Cited by 216CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringVirus-based gene therapy researchRNA Interference and Gene Delivery

In utero CRISPR-mediated therapeutic editing of metabolic genes

Open access
Rossidis, Avery C., Stratigis, John D., Chadwick, Alexandra C., Hartman, Heather A., Ahn, Nicholas J., Li, Haiying, Singh, Kshitiz, Coons, Barbara E. +9 more·2018·Nature Medicine

Abstract

In utero gene editing has the potential to prenatally treat genetic diseases that result in significant morbidity and mortality before or shortly after birth. We assessed the viral vector-mediated delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 or base editor 3 in utero, seeking therapeutic modification of Pcsk9 or Hpd in wild-type mice or the murine model of hereditary tyrosinemia type 1, respectively. We observed long-term postnatal persistence of edited cells in both models, with reduction of plasma PCSK9 and cholesterol levels following in utero Pcsk9 targeting and rescue of the lethal phenotype of hereditary tyrosinemia type 1 following in utero Hpd targeting. The results of this proof-of-concept work demonstrate the possibility of efficiently performing gene editing before birth, pointing to a potential new therapeutic approach for selected congenital genetic disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41591-018-0184-6

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In utero gene editing has rescued the lethal phenotype of hereditary tyrosinemia type 1, improved the pulmonary phenotype of surfactant protein C deficiency, and ameliorated metabolic, musculoskeletal, and cardiac disease in mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS-IH, Hurler syndrome) in mouse models.

    “Previously, we demonstrated the therapeutic potential of in utero gene editing in mouse models of human diseases, rescuing the lethal phenotype of hereditary tyrosinemia type 1, improving the pulmonary phenotype of surfactant protein C deficiency, and ameliorating metabolic, musculoskeletal, and cardiac disease in mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS-IH, Hurler syndrome) (7–9).”

    From Ionizable Lipid Nanoparticles for Therapeutic Base Editing of Congenital Brain Disease (2023) · cites this paper as [7]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • CNS targeting via prior viral vector approaches was not efficient.

