Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 365

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 89 of the 89 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comprehensive identification of RNA–protein interactions in any organism using orthogonal organic phase separation (OOPS)

Open access
Queiroz, Rayner M. L., Smith, Tom, Villanueva, Eneko, Marti-Solano, Maria, Monti, Mie, Pizzinga, Mariavittoria, Mirea, Dan-Mircea, Ramakrishna, Manasa, Harvey, Robert F., Dezi, Veronica, Thomas, Gavin H., Willis, Anne E., Lilley, Kathryn S.·2019·Nature Biotechnology

Abstract

Existing high-throughput methods to identify RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are based on capture of polyadenylated RNAs and cannot recover proteins that interact with nonadenylated RNAs, including long noncoding RNA, pre-mRNAs and bacterial RNAs. We present orthogonal organic phase separation (OOPS), which does not require molecular tagging or capture of polyadenylated RNA, and apply it to recover cross-linked protein–RNA and free protein, or protein-bound RNA and free RNA, in an unbiased way. We validated OOPS in HEK293, U2OS and MCF10A human cell lines, and show that 96% of proteins recovered were bound to RNA. We show that all long RNAs can be cross-linked to proteins, and recovered 1,838 RBPs, including 926 putative novel RBPs. OOPS is approximately 100-fold more efficient than existing methods and can enable analyses of dynamic RNA–protein interactions. We also characterize dynamic changes in RNA–protein interactions in mammalian cells following nocodazole arrest, and present a bacterial RNA-interactome for Escherichia coli. OOPS is compatible with downstream proteomics and RNA sequencing, and can be applied in any organism. RNA-binding proteins can be identified and quantified in any organism using a simple method that combines UV cross-linking and phase separation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41587-018-0001-2

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 89 references

Cited by

See all 365

Metadata

Authors
Queiroz, R. M. L., Smith, T., Villanueva, E., Marti-Solano, M., Monti, M., Pizzinga, M., Mirea, D.-M., Ramakrishna, M., Harvey, R. F., Dezi, V., Thomas, G. H., Willis, A. E., & Lilley, K. S.
Venue
Nature Biotechnology
Published
2019-01-03
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
169-178
ISSN
  • 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
  • 1087-0156
  • 1546-1696
OpenAlex
W2907992023
Cited by
365
References
89
FWCI
12.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comprehensive identification of RNA–protein interactions in any organism using orthogonal organic phase separation (OOPS). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41587-018-0001-2
The paper
Queiroz, R. M. L., Smith, T., Villanueva, E., Marti-Solano, M., Monti, M., Pizzinga, M., Mirea, D.-M., Ramakrishna, M., Harvey, R. F., Dezi, V., Thomas, G. H., Willis, A. E., & Lilley, K. S. (2019). Comprehensive identification of RNA–protein interactions in any organism using orthogonal organic phase separation (OOPS). Nature Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-018-0001-2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.