Cited by 654Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityPlant Pathogens and Fungal DiseasesFungal Biology and Applications

Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi.

Open access
Berman, Judith, Krysan, Damian J.·2020·Nature Reviews Microbiology

Abstract

Systemic fungal infections pose a serious clinical problem. Treatment options are limited, and antifungal drug resistance is increasing. In addition, a substantial proportion of patients do not respond to therapy despite being infected with fungi that are susceptible to the drug. The discordance between overall treatment outcome and low levels of clinical resistance may be attributable to antifungal drug tolerance. In this Review, we define and distinguish resistance and tolerance and discuss the current understanding of the molecular, genetic and physiological mechanisms that contribute to those phenomena. Distinguishing tolerance from resistance might provide important insights into the reasons for treatment failure in some settings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41579-019-0322-2

Cites

130 of 130 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

98 of 154 cited sources checked · 33 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Drug uptake and efflux appear to contribute at least partially to tolerance, based on studies with fluorescent azole probes and strains with similar MIC levels but different tolerance levels.

    “In addition to affecting resistance, drug uptake and efflux appears to contribute, at least partially, to tolerance9, based on studies with fluorescent azole probes and strains with similar MIC levels but different tolerance levels (measured as FoG and SMG, see Box ##)89,90”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [9] Rosenberg, A. et al. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat. Commun. 9, 2470 (2018). This article provides a quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans, distinguishing it from resistance and highlighting its phenotypic heterogeneity and association with subpopulation growth, and sensitivity to adjuvant drugs. source

      In the Discussion, the paper says higher tolerance is associated with more cells having lower intracellular drug levels, but explicitly states that tolerance is not a function of either uptake or efflux rates. The section “Decreased intracellular drug levels underlie increased tolerance” likewise reports that measured efflux rates did not correlate with FoG. Thus, the fluorescent-probe findings do not support the attributed conclusion that uptake and efflux contribute to tolerance. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [89] Benhamou, R. I. et al. Real-time imaging of the azole class of antifungal drugs in live Candida cells. ACS Chem. Biol. 12, 1769–1777 (2017). source

      The Introduction describes fluorescent azole probes for studying drug uptake, and Results and Discussion reports that increased efflux is associated with fluconazole resistance in one Candida strain. The paper does not report that uptake or efflux contributes to tolerance, or compare strains with similar MICs but different FoG or SMG tolerance levels. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [90] Benhamou, R. I., Bibi, M., Berman, J. & Fridman, M. Localizing antifungal drugs to the correct organelle can markedly enhance their efficacy. Angew. Chem. 57, 6230–6235 (2018). source
  • Premisecitation

    Infections from Candida isolates that test susceptible frequently do not respond to available treatments.

    “For example, the rate of fluconazole and echinocandin resistance in Candida. albicans, the most prevalent Candida species, is generally less than 1%7, yet existing therapies often fail to treat infections caused by susceptible Candida isolates.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [7] Pfaller, M. A., Diekema, D. J., Turnidge, J. D., Castanheira, M. & Jones, R. N. Twenty years of the SENTRY antifungal surveillance program: results for Candida species from 1997–2016. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 6, S79–S94 (2019). source

      The Results report very low echinocandin resistance in C. albicans, and the Conclusions mention breakthrough infections. Neither passage says that infections caused by isolates testing susceptible frequently fail to respond to treatment. Searches for treatment failure despite in vitro susceptibility found no such statement in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    In C. albicans, resistance to fluconazole and echinocandins usually occurs in under 1% of isolates.

    “For example, the rate of fluconazole and echinocandin resistance in Candida. albicans, the most prevalent Candida species, is generally less than 1%7, yet existing therapies often fail to treat infections caused by susceptible Candida isolates.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [7] Pfaller, M. A., Diekema, D. J., Turnidge, J. D., Castanheira, M. & Jones, R. N. Twenty years of the SENTRY antifungal surveillance program: results for Candida species from 1997–2016. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 6, S79–S94 (2019). source
  • Premisecitation

    A recent quantitative study of seven diverse C. albicans isolates described four features of cells tolerant to fluconazole.

    “A recent quantitative study9 identified four characteristics of fluconazole-tolerant cells across a set of seven diverse C. albicans isolates.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [9] Rosenberg, A. et al. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat. Commun. 9, 2470 (2018). This article provides a quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans, distinguishing it from resistance and highlighting its phenotypic heterogeneity and association with subpopulation growth, and sensitivity to adjuvant drugs. source

      The Discussion (page not provided) describes quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans isolates and lists four cellular features, followed by a fifth point: tolerance is mechanistically distinct from resistance. The claim's restriction to seven diverse isolates is not supported: the paper also describes seven non-persistent clinical isolates and isolates from 12 patients with persistent candidemia (Candida albicans isolates, page not provided). (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Genome changes such as whole-chromosome aneuploidy and shorter amplifications can raise resistance.