    “Although encouraging, CNS targeting via these approaches was not efficient, highlighting the need to evaluate alternative delivery approaches to treat genetic CNS diseases.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. [1]Davey MG Induction of immune tolerance to foreign protein via adeno-associated viral vector gene transfer in mid-gestation fetal sheep. PLoS One 12, e0171132 (2017). 28141818 PMC5283730
  2. [2]Sabatino DE Persistent expression of hF.IX After tolerance induction by in utero or neonatal administration of AAV-1-F.IX in hemophilia B mice. Mol. Ther 15, 1677– 1685 (2007). 17565352
  3. [3]Mingozzi F CD8(+) T-cell responses to adeno-associated virus capsid in humans. Nat. Med 13, 419– 422 (2007). 17369837
  4. [4]Moss RB Repeated aerosolized AAV-CFTR for treatment of cystic fibrosis: a randomized placebo-controlled phase 2B trial. Hum. Gene Ther 18, 726– 732 (2007). 17685853
  5. [5]Endo M The developmental stage determines the distribution and duration of gene expression after early intra-amniotic gene transfer using lentiviral vectors. Gene Ther 17, 61– 71 (2010). 19727133
  6. [7]Kim D Genome-wide target specificities of CRISPR RNA-guided programmable deaminases. Nat. Biotechnol 35, 475– 480 (2017). 28398345
  7. [8]Ahi YS, Bangari DS & Mittal SK Adenoviral vector immunity: its implications and circumvention strategies. Curr. Gene Ther 11, 307– 320 (2011). 21453277 PMC4009923
  8. [9]Cohen JC, Boerwinkle E, Mosley TH Jr. & Hobbs HH Sequence variations in PCSK9, low LDL, and protection against coronary heart disease. N. Engl. J. Med 354, 1264– 1272 (2006). 16554528
  9. [10]Ding Q Permanent alteration of PCSK9 with in vivo CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing. Circ. Res 115, 488– 492 (2014). 24916110 PMC4134749
  10. [12]Chadwick AC, Wang X & Musunuru K In vivo base editing of PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9) as a therapeutic alternative to genome editing. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol 37, 1741– 1747 (2017). 28751571 PMC5570639
  11. [14]Wang X CRISPR-Cas9 targeting of PCSK9 in human hepatocytes in vivo. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol 36, 783– 786 (2016). 26941020 PMC4850082
  12. [15]Lipshutz GS, Flebbe-Rehwaldt L & Gaensler KM Reexpression following readministration of an adenoviral vector in adult mice after initial in utero adenoviral administration. Mol. Ther 2, 374– 380 (2000). 11020353
  13. [16]Waddington SN In utero gene transfer of human factor IX to fetal mice can induce postnatal tolerance of the exogenous clotting factor. Blood 101, 1359– 1366 (2003). 12393743
  14. [17]Morrow G & Tanguay RM Biochemical and clinical aspects of hereditary tyrosinemia type 1. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol 959, 9– 21 (2017). 28755181
  15. [18]Yin H Genome editing with Cas9 in adult mice corrects a disease mutation and phenotype. Nat. Biotechnol 32, 551– 553 (2014). 24681508 PMC4157757
  16. [20]Pankowicz FP Reprogramming metabolic pathways in vivo with CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing to treat hereditary tyrosinaemia. Nat. Commun 7, 12642 (2016). 27572891 PMC5013601
  17. [22]Azuma H Robust expansion of human hepatocytes in Fah−/−/Rag2−/−/Il2rg−/−mice. Nat. Biotechnol 25, 903– 910 (2007). 17664939 PMC3404624
  18. [23]Paulk NK Adeno-associated virus gene repair corrects a mouse model of hereditary tyrosinemia in vivo. Hepatology 51, 1200– 1208 (2010). 20162619 PMC3136243
  19. [24]Daer RM, Cutts JP, Brafman DA & Haynes KA The impact of chromatin dynamics on Cas9-mediated genome editing in human cells. ACS Synth. Biol 6, 428– 438 (2017). 27783893 PMC5357160
  20. [26]Rafati M, Mohamadhashem F, Hoseini A, Ramandi SD & Ghaffari SR Prenatal diagnosis of tyrosinemia type 1 using next generation sequencing. Fetal Pediatr. Pathol 35, 282– 285 (2016). 27093575
  21. [27]Haeussler M Evaluation of off-target and on-target scoring algorithms and integration into the guide RNA selection tool CRISPOR. Genome Biol 17, 148 (2016). 27380939 PMC4934014
  22. [28]Boelig MM The intravenous route of injection optimizes engraftment and survival in the murine model of in utero hematopoietic cell transplantation. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant 22, 991– 999 (2016). 26797401
  23. [29]Wang D Adenovirus-mediated somatic genome editing of Pten by CRISPR/Cas9 in mouse liver in spite of Cas9-specific immune responses. Hum. Gene Ther 26, 432– 442 (2015). 26086867 PMC4509492
  24. [30]Kim YB Increasing the genome-targeting scope and precision of base editing with engineered Cas9-cytidine deaminase fusions. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 371– 376 (2017). 28191901 PMC5388574

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rossidis, A. C., Stratigis, J. D., Chadwick, A. C., Hartman, H. A., Ahn, N. J., Li, H., Singh, K., Coons, B. E., Li, L., Lv, W., Zoltick, P. W., Alapati, D., Zacharias, W., Jain, R., Morrisey, E. E., Musunuru, K., & Peranteau, W. H.
Affiliations
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
  • Musunuru, Kiran
  • Peranteau, William H.
Venue
Nature Medicine
Published
2018-10
Volume
24
Issue
10
Pages
1513-1518
ISSN
  • 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-170X
OpenAlex
W2895334061
Cited by
216
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 10
FWCI
9.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001878)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL126875, R01HL118744, T32HL007843)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
Keywords
CRISPR/Cas9, base editing, PCSK9, HPD, tyrosinemia type I, viral gene delivery, fetal therapy, cholesterol levels
MeSH terms
Proprotein Convertase 9, Gene Editing, Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Genetic Vectors, Humans, Oxidoreductases, Genetic Therapy, Tyrosinemias, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review