero-Menéndez, O., Mead, M. E., Silva, L. P., Bastos, R. W., Alastruey‐Izquierdo, A., Goldman, G. H., & Rokas, A. (2020) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2020.00459 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
“Finally, future 561 phenotypic and genomic analyses can help us to better understand more complex topics 562 involving antifungal drugs, such as resistance, persistence and tolerance (as well as the 563 role of tolerance in resistance) (Berman and Krysan, 2020).”
Zhai, B., Liao, C., Jaggavarapu, S., Tang, Y., Rolling, T., Ning, Y., Sun, T., Bergin, S. A., Gjonbalaj, M., Miranda, E., et al. (2024) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-024-03183-4 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
“In fact, insights from azole-tolerance studies have indicated that, unlike conventional resistance, which often arises from mutations of the direct drug target, tolerance or heteroresistance may hinge on changes in stress response pathways 2 .”
Arastehfar, A., Daneshnia, F., Cabrera, N., Penalva-Lopez, S., Sarathy, J., Zimmerman, M., Shor, E., & Perlin, D. S. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-36882-6 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Tunicamycin Potentiates Antifungal Drug Tolerance via Aneuploidy in Candida albicans
Yang, F., Gritsenko, V., Slor Futterman, Y., Gao, L., Zhen, C., Lu, H., Jiang, Y.-Y., & Berman, J. (2021) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.02272-21 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
“slowly, in the presence of supra-MIC drug concentrations (5, 6).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationSharma, C., & Kadosh, D. (2023) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1011190 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
“Antifungal tolerance/trailing growth is usually characteristic of susceptible strains that tend to grow slowly at inhibitory drug concentrations [62,63].”
BackgroundMicrobial extracellular vesicles contribute to antimicrobial resistance
Jiang, B., Lai, Y., Xiao, W., Zhong, T., Liu, F., Gong, J., & Huang, J. (2024) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1012143 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Antifungal Drug Concentration Impacts the Spectrum of Adaptive Mutations in <i>Candida albicans</i>
Todd, R. T., Soisangwan, N., Peters, S., Kemp, B., Crooks, T., Gerstein, A., & Selmecki, A. (2023) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msad009 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
“Although the drivers of antifungal drug tolerance remain largely unknown, genes involved in core stress responses likely play a role (Cowen et al. 2014; Rosenberg et al. 2018; Berman and Krysan 2020).”
Martins‐Santana, L., Rezende, C. P., Rossi, A., Martinez-Rossi, N. M., & Almeida, F. B. D. R. (2023) · Pathogens · doi:10.3390/pathogens12020293 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
“This may be due to a series of physiological mechanisms exhibited by the fungi to prevent cell death [3].”
BackgroundFan, X., Dai, R.-C., Zhang, S., Geng, Y.-Y., Kang, M., Guo, D.-W., Mei, Y.-N., Pan, Y.-H., Sun, Z.-Y., Xu, Y.-C., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-43380-2 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
“In C. tropicalis , it has been well established that certain ERG11 gene mutations that lead to key amino acid substitutionsintheazoletargetErg11p(e.g., ERG11 genemutationA395T conferring a key substitution Y132F) represent major mechanisms responsible for azole resistance 14,15 .”
InfluentialPotential Strategies to Control the Risk of Antifungal Resistance in Humans: A Comprehensive Review
Rabaan, A. A., Sulaiman, T., Al-Ahmed, S. H., Buhaliqah, Z. A., Buhaliqah, A. A., AlYuosof, B., Alfaresi, M. S., Fares, M. A. A., Alwarthan, S. M., Alkathlan, M. S., et al. (2023) · Antibiotics · doi:10.3390/antibiotics12030608 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Innate Inspiration: Antifungal Peptides and Other Immunotherapeutics From the Host Immune Response
Mercer, D. K., & O'Neil, D. A. (2020) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.02177 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
“Most serious fungal infections are treated with drugs from only 3 classes; azoles, echinocandins and the polyene, amphotericin B (46, 52) and therefore, resistance to one class of antifungal limits treatment options to a significant degree (51).”
BackgroundProgrammed Cell Death: Central Player in Fungal Infections
Camilli, G., Blagojevic, M., Naglik, J. R., & Richardson, J. P. (2020) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2020.11.005 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
“Furthermore, treatment options in the clinical setting are limited and the incidence of drugresistant infections is rising [5].”