    “Copy number variations, including whole-chromosome aneuploidy and shorter-range amplifications, are genome changes that can increase resistance32,43–49.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 8 sources checked
    • cites [32] Prasad, R., Rawal, M. K. & Shah, A. H. Candida efflux ATPases and antiporters in clinical drug resistance. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 892, 351–376 (2016). source
    • cites [43] Kordalewska, M. et al. Understanding echinocandin resistance in the emerging pathogen Candida auris. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 62, e00238–18 (2018). source
    • cites [44] Selmecki, A., Forche, A. & Berman, J. Aneuploidy and isochromosome formation in drug-resistant Candida albicans. Science 313, 367–370 (2006). source
    • cites [45] Anderson, M. Z., Saha, A., Haseeb, A. & Bennett, R. J. A chromosome 4 trisomy contributes to increased fluconazole resistance in a clinical isolate of Candida albicans. Microbiology 163, 856–865 (2017). source
    • cites [46] Yang, F. et al. Tolerance to caspofungin in Candida albicans is associated with at least three distinctive mechanisms that govern expression of FKS genes and cell wall remodeling. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 61, e00071–17 (2017). source
    • cites [47] Yang, F., Kravets, A., Bethlendy, G., Welle, S. & Rustchenko, E. Chromosome 5 monosomy of Candida albicans controls susceptibility to various toxic agents, including major antifungals. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 57, 5026–5036 (2013). source
    • cites [48] Yang, F. et al. Aneuploidy enables cross-adaptation to unrelated drugs. Mol. Biol. Evol. 36, 1768–1782 (2019). source
    • cites [49] Todd, R. T., Wikoff, T. D., Forche, A. & Selmecki, A. Genome plasticity in Candida albicans is driven by long repeat sequences. eLife. 8, e45954 (2019). source

      The Introduction (page not provided) says that amplification of a chromosome arm confers fluconazole resistance, and the Results report increased resistance with another segmental amplification. The paper also associates aneuploidy broadly with resistant isolates, but the passages do not establish that whole-chromosome aneuploidy itself increases resistance. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 10
  • May combine two claims. 40
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Solid organ transplant recipients who develop candidemia have a 90-day mortality rate of 22%-44%, depending on Candida species.

    “For example, the 90-day mortality rate for recipients of solid organ transplants who develop candidemia [G] is between 22%-44%, depending on the Candida species4.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4] Andes, D. R. et al. The epidemiology and outcomes of invasive Candida infections among organ transplant recipients in the United States: results of the Transplant-Associated Infection Surveillance Network (TRANSNET). Transpl. Infect. Dis. 18, 921–931 (2016). source

      Section 3.2 reports 90-day mortality of 22.6%–44% by Candida species among organ transplant recipients with invasive candidiasis. The cohort includes infection sites other than the bloodstream, so these figures are not established specifically for recipients with candidemia. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Although resistance levels for most Candida species are relatively low, candidemia outcomes remain poor, with mortality between 15% and 50%.

    “Although relatively low levels of resistance for most Candida species have been described, the outcomes for candidemia remain poor, as high levels of mortality (15%-50%) have been associated with candida infections7.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [7] Pfaller, M. A., Diekema, D. J., Turnidge, J. D., Castanheira, M. & Jones, R. N. Twenty years of the SENTRY antifungal surveillance program: results for Candida species from 1997–2016. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 6, S79–S94 (2019). source

      The introductory passage following the Abstract’s Conclusions says antifungal-resistant Candida isolates remain uncommon and invasive fungal infections are associated with high mortality. It does not give a 15%–50% mortality range or state a mortality rate specifically for candidemia; searches for that range and for candidemia mortality found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Tolerant cell subpopulations show slow growth when drug levels exceed the MIC; this usually becomes visible only after more than the standard 24-hour MIC measurement period.

    “Subpopulations of tolerant cells grow slowly in drug concentrations above the MIC, which is usually visually evident after time periods longer than the standard 24 h for MIC measurements.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [9] Rosenberg, A. et al. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat. Commun. 9, 2470 (2018). This article provides a quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans, distinguishing it from resistance and highlighting its phenotypic heterogeneity and association with subpopulation growth, and sensitivity to adjuvant drugs. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    C. auris seems to quickly develop resistance or tolerance to echinocandins and polyenes, leaving few treatment choices.

    “C. auris appears to rapidly acquire resistance or tolerance to echinocandins as well polyenes1,42, leaving few, if any, treatment options.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [1] Arendrup, M. C. & Patterson, T. F. Multidrug-resistant Candida: epidemiology, molecular mechanisms, and treatment. J. Infect. Dis. 216, S445–S451 (2017). source
    • cites [42] Satoh, K. et al. Candida auris sp. nov., a novel ascomycetous yeast isolated from the external ear canal of an inpatient in a Japanese hospital. Microbiol. Immunol. 53, 41–44 (2009). source

      The Results and Discussion (page unavailable) describe antifungal susceptibility for a single C. auris isolate, but do not report resistance developing over time. Table 1 (page unavailable) lists susceptibility results for other drug classes, not echinocandins or polyenes. Searches for rapid acquisition of resistance, echinocandins, polyenes, and treatment options found no passage supporting the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Many ERG11 mutations appear to disrupt drug binding and reduce susceptibility additively.

    “Many ERG11 mutations seem to interfere with drug binding and to decrease susceptibility in an additive manner36.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [36] Flowers, S. A. et al. Gain-of-function mutations in UPC2 are a frequent cause of ERG11 upregulation in azole-resistant clinical isolates of Candida albicans. Eukaryot. Cell 11, 1289–1299 (2012). This study establishes that gain-of-function mutations in UPC2, the key regulator of ergosterol biosynthesis gene expression, are a source of clinically important fluconazole resistance. Previously, only transcriptional regulators of efflux pump expression were known to do so. source

      The introduction states that ERG11 point mutations reduce azole binding to their target, supporting the drug-binding part of the claim. The Discussion describes lower azole susceptibility with two mutant UPC2 alleles than with one, but does not say that ERG11 mutations reduce susceptibility additively. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Rates of antifungal resistance among Candida species change over time and differ across hospitals and countries.

