Cited by 343Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesAlgorithms and Data Compression

Pangenome graph construction from genome alignments with Minigraph-Cactus

Open access
Hickey, Glenn, Monlong, Jean, Ebler, Jana, Novak, Adam M., Eizenga, Jordan M., Gao, Yan, Human Pangenome Reference Consortium, Abel, Haley J. +114 more·2024·Nature Biotechnology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Pangenome references address biases of reference genomes by storing a representative set of diverse haplotypes and their alignment, usually as a graph. Alternate alleles determined by variant callers can be used to construct pangenome graphs, but advances in long-read sequencing are leading to widely available, high-quality phased assemblies. Constructing a pangenome graph directly from assemblies, as opposed to variant calls, leverages the graph's ability to represent variation at different scales. Here we present the Minigraph-Cactus pangenome pipeline, which creates pangenomes directly from whole-genome alignments, and demonstrate its ability to scale to 90 human haplotypes from the Human Pangenome Reference Consortium. The method builds graphs containing all forms of genetic variation while allowing use of current mapping and genotyping tools. We measure the effect of the quality and completeness of reference genomes used for analysis within the pangenomes and show that using the CHM13 reference from the Telomere-to-Telomere Consortium improves the accuracy of our methods. We also demonstrate construction of a Drosophila melanogaster pangenome.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41587-023-01793-w

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Building assembly graphs rather than using single reference genomes is now routine with mature tools and advancements in genome assembly.

    “Building assembly graphs rather than using single reference genomes is now routine with mature tools and advancements in genome assembly ( 207 )”

    From Topological Approaches in Animal Comparative Genomics (2026) · cites this paper as [207]