BackgroundMartian, P. C., Tertiş, M., Leonte, D., Hădade, N. D., Cristea, C., & Crisan, O. (2024) · Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2024.116488 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Calcium-calcineurin signaling pathway in Candida albicans: A potential drug target
Li, W., Shrivastava, M., Lu, H., & Jiang, Y. (2021) · Microbiological Research · doi:10.1016/j.micres.2021.126786 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Pérez-Laguna, V., Garcı́a, I., Ballesta, S., Rezusta, A., & Gilaberte, Y. (2021) · Pharmaceuticals · doi:10.3390/ph14070603 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
“They are implicated in the AMR problem due to the increasingly frequent existence of fluconazole resistant strains [13,14].”
BackgroundPriest, S. J., Yadav, V., Roth, C., Dahlmann, T. A., Kück, U., Magwene, P. M., & Heitman, J. (2022) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41564-022-01183-z · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Brain glucose induces tolerance of Cryptococcus neoformans to amphotericin B during meningitis
Chen, L., Tian, X., Zhang, L., Wang, W., Hu, P., Ma, Z., Li, Y., Li, S., Shen, Z., Fan, X., et al. (2024) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41564-023-01561-1 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Gerstein, A. C., & Berman, J. G. (2020) · mSphere · doi:10.1128/msphere.00480-20 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Self-citationFungicide-tolerant persister formation during cryptococcal pulmonary infection
Ke, W., Xie, Y., Chen, Y., Ding, H., Ye, L., Qiu, H., Li, H., Zhang, L., Chen, L., Tian, X., et al. (2024) · Cell Host & Microbe · doi:10.1016/j.chom.2023.12.012 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
An, X., Erramilli, S., & Reinhard, B. M. (2021) · Nanoscale · doi:10.1039/d0nr08353d · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Dhasarathan, P., AlSalhi, M. S., Devanesan, S., Subbiah, J., Ranjitsingh, A. J. A., Binsalah, M. A., & Alfuraydi, A. A. (2021) · Journal of Infection and Public Health · doi:10.1016/j.jiph.2021.11.002 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Hoenigl, M., Sprute, R., Arastehfar, A. A., Perfect, J. R., Lass‐Flörl, C., Bellmann, R., Prattes, J., Thompson, G. R., Wiederhold, N. P., Al‐Obaidi, M. M., et al. (2022) · Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs · doi:10.1080/13543784.2022.2086120 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
“Details regarding this concept have been provided elsewhere [21].”
BackgroundDaneshnia, F., de Almeida, J. N., Arastehfar, A. A., Lombardi, L., Shor, E., Moreno, L., Mendes, A. V. A., Barberino, M. G., Thomaz, D. Y., Butler, G., et al. (2022) · Emerging Microbes & Infections · doi:10.1080/22221751.2022.2117093 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
“Antifungal tolerance is defined as reduced in vitro susceptibility in the absence of known resistance mechanisms, and measurement strategies vary depending on the killing dynamic, where azole tolerance is defined as slow growth above the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) after 48 h using E-test and broth microdi…”
BackgroundMethodPrasath, K. G., Alexpandi, R., Parasuraman, R., Pavithra, M., Ravi, A. V., & Pandian, S. K. (2020) · Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2020.111043 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Recent Advances in Photodynamic Therapy against Fungal Keratitis
Hung, J., Lee, C., Hsu, H., Ng, I., Wu, C., Yu, C., Lee, N., Chang, Y. H., & Wong, T. (2021) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics13122011 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
“glabrata infections with FKS1 and FKS2 mutations [6].”
BackgroundInfluentialMicrobial Metabolite Inspired β‐Peptide Polymers Displaying Potent and Selective Antifungal Activity
Zhang, D., Shi, C., Cong, Z., Chen, Q., Bi, Y., Zhang, J., Ma, K., Liu, S., Gu, J., Chen, M., et al. (2022) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202104871 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Mezgebe, K., & Mulugeta, E. (2024) · Medicinal Chemistry Research · doi:10.1007/s00044-024-03192-5 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
“Currently, fungal pathogens resistant to antifungal drugs have quietly been observed with alarming spread from day to day [78 – 82].”
Yang, C., Bian, Z.-Y., Blechert, O., Deng, F., Chen, H., Li, Y., Yang, Y., Chen, M., & Zhan, P. (2021) · Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fcimb.2021.723251 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
“The most prevalent mechanism of resistance involves increased drug efflux pump activity and alterations in antifungal drug targets, due to increased target expression or mutations within the target protein sequence (Berman and Krysan, 2020).”
BackgroundPresent scenarios and future prospects of herbal nanomedicine for antifungal therapy
Yadav, R., Pradhan, M., Yadav, D. K., Mahalvar, A., & Yadav, H. (2022) · Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jddst.2022.103430 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
“In some cases, this might lead to azole medicines binding poorly to certain targets [24].”