    “Antifungal drug resistance rates in Candida species are dynamic and variable between medical institutions and countries7.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [7] Pfaller, M. A., Diekema, D. J., Turnidge, J. D., Castanheira, M. & Jones, R. N. Twenty years of the SENTRY antifungal surveillance program: results for Candida species from 1997–2016. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 6, S79–S94 (2019). source

      The Results section reports changes in fluconazole resistance over time for several Candida species and different resistance rates across geographic regions (Tables 3 and 4; page not provided). It does not report resistance rates by individual medical institution or country, so those specific comparisons are not established by this source. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Candida species have ERG11 mutations, with more than 100 distinct ERG11 alleles reported.

    “Mutations in ERG11 have also been observed in Candida spp. and over 100 different ERG11 alleles have been described35.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [35] Munoz, J. F. et al. Genomic insights into multidrug-resistance, mating and virulence in Candida auris and related emerging species. Nat. Commun. 9, 5346 (2018). source

      The Results section (“Conservation of known drug resistance and virulence related genes”; page unavailable) reports ERG11 mutations in Candida auris isolates and identifies a mutation also found in C. pseudohaemulonii. It does not report more than 100 distinct ERG11 alleles; searches for that number and for ERG11 allele counts found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Trailing growth depends on growth conditions; clinical isolates differ in this sensitivity, causing substantial variation between laboratories in its measurement.

    “Like tolerance, trailing growth is sensitive to growth conditions17–19; the degree of sensitivity to these conditions differs for different clinical isolates9,(reviewed in 20), and leads to considerable laboratory-to-laboratory variation in the estimation of trailing growth.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 5 sources checked
    • cites [17] Coenye, T., De Vos, M., Vandenbosch, D. & Nelis, H. Factors influencing the trailing endpoint observed in Candida albicans susceptibility testing using the CLSI procedure. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 14, 495–497 (2008). source
    • cites [18] Agrawal, D., Patterson, T. F., Rinaldi, M. G. & Revankar, S. G. Trailing end-point phenotype of Candida spp. in antifungal susceptibility testing to fluconazole is eliminated by altering incubation temperature. J. Med. Microbiol. 56, 1003–1004 (2007). source
    • cites [19] Marr, K. A., Rustad, T. R., Rex, J. H. & White, T. C. The trailing end point phenotype in antifungal susceptibility testing is pH dependent. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43, 1383–1386 (1999). source
    • cites [9] Rosenberg, A. et al. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat. Commun. 9, 2470 (2018). This article provides a quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans, distinguishing it from resistance and highlighting its phenotypic heterogeneity and association with subpopulation growth, and sensitivity to adjuvant drugs. source
    • cites [20] Delarze, E. & Sanglard, D. Defining the frontiers between antifungal resistance, tolerance and the concept of persistence. Drug Resist. Updat. 23, 12–19 (2015). source

      Section 6 reports trailing growth at neutral pH but not low pH, supporting sensitivity to growth conditions, while cautioning that the media also differed. Section 4 describes different degrees of trailing growth among C. albicans isolates. Neither passage establishes that isolates differ in their sensitivity to growth conditions or that this causes laboratory-to-laboratory variation in trailing-growth measurements; page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In bacteria, greater tolerance correlates with a longer lag phase; in fungi, greater tolerance correlates with a shorter lag phase than in less tolerant isolates.

    “Furthermore, higher tolerance in bacterial isolates is associated with longer lag phase length, whereas fungal isolates with higher tolerance levels have shorter lag phase length (measured as time required for colonies to become visible13) relative to those with lower tolerance levels9.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [13] Levin-Reisman, I., Fridman, O. & Balaban, N. Q. ScanLag: high-throughput quantification of colony growth and lag time. J. Vis. Exp. https://doi.org/10.3791/51456 (2014). source
    • cites [9] Rosenberg, A. et al. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat. Commun. 9, 2470 (2018). This article provides a quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans, distinguishing it from resistance and highlighting its phenotypic heterogeneity and association with subpopulation growth, and sensitivity to adjuvant drugs. source

      The Discussion says antibacterial tolerance generally involves a longer lag phase. In Subpopulation growth dynamics, highly tolerant fungal isolates had shorter lag times in liquid assays with drug and a shorter drug-induced delay in colony appearance. The claim omits the drug condition and implies that colony appearance time itself was shorter; the paper says lag-phase duration did not correlate with tolerance in growth measurements without drug. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Tolerance usually involves large subpopulations (5-90%) growing in drug, while heteroresistance or persistence involves rare cells (generally <<1%) that transiently survive high drug levels.

