Cited by 107Prosthetics and Rehabilitation RoboticsMuscle activation and electromyography studiesSoft Robotics and Applications

Task-agnostic exoskeleton control via biological joint moment estimation

Molinaro, Dean D., Scherpereel, Keaton L., Schonhaut, Ethan B., Evangelopoulos, Georgios, Shepherd, Max K., Young, Aaron J.·2024·Nature

Abstract

Lower-limb exoskeletons have the potential to transform the way we move 1-14, but current state-of-the-art controllers cannot accommodate the rich set of possible human behaviours that range from cyclic and predictable to transitory and unstructured. We introduce a task-agnostic controller that assists the user on the basis of instantaneous estimates of lower-limb biological joint moments from a deep neural network. By estimating both hip and knee moments in-the-loop, our approach provided multi-joint, coordinated assistance through our autonomous, clothing-integrated exoskeleton. When deployed during 28 activities, spanning cyclic locomotion to unstructured tasks (for example, passive meandering and high-speed lateral cutting), the network accurately estimated hip and knee moments with an average R 2 of 0.83 relative to ground truth. Further, our approach significantly outperformed a best-case task classifier-based method constructed from splines and impedance parameters. When tested on ten activities (including level walking, running, lifting a 25 lb (roughly 11 kg) weight and lunging), our controller significantly reduced user energetics (metabolic cost or lower-limb biological joint work depending on the task) relative to the zero torque condition, ranging from 5.3 to 19.7%, without any manual controller modifications among activities. Thus, this task-agnostic controller can enable exoskeletons to aid users across a broad spectrum of human activities, a necessity for real-world viability.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-024-08157-7

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Molinaro, D. D., Scherpereel, K. L., Schonhaut, E. B., Evangelopoulos, G., Shepherd, M. K., & Young, A. J.
Affiliations
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
  • Google (United States) (US)
  • Northeastern University (US)
Corresponding author
Molinaro, Dean D.
Venue
Nature
Published
2024-11-13
Volume
635
Issue
8038
Pages
337-344
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W4404305449
Cited by
107
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 55 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 1
FWCI
11.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Soft Robotics and Applications
Keywords
lower limb exoskeleton, deep neural network, metabolic cost reduction, gait assistance, impedance control
MeSH terms
Exoskeleton Device, Deep Learning, Adult, Biomechanical Phenomena, Energy Metabolism, Female, Hip Joint, Humans, Knee Joint, Locomotion, Male, Running, Walking, Weight-Bearing, Neural Networks, Computer, Torque, Lower Extremity, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review