Cited by 21Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and AnimalsGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock

Multiancestry brain pQTL fine-mapping and integration with genome-wide association studies of 21 neurologic and psychiatric conditions

Open access
Wingo, Aliza P., Liu, Yue, Vattathil, Selina M., Gerasimov, Ekaterina S., Mei, Zhen, Ravindran, Suda Parimala, Liu, Jiaqi, Shantaraman, Ananth +15 more·2025·Nature Genetics

Abstract

To understand shared and ancestry-specific genetic control of brain protein expression and its ramifications for disease, we mapped protein quantitative trait loci (pQTLs) in 1,362 brain proteomes from African American, Hispanic/Latin American and non-Hispanic white donors. Among the pQTLs that multiancestry fine-mapping MESuSiE confidently assigned as putative causal pQTLs in a specific population, most were shared across the three studied populations and are referred to as multiancestry causal pQTLs. These multiancestry causal pQTLs were enriched for exonic and promoter regions. To investigate their effects on disease, we modeled the 858 multiancestry causal pQTLs as instrumental variables using Mendelian randomization and genome-wide association study results for neurologic and psychiatric conditions (21 traits in participants with European ancestry, 10 in those with African ancestry and 4 in Hispanic participants). We identified 119 multiancestry pQTL–protein pairs consistent with a causal role in these conditions. Remarkably, 29% of the multiancestry pQTLs in these pairs were coding variants. These results lay an important foundation for the creation of new molecular models of neurologic and psychiatric conditions that are likely to be relevant to individuals across different genetic ancestries.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41588-025-02291-2

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Common risk variants are enriched in regulatory regions of genes expressed in developing cortical neurons, particularly those involved in synaptic transmission, ion channel activity, and chromatin remodeling.

    “Recent work integrating genome-wide association study (GWAS) results with transcriptomic and proteomic data suggests that common risk variants are enriched in regulatory regions of genes expressed in developing cortical neurons, particularly those involved in synaptic transmission, ion channel activity, and chromatin remodeling (Wingo et al., 2025).”

    From Biological hierarchy from genotype to phenotype in syndromic and non-syndromic autism spectrum disorder (2026) · cites this paper as Wingo et al., 2025