    “Whereas tolerance is generally due to substantial subpopulations of cells (5-90%) that grow in drug, antifungal heteroresistance or persistence involve rare cells (generally <<1%) that transiently survive high concentrations of antifungal drugs14.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [14] Wuyts, J., Van Dijck, P. & Holtappels, M. Fungal persister cells: the basis for recalcitrant infections? PLoS Pathog. 14, e1007301 (2018). source

      The Introduction describes persisters as a small, nongrowing subpopulation that survives high antifungal doses, supporting that part of the claim. It defines tolerance as survival after transient exposure, not growth in drug, and attributes growth in drug to resistant isolates. The cited passages give neither the 5–90% nor the generally <<1% range, and do not address heteroresistance; the section on in vivo persistence reports persister frequencies of up to 9% in some strains. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    An isolate's tolerance is fairly reproducible; variation in tolerance between isolates is presumed to arise from intrinsic genetic differences.

    “First, tolerance of an isolate is relatively reproducible, with differences in tolerance levels between isolates presumed to be affected by intrinsic genetic differences between those isolates. (Fig. 1A).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [9] Rosenberg, A. et al. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat. Commun. 9, 2470 (2018). This article provides a quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans, distinguishing it from resistance and highlighting its phenotypic heterogeneity and association with subpopulation growth, and sensitivity to adjuvant drugs. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The degree of tolerance correlates with the size of the subpopulation of cells that grow above the MIC and with the rate at which such cells form visible colonies at supra-MIC concentrations.

    “The degree of tolerance correlates with the size of the subpopulation of cells that grow above the MIC, and the rate at which such cells form visible colonies at supra-MIC concentrations9.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [9] Rosenberg, A. et al. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat. Commun. 9, 2470 (2018). This article provides a quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans, distinguishing it from resistance and highlighting its phenotypic heterogeneity and association with subpopulation growth, and sensitivity to adjuvant drugs. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Upon fluconazole exposure, all cells undergo one to three rounds of division before growth arrest; tolerant cells resume growth several hours later, whereas non-tolerant cells arrest for considerably longer and resume division only in the absence of the drug.

    “Upon exposure to fluconazole, all cells undergo 1-3 rounds of division before growth arrest9,58; tolerant cells in the population resume growth several hours later, whereas non-tolerant cells arrest for considerably longer and only resume division in the absence of the drug.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [9] Rosenberg, A. et al. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat. Commun. 9, 2470 (2018). This article provides a quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans, distinguishing it from resistance and highlighting its phenotypic heterogeneity and association with subpopulation growth, and sensitivity to adjuvant drugs. source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [58] Forche, A. et al. The parasexual cycle in Candida albicans provides an alternative pathway to meiosis for the formation of recombinant strains. PLoS Biol. 6, e110 (2008). source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Adjuvant drugs and mutations affecting several stress-responsive pathways often reduce tolerance, and adjuvants reduce tolerance to similar baseline levels irrespective of the isolate's tolerance level.

    “Adjuvant [G] drugs and mutations that affect several stress-responsive pathways often reduce tolerance9 (Box 5); and adjuvants reduce tolerance to similar baseline levels irrespective of the tolerance level of the isolate9.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [9] Rosenberg, A. et al. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat. Commun. 9, 2470 (2018). This article provides a quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans, distinguishing it from resistance and highlighting its phenotypic heterogeneity and association with subpopulation growth, and sensitivity to adjuvant drugs. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    This ERG11 allele's homozygosis persisted in the infecting population for over 8 months, supporting the idea that ERG11 mutations help pathogens survive drug selection.

    “Homozygosis of this ERG11 allele was persistent (retained in the infecting population for more than 8 months55), consistent with the notion that mutations in ERG11 promote pathogen survival under drug selection56.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [55] Ford, C. B. et al. The evolution of drug resistance in clinical isolates of Candida albicans. eLife 4, e00662 (2015). source
    • cites [56] White, T. C. Increased mRNA levels of ERG16, CDR, and MDR1 correlate with increases in azole resistance in Candida albicans isolates from a patient infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41, 1482–1487 (1997). This article presents the first detailed study of the molecular mechanisms underlying the development of fluconazole resistance over time in patients. It is a landmark study because of its patient-based approach and because it yielded strains that are still under study today. source

      The paper’s opening passage says alterations in the azole target enzyme can contribute to resistance, which supports the general link between target-enzyme changes and drug resistance. Our copy does not report that this ERG11 allele became homozygous or persisted for more than eight months, nor does it establish that the mutation promoted survival under drug selection. (LLM, conf=0.75)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Phenotypic differences between clinical isolates involve many thousands to tens of thousands of SNPs and are evident in phenotypes such as biofilm formation and dependence on specific transcription factors.

    “Phenotypic differences between clinical isolates involves many thousands, to tens of thousands of SNPs, and is also evident with phenotypes such as biofilm formation and its dependence upon specific transcription factors72.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [72] Ropars, J. et al. Gene flow contributes to diversification of the major fungal pathogen Candida albicans. Nat. Commun. 9, 2253 (2018). source

      The Results and Discussion report an average of 65,629 heterozygous SNPs per isolate and describe phenotypic differences among isolates. That count is within isolates, not a measure of SNP differences between isolates. The paper links transcription factors to fitness and morphogenesis, but the passages found do not establish differences in biofilm formation or its dependence on particular transcription factors (Results and Discussion; page unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    LOH and aneuploidy arise 2-4-fold more often than point mutations and are easily found after one mouse passage through blood or oral cavity.