Bibi, M., Murphy, S., Benhamou, R. I., Rosenberg, A., Ulman, A., Bicanic, T. A., Fridman, M., & Berman, J. G. (2021) · ACS Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1021/acsinfecdis.0c00721 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
“8 Several recent studies suggest high levels of tolerance have a negative e ff ect on clinical outcomes.”
Self-citationRational Design of an Antifungal Polyacrylamide Library with Reduced Host-Cell Toxicity
Schaefer, S., Phuong, P. T. T., Brunke, S., Hube, B., Jung, K., Lenardon, M. D., & Boyer, C. A. (2021) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.1c05020 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Lara‐Aguilar, V., Rueda, C., García-Barbazán, I., Varona, S., Monzón, S., Jiménez, P., Cuesta, I., Zaballos, Á., & Zaragoza, Ó. (2021) · Virulence · doi:10.1080/21505594.2021.1927609 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
“induce tolerance to different antifungal families, such as azoles and echinocandins [38].”
BackgroundArastehfar, A. A., Kargar, M. L., Mohammadi, S. R., Roudbary, M., Ghods, N., Haghighi, L., Daneshnia, F., Tavakoli, M., Jafarzadeh, J., Hedayati, M. T., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2021.655069 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Arastehfar, A., Hilmioğlu-Polat, S., Daneshnia, F., Hafez, A., Salehi, M., Polat, F., Yaşar, M., Arslan, N., Hoşbul, T., Ünal, N., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.587278 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
“An additional matter of concern is the development of drug tolerance, which may allow the fungus to acquire stable genetic alterations leading to antifungal resistance and which could be potentially linked to azole therapeutic failure and mortality (Rosenberg et al., 2018; Berman and Krysan, 2020).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBeat the heat: correlates, compounds, and mechanisms involved in fungal thermotolerance
Mattoon, E. R., Casadevall, A., & Cordero, R. J. B. (2021) · Fungal Biology Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.fbr.2021.03.002 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Feng, Y., Lu, H., Whiteway, M., & Jiang, Y. (2023) · Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance · doi:10.1016/j.jgar.2023.10.019 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Beyond resistance: antifungal heteroresistance and antifungal tolerance in fungal pathogens
Yang, F., & Berman, J. (2024) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.mib.2024.102439 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Self-citationFluconazole-COX Inhibitor Hybrids: A Dual-Acting Class of Antifungal Azoles
Elias, R., Basu, P., & Fridman, M. (2022) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c01807 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Photosensitizer‐Polypeptide Conjugate for Effective Elimination of Candida albicans Biofilm
Wan, P., Guo, W., Wang, Y., Deng, M., Xiao, C., & Chen, X. (2022) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.202200268 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Mudenda, S. (2024) · Pharmacology & Pharmacy · doi:10.4236/pp.2024.154007 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
“Antifungal resistance (AFR) is a global public health issue [1] [2] [3] [4] [5], that has been exacerbated by the exposure of fungi to antifungal agents and as a result of an increased number of immunocompromised patients [1] [2] [6].”
BackgroundInvasive Aspergillosis in the Intensive Care Unit
Townsend, L., & Martín‐Loeches, I. (2022) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics12112712 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
“This is due to selective survival pressure driving fungal resistance in vivo, a concept known as drug tolerance [93].”
Fungal resilience and host–pathogen interactions: Future perspectives and opportunities
Brown, A. J. P. (2022) · Parasite Immunology · doi:10.1111/pim.12946 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
“compromised when the cell wall integrity pathway, calcineurin signalling or Hsp90 functionality is perturbed.(9,12) Furthermore, cellular”
BackgroundInfluentialMultifactorial Mechanisms of Tolerance to Ketoconazole in Candida albicans
Xu, Y., Lu, H., Zhu, S., Li, W.-Q., Jiang, Y., Berman, J. G., & Yang, F. (2021) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/spectrum.00321-21 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Self-citationKukurudz, R. J., Chapel, M., Wonitowy, Q., Adamu Bukari, A.-R., Sidney, B., Sierhuis, R., & Gerstein, A. C. (2022) · G3 · doi:10.1093/g3journal/jkac156 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
“Strains and evolution Eight clinical strains of C. albicans that span ancestral fitness to fluconazole (Gerstein and Berman, 2020) were selected (FH1, (Fonzi and Irwin 1993); SC5314, (Lockhart et al. 2002); T101 (Odds et al. 2007); GC75, P75016, P76055, P78048, and P87, (Wu et al. 2007)).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialGarcia-Rubio, R., Hernandez, R. Y., Clear, A., Healey, K. R., Shor, E., & Perlin, D. S. (2021) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2021.702779 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Nagaraj, S., Manivannan, S., & Narayan, S. (2021) · Journal of Basic Microbiology · doi:10.1002/jobm.202100204 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Trichosporon asahii and Trichosporon inkin biofilms produce antifungal-tolerant persister cells
Cordeiro, R. D. A., Aguiar, A. L. R., da Silva, B. N., Pereira, L. M. G., Portela, F. V. M., de Camargo, Z. P., de Lima-Neto, R. G., Castelo-Branco, D. D. S. C. M., Rocha, M. F. G., & Sidrim, J. J. C. (2021) · Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fcimb.2021.645812 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“Previous studies have shown that the extracellular matrix actively contributes to the antifungal resistance of biofilms, by inducing drug-sequestration and harboring drug-efflux proteins (Li et al., 2015; Wuyts et al., 2018; Berman and Krysan, 2020).”