    The Results (Multiancestry pQTL fine-mapping; page unavailable) report enrichment of putative causal brain pQTLs in promoter regions. The Results (Molecular processes, drug targets and drug repurposing; page unavailable) also report synapse-related enrichment among candidate proteins for schizophrenia and anxiety. Neither passage establishes that common risk variants are enriched in regulatory regions of genes expressed in developing cortical neurons, or identifies ion channel activity and chromatin remodeling as enriched processes. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. [1]Wang, Y., Tsuo, K., Kanai, M., Neale, B. M. & Martin, A. R. Challenges and opportunities for developing more generalizable polygenic risk scores. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Data Sci. 5, 293–320 (2022). 35576555 PMC9828290
  2. [2]Keys, K. L. et al. On the cross-population generalizability of gene expression prediction models. PLoS Genet. 16, e1008927 (2020). 32797036 PMC7449671
  3. [3]Gusev, A. et al. Integrative approaches for large-scale transcriptome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet. 48, 245–252 (2016). 26854917 PMC4767558
  4. [4]Zhou, X. & Stephens, M. Genome-wide efficient mixed-model analysis for association studies. Nat. Genet. 44, 821–824 (2012). 22706312 PMC3386377
  5. [5]Zhang, J. et al. Plasma proteome analyses in individuals of European and African ancestry identify cis-pQTLs and models for proteome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet. 54, 593–602 (2022). 35501419 PMC9236177
  6. [8]Gao, B. & Zhou, X. MESuSiE enables scalable and powerful multi-ancestry fine-mapping of causal variants in genome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet. 56, 170–179 (2024). 38168930 PMC11849347
  7. [9]Wang, G., Sarkar, A., Carbonetto, P. & Stephens, M. A simple new approach to variable selection in regression, with application to genetic fine mapping. J. R. Stat. Soc. Series B 82, 1273–1300 (2020). PMC10201948 37220626
  8. [10]Zhu, Z. et al. Integration of summary data from GWAS and eQTL studies predicts complex trait gene targets. Nat. Genet. 48, 481–487 (2016). 27019110
  9. [11]Yuan, Z. et al. Testing and controlling for horizontal pleiotropy with probabilistic Mendelian randomization in transcriptome-wide association studies. Nat. Commun. 11, 3861 (2020). 32737316 PMC7395774
  10. [13]Cannon, M. et al. DGIdb 5.0: rebuilding the drug-gene interaction database for precision medicine and drug discovery platforms. Nucleic Acids Res. 52, D1227–D1235 (2024). 37953380 PMC10767982
  11. [14]Hou, K. et al. Causal effects on complex traits are similar for common variants across segments of different continental ancestries within admixed individuals. Nat. Genet. 55, 549–558 (2023). 36941441 PMC11120833
  12. [15]Amberger, J. S., Bocchini, C. A., Scott, A. F. & Hamosh, A. OMIM.org: leveraging knowledge across phenotype-gene relationships. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D1038–D1043 (2019). 30445645 PMC6323937
  13. [17]Cherian, A., P, D. K. & Vijayaraghavan, A. Parkinson’s disease - genetic cause. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 36, 292–301 (2023). 37366140
  14. [18]Suhre, K., McCarthy, M. I. & Schwenk, J. M. Genetics meets proteomics: perspectives for large population-based studies. Nat. Rev. Genet. 22, 19–37 (2021). 32860016
  15. [19]De Jager, P. L. et al. A multi-omic atlas of the human frontal cortex for aging and Alzheimer’s disease research. Sci. Data 5, 180142 (2018). 30084846 PMC6080491
  16. [20]Wang, M. et al. The Mount Sinai cohort of large-scale genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic data in Alzheimer’s disease. Sci. Data 5, 180185 (2018). 30204156 PMC6132187
  17. [21]Wingo, A. P. et al. Integrating human brain proteomes with genome-wide association data implicates new proteins in Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis. Nat. Genet. 53, 143–146 (2021). 33510477 PMC8130821
  18. [23]Johnston, H. R. et al. PEMapper and PECaller provide a simplified approach to whole-genome sequencing. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E1923 (2017). 28223510 PMC5347547
  19. [24]Purcell, S. et al. PLINK: a toolset for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analysis. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81, 559–575 (2007). 17701901 PMC1950838
  20. [25]Das, S. et al. Next-generation genotype imputation service and methods. Nat. Genet. 48, 1284–1287 (2016). 27571263 PMC5157836
  21. [26]Manichaikul, A. et al. Robust relationship inference in genome-wide association studies. Bioinformatics 26, 2867–2873 (2010). 20926424 PMC3025716
  22. [27]Price, A. L. et al. Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet. 38, 904–909 (2006). 16862161
  23. [28]Auton, A. et al. A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature 526, 68–74 (2015). 26432245 PMC4750478
  24. [29]Hodes, R. J. & Buckholtz, N. Accelerating Medicines Partnership: Alzheimer’s Disease (AMP-AD) Knowledge Portal aids Alzheimer’s drug discovery through open data sharing. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 20, 389–391 (2016). 26853544
  25. [30]Seifar, F. et al. Large-scale deep proteomic analysis in Alzheimer’s disease brain regions across race and ethnicity. Alzheimers Dement. 20, 8878–8897 (2024). 39535480 PMC11667503
  26. [31]Johnson, E. C. B. et al. Large-scale proteomic analysis of Alzheimer’s disease brain and cerebrospinal fluid reveals early changes in energy metabolism associated with microglia and astrocyte activation. Nat. Med. 26, 769–780 (2020). 32284590 PMC7405761
  27. [32]Kong, A. T., Leprevost, F. V., Avtonomov, D. M., Mellacheruvu, D. & Nesvizhskii, A. I. MSFragger: ultrafast and comprehensive peptide identification in mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nat. Methods 14, 513–520 (2017). 28394336 PMC5409104
  28. [33]Khoury, G. A., Baliban, R. C. & Floudas, C. A. Proteome-wide post-translational modification statistics: frequency analysis and curation of the swiss-prot database. Sci. Rep. 1, 90 (2011). 22034591 PMC3201773
  29. [35]Wingo, T. S. et al. Brain proteome-wide association study implicates novel proteins in depression pathogenesis. Nat. Neurosci. 24, 810–817 (2021). 33846625 PMC8530461
  30. [36]Wingo, T. S. et al. Shared mechanisms across the major psychiatric and neurodegenerative diseases. Nat. Commun. 13, 4314 (2022). 35882878 PMC9325708
  31. [38]Yang, J. et al. Genomic inflation factors under polygenic inheritance. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 19, 807–812 (2011). 21407268 PMC3137506
  32. [39]Kotlar, A. V., Trevino, C. E., Zwick, M. E., Cutler, D. J. & Wingo, T. S. Bystro: rapid online variant annotation and natural-language filtering at whole-genome scale. Genome Biol. 19, 14 (2018). 29409527 PMC5801807
  33. [40]Moore, J. E. et al. Expanded encyclopaedias of DNA elements in the human and mouse genomes. Nature 583, 699–710 (2020). 32728249 PMC7410828
  34. [42]Zhou, H. et al. Multi-ancestry study of the genetics of problematic alcohol use in over 1 million individuals. Nat. Med. 29, 3184–3192 (2023). 38062264 PMC10719093
  35. [43]Watson, H. J. et al. Genome-wide association study identifies eight risk loci and implicates metabo-psychiatric origins for anorexia nervosa. Nat. Genet. 51, 1207–1214 (2019). 31308545 PMC6779477
  36. [44]Levey, D. F. et al. Reproducible genetic risk loci for anxiety: results from approximately 200,000 participants in the Million Veteran Program. Am. J. Psychiatry 177, 223–232 (2020). 31906708 PMC7869502
  37. [45]Demontis, D. et al. Genome-wide analyses of ADHD identify 27 risk loci, refine the genetic architecture and implicate several cognitive domains. Nat. Genet. 55, 198–208 (2023). 36702997 PMC10914347
  38. [48]Johnson, E. C. et al. A large-scale genome-wide association study meta-analysis of cannabis use disorder. Lancet Psychiatry 7, 1032–1045 (2020). 33096046 PMC7674631
  39. [49]Jansen, P. R. et al. Genome-wide analysis of insomnia in 1,331,010 individuals identifies new risk loci and functional pathways. Nat. Genet. 51, 394–403 (2019). 30804565
  40. [50]Als, T. D. et al. Depression pathophysiology, risk prediction of recurrence and comorbid psychiatric disorders using genome-wide analyses. Nat. Med. 29, 1832–1844 (2023). 37464041 PMC10839245
  41. [51]Meng, X. et al. Multi-ancestry genome-wide association study of major depression aids locus discovery, fine mapping, gene prioritization and causal inference. Nat. Genet. 56, 222–233 (2024). 38177345 PMC10864182
  42. [52]Nagel, M. et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for neuroticism in 449,484 individuals identifies novel genetic loci and pathways. Nat. Genet. 50, 920–927 (2018). 29942085
  43. [53]Gaddis, N. et al. Multi-trait genome-wide association study of opioid addiction: OPRM1 and beyond. Sci. Rep. 12, 16873 (2022). 36207451 PMC9546890
  44. [54]Stein, M. B. et al. Genome-wide association analyses of post-traumatic stress disorder and its symptom subdomains in the Million Veteran Program. Nat. Genet. 53, 174–184 (2021). 33510476 PMC7972521
  45. [56]Mullins, N. et al. Dissecting the shared genetic architecture of suicide attempt, psychiatric disorders, and known risk factors. Biol. Psychiatry 91, 313–327 (2022). 34861974 PMC8851871
  46. [57]Saunders, G. R. B. et al. Genetic diversity fuels gene discovery for tobacco and alcohol use. Nature 612, 720–724 (2022). 36477530 PMC9771818
  47. [58]Bellenguez, C. et al. New insights into the genetic etiology of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias. Nat. Genet. 54, 412–436 (2022). 35379992 PMC9005347
  48. [59]Kunkle, B. W. et al. Novel Alzheimer disease risk loci and pathways in African American individuals using the African Genome Resources Panel: a meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol. 78, 102–113 (2021). 33074286 PMC7573798
  49. [60]van Rheenen, W. et al. Common and rare variant association analyses in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis identify 15 risk loci with distinct genetic architectures and neuron-specific biology. Nat. Genet. 53, 1636–1648 (2021). 34873335 PMC8648564
  50. [62]Chia, R. et al. Genome sequencing analysis identifies new loci associated with Lewy body dementia and provides insights into its genetic architecture. Nat. Genet. 53, 294–303 (2021). 33589841 PMC7946812
  51. [63]Nalls, M. A. et al. Identification of novel risk loci, causal insights, and heritable risk for Parkinson’s disease: a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies. Lancet Neurol. 18, 1091–1102 (2019). 31701892 PMC8422160
  52. [64]Rizig, M. et al. Identification of genetic risk loci and causal insights associated with Parkinson’s disease in African and African admixed populations: a genome-wide association study. Lancet Neurol. 22, 1015–1025 (2023). 37633302 PMC10593199
  53. [65]Mishra, A. et al. Stroke genetics informs drug discovery and risk prediction across ancestries. Nature 611, 115–123 (2022). 36180795 PMC9524349
  54. [66]Oughtred, R. et al. The BioGRID database: a comprehensive biomedical resource of curated protein, genetic, and chemical interactions. Protein Sci. 30, 187–200 (2021). 33070389 PMC7737760
  55. [67]Zambon, A. C. et al. GO-Elite: a flexible solution for pathway and ontology over-representation. Bioinformatics 28, 2209–2210 (2012). 22743224 PMC3413395