    “Furthermore, both LOH and aneuploidy occur at much higher frequency (2-4-fold) than point mutations59, and are readily detected following a single passage through the bloodstream or oral cavity of a mouse61–63.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim4 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [59] Harrison, B. D. et al. A tetraploid intermediate precedes aneuploid formation in yeasts exposed to fluconazole. PLoS Biol. 12, e1001815 (2014). source

      The citation to this paper is attached to detection after a single mouse passage, not to the 2–4-fold comparison, which cites reference 59. The Results section, “Trimeras Form During Exposure to FLC Within the Host” (page unavailable), reports trimera-like cells in fluconazole-treated mouse ear tissue after 48 hours; it does not report detecting LOH or aneuploidy after passage through the bloodstream or oral cavity. Searches for those routes and for mouse-passage detection found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [61] Ene, I. V. et al. Global analysis of mutations driving microevolution of a heterozygous diploid fungal pathogen. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E8688–E8697 (2018). source

      The Genome Architecture and Environmental Pressures section says LOH was more frequent during bloodstream passage and oral-cavity infection than in vitro. The paper also reports aneuploidy after mouse gastrointestinal passage, but does not establish that both changes were readily detected after a single passage through the bloodstream or oral cavity. The 2–4-fold comparison is attached to a different citation (59). (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [62] Forche, A. et al. Rapid phenotypic and genotypic diversification after exposure to the oral host niche in Candida albicans. Genetics 209, 725–741 (2018). source
    • cites [63] Forche, A., May, G. & Magee, P. T. Demonstration of loss of heterozygosity by single-nucleotide polymorphism microarray analysis and alterations in strain morphology in Candida albicans strains during infection. Eukaryot. Cell 4, 156–165 (2005). source

      Materials and Methods describes isolates obtained after passage through mice in a model of bloodstream-disseminated infection, and Results and Discussion reports LOH and chromosome-size changes in those isolates. The paper does not establish aneuploidy or examine passage through the oral cavity. The 2–4-fold comparison is attached to a different citation in the citing sentence, so it is not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Amphotericin B is toxic and is the only treatment option for multi-drug resistant C. glabrata infections.

    “it leaves the polyene amphotericin B, which is toxic8, as the only treatment option for these infections.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [8] Lepak, A. J. & Andes, D. R. Antifungal pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 5, a019653 (2014). source
    • cites [71] Shor, E., Schuyler, J. & Perlin, D. S. A novel, drug resistance-independent, fluorescence-based approach to measure mutation rates in microbial pathogens. mBio 10, e00120–19 (2019). source

      Citation 8 is attached specifically to the assertion that amphotericin B is toxic. The Introduction (page unavailable) discusses multidrug-resistant C. glabrata infections but does not address amphotericin B or its toxicity; searches for amphotericin B and toxicity found no supporting passage. The Introduction instead says there are no treatment options for these infections, rather than identifying amphotericin B as the only option. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Echinocandin resistance is rarer than azole resistance: under 1% in C. albicans and up to 10% in C. glabrata.

    “Echinocandin resistance is less prevalent than azole resistance (less than 1% of C. albicans infections7, but up to 10% of C. glabrata infections)66.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [7] Pfaller, M. A., Diekema, D. J., Turnidge, J. D., Castanheira, M. & Jones, R. N. Twenty years of the SENTRY antifungal surveillance program: results for Candida species from 1997–2016. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 6, S79–S94 (2019). source

      In the Results section on echinocandin resistance (page unavailable), the paper reports 1.7%–3.5% resistance among C. glabrata isolates overall and cites earlier findings of 8%–9% specifically among fluconazole-resistant bloodstream isolates. Thus, “up to 10%” is plausible for that restricted subgroup, but the citing sentence omits the qualifier and presents it as a rate for C. glabrata infections generally. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [66] Farmakiotis, D., Tarrand, J. J. & Kontoyiannis, D. P. Drug-resistant Candida glabrata infection in cancer patients. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 20, 1833–1840 (2014). source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Tolerant cell growth is slower and more time-dependent than resistant cell growth, and is less dependent on drug concentration.

    “tolerant cell growth is slower and more time-dependent than resistant cell growth, and is less dependent on drug concentration9.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [9] Rosenberg, A. et al. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat. Commun. 9, 2470 (2018). This article provides a quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans, distinguishing it from resistance and highlighting its phenotypic heterogeneity and association with subpopulation growth, and sensitivity to adjuvant drugs. source

      The Results describe tolerant growth at supra-MIC fluconazole concentrations becoming evident at 48 hours while MIC remains unchanged, supporting a time-dependent distinction from resistance. Subpopulation growth dynamics reports delayed colony appearance with drug except in a resistant strain, but does not establish a general slower growth rate for tolerant versus resistant cells. The passages do not establish that tolerant growth is less dependent on drug concentration than resistant growth. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Intracellular drug concentrations vary among cells within a given isolate, with more tolerant isolates having a larger population of cells with moderate amounts of drug per cell.

    “Furthermore, intracellular drug concentrations vary among cells within a given isolate, with the more tolerant isolates (those that grow slowly) having a larger population of cells with moderate amounts of drug per cell.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [9] Rosenberg, A. et al. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat. Commun. 9, 2470 (2018). This article provides a quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans, distinguishing it from resistance and highlighting its phenotypic heterogeneity and association with subpopulation growth, and sensitivity to adjuvant drugs. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, several genes involved in retrograde trafficking modulate tolerance and/or trailing growth, including VPS21, VPS15 and VPS5; Rim101 may influence tolerance via regulating transcription of key components of the vacuolar trafficking pathway.