    The Abstract says advances in long-read sequencing are making high-quality assemblies widely available, and the paper presents a tool for constructing pangenome graphs from them. But the Discussion says graph construction remains an active research area and predicts that producing large numbers of high-quality genomes will soon be routine; it does not say that building assembly graphs is already routine. The supplied passages have section labels but no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Hickey, G. et al. Genotyping structural variants in pangenome graphs using the vg toolkit. Genome Biol. 21, 35 (2020).
  2. Rautiainen, M. et al. Telomere-to-telomere assembly of diploid chromosomes with Verkko. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41587-022-01435-7 (2023). · DOI
  3. Kille, B., Balaji, A., Sedlazeck, F. J., Nute, M. & Treangen, T. J. Multiple genome alignment in the telomere-to-telomere assembly era. Genome Biol. 23, 182 (2022).
  4. Harris, R. S. Improved Pairwise Alignment of Genomic DNA. PhD thesis, Pennsylvania State Univ. (2007).
  5. Goenka, S. D., Turakhia, Y., Paten, B. & Horowitz, M. SegAlign: a scalable GPU-based whole genome aligner. In SC20: International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1109/ sc41405.2020.00043 (IEEE, 2020). · DOI
  6. Bzikadze, A. V. & Pevzner, P. A. TandemAligner: a new parameter-free framework for fast sequence alignment. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.09.15.507041 (2022). · DOI
  7. Rautiainen, M. & Marschall, T. GraphAligner: rapid and versatile sequence-to-graph alignment. Genome Biol. 21, 253 (2020).
  8. Chakraborty, M., Emerson, J. J., Macdonald, S. J. & Long, A. D. Structural variants exhibit widespread allelic heterogeneity and shape variation in complex traits. Nat. Commun. 10, 4872 (2019).
  9. Garrison, E. & Marth, G. Haplotype-based variant detection from short-read sequencing. Preprint at arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/ arXiv.1207.3907 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  10. Leonard, A. S. et al. Structural variant-based pangenome construction has low sensitivity to variability of haplotype-resolved bovine assemblies. Nat. Commun. 13, 3012 (2022).
  11. Publisher's note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely ), under exclusive Nature America, Inc. 2023 Human Pangenome Reference Consortium
  12. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD, USA. 23 Vertebrate Genome Laboratory, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA. 24 National Institutes of Health (NIH)-National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA. 25 Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA. 26 Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability, Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark. 27 Institute for Society and Genetics, College of Letters and Science, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  13. Tree of Life, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK. 39
  14. Cleary, J. G. et al. Comparing variant call files for performance benchmarking of next-generation sequencing variant calling pipelines. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/023754 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  15. English, A. C., Menon, V. K., Gibbs, R. A., Metcalf, G. A. & Sedlazeck, F. J. Truvari: refined structural variant comparison preserves allelic diversity. Genome Biol. 23, 271 (2022).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hickey, G., Monlong, J., Ebler, J., Novak, A. M., Eizenga, J. M., Gao, Y., Human Pangenome Reference Consortium, Abel, H. J., Antonacci-Fulton, L. L., Asri, M., Baid, G., Baker, C. A., Belyaeva, A., Billis, K., Bourque, G., Buonaiuto, S., Carroll, A., Chaisson, M. J. P., Chang, P.-C., Chang, X. H., Cheng, H., Chu, J., Cody, S., Colonna, V., Cook, D. E., Cook-Deegan, R. M., Cornejo, O. E., Diekhans, M., Doerr, D., Ebert, P., Ebler, J., Eichler, E. E., Fairley, S., Fedrigo, O., Felsenfeld, A. L., Feng, X., Fischer, C., Flicek, P., Formenti, G., Frankish, A., Fulton, R. S., Garg, S., Garrison, E., Garrison, N. A., Giron, C. G., Green, R. E., Groza, C., Guarracino, A., Haggerty, L., Hall, I. M., Harvey, W. T., Haukness, M., Haussler, D., Heumos, S., Hoekzema, K., Hourlier, T., Howe, K., Jain, M., Jarvis, E. D., Ji, H. P., Kenny, E. E., Koenig, B. A., Kolesnikov, A., Korbel, J. O., Kordosky, J., Koren, S., Lee, H., Lewis, A. P., Liao, W.-W., Lu, S., Lu, T.-Y., Lucas, J. K., Magalhães, H., Marco-Sola, S., Marijon, P., Markello, C., Marschall, T., Martin, F. J., McCartney, A., McDaniel, J., Miga, K. H., Mitchell, M. W., Mountcastle, J., Munson, K. M., Mwaniki, M. N., Nattestad, M., Nurk, S., Olsen, H. E., Olson, N. D., Pesout, T., Phillippy, A. M., Popejoy, A. B., Porubsky, D., Prins, P., Puiu, D., Rautiainen, M., Regier, A. A., Rhie, A., Sacco, S., Sanders, A. D., Schneider, V. A., Schultz, B. I., Shafin, K., Sibbesen, J. A., Sirén, J., Smith, M. W., Sofia, H. J., Tayoun, A. N. A., Thibaud-Nissen, F., Tomlinson, C., Tricomi, F. F., Villani, F., Vollger, M. R., Wagner, J., Walenz, B., Wang, T., Wood, J. M. D., Zimin, A. V., Zook, J. M., Marschall, T., Li, H., & Paten, B.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Google (United States) (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • European Bioinformatics Institute (GB)
  • Kyoto University (JP)
  • Institute of Genetics and Biophysics (IT)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
  • University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US)
  • Washington Center (US)
  • Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • Rockefeller University (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Novo Nordisk Foundation (DK)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • McGill University (CA)
  • Yale University (US)
  • Quantitative Biology Center (DE)
  • Wellcome Sanger Institute (GB)
  • Northeastern University (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
  • Coriell Institute For Medical Research (US)
  • University of Pisa (IT)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Max Delbrück Center (DE)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Al Jalila Foundation (AE)
Corresponding author
  • Hickey, Glenn
  • Paten, Benedict
ORCID
Venue
Nature Biotechnology
Published
2023-05-10
Volume
42
Issue
4
Pages
663-673
ISSN
  • 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
  • 1087-0156
  • 1546-1696
OpenAlex
W4376118380
Cited by
343
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 140 · 2025: 105 · 2024: 72 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
30.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf
  • National Institutes of Health (OT2OD033761)
  • High Performance Research Computing, Texas A and M University
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (OT3HL142481)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (R01HG010485, U01HG010973, U01HG010963, U01HG010971, R01HG011274, U01HG010961, R01HG010040, U24HG011853, U24HG007234, U24HG010262)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Algorithms and Data Compression
Keywords
pangenome graphs, whole-genome alignment, Human Pangenome Reference Consortium, reference genome bias
MeSH terms
Alleles, Animals, Drosophila melanogaster, Haplotypes, Humans, Genome, Human, Sequence Analysis, DNA, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review