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wingo, A. P., Liu, Y., Vattathil, S. M., Gerasimov, E. S., Mei, Z., Ravindran, S. P., Liu, J., Shantaraman, A., Seifar, F., Wang, E., Zhang, B., Reddy, J., Allen, M., Ertekin-Taner, N., De Jager, P. L., Fox, E. J., Duong, D. M., Epstein, M. P., Cutler, D. J., Levey, A. I., Bennett, D. A., Seyfried, N. T., & Wingo, T. S.
Affiliations
  • VA Northern California Health Care System (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • Emory University (US)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
  • Wingo, Aliza P.
  • Wingo, Thomas S.
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2025-09
Volume
57
Issue
9
Pages
2156-2165
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W4414064858
Cited by
21
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 1
FWCI
12.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Aging (R01 AG072120, RF1 AG071170)
  • Alzheimer’s Association Zenith Fellows Award
  • NIH/NIA
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Keywords
protein quantitative trait loci, brain proteome, neurologic conditions, psychiatric conditions, Mendelian randomization, brain protein expression, coding variants, African Americans, non-Hispanic whites
MeSH terms
White, Mental Disorders, Black or African American, Brain, Chromosome Mapping, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Nervous System Diseases, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Quantitative Trait Loci, White People, Genome-Wide Association Study, Mendelian Randomization Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review