Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,750

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

CheckV assesses the quality and completeness of metagenome-assembled viral genomes

Open access
Nayfach, Stephen, Camargo, Antonio Pedro, Schulz, Frederik, Eloe-Fadrosh, Emiley, Roux, Simon, Kyrpides, Nikos C.·2021·Nature Biotechnology

Abstract

Millions of new viral sequences have been identified from metagenomes, but the quality and completeness of these sequences vary considerably. Here we present CheckV, an automated pipeline for identifying closed viral genomes, estimating the completeness of genome fragments and removing flanking host regions from integrated proviruses. CheckV estimates completeness by comparing sequences with a large database of complete viral genomes, including 76,262 identified from a systematic search of publicly available metagenomes, metatranscriptomes and metaviromes. After validation on mock datasets and comparison to existing methods, we applied CheckV to large and diverse collections of metagenome-assembled viral sequences, including IMG/VR and the Global Ocean Virome. This revealed 44,652 high-quality viral genomes (that is, >90% complete), although the vast majority of sequences were small fragments, which highlights the challenge of assembling viral genomes from short-read metagenomes. Additionally, we found that removal of host contamination substantially improved the accurate identification of auxiliary metabolic genes and interpretation of viral-encoded functions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41587-020-00774-7

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 68 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Smits, S. L. et al. Assembly of viral genomes from metagenomes. Front. Microbiol. 5, 714 (2014). · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2014.00714
  2. Chung, C. H. et al. Predicting genome terminus sequences of Bacillus cereus–group bacteriophage using next generation sequencing data. BMC Genomics 18, 350 (2017).
  3. Savilahti, H. & Bamford, D. H. Linear DNA replication: inverted terminal repeats of five closely related Escherichia coli bacteriophages. Gene 49, 199–205 (1986). · doi:10.1016/0378-1119(86)90280-5

Cited by

See all 1,750

Metadata

Authors
Nayfach, S., Camargo, A. P., Schulz, F., Eloe-Fadrosh, E., Roux, S., & Kyrpides, N. C.
Venue
Nature Biotechnology
Published
2020-12-21
Volume
39
Issue
5
Pages
578-585
ISSN
  • 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
  • 1087-0156
  • 1546-1696
OpenAlex
W3118048495
Cited by
1,750
References
68
FWCI
66.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid
Licence
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DE-AC02-05CH11231)
  • University of São Paulo | Pro-Reitoria de Pesquisa, Universidade de São Paulo (2016/23218-0)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CheckV assesses the quality and completeness of metagenome-assembled viral genomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41587-020-00774-7
The paper
Nayfach, S., Camargo, A. P., Schulz, F., Eloe-Fadrosh, E., Roux, S., & Kyrpides, N. C. (2021). CheckV assesses the quality and completeness of metagenome-assembled viral genomes. Nature Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-020-00774-7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.