    “In Saccharomyces cerevisiae several genes involved in retrograde trafficking modulate tolerance and/or trailing growth, including VPS2127,51, VPS15 and VPS5194; Rim101 may influence tolerance via its ability to regulate the transcription of key components of the vacuolar trafficking pathway95.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [27] Sanglard, D., Ischer, F., Marchetti, O., Entenza, J. & Bille, J. Calcineurin A of Candida albicans: involvement in antifungal tolerance, cell morphogenesis and virulence. Mol. Microbiol. 48, 959–976 (2003). source
    • cites [51] Selmecki, A. M., Dulmage, K., Cowen, L. E., Anderson, J. B. & Berman, J. Acquisition of aneuploidy provides increased fitness during the evolution of antifungal drug resistance. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000705 (2009). source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [94] Roemer, T. & Krysan, D. J. Antifungal drug development: challenges, unmet clinical needs, and new approaches. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 4, a019703 (2014). source
    • cites [95] Cornet, M. et al. Deletions of endocytic components VPS28 and VPS32 affect growth at alkaline pH and virulence through both RIM101-dependent and RIM101-independent pathways in Candida albicans. Infect. Immun. 73, 7977–7987 (2005). source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Inhibition of Hsp90 in the presence of fluconazole eliminates tolerance and renders fluconazole fungicidal.

    “In part, this argument is based on the observation that inhibition of Hsp90 in the presence of fluconazole not only eliminates tolerance9 but also renders fluconazole fungicidal87.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [9] Rosenberg, A. et al. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat. Commun. 9, 2470 (2018). This article provides a quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans, distinguishing it from resistance and highlighting its phenotypic heterogeneity and association with subpopulation growth, and sensitivity to adjuvant drugs. source
    • cites [87] Cowen, L. E. et al. Harnessing Hsp90 function as a powerful, broadly effective therapeutic strategy for fungal infectious disease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 2818–2823 (2009). source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    A finer understanding of how fungi respond to drugs could clarify why infections from apparently susceptible isolates have poor outcomes.

    “However, a more nuanced understanding of the fungal response to drugs may help explain the poor outcomes for infections caused by apparently susceptible isolates (that is, isolates that have a susceptible MIC at 24h, the standard endpoint for MIC measurements for Candida species).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Strains classified as resistant have MIC values exceeding clinical breakpoints; such strains are more prone to treatment failure than susceptible strains whose MIC values fall below those breakpoints.

    “Resistant strains have MICs above the breakpoint and are more likely to cause a therapeutic failure than susceptible strains with MICs below the breakpoint.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Within the same isogenic population, another subpopulation either fails to grow in drug or grows so slowly that it is undetectable by 48 hours.

    “In the same isogenic population, a second subpopulation of cells does not grow in the drug or its extremely slow growth is not detectable following 48 h in the drug.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Loss of one antifungal class to resistance reduces therapeutic options by at least 33%, and often by 50%, because not all fungi respond to azoles or echinocandins.

    “Thus, one antifungal drug class becoming ineffective in treating a fungal infection owing to resistance reduces the therapeutic options by at least 33%, and frequently by 50% because azoles and echinocandins are not active against all fungi.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premiseown data

    Upon retesting, tolerant or trailing cells show a similar MIC and comparable slow or partial growth above the MIC.

    “Noteworthy, tolerant or trailing cells, when re-tested, have a similar MIC and a similar slow/partial growth in the presence of drugs at concentrations above the MIC (Fig. 1A).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Candida species are the most prevalent fungi and the leading cause of life-threatening invasive disease and clinically important mucosal conditions such as vulvovaginal candidiasis, thrush, and esophagitis.

    “Although resistance is emerging in non-Candida species such as Aspergillus spp.,29 the general molecular mechanisms of resistance are conserved; therefore, we will focus primarily on Candida spp., the most prevalent species and the most common cause of both life-threatening invasive disease and clinically important mucosal diseases, such as vulvovaginal candidiasis, thrush and esophagitis.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Overlapping efflux pump functions mean that losing one pump gene or gaining less efficient pumps only modestly affects true resistance; the strongest effects require overexpression plus homozygosis of hyperactive transcription factor alleles.

    “Furthermore, because of the overlapping functions of different efflux pumps, mutations such as loss-of-function of a single gene encoding an efflux pump, or gain-of-function of less efficient efflux pumps, have only modest effects on bona fide resistance and the most dramatic effects are from overexpression combined with homozygosis (loss of heterozygosity) of hyperactive transcription factor alle”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [33] Sasse, C. et al. The stepwise acquisition of fluconazole resistance mutations causes a gradual loss of fitness in Candida albicans. Mol. Microbiol. 86, 539–556 (2012). This article shows that when a strain accumulates multiple resistance mutations that affect different transcription factors, the effects are independent and additive. In addition, these effects, generated by engineered deletion mutations, are associated with reduced fitness in the absence of drug stress. As many resistant isolates do not have obvious fitness defects, it is assumed that they must have acquired compensatory mechan source
    • cites [37] Xiang, M. J. et al. Erg11 mutations associated with azole resistance in clinical isolates of Candida albicans. FEMS Yeast Res. 13, 386–393 (2013). source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Trailing growth is commonly measured as growth at various drug concentrations relative to drug-free growth, similar to the supra-MIC growth parameter for tolerance.

