Cited by 68Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationMesenchymal stem cell researchBlood disorders and treatments

A latent subset of human hematopoietic stem cells resists regenerative stress to preserve stemness

Open access
Kaufmann, Kerstin B., Zeng, Andy G. X., Coyaud, Etienne, Garcia-Prat, Laura, Papalexi, Efthymia, Murison, Alex, Laurent, Estelle M. N., Chan-Seng-Yue, Michelle +10 more·2021·Nature Immunology

Abstract

Continuous supply of immune cells throughout life relies on the delicate balance in the hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) pool between long-term maintenance and meeting the demands of both normal blood production and unexpected stress conditions. Here we identified distinct subsets of human long-term (LT)-HSCs that responded differently to regeneration-mediated stress: an immune checkpoint ligand CD112 lo subset that exhibited a transient engraftment restraint (termed latency) before contributing to hematopoietic reconstitution and a primed CD112 hi subset that responded rapidly. This functional heterogeneity and CD112 expression are regulated by INKA1 through direct interaction with PAK4 and SIRT1, inducing epigenetic changes and defining an alternative state of LT-HSC quiescence that serves to preserve self-renewal and regenerative capacity upon regeneration-mediated stress. Collectively, our data uncovered the molecular intricacies underlying HSC heterogeneity and self-renewal regulation and point to latency as an orchestrated physiological response that balances blood cell demands with preserving a stem cell reservoir.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41590-021-00925-1

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • TGFB1 encodes the pro-fibrotic cytokine TGFb, established as one of the main inducers of myelofibrosis in patients with fibrotic-phase MPN.

    “We also observed a downregulation of TGFB1 ( Supplementary Fig. 4b ), that encodes the pro-fibrotic cytokine TGFb established as one of the main inducers of myelofibrosis in patients with fibrotic-phase of MPN 50,51 .”

    From Type 1 interferon perturbates clonal competition by reshaping human blood development (2026) · cites this paper as [51]

    The cited paper’s PAK4-inhibition section (pp. 20–21) discusses hematopoietic stem-cell responses to treatment, not TGFB1 or fibrosis. Searches of our copy for TGFB1, TGF-beta, and myelofibrosis found no passage addressing the claimed role of TGF-beta in fibrotic-phase MPN. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • MPN megakaryocytes exhibit higher expression of TGFB1.

    “We and others have shown that MPN megakaryocytes indeed exhibit higher expression of TGFB1 20,50,51 , and thus downregulation of TGFB1 by IFNa may be a key mechanism of improvement in fibrosis frequently observed in patients treated with IFNa.”

    From Type 1 interferon perturbates clonal competition by reshaping human blood development (2026) · cites this paper as [51]

    The Extended Data Fig. 6 description (p. 5) mentions megakaryocytic cells only as an output of stem-cell differentiation assays; it does not address MPN megakaryocytes or TGFB1 expression. Searches for “MPN megakaryocytes TGFB1,” “transforming growth factor beta 1,” and “TGFB1” found no passage supporting the attributed comparison. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Downregulation of TGFB1 by IFNa may be a key mechanism of improvement in fibrosis frequently observed in patients treated with IFNa.

    “We and others have shown that MPN megakaryocytes indeed exhibit higher expression of TGFB1 20,50,51 , and thus downregulation of TGFB1 by IFNa may be a key mechanism of improvement in fibrosis frequently observed in patients treated with IFNa.”

    From Type 1 interferon perturbates clonal competition by reshaping human blood development (2026) · cites this paper as [51]

    The citation in the printed sentence follows the claim that MPN megakaryocytes have higher TGFB1 expression; the IFNa–fibrosis mechanism is the citing authors’ subsequent inference. Our copy’s PAK4-inhibition section (pp. 20–21) discusses hematopoietic stem-cell cycling, not either TGFB1 expression in MPN megakaryocytes or IFNa-associated fibrosis improvement. Searches for TGFB1, MPN megakaryocytes, and IFNa found no passage addressing those points. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • TGFB1 was downregulated upon IFNa treatment.

    “We also observed a downregulation of TGFB1 ( Supplementary Fig. 4b ), that encodes the pro-fibrotic cytokine TGFb established as one of the main inducers of myelofibrosis in patients with fibrotic-phase of MPN 50,51 .”

    From Type 1 interferon perturbates clonal competition by reshaping human blood development (2026) · cites this paper as [51]

    The cited paper’s PAK4-inhibition section (pp. 20–21) discusses hematopoietic stem-cell responses to a PAK4 inhibitor, not IFNα treatment. Searches for TGFB1 downregulation and IFNα treatment found no passage addressing the claim. In the citing sentence, references 50 and 51 appear attached to TGFβ’s role in myelofibrosis, while the downregulation is presented as the citing authors’ own observation. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. 51 Eraslan, G., Simon, L. M., Mircea, M., Mueller, N. S. & Theis, F. J. Single-cell RNA-seq denoising using a 1082 deep count autoencoder. Nat Commun 10 , 390, doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07931-2 (2019). 1083 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 52 Fares, I. et al. EPCR expression marks UM171-expanded CD34(+) cord blood stem cells. Blood 129 , 33441084 3351, doi:10.1182/blood-2016-11-750729 (2017). 1085 · DOI
  3. 53 Buenrostro, J. D., Giresi, P. G., Zaba, L. C., Chang, H. Y. & Greenleaf, W. J. Transposition of native 1086 chromatin for fast and sensitive epigenomic profiling of open chromatin, DNA-binding proteins and 1087 nucleosome position. Nat Methods 10 , 1213-1218, doi:10.1038/nmeth.2688 (2013). 1088 normalized enrichment score (nES) · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kaufmann, K. B., Zeng, A. G. X., Coyaud, E., Garcia-Prat, L., Papalexi, E., Murison, A., Laurent, E. M. N., Chan-Seng-Yue, M., Gan, O. I., Pan, K., McLeod, J., Boutzen, H., Zandi, S., Takayanagi, S.-I., Satija, R., Raught, B., Xie, S. Z., & Dick, J. E.
Affiliations
  • University Health Network (CA)
  • New York Genome Center (US)
Corresponding author
Dick, John E.
Venue
Nature Immunology
Published
2021-05-06
Volume
22
Issue
6
Pages
723-734
ISSN
  • 1529-2908 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2916
OpenAlex
W3159593160
Cited by
68
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
6.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • LillOA (Université de Lille (University Of Lille)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (154293)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Mesenchymal stem cell research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Blood disorders and treatments
Keywords
hematopoietic stem cells, long-term hematopoietic stem cells, HSC heterogeneity, CD112, SIRT1, PAK4, HSC quiescence, HSC self-renewal, histone H4K16 acetylation, epigenetic regulation, engraftment
MeSH terms
Cell Self Renewal, Immune Reconstitution, Nectins, RNA-Seq, Adult, Animals, Cells, Cultured, Female, Fetal Blood, Flow Cytometry, Hematopoiesis, Hematopoietic Stem Cells, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Male, Middle Aged, Stress, Physiological, Transplantation, Heterologous, Immunomagnetic Separation, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Multipotent Stem Cells, Epigenesis, Genetic, Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, Mice, p21-Activated Kinases, Gene Knockdown Techniques, Sirtuin 1, Single-Cell Analysis, Primary Cell Culture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review