BackgroundJenull, S., Shivarathri, R., Tsymala, I., Penninger, P., Trinh, P.-C., Nogueira, F., Chauhan, M., Singh, A., Petryshyn, A., Stoiber, A., et al. (2022) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.00799-22 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
“Since ECN and AmB resistance can be rapidly acquired (17), the U.”
BackgroundStevenson, E. M., Gaze, W. H., Gow, N. A. R., Hart, A. J., Schmidt, W., Usher, J., Warris, A., Wilkinson, H., & Murray, A. K. (2022) · Frontiers in Fungal Biology · doi:10.3389/ffunb.2022.918717 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Hu, T., Wang, S., Bing, J., Zheng, Q., Du, H., Li, C., Guan, Z., Bai, F., Nobile, C. J., Chu, H., et al. (2023) · International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents · doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2023.107010 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
A synthetic peptide mimic kills Candida albicans and synergistically prevents infection
Schaefer, S., Vij, R., Sprague, J. L., Austermeier, S., Dinh, H., Judzewitsch, P. R., Müller‐Loennies, S., Silva, T. L., Seemann, E. A., Qualmann, B., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-50491-x · Cited by 38 · see citing works
“…the de fi nition of resistance and tolerance suggested by Berman and Krysan 80 ; where resistance is the clinically observed ineffectiveness of a drug against a fungal pathogen and tolerance is the slow growth of a less susceptible fungal strain at normally inhibitory concentrations in vitro 80 .”
InfluentialAdvances in fungal chemical genomics for the discovery of new antifungal agents
Xue, A., Robbins, N., & Cowen, L. E. (2020) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.14484 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Li, Z., Huang, Y., Tu, J., Yang, W., Liu, N., Wang, W., & Sheng, C. (2023) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.3c00165 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Candidemia: An Update on Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Diagnosis, Susceptibility, and Treatment
Cabrera-Guerrero, J. P., García-Salazar, E., Hernández‐Silva, G., Herrera, A. C., Martínez-Herrera, E. O., Pinto‐Almazán, R., León, M. G. F.-D., & Castro-Fuentes, C. A. (2025) · Pathogens · doi:10.3390/pathogens14080806 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
“…the fungus–antifungal interaction, particularly in the context of clinical scenarios where susceptible strains are identified and treatment failure is documented, are secondary to phenomena such as tolerance, phenotypic heterogeneity, biofilm formation, and adaptive response to stress [48,69,133].”
Jaber, Q. Z., Bibi, M., Księżopolska, E., Gabaldón, T., Berman, J. G., & Fridman, M. (2020) · ACS Central Science · doi:10.1021/acscentsci.0c00813 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Berman, J., & Krysan, D. J.
- Affiliations
- Tel Aviv University (IL)
- University of Iowa (US)
- Corresponding author
- Berman, Judith
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Microbiology
- Published
- 2020-02-11
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 319-331
- ISSN
- 1740-1526 (ISSN-L)
- 1740-1534
- PMC
- PMC7231573
- OpenAlex
- W3006511740
- Cited by
- 654
- References
- 137
- Citations by year
- 2026: 79 · 2025: 108 · 2024: 131 · 2023: 105 · 2022: 90 · 2021: 79 · 2020: 32
- FWCI
- 4.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2020-06-29)
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Nature Reviews Microbiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Fungal Biology and Applications
- Keywords
- antifungal resistance, antifungal drug tolerance, systemic fungal infection, treatment failure, molecular mechanisms of resistance, fungal pathogenesis
- MeSH terms
- Antifungal Agents, Candida, Drug Tolerance, Humans, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Drug Resistance, Fungal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review