Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 454

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 serology assays reveals a range of test performance

Open access
Whitman, Jeffrey D., Hiatt, Joseph, Mowery, Cody T., Shy, Brian R., Yu, Ruby, Yamamoto, Tori N., Rathore, Ujjwal, Goldgof, Gregory M., Whitty, Caroline, Woo, Jonathan M., Gallman, Antonia E., Miller, Tyler E., Levine, Andrew G., Nguyen, David N., Bapat, Sagar P., Balcerek, Joanna, Bylsma, Sophia A., Lyons, Ana M., Li, Stacy, Wong, Allison Wai-yi, Gillis-Buck, Eva Mae, Steinhart, Zachary B., Lee, Youjin, Apathy, Ryan, Lipke, Mitchell J., Smith, Jennifer Anne, Zheng, Tina, Boothby, Ian C., Isaza, Erin, Chan, Jackie, Acenas, Dante D., Lee, Jinwoo, Macrae, Trisha A., Kyaw, Than S., Wu, David, Ng, Dianna L., Gu, Wei, York, Vanessa A., Eskandarian, Haig Alexander, Callaway, Perri C., Warrier, Lakshmi, Moreno, Mary E., Levan, Justine, Torres, Leonel, Farrington, Lila A., Loudermilk, Rita P., Koshal, Kanishka, Zorn, Kelsey C., Garcia-Beltran, Wilfredo F., Yang, Diane, Astudillo, Michael G., Bernstein, Bradley E., Gelfand, Jeffrey A., Ryan, Edward T., Charles, Richelle C., Iafrate, A. John, Lennerz, Jochen K., Miller, Steve, Chiu, Charles Y., Stramer, Susan L., Wilson, Michael R., Manglik, Aashish, Ye, Chun Jimmie, Krogan, Nevan J., Anderson, Mark S., Cyster, Jason G., Ernst, Joel D., Wu, Alan H. B., Lynch, Kara L., Bern, Caryn, Hsu, Patrick D., Marson, Alexander·2020·Nature Biotechnology

Abstract

Appropriate use and interpretation of serological tests for assessments of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) exposure, infection and potential immunity require accurate data on assay performance. We conducted a head-to-head evaluation of ten point-of-care-style lateral flow assays (LFAs) and two laboratory-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays to detect anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibodies in 5-d time intervals from symptom onset and studied the specificity of each assay in pre-coronavirus disease 2019 specimens. The percent of seropositive individuals increased with time, peaking in the latest time interval tested (>20 d after symptom onset). Test specificity ranged from 84.3% to 100.0% and was predominantly affected by variability in IgM results. LFA specificity could be increased by considering weak bands as negative, but this decreased detection of antibodies (sensitivity) in a subset of SARS-CoV-2 real-time PCR-positive cases. Our results underline the importance of seropositivity threshold determination and reader training for reliable LFA deployment. Although there was no standout serological assay, four tests achieved more than 80% positivity at later time points tested and more than 95% specificity. Of 12 serology assays tested, four detect antibodies in more than 80% of patients with COVID-19.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41587-020-0659-0

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 454

Metadata

Authors
Whitman, J. D., Hiatt, J., Mowery, C. T., Shy, B. R., Yu, R., Yamamoto, T. N., Rathore, U., Goldgof, G. M., Whitty, C., Woo, J. M., Gallman, A. E., Miller, T. E., Levine, A. G., Nguyen, D. N., Bapat, S. P., Balcerek, J., Bylsma, S. A., Lyons, A. M., Li, S., Wong, A. W.-Y., Gillis-Buck, E. M., Steinhart, Z. B., Lee, Y., Apathy, R., Lipke, M. J., Smith, J. A., Zheng, T., Boothby, I. C., Isaza, E., Chan, J., Acenas, D. D., Lee, J., Macrae, T. A., Kyaw, T. S., Wu, D., Ng, D. L., Gu, W., York, V. A., Eskandarian, H. A., Callaway, P. C., Warrier, L., Moreno, M. E., Levan, J., Torres, L., Farrington, L. A., Loudermilk, R. P., Koshal, K., Zorn, K. C., Garcia-Beltran, W. F., Yang, D., Astudillo, M. G., Bernstein, B. E., Gelfand, J. A., Ryan, E. T., Charles, R. C., Iafrate, A. J., Lennerz, J. K., Miller, S., Chiu, C. Y., Stramer, S. L., Wilson, M. R., Manglik, A., Ye, C. J., Krogan, N. J., Anderson, M. S., Cyster, J. G., Ernst, J. D., Wu, A. H. B., Lynch, K. L., Bern, C., Hsu, P. D., & Marson, A.
Venue
Nature Biotechnology
Published
2020-08-27
Volume
38
Issue
10
Pages
1174-1183
ISSN
  • 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
  • 1087-0156
  • 1546-1696
OpenAlex
W3081055927
Cited by
454
References
8
FWCI
12.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 serology assays reveals a range of test performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41587-020-0659-0
The paper
Whitman, J. D., Hiatt, J., Mowery, C. T., Shy, B. R., Yu, R., Yamamoto, T. N., Rathore, U., Goldgof, G. M., Whitty, C., Woo, J. M., Gallman, A. E., Miller, T. E., Levine, A. G., Nguyen, D. N., Bapat, S. P., Balcerek, J., Bylsma, S. A., Lyons, A. M., Li, S., . . . Marson, A. (2020). Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 serology assays reveals a range of test performance. Nature Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-020-0659-0

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.