    “Trailing growth is often estimated as the percent of growth at different drug concentrations relative to growth in the absence of drug16, a measure similar to the ‘supra-MIC growth’ (SMG) parameter used to measure tolerance (Fig. 1B).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [16] Marcos-Zambrano, L. J., Escribano, P., Sanchez-Carrillo, C., Bouza, E. & Guinea, J. Scope and frequency of fluconazole trailing assessed using EUCAST in invasive Candida spp. isolates. Med. Mycol. 54, 733–739 (2016). source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Clinical breakpoints help indicate whether a particular isolate is likely to respond to treatment.

    “Clinical breakpoints provide guidance regarding the likelihood that a given isolate will respond to therapy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Intrinsically resistant non-C. albicans species also show higher ERG11 expression, though the mechanism remains unknown.

    “Increased ERG11 expression is also seen in intrinsically resistant non-C. albicans species; however, the underlying mechanism is unknown.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    In many publications, especially mechanism-focused studies, resistance means a higher MIC than a reference strain.

    “Specifically, many published reports refer to resistance as an increase in the MIC relative to a reference strain, particularly in the setting of work focused on elucidating the mechanisms of resistance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The response to hydroxyurea depends on two genes on chromosome 2, RNR1 and RNR2; the genes responsible for caspofungin survival are distinct and have not yet been identified.

    “The response to hydroxyurea was shown to be dependent on two of the 1087 different genes located on chromosome 2: RNR1 and RNR21; the genes responsible for survival in the presence of caspofungin are distinct from these RNR genes and have not yet been identified47.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [47] Yang, F., Kravets, A., Bethlendy, G., Welle, S. & Rustchenko, E. Chromosome 5 monosomy of Candida albicans controls susceptibility to various toxic agents, including major antifungals. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 57, 5026–5036 (2013). source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The degree of tolerance varies across different isolates, presumably owing to the intrinsic allele diversity of each isolate.

    “The degree of tolerance varies across different isolates, presumably owing to the intrinsic allele diversity of each isolate.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Recent IDSA guidelines advise starting with an echinocandin instead of an azole for most invasive Candida infections.

    “Recent guidelines of the Infectious Disease Society of America recommend that an echinocandin, rather than azoles, be used as initial therapy for most invasive Candida spp. infections64.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [64] Forche, A., Magee, P. T., Selmecki, A., Berman, J. & May, G. Evolution in Candida albicans populations during a single passage through a mouse host. Genetics 182, 799–811 (2009). source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The increased growth from chromosome 3 trisomy is tolerance rather than resistance because the MIC remained susceptible and increased growth was detected after more than 24 hours in standard MIC assays.

    “This is tolerance, rather than resistance, because the MIC remained susceptible and the increased growth was detected after incubation for more than the 24 h in standard MIC assays.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    For a single isolate, the phenotypic heterogeneity that drives some cells to grow slowly and others to arrest must be due to physiological or metabolic shifts that differ between isogenic cells.

    “By contrast, for a single isolate, the phenotypic heterogeneity that drives some cells to grow slowly, and others to arrest growth, must be due to physiological or metabolic shifts that differ between isogenic cells in the population.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Tolerance is likely due to physiological responses that emerge heterogeneously among the cell population, with the proportion of cells exhibiting such responses being a function of the genetic potential of the specific isolate.

    “Thus, tolerance is likely to be due to physiological responses that emerge heterogeneously among the cell population, where the proportion of cells exhibiting such responses is a function of the genetic potential of the specific isolate.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Tolerance is a feature of susceptible, non-resistant isolates that relies on several central stress response pathways; it is a consequence of phenotypic heterogeneity in which some cells in the population grow slowly in drug.

    “By contrast, tolerance is a feature of susceptible (non-resistant) isolates that relies upon several central stress response pathways; it is a consequence of phenotypic heterogeneity, in which some cells in the population grow, albeit slowly, in drug.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Differences in tolerance levels between isolates have a genetic basis and affect the proportion of cells able to grow in the presence of drug.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    A highly tolerant strain will divide more frequently in the presence of fluconazole than a strain with low tolerance levels, and will therefore have a higher population size and a higher likelihood of acquiring new mutations.

    “Nonetheless, because a highly tolerant strain will divide more frequently in the presence of fluconazole than a strain with low tolerance levels, it will also have a higher population size and a higher likelihood of acquiring new mutations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Inter-isolate heterogeneity in tolerance is a composite phenotype emerging from variations at multiple loci; different stress response pathways probably contribute to tolerance to different degrees in different isolates.

    “We posit that inter-isolate heterogeneity in tolerance is a composite phenotype that emerges from variations at multiple loci; that is, different stress response pathways probably contribute to tolerance to a different degree in different isolates.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The downstream effects of mutations in transcription factors on resistance and tolerance could be independent of one another.

    “Transcription factors can regulate multiple targets, and therefore the downstream effects of mutations in those transcription factors on resistance and tolerance could be independent of one another.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Resistance is due to genetic changes that directly affect either the drug target and/or intracellular drug concentrations and cause a heritable effect on the entire population of cells in a given isolate.

    “Resistance is due to genetic changes that directly affect either the drug target and/or intracellular drug concentrations and cause a heritable effect on the entire population of cells in a given isolate.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Cell-to-cell phenotypic heterogeneity occurs at a frequency too high to be due to genetic acquisition of mutations, implying that it is due to non-genetic differences between cells.

    “Cell-to-cell phenotypic heterogeneity occurs at a frequency that is far too high (10-90% of cells) to be due to the genetic acquisition of mutations, implying that it is due to non-genetic differences between the cells.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Tolerance has a genetic component that varies between isolates and a non-genetic component influenced by growth conditions and cell physiology.

    “Thus, tolerance has a genetic component that varies between isolates, and a non-genetic component that is influenced by growth conditions and cell physiology.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Most or all fluconazole-associated stress response pathways affect tolerance, because inhibiting these pathways does not affect MIC levels.

    “It appears that most, or all, of these fluconazole-associated stress response pathways affect tolerance, because inhibiting these pathways does not affect MIC levels (Box 5).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    No colonies grow when fluconazole and an Hsp90 inhibitor are combined, because dead cells cannot evolve.

    “Thus, no colonies grow when fluconazole and an Hsp90 inhibitor are combined, because dead cells cannot evolve.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Although resistance and tolerance are different, they may share the same processes, albeit to different degrees, to promote growth in the presence of antifungal drugs.

    “Thus, although resistance and tolerance are different (as described above), they may share the same processes (albeit to different degrees) to promote growth in the presence of antifungal drugs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
50 of 50
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Tolerance and trailing growth in fluconazole probably represent the same phenomenon.

    “Thus, we use the term ‘trailing’ for describing studies that used that term, with the assumption that tolerance and trailing growth in fluconazole probably reflect the same phenomenon19–21 in this Review.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Differences in tolerance levels between isolates have a genetic basis and affect the proportion of cells able to grow in the presence of drug.

    “Differences in tolerance levels between isolates is assumed to have a genetic basis, and to affect the proportion of cells able to grow in drug.”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some 5-90% of tolerant cells can slowly proliferate.

    “Furthermore, some 5–90% of the tolerant cells can slowly proliferate [105].”

    From Insight into the Mechanisms and Clinical Relevance of Antifungal Heteroresistance (2025) · cites this paper as [105]

    The Introduction says that slowly growing tolerant cells make up 5–90% of all cells in an isolate, depending on the isolate. The citing sentence instead makes 5–90% a fraction of the tolerant cells, changing the denominator. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The fungistatic nature of FLC renders pathogenic fungi capable of developing tolerance, characterized by FLC-susceptible fungal strains surviving at FLC concentrations higher than the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC).

    “Nevertheless, the fungistatic nature of FLC renders pathogenic fungi capable of developing tolerance, characterized by FLC-susceptible fungal strains surviving at FLC concentrations higher than the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) [9].”

    From Pitavastatin Calcium Confers Fungicidal Properties to Fluconazole by Inhibiting Ubiquinone Biosynthesis and Generating Reactive Oxygen Species (2024) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Introduction defines tolerance as growth of drug-susceptible fungal strains above the MIC, and says antifungal tolerance is most evident with fungistatic drugs. The paper discusses fluconazole-tolerant cells, but does not establish that fluconazole’s fungistatic nature itself causes pathogenic fungi to develop tolerance. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Azole resistance and tolerance pose substantial obstacle and underscore necessity for alternative approaches to impede Erg11 function.

    “However, the emerging issue of azole resistance and tolerance poses a substantial obstacle7 and underscores the necessity for alternative approaches to impede the function of Erg11.”
  • Fungal drug tolerance is linked to azole treatment failure and the inability to clear an infection, despite isolates being considered drug-sensitive by typical MIC50 assays.

    “Fungal drug tolerance is linked to azole treatment failure and the inability to clear an infection, despite these isolates being considered drug-sensitive by the typical MIC50 assays (Sanglard et al. 2003; Delarze and Sanglard 2015; Rosenberg et al. 2018; Berman and Krysan 2020).”
  • The C. neoformans homologue of mTOR kinase, Tor1, is essential for Cryptococcus stress response signalling, virulence and fluconazole tolerance.

    “The C. neoformans homologue of mTOR kinase, Tor1, is essential for Cryptococcus stress response signalling, virulence84,85 and fluconazole tolerance (that is, the ability of a drug-susceptible organism to grow in the presence of an antifungal drug at concentrations above the minimum inhibitory concentration)86.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

7 of the 137 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berman, J., & Krysan, D. J.
Affiliations
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • University of Iowa (US)
Corresponding author
Berman, Judith
Venue
Nature Reviews Microbiology
Published
2020-02-11
Volume
18
Issue
6
Pages
319-331
ISSN
  • 1740-1526 (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-1534
OpenAlex
W3006511740
Cited by
654
References
137
Citations by year
2026: 79 · 2025: 108 · 2024: 131 · 2023: 105 · 2022: 90 · 2021: 79 · 2020: 32
FWCI
4.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Fungal Biology and Applications
Keywords
antifungal resistance, antifungal drug tolerance, systemic fungal infection, treatment failure, molecular mechanisms of resistance, fungal pathogenesis
MeSH terms
Antifungal Agents, Candida, Drug Tolerance, Humans, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Drug Resistance, Fungal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review